最新动态
Memo to:
Memo to:
橡树资本客户专享
Oaktree Clients Only
From:
From:
Howard Marks
Howard Marks
Re:
Re:
Latest Update
Latest Update
在这次危机期间,我将尽我所能提供信息和观点,尽管或许无法像往常那样赋予叙事或文学性的华丽辞藻。
I’m going to do all I can to provide information and views throughout this crisis, albeit perhaps without the kind of narrative or literary flourish I usually try for.
拉平曲线
病毒的传播被形容为“指数级”。大多数人用这个词时,并不确切理解它的含义。简单说,指数增长就是我们这一行所说的复利在现实世界的体现。换句话说,有一个增长率,相关参数每个周期按这个百分比增长。因此增长速度是恒定的,但增长的绝对值每个周期都在扩大。多年来,我们一直谈论互联网上“病毒式传播”的东西。这就是指数增长的含义。
如果每日新增病例以 10% 的恒定速度增长(在目前的情况下,这几乎肯定是大幅低估),从第 1 天的 100 个新增病例开始,第 2 天会有 110 个新增病例;第 3 天 121 个;第 4 天 133 个;第 5 天 146 个。每日新增病例的最终潜在数量是可怕的。如果新增病例继续以每天 10% 的速度增长,到第 31 天将有 1745 个新增病例。(很抱歉不得不写出这样的数字。)
抗击病毒的短期成功不是以消灭疾病来衡量的,而是“拉平曲线”。换句话说,(a)降低增长率会减少每天新增病例的增幅(但仍然是增长),(b)让增长率变为负值意味着每天新增病例比前一天少(但仍然有新增病例)。
观察人士似乎都在假设,迟早“曲线会被拉平,然后向下弯曲”,意味着疾病将在三到六个月内得到控制,也许还会消失。在这方面保持乐观的理由如下:
Flattening the Curve The spread of the virus has been described as “exponential.” Most people use this word without understanding precisely what it means. In short, exponential growth is the real-world version of what people in our business refer to as compounding. In other words, there’s a growth percentage, and the parameter in question increases by that percentage every period. Thus the rate of growth is constant, but the magnitude of the increase grows in each period. For years, we’ve talked about things on the Internet “going viral.” This is what exponential growth means. If the number of daily new cases grows at a constant 10% (almost certainly a substantial understatement in the current case), and we start with 100 new cases on day 1, there will be 110 new cases on day 2; 121 on day 3; 133 on day 4; and 146 on day 5. The ultimate potential number of daily new cases is ugly. If the number of new cases continues to grow at 10% per day, there will be 1,745 new cases on day 31. (I’m very sorry to have to write about a number like that.) Short-term success in fighting the virus isn’t described in terms of eliminating the disease but rather “flattening the curve.” In other words, (a) reducing the growth rate will result in a smaller increase in new cases each day (but still an increase), and (b) making the growth rate negative means there will be fewer new cases each day than the day before (but still new cases). Observers seem to be working under the assumption that, sooner or later, “the curve will be flattened and then bent downward,” meaning the disease will be controlled and perhaps disappear in three to six months. The reasons for optimism in this regard are as follows:
人们会日益自我隔离。学校、企业和聚集场所的关闭将在这方面发挥作用。检测将使我们能够找出患病者,并将其与健康人群隔离开来。当天气转暖时,疫情会消退(近几十年出现的其他流行病都证明具有这种季节性规律)。预防性疫苗或治疗药物将会研发出来并获得批准。
People will isolate increasingly. The closures of schools, businesses and gathering places will help in this regard. Testing will allow us to identify those with the disease and separate them from the healthy population. The disease will fade when warm weather sets in (other epidemics that have appeared in recent decades have proved seasonal in this way). A preventive vaccine or therapeutic medication will be developed and approved.
当然,没有人知道这些事情会不会发生,或者何时会发生。但我们可以希望,正如上文所述,这样的组合能把疫情限制在接下来的三到六个月内。
Of course, no one knows whether or when these things will happen. But we can hope that the combination will limit the disease to the next three to six months as described above.
