2008 年 CNBC Mars-Wrigley 交易访谈
这是 2008 年 4 月 28 日沃伦·巴菲特在 CNBC 讨论玛氏–箭牌交易的节目实录。
This is a transcript of Warren Buffett’s discussion on CNBC in regards to Mars - Wrigley deal on April 28, 2008
贝基·奎克:沃伦,感谢您今天早上参加我们的节目,十分感谢。
Becky Quick: Warren, thanks for joining us this morning. Appreciate it.
沃伦·巴菲特:不客气。
Warren Buffett: My pleasure.
贝基:人们总想弄清楚你的现金打算怎么用。为什么你会在这个时候看上箭牌?为什么偏偏是现在做这笔交易?
Becky: People are always trying to figure out what you’re doing with your cash. Why would you look at Wrigley right now? Why this deal right now?
巴菲特:嗯,贝基,我从差不多七岁起就在做一项长达 70 年的口味测试了,对象就是这些产品。玛氏的产品我也一样测过。它们都通过了这 70 年的口味考验(笑)。不过说实话,是玛氏的人来问我愿不愿意参与这件事,我们提供资金。但我们是非常、非常次要的合作伙伴,尽管我们会投入大约 65 亿美元。实际上,在这次收购中,我们只是玛氏的融资伙伴。
Buffett: Well, I’ve been conducting a 70-year taste test, Becky, since I was about seven years old, on the products. I’ve done the same thing with Mars products. And they met the 70-year taste test (laughs.) But to tell you the truth, the Mars people asked me about participating in this, and we are financing. But we are a very, very junior partner, although we will have about 6-1/2 billion dollars in it. But we are a financing partner, in effect, for Mars in this acquisition.
贝基:不过 65 亿美元,仍然是一笔很大的投入。除了口味测试,你们还看什么?你觉得像这样的投资,是在经济困难时期也能做成的划算买卖吗?这是一项防御衰退的资产吗?
Becky: Six-and-a-half billion dollars, though. That’s still a substantial take. What do you look at beyond just the taste test? Do you think that this is the type of a bet that makes a good deal when you’re looking at economic hardship times? Is this a recession-proof play?
巴菲特:是的。两家公司都拥有非常出色的品牌。我在给大学生讲课时,十几年来一直拿箭牌当例子……我对玛氏了解不多,只知道它是一家私人公司。但像箭牌或玛氏这样的品牌,确实不会出什么大问题。毫不夸张地说,它们经受住了数十年漫长岁月的考验,而且人们每天使用它们的产品越来越多。
Buffett: Yeah. Both companies have great brands. When I talk to classes of university students, for a dozen years or more I’ve used Wrigley as an example … I haven’t known about Mars except that they’re a provate company. But there is really nothing that can go wrong with something like the Wrigley or the Mars brands. It’s literally true that they have, ah, faced the test of time over decades and decades and people use more and more of their products every day.
乔·科南:沃伦,我是乔。你不会来经营这块业务,也不会对这些业务的运营施加任何影响……
Joe Kernen: Warren, this is Joe. You’re not going to operate this, or exert any influence operating ..
巴菲特:不会。
Buffett: No.
乔:……所以这不像是我们以后会看到喜诗糖果跟玛氏或箭牌发生什么关联。你已经拥有了冰雪皇后。我看得到与可口可乐的协同效应。我是说,我看到这里头有很多事情可以发生——沃伦,尽管没一样对我的腰围是好事——但我觉得你能做的文章很多。只是,这一切并不在计划之内?
Joe: .. So it’s not like we’re going to see See’s (Candies) somehow with a Mars, or a Wrigley. You’ve got Dairy Queen. I see synergies with Coca-Cola. I mean, I see a lot of things happening here, Warren, none of them good for my waistline, but I see a lot of things you could do here. But that’s not what’s in the cards?
沃伦:完全不在计划之内。不。事实上,玛氏大约三十年前就开始做盒装巧克力业务了,具体哪一年我不太确定,目的就是跟喜诗竞争,所以我们各占一端。两家公司之间绝不会有任何联系。
Warren: That’s not what’s in the cards at all. No. In matter of fact Mars has had a boxed chocolate operation that they started, I don’t know, thirty years ago, to compete with See’s, so we’re in different ends of the game. There will be no connection at all.
