2015 年 9 月 CNBC 专访
卡尔·昆塔尼利亚今天是沃伦·巴菲特的年度午餐会。格莱德基金会(GLIDE Foundation)午餐的竞得者支付了逾 230 万美元,只为与这位奥马哈先知共进午餐。现在我们将画面交给贝基·奎克,她就在巴菲特本人身边。
CARL QUINTANILLATHE ANNUAL LUNCH WITH WARREN BUFFETT IS TODAY. THE WINNING BIDDER OF THE GLIDE FOUNDATION LUNCH PAID OVER $2.3 MILLION TO HAVE LUNCH WITH THE ORACLE OF OMAHA. LET'S SEND IT OVER TO BECKY QUICK, WHO IS WITH THE MAN HIMSELF.
贝基·奎克多谢。我们再次为您现场直播,身边正是沃伦·巴菲特。沃伦,花 230 万美元吃一顿午餐,可不是小数目。我知道这笔钱是捐给格莱德基金会的,但你这个约会对象可真是不便宜。
BECKY QUICKTHANK YOU VERY MUCH. AGAIN WE ARE LIVE, WITH WARREN BUFFETT. WARREN, $2.3 MILLION IS A LOT OF MONEY TO PAY FOR A LUNCH. I KNOW IT GOES TO GLIDE, BUT YOU'RE NO CHEAP DATE.
沃伦·巴菲特想想那笔小费该有多少。
WARREN BUFFETTJUST THINK OF THE TIP.
贝基·奎克今天能请到你,我确实非常高兴,因为我们一直在关注市场,市场的波动实在太剧烈了,让人忧心忡忡。就在今天早上,开盘前标普期货一度涨超 350 点。你觉得这到底是怎么回事?为什么会这样?
BECKY QUICKI'M REALLY GLAD THAT WE HAVE YOU HERE TODAY, BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN WATCHING THE MARKETS AND THERE'S BEEN SO MUCH VOLATILITY. SO MUCH CONCERN. EVEN TODAY, THIS MORNING, THE FUTURES AT ONE POINT UP OVER 350 POINTS BEFORE THE MARKET OPENED. WHAT DO YOU THINKI IS HAPPENING? WHY IS THIS TAKING PLACE?
沃伦·巴菲特我对当下市场的走势一窍不通。我完全不知道明天或者下周会发生什么。有时候市场就像现在这样剧烈动荡,有时候又沉闷得让人昏昏欲睡。但重要的是五年、十年之后它会走到哪里。我很有信心,十年后市场会比现在高得多。至于十天或十个月后会怎样,我确实毫无概念。
WARREN BUFFETTI'M NO GOOD ON WHAT'S GOING ON IN MARKETS. I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT WILL HAPPEN TOMORROW OR NEXT WEEK AND SOMETIMES THEY'RE, THEY GET VERY VOLATILE LIKE THIS AND OTHER TIMES THEY PUT YOU TO SLEEP. BUT THE IMPORTANT THING IS WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE IN FIVE OR TEN YEARS. AND I'M CONFIDENT THEY'LL BE CONSIDERABLY HIGHER IN TEN YEARS. AND I REALLY HAVE NO IDEA WHERE THEY'LL IN TEN DAYS OR TEN MONTHS.
贝基·奎克李·库珀曼(Lee Cooperman)今天早上在《财经论谈》(Squawk Box)上说他觉得部分原因在于一些计算机程序引发的强制买入。你觉得这有道理吗?
BECKY QUICKLEE COOPERMAN WAS ON "SQUAWK BOX" THIS MORNING AND HE SAID THAT HE THINKS THAT SOME OF IT IS BECAUSE WHAT'S BEEN HAPPENING WITH SOME OF THE FORCED COMPUTER BUYING THAT'S TAKING PLACE. DO YOU THINK THERE IS ANY TRUTH TO THAT?