2020 年橡树资本管理有限合伙公司
2020 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
版权所有。
All Rights Reserved
短期应对措施
显然,必须采取强力行动,才能遏制或扭转新冠病毒新增病例数不断上升的趋势。我们在其他国家看到的情况包括:
Short-Term Response It’s clear that strong actions are essential in order to halt or reverse the rising trend in the number of new coronavirus cases. Things we’ve seen in other countries include:
不是在建议,而是命令人们不要外出、聚集和社交。
对跨出家门一步的人施加惩罚。
禁止已确诊人员活动,并通过手机追踪他们的行踪。
Not suggesting, but ordering people to desist from going out, gathering and socializing. Imposing punishment for stepping over the threshold of their homes. Prohibiting movement on the part of people who have been diagnosed, and tracking their movement through cell phones.
看来,遏制疫情曲线的最有效办法,无疑是找出感染者并阻止其传染他人。这场抗疫之战,可能让公共卫生考量与公民自由发生冲突。限制人员流动在“美式价值观”里似乎不合时宜,但迄今为止,美国人的独立精神似乎让一些人觉得维持日常行为无可厚非。单靠警告、建议和鼓励恐怕不够,可能需要强制规则。限制措施能提高我们打赢这场战争的概率。尽管这些措施的出台可能令人震惊,但人们不该对此感到意外。
同样,人们聚集起来做生意会拖延并加剧疫情。关停的企业越多,我们对抗疫病的胜算就越大。此外,关停能减少病毒传播,这应能减轻医院和医生的接诊压力,提升医疗系统救治患者的能力。但显而易见,这对个人和经济造成的冲击将是痛苦的。
There seems to be no doubt about the fact that success in flattening the curve comes best from identifying the people who have the disease and preventing them from passing it on to others. Thus the battle against the virus may bring public health considerations into conflict with civil liberties. It’s “un-American” to restrict people’s movements, but so far the American spirit of independence seems to be allowing some people to justify maintaining their usual behavior. Rules may be required, not just warnings, suggestions and encouragement. Restrictions will increase our chances of winning the war. People should not be surprised to see them, although their promulgation may come as a shock. Likewise, people coming together to do business would prolong and exacerbate the epidemic. The more businesses that close, the more success we’re likely to have against the disease. In addition, the fact that closings reduce the spread should alleviate the flow of patients to doctors and hospitals, improving the health system’s ability to help sufferers. But, of course, the impact on individuals and the economy will be painful.
无法避免的痛苦
近期消息恐怕不容乐观,反而很可能包含:
Unavoidable Pain The news in the near term is unlikely to be good; instead it’ll probably include:
企业倒闭
岗位流失
供应链中断
生活必需品短缺,源于产量减少与分销不畅
医疗体系承压
Business closures Job losses Supply-chain disruption Shortages of life’s necessities, stemming from reduced production and distribution difficulties Challenges to the health system
许多企业被勒令停业(如餐馆和酒吧)。有些企业的收入则化为乌有(如航空公司、酒店和影院)。所有这些都将导致失业,对低收入群体的冲击尤为沉重。
3 月 17 日,财政部长姆努钦警告称,若政府应对失当,美国失业率可能升至近 20%(作为参照,大萧条期间的 1933 年失业率达 25%,全球金融危机期间为 10%)。无论采取何种措施,失业率似乎都必将从 3.5% 的 50 年低点大幅攀升。
Many businesses have been ordered to close (e.g., restaurants and bars). Some have seen their revenues evaporate (e.g., airlines, hotels and theaters). All of these things will cause job losses, with a particularly heavy impact on lower-income workers. On March 17, Treasury Secretary Mnuchin warned that failure of the government to take appropriate action could take the U.S. unemployment rate to nearly 20% (by way of comparison, it reached 25% in 1933, during the Great Depression, and hit 10% as a result of the Global Financial Crisis). Regardless of the action taken, it seems sure to rise substantially from the 50-year low of 3.5%.