乔·科南:我注意到你这 65 亿美元又投进了此类项目,而不是投向华尔街的金融机构。但很多人认为金融机构现在已经见底了。你是不是终于开始觉得,也许可以谨慎地试探一下了?
Joe: I see once again that your 6-1/2 billion is going into something like this and not going into a financial on Wall Street. But a lot of people think they’ve bottomed now. Are you finally ready to think now that maybe it’s safe to put your toe in the water?
巴菲特:嗯,我对箭牌或玛氏的了解,远胜过我对某些大型银行资产负债表的了解。我很清楚这笔投资我会得到什么,而有些大型金融机构,我真不清楚它里面到底有什么。
Buffett: Well, I understand a Wrigley or a Mars a whole lot better than I understand the balance sheet of some of the big banks. I know what I’m getting in this, and some of the larger financial institutions, I really don’t know what’s there.
乔·科南:你觉得一些压力、焦虑情绪,还有信贷紧缩,有没有减轻?沃伦,你认为我们已经熬过最难的关口了吗?
Joe: Do you feel a lessening of some of the pressures and some of the angst, some of the credit crunch? Do you think we’re over the hump, Warren?
巴菲特:嗯,我认为美联储所做的——我也认为是恰当的——在贝尔斯登这件事情上画下了一条鲜明的界线。这改变了整个局面。从那时起,金融世界的面貌就变得不一样了。
Buffett: Well, I think that what the Fed did, and I think it was proper, what the Fed did with Bear Stearns was a big line in the sand. That changed the game. At that point, the world is looking kind of different in the financial world.
卡尔·昆塔尼拉:沃伦,我们都知道,这个领域里的很多公司,其业绩高度依赖于大宗商品价格,无论是可可还是别的什么。对过去一周我们一直在谈论的粮食问题,乃至全球大宗商品的整体走势,你有什么看法?你觉得现在行情是不是见顶了?
Carl Quintanilla: Warren, we all know that a lot of the companies in this space are leveraged to the price of commodities, whether it’s cocoa, or what have you. Do you have a comment on what we’ve just been talking about the past week, whether it’s grains, or just global commodities in general. Does it feel toppy to you?
巴菲特:嗯,我有个儿子是农民,他过得挺开心的。内布拉斯加这边以前老讲一个故事,说有个农民中了彩票,电视台派了组人去做采访。记者问他:“你刚中了 2000 万美元的彩票,打算怎么花?”农民说:“嗯,我想我就接着种地,直到把这笔钱全花光。”(笑声)其实一直到差不多去年之前,农业的情况也就是那样,但现在这世界变样了。我不知道乙醇在这其中贡献了多少,但你看,大豆卖到 12 美元、玉米 6 美元这样的价位,这肯定会有影响。我很惊讶,目前 CPI 居然还没显现出更明显的通胀效应,但你要是看看钢材在涨、石油在涨、谷物在涨,那后面潜在的通胀压力可大了去了。
Buffett: Well, I’ve got a son that’s a farmer. He’s a very happy fellow. They used to tell the story out here in Nebraska about the farmer that won the lottery, and they sent a television crew out to see him. And the television interviewer said, ‘You know, you’ve just won twenty million dollars in the lottery, what are you going to do with it? And the farmer said, ‘Well, I think I’ll just keep farming until it’s all gone.’ (Laughter.) Well, that was the situation in farming until the last year or so, but it’s a different world now. And I don’t know how much ethanol contributed to it, but, you know, you get twelve dollar soybeans and six dollar corn and that sort of thing, and it’s going to have an effect. I’m amazed we haven’t seen more inflationary effect so far with the CPI, when you consider what steel is doing, what oil is doing, what grains are doing, there is a lot of potential inflation down the road.
贝基:嘿,沃伦,今天上午我们一直在讨论美国目前是否已陷入衰退。上次我们和你聊是几个月前,当时你说,用任何有意义的衡量方式,用任何实实在在的估算,看起来美国都处于衰退中。但也有人表示,对他们来说这不像衰退。本周 GDP 数据就要公布了。你还坚持美国看起来正在衰退这个看法吗?