沃伦·巴菲特我不知道,我对此了解不多。这对我们其实没什么影响。如果我们买入一只股票,通常都争取按当天成交量的一定比例去买。卖出也是同样的思路,只是我们很少卖。所以,我喜欢下跌的日子,因为可以买得更便宜,我们也不会费心去弄清楚市场到底在发生什么。我在择时这方面从来不在行。
WARREN BUFFETTI DON'T KNOW. I DON'T KNOW THAT MUCH ABOUT IT. IT DOESN'T REALLY MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE TO US, IF WE'RE BUYING A STOCK, WE USUALLY TRY AND BUY A GIVEN PERCENTAGE OF THE VOLUME THAT TRADES THAT DAY. SAME WAY FOR SELLING ALTHOUGH WE DON'T SELL VERY OFTEN. SO DOWN DAYS I LIKE BECAUSE WE BUY THEM CHEAPER AND WE DON'T TRY TO REALLY FIGURE OUT WHAT'S GOING ON IN MARKETS. I'VE NEVER BEEN ANY GOOD AT IT.
贝基·奎克那你有没有把这轮回调视为买入机会呢?
BECKY QUICKHAVE YOU SEEN THIS RECENT PULL-BACK AS A REASON TO BE BUYING?
沃伦·巴菲特嗯,我们买入,是因为看好正在买入的标的的长期前景。如果几周前在 X 价位时我们就看好,现在到了 95% 的 X,我就更看好了;要是再到 90% 的 X,那我岂不是会更喜欢?
WARREN BUFFETTWELL WE, WE'RE BUYING BECAUSE WE LIKE WHAT WE'RE BUYING IN RELATION TO ITS LONG-TERM PROSPECTS IF WE LIKED IT AT X A FEW WEEKS AGO AND IT'S 95% OF X NOW, I LIKE IT EVEN BETTER AND IF IT GOES TO 90% OF X I'LL LIKE IT STILL BETTER?
贝基·奎克你说的是哪只股票?
BECKY QUICKWHAT STOCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
沃伦·巴菲特你大概猜得到名字,但我就不说出来让你觉得无聊了。
WARREN BUFFETTWELL YOU PROBABLY KNOW THE NAME, BUT I WOULDN'T TO BORE YOU WITH IT.
贝基·奎克我记得是 8 月 10 日,我们在电话里聊起过,你当时隐约暗示你在第二季度可能追加买入了 IBM 的股票。后来的持仓文件出来,我们还有点意外,第二季度实际上并没有增持。
BECKY QUICKWHEN WE SPOKE WITH YOU ON THE PHONE BACK ON AUGUST 10 I THINK IT WAS, YOU KIND OF HINTED THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE BEEN BUYING MORE SHARES OF IBM IN THE SECOND QUARTER. THOSE FILINGS CAME OUT AND KIND OF SURPRISED US. THAT THERE WEREN'T ANY ADDITIONAL PURCHASES IN THE SECOND QUARTER
沃伦·巴菲特嗯,在这个问题上我欠你一个交代,因为我当时确实以为那个季度买入了。我们其实是在第一季度买入的。通常我不会告诉你接下来的事,不过我们第三季度又买了一些。我之前真的以为第二季度有买入记录。要不是我当时以为持仓数字会比实际公布的高一点,我也不会那么说。但我确实搞错了。所以我现在必须告诉你,我们在第三季度买了一点,第一季度也的确买了。
WARREN BUFFETTWELL I OWE YOU ONE ON THAT BECAUSE I THOUGHT I WAS BUYING IT IN THAT QUARTER WE BOUGHT IT IN THE FIRST QUARTER. AND NORMALLY I WOULDN'T TELL YOU THIS, BUT WE BOUGHT SOME IN THE THIRD QUARTER. I ACTUALLY THOUGHT THERE WAS PURCHASES IN THE SECOND QUARTER. I WOULDN'T HAVE SAID THAT UNLESS I THOUGHT THE NUMBER WAS GOING TO BE A LITTLE BIT HIGHER. BUT I WAS WRONG. SO I HAVE TO TELL YOU THAT WE HAVE BOUGHT A LITTLE IN THE THIRD QUARTER AND WE DID BUY IT IN THE FIRST QUARTER AS WELL.