2020 年橡树资本管理有限合伙企业
2020 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
2
2
版权所有,保留所有权利。
All Rights Reserved
近年来,观察人士大书特书一个事实:相当比例的美国人面对 400 美元的紧急支出都拿不出来。这个说法是否属实,各方有些分歧,但显然很多人银行里没存多少钱。要是他们丢了工作,拿什么钱去买生活必需品?政府极有可能发放现金,但发放速度和足额程度尚待观察。
未来几周,我们很可能会看到医院超负荷运转;病床、呼吸机和物资短缺;按患者年龄和健康状况分诊;医护人员感染;死亡人数不断上升。卫生系统准备不足,这一点毫无疑问;问题在于,应对能力还能提升多少。我很难相信短期消息会向好。
从这些方面以及其他角度来看,早期消息必定是坏消息。我认为这一点无可争辩。这方面唯一的好消息,就是实际情况没有达到人们预期和担忧的严重程度。
In recent years observers have made a big thing out of the fact that a large percentage of Americans would be unable to respond to a $400 emergency. There’s some disagreement as to whether it’s true, but clearly many people don’t have much money in the bank. Where will they get money to buy essentials if they lose their jobs? The government is highly likely to distribute cash, but the speed and adequacy remain to be seen. In coming weeks we are likely to see over-taxed hospitals; shortages of beds, ventilators and supplies; triage of care based on patients’ age and health; infection among health professionals; and rising numbers of fatalities. There’s no question that the health system is underprepared; the question is how much preparedness can be improved. I find it hard to believe the short-term news will be good. In all these ways and more, the early news is bound to be bad. I think that’s indisputable. The only good news in this regard would be if it doesn’t reach the levels people expect and fear.
财政与货币举措
Fiscal and Monetary Actions
美联储已将短期利率降至零——包括 3 月 15 日(周日)创纪录的紧急降息 100 个基点——但遗憾的是,总降幅仅为 150 个基点,而以往降息周期累计降幅大约为 500 个基点。
The Fed has cut the short-term interest rate to zero – including a record emergency cut of 100 basis points on Sunday, March 15 – but unfortunately the total reduction has been only 150 basis points, whereas past rate-cut programs have amounted to roughly 500 basis points.
美联储和财政部还采取了其他非常规措施,以帮助市场正常运转、维持金融体系流动性。商业票据市场将获得支持。免税期和资产购买也在可能的选项之内。
The Fed and Treasury have taken other extraordinary actions to aid market functioning and financial system liquidity. The commercial paper market will be supported. Tax holidays and asset purchases are possible.
银行很可能因借款人违约或客户暂停还款而遭受重创。因此,我们极有可能看到旨在增强金融机构偿付能力和信贷可得性的措施出台。由于银行需要股权资本,股息可能会被禁止或受到抑制。
Banks are likely to be hard-hit as a result of borrowers’ defaults or moratoria on customers’ payments. Thus we’re highly likely to see steps designed to bolster the solvency of financial institutions and the availability of credit. Since banks need equity, dividends could be prohibited/discouraged.
经济学家和预测人士仍然比比皆是——充满挑战的环境并没有让他们变得稀缺——而且每个人都有自己的一套看法。我从来不知道谁是对的,但我发现自己被布兰资本(Brean Capital)的康拉德·德夸德罗斯(Conrad DeQuadros)的观点所吸引:
除了周日的行动(降息并启动资产购买)之外,流动性工具的字母汤又回来了,商业票据融资机制和一级交易商信贷机制昨日重新启动。通过一级交易商信贷机制,交易商甚至可以将股票质押给美联储,仅需 16% 的折扣率,就能以 0.25% 的利率获得 90 天贷款。非投资级公司债券的折扣率为 20%。
我们还看到美联储继续采取行动鼓励贴现窗口贷款。现在与 2008 年的一个关键区别是美联储推出这些工具的速度。2008 年,一级交易商信贷机制于 3 月推出,商业票据融资机制于 10 月推出,第一轮大规模资产购买则在 11 月进行。而这次,我们看到了利率被削减至零利率下限、大规模资产购买、贴现窗口行动(包括监管指引)、商业票据融资机制、一级交易商信贷机制——所有这些都在……
Economists and forecasters are still plentiful – the challenging environment hasn’t created a shortage there – and each one has an opinion. I never know which ones are right, but I find myself drawn to the views of Conrad DeQuadros of Brean Capital: In addition to Sunday’s actions [cutting rates and initiating asset purchases], the alphabet soup of liquidity facilities is back with the relaunch of the Commercial Paper Funding Facility and the Primary Dealer Credit Facility yesterday. With the PDCF, dealers can even pledge equities to the Fed, with only a 16% haircut, and receive a 90-day loan at 0.25%. Non-investment grade corporate debt gets a 20% haircut. We also have continued actions by the Fed to encourage discount window loans. A key difference between now and 2008 is the speed with which the Fed is launching these facilities. In 2008, the PDCF was rolled out in March, the CPFF in October, and the first round of Large-Scale Asset Purchases in November. In this episode, we have rates slashed to the zero-lower bound, massive asset purchases, discount window actions (including regulatory guidance), the CPFF, the PDCF—all in a