Becky: Hey Warren, we’ve been talking this morning about whether or not we’re in a recession at this point. The last we talked with you was a couple of months ago, and you said it looked by any sort of relevant manner, if you’re trying to measure this, by any sort of real estimate it looked like we’re in a recession. But there are some people who are saying, yeah, it doesn’t look like a recession to them. We’ve got GDP this week. Do you still stand by that idea that it looks like we’re in a recession?
巴菲特:是的。我认为我们正处于经济衰退中。我是说,全国经济研究局有它自己的定义方式,但普通人眼中的定义和连续两个季度 GDP 负增长不完全是一回事。顺便说一句,当 GDP 年增长率低于 1% 时,人均实际是在下降,因为我们的人口每年增长约 1%。所以,即使全国经济研究局用绝对数值来衡量,比如某季度增长十分之一,他们不把它算作衰退季度,但人均 GDP 在那个只有半个点增长的季度其实已经下滑了。我们正处于衰退之中——除非你死抠那个技术定义,但我真心觉得那个定义对丢了工作的人,或者面对货币市场基金不付钱给他的那个人,没什么意义。
Buffett: Yeah. I think we’re in a recession. I mean, a recession is defined in a certain way by the National Bureau of Economic Research, but I think it’s defined by the man in the street a little differently than whether there have been two quarters of reported (negative) GDP growth. And incidentally, when GDP growth is below 1% a year it’s really falling on a per capita basis because our population increases about one percent. So even though the National Bureau uses an absolute figure, it’s up one-tenth they don’t count that as a recessionary quarter, but the GDP per capita has gone down in a quarter where the gain is half a percent or something of the sort. We are in a recession, unless you want to stick strictly to the technical definition, which I really don’t think has much meaning to the fellow who has lost his job or is facing a money-market fund that isn’t paying him out, or whatever it might be.
史蒂夫·利斯曼:你们在这笔交易里充当融资方的角色,这对信贷市场来说意味着什么?伯克希尔账上现金充裕,你觉得这是不是你们以后会越来越多扮演的新角色?
Steve Liesman: What does it say about credit markets that you guys are acting as a financier in this case, and is this a new role for Berkshire that you see yourself increasingly playing with the considerable cash on your books?
巴菲特:是的,这不是我们的常规角色,但我们以前干过,以后可能还会干。具体到这笔交易,我们作为合作伙伴,非常符合玛氏家族这次收购想达成的目标。他们需要一个信得过的人——知道支票能兑现,又不会在实质上插手。所以我们的做法跟大多数人不一样,是按他们想要的方式办的。
Buffett: Yeah, it’s not a common role for us but it’s something we have done before and we’ll probably do again. I think in this particular case, we fit very well as a partner for what the Mars family wanted to achieve in this purchase. They needed somebody they felt comfortable with, they knew the check would clear, that wouldn’t interfere in any real way. So we’ve done it differently than most people would have done it. We did it the way they wanted it done.
迈克尔·法尔,CNBC《财经论谈》嘉宾主持:巴菲特先生,早上好,我是迈克尔·法尔。
Michael Farr, CNBC Squawk Box Guest Host: Mr. Buffett, good morning, it’s Michael Farr.
巴菲特:你好,迈克尔。
Buffett: Hi, Michael.
法尔:你看这笔交易,为什么选现在这个时机?经济形势在收缩,利率又维持当前水平,为什么现在是收购的好时机?还有,当玛氏接手这家上市公司时,你是否有整合方面的担忧?
Farr: When you look at this deal, why now? The economy, if things are contracting and we’ve got rates where they are, why is this a good time for an acquisition? And do you have any integration concerns as Mars begins to take on this public company?
巴菲特:我认为,买入一家真正优秀的企业,最佳时机就是你能买入的时候。很多很多年前,我记得赫曼·莱曾把菲多利公司优先推荐给可口可乐。据我所知,他首先向可口可乐提出了收购邀约,但可口可乐出于这样那样的原因决定当时不做这笔交易。结果百事可乐买下了它,这成了百事可乐做过的最明智的事。所以,如果你有机会买入一家出色的企业,我的建议是——抓住它。正如约吉·贝拉所说:“当你走到岔路口,就拐进去。”
Buffett: Well, I think a good time to buy a really great business is when you can do it. Many, many years ago, as I remember, Herman Lay offered the Frito-Lay company to Coca-Cola. And he offered them the company first, as I understand it, and they decided for one reason or another they didn’t want to do it then. And of course Pepsico bought it and it’s the best thing they ever did. So if you get a chance to buy a wonderful business, then my advice is, grab it. As Yogi Berra would say, ‘When you come to a fork in the road, take it.”