贝基·奎克咱们通话是在 8 月 10 日。那么,我可不可以理解为,你在 8 月 10 日之前,也就是市场剧烈波动还没有完全爆发的时候,就已经在第三季度买入了。
BECKY QUICKTHAT WAS AUGUST 10th. SO I TAKE IT YOU WERE BUYING IN THE THIRD QUARTER BEFORE AUGUST 10, EVEN BEFORE THE MARKET VOLATILITY CAME UP.
沃伦·巴菲特具体日期我记得不是特别清楚了,而且我之前就因为没记清的事回答后给自己惹了麻烦。所以我就不再展开了,就按我之前说过的为准,那些话是准确的:我们肯定在第一季度和第三季度买了,第二季度也肯定没有买——尽管我之前隐约觉得我们买了。
WARREN BUFFETTI DON'T REMEMBER THAT EXACTLY AND I GOT IN TROUBLE GIVING AN ANSWER WHERE I DIDN'T REMEMBER PERFECTLY BEFORE. SO I'LL LEAVE IT AT WHAT I SAID WHICH IS TRUE, THAT WE DEFINTELY BOUGHT IT IN THE FIRST QUARTER AND THE THIRD QUARTER AND WE DEFINITELY DID NOT BUY IN THE SECOND QUARTER EVEN THOUGH I KIND OF THOUGHT THAT WE HAD.
贝基·奎克不过你最近在精密铸件公司(Precision Castparts)身上可是投了一大笔钱,显然已经花出去了好几十亿美元。
BECKY QUICKYOU'VE BEEN SPENDING A LOT OF MONEY RECENTLY THOUGH WITH PRECISION CAST PARTS. YOU HAVE OBVIOUSLY SPENT BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
沃伦·巴菲特我们还没花出去,但正准备花。
WARREN BUFFETTWE HAVEN'T SPENT IT YET BUT WE'RE GETTING READY TO SPEND IT.
贝基·奎克那会不会让你现金偏紧?当你看到市场回调 10% 或更多时,要拿出钱来买入比之前便宜 10% 的东西,会不会更难?
BECKY QUICKDOES THAT LEAVE YOU SHORT OF CASH THOUGH. WHEN YOU SEE A PULLBACK OF 10% OR MORE, DOES IT MAKE IT TOUGHER FOR TO YOU COME UP WITH THE MONEY TO BUY THINGS THAT ARE 10% CHEAPER THAN THEY WERE BEFORE.
沃伦·巴菲特我们知道接下来大概四五个月内要掏出 320 亿美元,所以我还有余钱可以买。我永远不会让现金低于 200 亿美元,事实上我甚至不会非常接近那个数,因为我不想低于它,而且我承诺过不会低于它。所以我们在公开市场买入时,可能会稍微不那么积极。但如果我们正在买入,比如每周花 5 亿美元,那么三四周也就 20 亿美元上下,而 320 亿美元才是大头。我并没有因为这笔即将到来的收购而克制自己不去做任何事。
WARREN BUFFETTWE KNOW WE'RE GOING TO BE LAYING OUT 32 BILLION IN THE NEXT PROBABLY FOUR OR FIVE MONTHS SO I'VE STILL GOT MONEY LEFT TO BUY. I'LL NEVER GO BELOW $20 BILLION OF CASH, IN FACT I WON'T EVEN GO VERY CLOSE TO IT BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO GO BELOW IT AND I PROMISED I WON'T GO BELOW IT SO WE MIGHT BE A LITTLE LESS AGGRESSIVE IN BUYING THINGS IN THE OPEN MARKET. BUT IF WE'RE BUYING AND WE'RE SPENDING SAY 500 MILLION A WEEK, IN THREE OR FOUR WEEKS, THAT'S JUST A COUPLE BILLION DOLLARS, SO THE 32 BILLION IS THE BIG CHUNK IT REALLY, I HAVEN'T HELD BACK FROM DOING ANYTHING BECAUSE OF THAT UPCOMING PURCHASE.