2020 年 橡树资本管理,有限合伙
2020 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
3
3
保留所有权利。
All Rights Reserved
事情发展到以天计的地步。新冠疫情事件蔓延的速度令人震惊,但美联储对金融压力的反应速度同样惊人。
美联储已进入“不惜一切代价”模式。财政当局很可能跟进(尤其是下周的失业救济申请人数将是过去最高纪录的数倍时)。欧洲央行今晚也加入了行列。这些都是恰当的行动。希望我们能看到这些措施以及更多措施带来的成效。美联储和财政部将尽一切他们认为可能有所帮助之事。显然,大家并不在乎支出会增加国家赤字和债务。
然而,遗憾的是,在近年来的繁荣时期,没有意愿去克制刺激措施并补充政策工具箱。没人知道这一失误是否会阻碍货币和财政应对的效果。但我希望(举例来说)我们现在是在从 5.0% 而非 1.5% 的利率水平下调短期利率。
matter of days. The speed with which COVID-19 events are unfolding is astonishing, but so is the speed of the Fed’s response to financial strains. The Fed is in “whatever it takes” mode. Fiscal authorities will likely follow suit (especially when next week’s unemployment claims reading is a multiple of the highest reading we have ever seen in the past). The ECB joined the parade tonight. All these are appropriate actions. Hopefully we’ll see benefits from them and more. The Fed and Treasury will do everything they think might help. Clearly there’s little interest in abstaining simply because expenditures will add to the national deficit and debt. However, it’s unfortunate that there was no appetite for refraining from stimulus and restocking the tool kit during the period of prosperity that prevailed in recent years. No one knows whether that failure will inhibit the monetary and fiscal response. But I wish (for example) that we were cutting short rates from 5.0%, not 1.5%.
市场行为
关于市场,我有几点观察:
说市场眼下接近恐慌,这话很容易讲出口。过去一个月里,我们已经多次看到创纪录的百分比跌幅(自 1940 年以来,只有黑色星期一——1987 年 10 月 19 日,标普 500 指数单日下跌 20.4%——能超过这些跌幅)。本周和上周的下跌日如下:-7.6%、-9.5%、-12.0%,昨日 -5.2%。这些都是巨大的损失。
不过,值得注意的一点是,每一次下跌之后都跟着类似的上涨:+4.9%、+9.3% 和 +6.0%(今天之前还有小幅上涨)。鉴于过去 80 年间几乎所有最大跌幅日之后都出现了上涨日,所以“逢低买入”的策略到目前为止依然行之有效。就这一点而言没问题,但这与基本面改善毫无关系。这告诉我的是,乐观情绪尚未被彻底根除并代之以投降。通常,只有当乐观情绪无处可寻时,底部才会真正到来。
另一方面,市场上出现了抢购现金的热潮。多头仓位和空头仓位都被平掉了——这是混乱和不确定性的明确信号。货币市场基金中的现金大幅增加。这并不能说明基本面情况,但未来市场表现的展望有所改善:
Market Behavior A few observations regarding the markets: It’s easy to say that something approaching panic is present in the markets. We’ve seen record percentage declines several times within the last month (exceeded since 1940 only by Black Monday – October 19, 1987 – when the S&P 500 declined by 20.4% in a day). This week and last included down days as follows: -7.6%, -9.5%, -12.0% and -5.2% yesterday. These are enormous losses. However, it’s worth noting that every one of those declines was followed by similar gains: +4.9%, +9.3% and +6.0% (before a small gain today). Given that almost all of the biggest down days in the last 80 years were followed by up days, so far the strategy of “buy the dips” has continued to be in favor. That’s fine as far as it goes, but it has nothing to do with fundamental improvement. What this tells me is that optimism still hasn’t been entirely eradicated and replaced by capitulation. Typically, the bottom is reached only when optimism is nowhere to be found. On the other hand, there has been a rush to cash. Both long positions and short positions have been closed out – a sure sign of chaos and uncertainty. Cash in money market funds has increased substantially. This doesn’t tell us anything about fundamentals, but the outlook for eventual market performance is improved:
人们卖得越多,
手里剩下的可卖筹码就越少,而一旦他们不再那么悲观,手头的现金反而越多,可以用来买入。
the more people have sold, the less they have left to sell, and the more cash they have with which to buy when they turn less pessimistic.