卡尔:沃伦,看起来差不多是在 72 小时前,美元汇率见底已经成了市场共识。你是想加入这个阵营,还是逆潮而动?
Carl: Warren, it seems like it’s been 72 hours or so since the bottom of the dollar has pretty much become conventional wisdom. Do you want to either join that camp or fight against the tide?
巴菲特:我从来不知道外汇市场、股票市场或债券市场在任何一周、一个月或一年里会怎么走。但我确实认为,随着时间的推移,如果我们继续遵循目前的贸易政策,美元会走弱。不过我说的是十年周期。顺便说一句,我们得搞清楚……我认为长期来看,美元会越来越不值钱。(笑声)
Buffett: I never have any idea what the foreign exchange or the stock market or the bond market is going to do in any given week or month or year. I do think over time, if we keep following the policies we’ve following on trade, the dollar will become weaker. But I’m talking about a ten-year period. And incidentally, let’s make sure … I think it’s going to become worth less, over time. (Laughter.)
贝基:不是“一文不值”那部分。
Becky: Not the ‘worthless.’
乔·科南:我本来正要问这个问题,巴菲特,你现在有没有头寸?或者你至少是在短期之内,平掉一些美元的空头部位?
Joe: That was going to be my question, whether you have a position right now and whether you’re covering any of your shorts, at least short-term, in the dollar, Warren?
巴菲特:嗯,我在年报里提到过,我们只有一个很小的直接外币头寸,非常小。但我们通过持有那些在国外赚很多钱的企业,在国外积累了更多盈利能力。像可口可乐这样的公司,它有很高比例的利润来自海外。所以我们通过盈利能力,间接持有了一部分货币头寸。我们没有任何重要的直接头寸,而且已经有一段时间没有了。
Buffett: Well, as I mentioned in the annual report, we only have one small direct foreign currency position, very small. But we have built up more earning power abroad through the ownership of businesses that earn a lot of money abroad. Some company like Coca-Cola earns a very high percentage of its money abroad. So we have an indirect position in currencies through earning power. We do not have any significant direct position, nor have we had for some time.
卡尔:不过,(巴西)雷亚尔对你挺不错的,对吧?
Carl: But the (Brazilian) real has treated you pretty well, hasn’t it?
巴菲特:有意思,巴西雷亚尔在过去五六年间升值了一倍多。谁能想到持有一款南美货币就能发财?
Buffett: It’s interesting, the real has more than doubled in value over the past five or six years. Who thought you would get rich owning a South American currency?
乔:你知道的,每次你接电话或一上来,我们就知道会一直聊下去,直到你假装去做那种广告,信号断了、电话挂掉。我下一个问题——你在谈论保险政策……咱们快速聊一下——你因为同时支持过克林顿参议员和奥巴马参议员的两场竞选而广为人知。这事没完没了。我跟你说,我猜不出谁会是最终提名人。我还是觉得会是希拉里·克林顿。
Joe: You know when you answer the phone or you come on, you know we’re going to keep talking until you pretend to do one of those commercials where it cuts out and your phone goes off. My next one, are you talking about policies…let’s quickly talk - you’re well-known to have helped the campaigns of both Senator Clinton and Senator Obama. This is going on and on and on. I tell you, I cannot pick who the nominee is going to be. I still think it’s going to be Hillary Clinton.
卡尔:你要是沃伦,就不必那样了。
Carl: If you were Warren, you wouldn’t have had to.
乔·科南:您两者都会选。巴菲特先生,您认为这是否已经到了影响民主党在 11 月份选情的程度?
Joe: You would have picked it both. Has it gotten to the point yet where it’s hurting the chances for the Democrats do you think in November, Mr. Buffett?