贝基·奎克5 亿美元,是伯克希尔正常一周的买入量吗?
BECKY QUICKIS 500 MILLION, IS THAT A NORMAL WEEK AT BERKSHIRE?
沃伦·巴菲特有可能。有时候是 2 亿,有时候会多一点。这取决于——通常股市下跌时,成交量会放大。所以如果我们买入当天 20% 的成交量,在暴跌的日子里,我们每天买入的量会比平时多。所以从我买入的角度,我喜欢成交量大的日子,因为我觉得如果一天买入超过 20%,可能对价格影响太大。另一方面,我又想尽量多买。所以我大致就定在每天 15% 到 20% 这个水平。
WARREN BUFFETTIT CAN BE. SOMETIMES IT'S 200 MILLION. SOMETIMES IT'S A LITTLE MORE. IT DEPENDS ON, USUALLY WHEN STOCKS ARE GOING DOWN, THE VOLUME PICKS UP. SO IF WE'RE BUYING 20% OF THE VOLUME, WE WILL BE BUYING MORE PER DAY ON BIG DOWN DAYS. THAN OTHER DAYS. SO I LIKE HIGH-VOLUME DAYS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF OUR PURCHASES, BECAUSE I THINK IF WE BUY MORE THAN 20% A DAY WE'RE PROBABLY AFFECTING THE PRICE TOO MUCH. AND ON THE OTHER HAND, I LIKE TO BUY AS MUCH AS I CAN GET. SO I SORT OF HIT ON THAT 15 OR 20% A DAY.
贝基·奎克我们来稍微聊聊最近披露的文件里还发现了什么。你现在持有菲利普斯 66 公司价值 45 亿美元的股份?
BECKY QUICKLET'S TALK A LITTLE BIT WHAT ELSE WE FOUND OUT IN THE MOST REEST FILINGS THAT CAME OUT. PHILLIPS 66 YOU NOW \ HAVE A $4.5 BILLION STAKE IN THE COMPANY?
沃伦·巴菲特没错。
WARREN BUFFETTTHAT'S CORRECT.
贝基·奎克发生了什么?你为什么买入它?因为你在 2013 年底用它换一些管道资产,我猜——
BECKY QUICKWHAT HAPPENED, WHY DID YOU BUY INTO THAT BECAUSE THIS IS SOMETHING THAT YOU TRADED OUT YOUR SHARES FOR BACK AT THE END OF 2013 FOR I GUESS SOME PIPELINES THAT YOU WERE --
沃伦·巴菲特我们换股,是在税收优惠的基础上做的。我们不是因为不喜欢这只股票才换的。事实上,我们换股时就挺喜欢它。那是一个机会,可以用一笔交易买入我们非常喜欢的一项资产,而且是免税的,对方也可以免税。我一直打算,只要价格合适,就再买回来。我们确实这么做了。
WARREN BUFFETTWE TRADED THE SHARES, WE WERE ABLE TO DO IT ON A TAX-ADVANTAGED BASIS, WE DIDN'T TRADE THEM BECAUSE WE DISLIKED THE STOCK AT ALL. A MATTER OF FACT I LIKED THE STOCK WHEN WE TRADED IT. IT WAS A CHANCE TO DO A TRANSACTION TO BUY AN ASSET WE LIKED VERY MUCH. TO DO IT ON A TAX-FREE BASIS, THEY COULD DO IT ON A TAX-FREE BASIS AND I HAD ALWAYS INTENDED THAT WE WOULD COME BACK IN. ASSUMING THAT THE PRICE WAS RIGHT. AND WE DID.