这正是说明一个道理的好时机:迄今为止,在这场事件中,还有更多证据表明,投资世界里根本不存在什么万无一失、灵丹妙药或银弹。
This is a good time to point out that, thus far in this episode, there’s additional evidence that there’s no such thing in the investment world as a sure thing, magic potion or silver bullet:
我觉得有意思的是,黄金——历来被视为抵御艰难时期的最大保护来源——在过去一个月里价格下跌了几个百分点。这是
I find it interesting that the price of gold – historically considered the greatest source of protection again tough times – has declined several percent over the last month. Here’s the
2020 年橡树资本管理有限合伙公司
2020 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
4
4
保留所有权利。
All Rights Reserved
一家黄金资讯网站的头条这样写道:“市场恐慌弥漫,金价大幅下挫。”按理说,不该是这个走势。
比特币,曾被其拥趸称为危机中的避风港,如今跌幅或许超过了任何其他“资产类别”。(我这么说比特币,是经过掂量的。)过去一个月,它从 10188 美元跌至 5337 美元,跌幅达 47.6%。
风险平价基金,本被设计成在多数市场环境下都能表现良好,却在 2 月遭遇了两位数的亏损。
就连全球最顶尖的算法基金——拥有堪称辉煌的长期业绩记录——据报道上月也亏损了几个百分点。
headline of a story from a gold site: “Gold prices sharply down as dread pervasive in marketplace.” It wasn’t supposed to work that way. Bitcoin, which partisans had said would serve as a safe harbor in times of crisis, may be down more than any other “asset class.” (I apply that term to Bitcoin advisedly.) It’s lost 47.6% over the last month, from $10,188 to $5,337. Risk-parity funds, which were designed to do well in most environments, experienced double-digit losses in February. Even the world’s greatest algorithmic fund – which sports a fabulous long-term record – is reported to have suffered a loss of several percent last month.
当然,这是一段短暂的混乱时期,但我们可以说,到目前为止,奇迹投资的证据尚不存在。这里并无新意。
最后,我想分享我们一位债券交易员贾斯汀·夸利亚的一些见闻:
在经历了两天基本停滞但压力重重的市场后,我们“终于迎来了橡皮筋的断裂”。被迫卖出者(因急需现金流而必须卖出)迅速将市场压低。我们开盘便低开 3-5 个点,而华尔街再次不愿承担风险(他们各自蜷缩在沙发、厨房餐桌、客厅或周末别墅里),因此风险只转移给了另一个市场参与者的买盘。清算水平很快又低了 6-8 个点。
一位经纪人说这完全是混乱……而且他还是在家办公!想象一下,真正的交易大厅会是什么样子。若你是做市商,基本上就成了“掩蔽躲避”,因为高层的决策限制了他们的风险承担能力。除了紧急需求,投资者卖出是为了应对季末赎回、汇率波动以及追加保证金。空头结算猖獗,较大宗交易在优质 BB 级信用债中成交。大多数人甚至不愿猜测 CCC 级风险的市场价格。这最终成为我们很久以来看到的第一天真正恐慌。
我们从不乐见引发混乱的事件,尤其是今天正在发生的这些。但正是像贾斯汀所描述的那种情绪助长了情绪化抛售,让我们得以获得最大的便宜货。
Of course this is a short, chaotic period, but we can say that so far, the evidence of a miracle investment is lacking. Nothing new here. To wrap up, I’ll share some color from Justin Quaglia, one of our debt traders: After two days of a basically stalled, but stressed market, we “finally had the rubber band snap.” Forced sellers (needing to sell for immediate cash flow needs) brought the market lower in a hurry. We opened 3-5 points lower, and the Street was again hesitant to take risk (from their couch/kitchen table/living room/weekend house) so risk only transferred into a bid from another market participant. Clearing levels quickly became 6-8 points lower. One of the brokers said it was flat-out mayhem . . . and he was working from home! Imagine what an actual trading floor would have been like. It basically became “duck and cover” if you were a market maker, as their risk-taking abilities are being hindered by the C-suite. Beside immediate needs, investors sold to prepare for quarter-end redemptions, FX movements, and to fund margin calls. Short settlements were rampant, and larger blocks cleared in high-quality BB credits. Most people don’t even want to guess what the mark is on CCC risk. This ultimately ended up being the first real day of panic we have seen in a long time. We’re never happy to have the events that bring on chaos, and especially not the ones that are underway today. But it’s sentiment like Justin describes above that fuels the emotional selling that allows us to access the greatest bargains.