巴菲特:这肯定没好处。我是说,有些人走出这场竞选时会带着负面情绪。至于这些负面情绪会不会让他们干脆待在家里不去投票,我怀疑它们会不会转化为投给麦凯恩的票。但你希望到了 11 月时,选民是热情高涨的。如果任何一方的人觉得自己的候选人没得到公平机会,或者被泼了太多脏水之类,这对整个竞选来说是减分项。我就坐在这儿,毫不含糊地同时踩在两家阵营里。
Buffett: It can’t help. I mean, some people are going to go away from this race with ill feelings. Whether the ill feelings translate into them staying home, I doubt if the ill feelings translate into them voting for McCain. But you want an enthusiastic electorate when you get to November and to the extent that people on either side feel that their candidate hasn’t quite gotten a fair shot or been subject to too much mudslinging or something, that’s a minus in the general campaign. I’m just sitting here unequivocally with a foot in both camps.
卡尔:我们记得你当时对两者都表示支持,而彼时人们问你的问题是,“你为什么不选边站?”你那时是否隐约料到最终会走到今天这一步?
Carl: We remember when you came out in favor of both, and the question was to you at the time, ‘Why aren’t you choosing?’ Did you have an inkling it was going to end up like this?
巴菲特:不,我当时认为他们是最佳的两名候选人。而且在他俩宣布参选之前很久,我就分别承诺会支持他们——很多人因为这样承诺而陷入麻烦,浪漫方面是这样,我则在政治方面惹上了麻烦。
Buffett: No, I thought they were the two best candidates. And well before they declared, I promised each of them that I would support them, which a lot of people have gotten in trouble doing that in a romantic way and I’ve gotten in trouble doing it in a political way.
贝基:再回到箭牌的事。大概六周前我们请了山姆·泽尔上节目,问了他关于箭牌球场的事。他说,嘿,这么多年那座球场冠名一直是免费的,但他不介意收点钱。您是棒球迷,您会掏钱让箭牌这个名字继续留在箭牌球场吗?
Becky: Back to what’s happening with Wrigley. We had Sam Zell on about six weeks ago and asked him about Wrigley Stadium. He said, hey. it’s been free all this time to have that name on the stadium but he wouldn’t mind charging for it. You’re a baseball fan. Would you pay up to keep Wrigley on Wrigley stadium?
巴菲特:我向来不太热衷——伯克希尔收到过不少提议,想把我们的名字冠在体育场馆上。根据对方开出的价码,我一直不太赞成这么做。我第一次看棒球赛是在 1939 年,去的瑞格利球场。但瑞格利公司在 1981 年卖掉了他们手里的小熊队股份,连带球场也一并出售。所以,他们其实早就和那边没什么关系了。
Buffett: I’ve never been a big fan — We’ve got a lot of propositions at Berkshire for sticking our name on sports stadiums. Based on the prices asked, I’ve never been a big fan of doing that. I did go to my first baseball game at Wrigley Stadium in 1939. But the Wrigley company sold their interest in the Cubs, which meant the stadium as well in 1981. So they really haven’t been involved there for a long time.
卡尔:对于我们这些曾经住在芝加哥的人来说,日子真是暗无天日。
Carl: Dark days for those of us who used to live in Chicago.
史蒂夫:你们有两家公司正在合并,它们都是那些成本眼下大幅上涨的投入品的大用户,我们能不能预期看到这种情况?这是不是某种试图对供应商施压的做法?我猜玉米糖浆现在肯定是玛氏和箭牌支付的大项成本之一。
Steve: The idea that you have two companies combining who are big users of inputs that are increasing in cost big-time right now, is that something we can expect to see? Is there something of an attempt to push back against the suppliers here. I’ve got to think corn syrup has to be one of the big costs of what Mars and Wrigley’s pay for these days.
巴菲特:我并不认为你有巨大的力量——大宗商品市场比任何一家公司都大。所以,就像如果你要买石油之类的东西,你得出市场价。好处在于,你的竞争对手也得付市场价。而且,糖是一个大要素,糖价还没动。但我觉得,不管是卡夫还是家乐氏,你随便举哪家公司,它们在原材料上都要花更多钱。
Buffett: I don’t think you have enormous power as a - commodity markets are bigger than any one company. So just like if you’re going to be buying oil or something of the sort, you’re going to pay the market price. The nice thing about it is your competitor is going to be paying the market price, as well. And, you, know, sugar is a big element and sugar hasn’t moved. But I think, you know, whether it’s Kraft or Kellogg, you name the company, they’re going to be paying more for their raw materials.