贝基·奎克但这一定是非常针对菲利普斯 66 的做法。因为我想你在去年第四季度卖掉了埃克森美孚的股票。
BECKY QUICKIT MUST BE VERY SPECIFIC TO PHILLIPS 66 THOUGH. BECAUSE YOU SOLD YOUR SHARES OF EXXONMOBIL I THINK IN THE FOURTH QUARTER LAST YEAR.
沃伦·巴菲特它们在某种程度上属于不同的业务。菲利普斯 66 没有上游开采业务,而上游开采可能占到埃克森价值的大头。另一方面,菲利普斯 66 也不是纯粹的炼油商。它们有一个很大的化学品部门,还有中游业务。所以我们买它,不是把它当作炼油商来买,当然也不是把它当作一体化石油公司来买。我们买它,是因为我们喜欢这家公司,而且非常喜欢其管理层。自从格雷格·加兰在它从康菲石油分拆出来后接手以来,他干得非常出色。所以我一直很喜欢这家公司。
WARREN BUFFETTTHEY'RE IN DIFFERENT BUSINESSES, TO SOME DEGREE. PHILLIPS 66 HAS NO UPSTREAM PRODUCTION, THAT PROBABLY ACCOUNTS FOR THE BULK OF THE VALUE OF AN EXXON. ON THE OTHER HAND, PHILLIPS 66 IS NOT A PURE REFINER. THEY'VE GOT A BIG CHEMICALS DIVISION, A MID STREAM BUSINESS. SO IT'S NOT, WE'RE NOT BUYING IT AS A REFINER, WE'RE CERTAINLY NOT BUYING IT AS AN INTEGRATED OIL COMPANY WE'RE BUYING IT BECAUSE WE LIKE THE COMPANY AND WE LIKE THE BMANAGEMENT VERY MUCH. EVER SINCE GREG GARLAND HAS TAKE TN OVER AFTER IT SPUN OUT OF CONOCO PHILLIPS, HE'S DONE A TERRIFIC JOB. SO I'VE LIKED THE COMPANY.
贝基·奎克有没有可能你最终会考虑直接收购整家公司?
BECKY QUICKIS IT SOMETHING THAT YOU COULD SEE EVENTUALLY ADDING BY BUYING THE COMPANY OUTRIGHT?
沃伦·巴菲特嗯,那离目前还差得远呢。而且我们永远不会在对方不情愿的情况下对任何公司采取行动。我觉得他们很乐意保持独立。
WARREN BUFFETTWELL, THAT'S A LONG – WOULD BE A LONG STRETCH FROM HERE AND WE NEVER, WE WOULD ONLY DO SOMETHING IN ANY COMPANY IF THE COMPANY WANTED US TO. AND I THINK THEY'RE VERY HAPPY TO BE INDEPENDENT.
贝基·奎克鉴于石油和天然气价格大幅下跌,你目前在石油和天然气领域还看到其他机会吗?
BECKY QUICKARE THERE OTHER OPPORTUNITIES THAT YOU SEE IN THE OIL AND NATURAL GAS POSITIONS AT THIS POINT? JUST BECAUSE OF THE HUGE DROP WE'VE SEEN IN OIL AND GAS.
沃伦·巴菲特我想我们拥有的与石油天然气行业相关的公司,就只有这一家。不过,精密铸件公司(Precision Castparts)为石油行业生产设备,我们的路博润业务也生产用于油气生产的化学品。
WARREN BUFFETTI THINK THAT'S THE ONLY OIL COMPANY THAT'S CONNECTED WITH THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY THAT WE OWN. ALTHOUGH PRECISION CASH PARTS MAKES EQUIPMENT FOR THE OIL INDUSTRY AND OUR LUBRIZOL OPERATION PRODUCES CHEMICALS THAT ARE USED IN OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION.