橡树资本资产类别
为了让你了解美国信贷市场至今的走势,我提供截至昨日收盘的价格、收益率和表现数据。这些信息到你看到时可能已过时,但希望仍具参考价值。
Oaktree Asset Classes To give you an indication of what has happened to date in U.S. credit, I’m going to provide data on prices, yields and performance as of yesterday’s close. This information will be to be out of date by the time it reaches you, but hopefully it will still be useful.
2020 年橡树资本管理有限合伙公司
2020 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
5
5
版权所有
All Rights Reserved
(截至 3 月 18 日收盘)
(As of the close, March 18)
Average
Price
Average Price
Average
Yield
Average Yield
平均
收益率利差
Average Yield Spread
业绩情况
2 月 19 日至 3 月 18 日
Performance Feb 19-Mar 18
高收益债券(不含能源)
高收益债券(含能源)
优先级贷款
BB 级贷款抵押债券(CLOs)
High Yield Bonds ex-energy High Yield Bonds with energy Senior Loans BB CLOs
88.42
83.06
81.57
74.24
88.42 83.06 81.57 74.24
8.9%
10.0
9.6
12.4
8.9% 10.0 9.6 12.4
787 bps
901
874
1,135
787 bps 901 874 1,135
(13.9)%
(17.2)
(15.1)
(20.7)
(13.9)% (17.2) (15.1) (20.7)
收益率和收益率利差已经大幅上升(换句话讲,造成的损失相当惨重)。价格跌幅很大,但每一分价格下跌带来的收益率上升都有助于踩刹车。在国债收益率 1% 的环境里,9%、10% 或 12% 的收益率相当抢眼,自然会减缓跌势。债券和贷款指数迄今已下跌 15%-20%,持有者损失惨重,但新投资的机会也大为改善。
Yields and yield spreads have increased significantly (which is another way of saying there’s been a lot of damage done). The price declines have been substantial, but the increase in yield for each point of price decline tends to put on the brakes. A yield of 9%, 10% or 12% is impressive in a world of 1% Treasurys, and thus tends to slow the fall. Declines to date of 15-20% for the bond and loan indices have brought substantial losses to holders, but also vastly improved opportunities for new investment.
*
*
*
*
*
*
我们知道什么?除了资产价格大幅下跌、资产持有者冷静持有的能力正在瓦解、以及受迫性卖出开始增多之外,所知甚少。我简单总结一下观点——因为实在说不出什么高深的东西来:
What do we know? Not much other than the fact that asset prices are well down, asset holders’ ability to hold coolly is evaporating, and motivated selling is picking up. I’ll sum up my views simply – since there’s nothing sophisticated to say:
“底部”就是复苏开始的前一天。因此,根本不可能知道何时已经触底……永远不可能。橡树资本明确拒绝等待底部的观念;我们在能以低价获得价值时就出手买入。
“The bottom” is the day before the recovery begins. Thus it’s absolutely impossible to know when the bottom has been reached . . . ever. Oaktree explicitly rejects the notion of waiting for the bottom; we buy when we can access value cheap.
尽管我们无法断言底部就在眼前,但制造廉价交易的那些条件,确实正在显现。
Even though there’s no way to say the bottom is at hand, the conditions that make bargains available certainly are materializing.
鉴于目前已经出现的价格下跌和抛售,我认为现在是投资的好时机,尽管事后可能证明这并非最佳时机。
Given the price drops and selling we’ve seen so far, I believe this is a good time to invest, although of course it may prove not have been the best time.
没有人会争辩说,你应该把所有的钱在今天花光……但同样,也没有人会争辩说,你应该分文不花。
No one can argue that you should spend all your money today . . . but equally, no one can argue that you shouldn’t spend any.
你越想博取潜在收益、越不介意按市值计价的亏损,就越应该在这里投资。反过来,你越在意防范中途的账面缩水、越能接受错过盈利机会,就越应该少投一些。
The more you want to garner potential gains and don’t mind mark-to-market losses, the more you should invest here. On the other hand, the more you care about protecting against interim markdowns and are able to live with missing opportunities for profit, the less you should invest.
然而,真的有不投资的理由吗?在我看来,我们未必身处“最低点”,这一点并不构成不投资的理由。
But is there really an argument for not investing at all? In my opinion, the fact that we’re not necessarily at “the bottom” isn’t such an argument.
March 19, 2020
March 19, 2020
2020 年橡树资本管理有限合伙公司(Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.)
2020 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
6
6
版权所有,保留所有权利。
All Rights Reserved