乔·科南:你好像没买过化肥公司,是吧沃伦?
Joe: You haven’t bought a fertilizer company, I don’t think, have you Warren?
巴菲特:不,我还没有。
Buffett: No, I haven’t.
乔·科南:种子公司?
Joe: Seed company?
巴菲特:不。
Buffett: No.
乔·科南:我知道,你在公用事业上投了不少。你在中国的中国石油(Petrochina)也投了一大笔,后来卖掉了。我们是不是该这么理解——你在那个领域的活跃程度,眼下没像局势本身显得那么紧要?是不是快到顶了?我憋着问你的就是这个。我猜没人知道答案。可现在大宗商品是疯了呢,还是说世界就是这个样子?
Joe: And I know, you have a lot of utilities. And you had a big Petrochina investment in China. You sold out. Should we read into that, that maybe you’re not as active in that area as the situation seems to dictate at this point? Are we getting toppy? That’s the question I’m trying to ask you. I guess nobody knows. But is it crazy right now in commodities or is this the state of the world?
巴菲特:这个谁知道呢?但我不押注行业板块,乔。我做这行有意思的地方就在于,每天早上上班的时候,我并不知道接下来会发生什么事。所以,两个月前,我压根儿没有想过会把伯克希尔 65 亿资金投到这笔交易里。你知道,然后电话就响了。我就喜欢电话响的时候。通常都是打错了,但偶尔也会有事发生。
Buffett: Well, who knows on that? But I don’t play sectors, Joe. When I — the thing that makes my job fun is when I go to work in the morning, I don’t really know what’s going to happen. So, two months ago, I didn’t have the faintest idea I would be investing 6-1/2 billion of Berkshire’s money in this particular transaction. You know, and then the phone rings. I love it when the phone rings. Usually it’s the wrong number but every now and then something happens.
贝基:不过沃伦,你过去确实投过一些板块,比如在铁路上的交通运输板块,还有其他一些领域。但你没有进行广泛的大宗商品操作。这有什么原因吗?
Becky: Although Warren, you have played some sectors in the past, with the transports playing on the rails, and other areas. You have not made broad commodities plays. Is there a reason for that?
巴菲特:嗯,可能是因为我不知道大宗商品会怎么走。大宗商品这玩意儿,要是我知道它们的走势,我就不需要借助股票来参与了,直接去商品市场操作就行了。所以,我不知道石油、小麦、大豆、可可或者其他类似的东西下周、下个月或者明年的价格会是多少。但我确实知道,人们还是会嚼箭牌口香糖,还是会吃玛氏巧克力棒。
Buffett: Well, it’s probably because I don’t know what commodities are going to do. The thing about commodities, if I knew what commodities were going to do, I wouldn’t have to play them through stocks. I could just go on the commodity market and do it. So, I, I don’t know what oil or wheat or soybeans or cocoa or anything like that’s going to be selling for next week or next month or next year. I do know people are going to be chewing Wrigley gum and eating Mars bars.
卡尔:知道吗,上周是地球日。你错过了,乔,我们搞了个很大的……
Carl: You know, last week was Earth Day. You missed it, Joe, and we had a big …
乔·科南:那天我人倒是在地球上,但我错过了你的报道。
Joe: I was around on the planet for that day, but I missed your coverage.
卡尔:但高盛(Goldman)的艾比·约瑟夫·科恩(Abby Joseph Cohen)提到的一件事是,沃伦,她看到涌入绿色倡议的风险投资比涌入几乎其他任何领域的都要多。你对这个领域有兴趣吗?
Carl: But one of the things that Abby Joseph Cohen from Goldman said, Warren, is she’s seen more VC money go into green initiatives than pretty much anything else. Does that hold any interest for you?