贝基·奎克沃伦,我们来谈谈经济。因为,上次我们跟你聊的时候,你说你觉得对美联储来说这会是一个相当艰难的抉择。自那以后,出来的经济数据相当亮眼,就业报告和失业率现在到了 5.1%。汽车销售达到了大约 1770 万或 1780 万辆的年化水平,回到了 2007 年之前的水平。所有这些加在一起,构成了一幅经济强劲的画面,然而市场的波动性可能又会让美联储按兵不动。你如何权衡这些因素?
BECKY QUICKWARREN, LET'S TALK ABOUT THE ECONOMY BECAUSE AGAIN, THE LAST TIME WE SPOKE WITH YOU, YOU SAID YOU THOUGHT IT WOULD BE A PRETY TOUGH CALL FOR THE FEDERAL RESERVE. SINCE THEN, YOU'VE HAD FANTASTIC ECONOMIC NEWS THAT'S BEEN COMING OUT WITH THE JOBS REPORT AND UNEMPLOYMENT NOW LOOKING AT ITS 5.1%. YOU'VE HAD AUTO SALES THAT CAME IN AT A RATE OF ABOUT 17.7 OR 17.8 MILLION, WHICH IS BACK TO WHAT WE WERE SEEING IN THE PRE 2007 PERIOD. ALL OF THOSE THINGS ADD UP TO A GREAT ECONOMY, AND YET THE MARKET'S VOLATILITY COULD BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD KEEP THE FED ON PAUSE. HOW DO YOU KIND OF DO THE CALCULUS ON THIS?
沃伦·巴菲特他们从来没请我当美联储的委员,也许他们觉得我根本不懂这个,他们说得没错。我一直都认为他们会行动缓慢,只是因为我们利率持续走强而欧洲想维持低利率,会对全球货币产生影响。在看 GDP 统计的时候你要稍微小心一点。我们谈公司盈利时,如果说是增长了 5%,那都是今年对比去年。而谈 GDP 季度数据的时候,我们说的是环比。如果你看 GDP 的同比数据,增长率是在 2% 多一点,而且一个季度又一个季度地保持这个水平。但是季度数据,当你把它乘以四的时候,微小的变化就会被放大很多。所以无论是当前季度还是上季度的季节性调整,都会在环比报告中极大地影响那些季度数字。我觉得某种程度上看同比数据更好一些。而我们同比数据现在大概在 2.5% 左右,已经持续了,我不知道,大概六个季度吧。所以不管环比数字往哪个方向走,别太激动,得小心点。
WARREN BUFFETTTHEY HAVE NEVER ASKED ME TO BE A MEMBER OF THE FED, MAYBE THEY THINK I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT AND THEY ARE CORRECT. I HAVE ALWAYS THOUGHT THEY WOULD BE SLOW JUST BECAUSE OF THE EFFECT ON CURRENCIES AROUND THE WORLD, IF OUR INTEREST RATES KEEP GETTING STRONGER WHEN EUROPE IS TRYING TO KEEP THEM LOW. ONE THING YOU HAVE TO BE A LITTLE CAREFUL ABOUT IN GDP STATISTICS, WHEN WE TALK ABOUT EARNINGS OF COMPANIES, WE ARE ALWAYS TALKING THIS YEAR VERSUS LAST YEAR IF WE SAY THEY'RE UP 5%. WITH GDP, WHEN WE TALK QUARTERLY, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SEQUENTIAL. IF YOU LOOK AT YEAR-OVER-YEAR FIGURES ON GDP, THEY'RE TWO AND A FRACTION PERCENT, AND THEY'VE BEEN THAT WAY QUARTER AFTER QUARTER AFTER QUARTER. BUT THE QUARTERLY FIGURES, WHEN YOU MULTIPLY SOMETHING BY FOUR, LITTLE CHANGES GET MULTIPLIED A LOT. SO THE SEASONAL ADJUSTMENTS BOTH OF THE CURRENT PERIOD AND THE LAST PERIOD, THEY CONTROL THOSE QUARTERLY NUMBERS A LOT WHEN YOU REPORT SEQUENTIALLY. I THINK IN A WAY IT'S BETTER TO LOOK AT THEM YEAR OVER YEAR. AND YEAR OVER YEAR WE'VE BEEN IN THE 2.5% RANGE NOW FOR, I DON'T KNOW, SIX QUARTERS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO I WOULD BE A LITTLE CAREFUL IN GETTING TOO EXCITED ABOUT QUARTERLY STATISTICS IN EITHER DIRECTION, AS LONG AS YOU'RE LOOKING AT THEM SEQUENTIALLY.