巴菲特:嗯,能吸引我的是这样一门生意:我能够理解它,它拥有持久的长期竞争优势,管理层优秀,而且价格合理。只要我在任何地方能找到这样的机会,我就会投。很多时候,很多事情都超出了我的能力圈。有人可能有个绝妙的主意,但我理解不了,那就祝他们好运吧。我还是会坚持做我能理解的事情。
Buffett: Well, what holds an interest for me is a business I can understand and one that’s got durable long-term competitive advantage and the good management and the price makes sense. If I can find that any place, I’ll do it. And a lot of times, things are just beyond my competence. Somebody can have a wonderful idea that I don’t understand and God bless them. I’ll stick with stuff I understand.
乔·科南:沃伦,你有没有关注过好时(Hershey)?有没有接近过这类机会,因为它是家族信托控股。你觉得那边现在会有什么动静吗?
Joe: Have you ever looked at Hershey, Warren? Ever gotten close to anything because it’s a family trust there. Do you think something happens there now?
巴菲特:嗯,我关注那个好长时间了。我 13 岁住在华盛顿特区那会儿,离家出走过,跑到了宾夕法尼亚州的赫希镇,结果被州警拦下了。所以我也算是对好时做过一点深度的实地调研了。(笑)不过你知道,这些年一直关注好时信托的故事,确实非常有意思。
Buffett: Well, I followed that for a long time. When I was 13 years old and living in Washington, D.C., I ran away to Hershey, Pennsylvania, and got picked up by the state police. So I’ve done a little in-depth research on Hershey that way. (Laughs). But you know, it’s been very interesting to follow the Hershey trust story.
乔·科南:你有考虑过收购好时吗?
Joe: You have looked at buying Hershey?
巴菲特:没有,其实没有,真没有。
Buffett: No, not really, not really.
乔·科南:算不上考虑过。
Joe: Not really.
卡尔:但你真的离家出走过?
Carl: But you really did run away from home?
巴菲特:那事儿我是干过,没错。不过我只跑了大约 100 英里。
Buffett: That I did, right. But I only got about 100 miles.
卡尔:那相当厉害了。
Carl: That’s pretty good.
贝基:沃伦,要是你审视一遍你所有的公司,因为你旗下有很多消费驱动的生意,都看一遍的话,最近这几个月情况发生了怎样的变化,或者有变化吗?
Becky: Warren, if you took a look at all of your businesses, because you have a lot of consumer-driven businesses and took a look at all of that, how have things changed over the last couple months or have they?
巴菲特:要我说,在零售业务上——我们做的是珠宝、家具这类生意——情况如果说有什么变化,那就是稍微变得更差了一点。当然,与住宅相关的业务,无论是制砖还是地毯,这些生意至今一点起色都没有。珠宝在圣诞节期间卖得很差,到处都差,沃尔玛、好市多这些地方也不例外,而且之后一直也没好转。所以我觉得——我觉得消费者正在承受汽油价格和食品价格的压力,感觉手头没多少闲钱去花在别的东西上了。
Buffett: I would say that in the retail businesses, we’re in jewelry, in furniture, that sort of thing, I would say that if anything, they’ve gotten a little worse. And, of course, the things connected with housing, whether it’s in brick or whether it’s in carpet, those businesses have shown no uptick at all. And jewelry had a bad Christmas. Everyplace, including places like Wal-Mart and Costco, and it stayed that way. So I think — I think consumers are feeling gas and food prices and not feeling they’ve got a lot of money for other things.
卡尔:沃伦,你知道,多头那边肯定会把目光投向今天开始发放的刺激支票,就今天。他们也在看过去几个月的新屋开工数据,说至少我们在朝房屋销量超过开工量的方向努力。这两件事里,有哪件能让你从中得到一丝宽慰吗?
Carl: You know, the bulls of course, Warren, as you know, are going to point to the stimulus checks that are going to go out today, starting today. They’re looking at some of the housing starts for the past couple months and saying at least we’re working our way toward selling more homes than we’re building. Do you take solace in any of those two things?
巴菲特:这个嘛,这是必须做的事。而且还得持续一段时间才能消化掉那部分积压。你要知道,我们国家每年会新增大概一百万户家庭。只要新开工的住房不到一百万套,我们就能在一定程度上慢慢消耗掉过剩的存量。但问题的根源——我是说,当年的房地产泡沫实在太大了。2006 年,光是优质抵押贷款,通过再融资套现出来的现金就有 3,300 亿美元。也就是说,单是人们从自己房子净值里套取现金这一项,就在 2006 年带来了巨大的刺激。我想这次衰退会相当漫长,程度也相当深,但谁知道呢?
Buffett: Well, that’s what you have to do. And it’s going to have to go for sometime to get rid of the overhang. We do form, you know, whatever it is, a million households every year in this country. And as long as they don’t build a million housing units, we’ll eat away to some extent at the surplus. But the problems were very — I mean the bubble in housing was huge. There was, in 2006, there was $330 billion of cash out, mortgages just in the primaries. So that was a lot of stimulus in 2006 just from people taking equity out of their homes. I think this is going to be fairly long and fairly deep but who knows?
迈克尔·法尔,CNBC《财经论谈》客座主持人:巴菲特先生,我是迈克尔·法尔。我们从华尔街交易员和其他策略师那里听到一种声音,说大概最差的阶段已经过去了,底部已经出现了,我们将面临的只是一场短暂的轻度衰退,很快就会结束。您说我们现在处于衰退之中。您认为这次会是那种迅速反弹的情况吗?我们现在可以开始买入了吗?
Michael Farr, CNBC Squawk Box Guest Host: Mr. Buffett, it’s Michael Farr again. We’re hearing from traders on the street and other strategists that perhaps we’ve seen the worst and we’ve seen the bottom and that we’re going to have this shallow recession and it’s going to be over with quickly. You’ve said we’re in recession. Do you think this is going to be, sort of, one of these short rebounds? Can we start buying now?
巴菲特:这个嘛,我不知道股市接下来会怎么走。我有个总体判断——这倒不是说这是我的专业领域——我总体判断是,这次衰退会比大多数人认为的更漫长、更严重。但股市的走势,往往和经济实际运行的情况并不同步。所以,我不会去预测股市会怎么走。就我从经济中观察到的情况而言,我的感受是,这不会是一场又短又浅的衰退。
Buffett: Well, I don’t know about the stock market in terms of what it will do. My general feeling, and this is not a field of specialty for me, but my general feeling is that the recession will be longer and deeper than most people think. But what the stock market, the stock market often does not behave in sync with what’s going on in business. So, I wouldn’t want to predict what the stock market might do. My feeling from what I see in the economy is that this will not be short and shallow.
贝基:好的。沃伦,再次感谢你今天上午来到我们的节目。沃伦·巴菲特又给我们带来了新闻,伯克希尔·哈撒韦和玛氏联手,即将敲定收购箭牌的交易。沃伦,非常感谢你今天的到来。
Becky: All right. Warren, want to thank you again for joining us this morning. Warren Buffett again with the news on Berkshire Hathaway and Mars teaming up to close a deal to acquire Wrigley. And Warren, thank you very much for coming on today.
巴菲特:谢谢。我这就回去接着嚼我的口香糖、吃我的糖了。
Buffett: Thank you, and I’ll get back to chewing my gum and eating candy.
贝基:箭牌的产品里你有什么偏爱吗?
Becky: Is there a favorite you have with Wrigley?
巴菲特:有啊,我是老派口味。我喜欢留兰香和果味(Juicy Fruit)。
Buffett: Yeah, I’m an old-timer. I like spearmint and Juicy Fruit.
乔:你还看玛氏的产品。士力架。
Joe: You look at Mars, too. Snickers.
巴菲特:士力架,对,我还喜欢新出的德芙巧克力棒,最近连彩虹糖我都吃上了。
Buffett: Snickers, yeah, I love the new Dove bar and I’ve even gotten into Skittles lately.
乔:是吗?
Joe: You have?
贝基:那是我的最爱。
Becky: Those are my favorite.
卡尔:我也喜欢彩虹糖。
Carl: I love Skittles, too.
乔:你们还年轻,可是,你知道,我的补牙填料。彩虹糖会把我牙里的填料粘下来,沃伦。
Joe: You guys are young, but you know, my fillings. They pull my fillings out, Warren.
巴菲特:那没关系。买点牙科诊所公司的股权就行了。
Buffett: That’s okay. Just buy an interest in a dentist firm.
贝基:谢谢,沃伦。
Becky: Thanks, Warren.