贝基·奎克所以你认为经济未必有我们看到的那些最新数据所显示的那么强劲?
BECKY QUICKSO YOU THINK THE ECONOMY IS NOT NECESSARILY AS STRONG AS THE MOST RECENT NUMBERS WE'VE SEEN?
沃伦·巴菲特我觉得我们还是走在过去六年那条老路上,年增长率在 2% 到略高于 2%,这个增速不算差,但也算不上繁荣。我想我们差不多还是这个样子。
WARREN BUFFETTI THINK WE'RE STILL ON THAT PATH WE'VE BEEN ON FOR SIX YEARS, WHERE IT'S GROWING AT 2 TO A LITTLE BIT BETTER THAN 2% ANNUALLY AND THAT'S NOT A BAD RATE, BUT IT'S NOT A BOOMING RATE EITHER. I THINK THAT'S ABOUT WHERE WE STILL ARE.
贝基·奎克所以对经济来说也许算不上繁荣,但也可能不是一个能支持零利率的经济。我的意思是,零利率是跳楼价,是紧急状况下用的。为什么不脱离零利率呢?
BECKY QUICKSO IT MAY NOT BE A BOOMING RATE FOR THE ECONOMY, BUT IT'S PROBABLY ALSO NOT AN ECONOMY THAT WARRANTS 0% INTEREST RATES. I MEAN THAT'S A FIRE SALE, THAT'S AN EMERGENCY SORT OF SITUATION. WHY NOT MOVE OFF OF ZERO?
沃伦·巴菲特他们很可能会。我不知道。正如我所说,如果我们的利率显著高于欧洲,我不认为这一定会利好美国的出口。在经济学里,你永远不可能只做一件事。总会有个“然后呢”?我觉得,在欧洲试图维持极低利率的时候,我们大幅加息,这件事的“然后呢”会在日后带来一些后果。
WARREN BUFFETTTHEY PROBABLY WILL. I DON'T KNOW. LIKE I SAY, IF OUR RATES GOT SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER THAN EUROPE'S, I WOULD NOT THINK THAT WOULD NECESSARILY BE GOOD FOR EXPORTS FOR THIS COUNTRY. IN ECONOMICS YOU CAN NEVER JUST DO ONE THING. THERE'S ALWAYS AND THEN WHAT? I THINK THE "AND THEN WHAT" OF MOVING RATES UP SUBSTANTIALLY WHILE EUROPE IS TRYING TO KEEP THEM VERY LOW, IS GOING TO HAVE SOME CONSEQUENCES DOWN THE LINE.
贝基·奎克你觉得这届美联储的任务不一样了吗?事情是不是真的变得如此全球化,以至于在一定程度上超出了美联储的掌控?
BECKY QUICKDO YOU THINK THIS FED HAS A DIFFERENT JOB? HAVE THINGS REALLY GOTTEN THAT MUCH MORE GLOBAL AND KIND OF OUT OF THE FED'S CONTROL?
沃伦·巴菲特我认为他们必须通盘考虑。这是我的意思,那是他们的工作,他们在看很多我不看的东西,而且我敢肯定,在很多事情上,他们能获得更好的信息。所以我并不羡慕他们的工作。而且,在某种程度上,也许从他们的言论看,他们已将自己推到了一个现在不得不做点事情的境地。但如果我处在那个位置上,我不会采取特别激进的行动。
WARREN BUFFETTI THINK THEY'D HAVE TO THINK ABOUT EVERYTHING. I MEAN THAT'S THEIR JOB AND THEY'RE LOOKING AT A LOT OF THINGS THAT I'M NOT LOOKING AT AND THEY MORE GET BETTER INFORMATION I'M SURE ON LOTS OF THINGS. SO I DON'T ENVY THEIR JOB AND TO SOME EXTENT MAYBE BY THEIR COMMENTARY, THEY'VE SORT OF PUSHED THEMSELVES INTO SOMETHING WHERE THEY HAVE TO DO A LITTLE BIT SOMETHING HERE. BUT I WOULD NOT BE TERRIBLY AGGRESSIVE IF I WERE IN THAT POSITION.
贝基·奎克有些人属于这样的阵营:主张加息 25 个基点,然后就收手,长时间按兵不动。这在理论上讲得通。但市场并不知道你究竟在做什么,除非他们一天天观察你的行动。
BECKY QUICKSO THERE ARE SOME PEOPLE WHO ARE IN THE CAMP OF RAISE IT 25 BASIS POINTS AND THEN BACK OFF AND DON'T DO ANYTHING FOR A LONG TIME. WHICH IS FINE IN THEORY. BUT THE MARKET DOESN'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE DOING UNTIL THEY WATCH ON A DAY-TO-DAY BASIS.
沃伦·巴菲特我做决策,从来不是基于我认为美联储短期或长期会做什么。我的意思是,这根本就不在考虑之列。在我们决定收购精密铸件公司(Precision Castparts)时,我和我的合伙人查理,或者我们的董事会,没有一句话谈到美联储的动向。我们收购 Phillips 66 时也一样。
WARREN BUFFETTI'VE NEVER MADE A DECISION BASED ON WHAT I THINK THE FED IS GOING TO DO NEAR-TERM OR LONGER-TERM. I MEAN IT JUST DOESN'T ENTER. WHEN WE DECIDED TO BUY PRECISION CASH PARTS, THERE WASN'T ONE WORD OF CONVERSATION WITH MY PARTNER, CHARLIE OR WITH OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS ABOUT FED ACTION. AND THE SAME THING GOES WITH OUR PURCHASE OF PHILLIPS PETROLEUM. PHILLIPS 66.
贝基·奎克今年五月,在奥马哈的伯克希尔股东大会期间,我和你跟比尔·盖茨聊过,你们俩都说,股市是否处于合理估值,取决于利率的走向。
BECKY QUICKIN MAY, WHEN I SPOKE WITH YOU AND BILL GATES IN OMAHA FOR THE BERKSHIRE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU BOTH SAID THAT WHETHER THE STOCK MARKET WAS FAIRLY VALUED OR NOT DEPENDED ON WHAT HAPPENED WITH INTEREST RATES.
沃伦·巴菲特没错。
WARREN BUFFETTCORRECT.
贝基·奎克那么,如果利率从现在开始上升,会不会改变你对股市整体的看法?
BECKY QUICKSO IF INTEREST RATES GO UP FROM HERE, DOES THAT CHANGE YOUR PERSPECTIVE ABOUT THE STOCK MARKET OVERALL?
沃伦·巴菲特如果只上升 100 个基点,不会。如果上升 400 或 500 个基点,那就会改变很多。
WARREN BUFFETTNOT IF THEY GO UP 100 BASIS POINTS. IF THEY GO UP 400 OR 500 BASIS POINTS THAT CHANGES A LOT.
贝基·奎克但在眼下,就算我们看到 100——就像一个百分点——
BECKY QUICKBUT AT THIS POINT, EVEN IF WE WERE TO SEE 100 – LIKE A 1 POINT –
沃伦·巴菲特100 个基点,并不——如果利率——如果你向我保证,未来 20 年利率将比现在高 100 个基点,我会疯狂地买入股票。
WARREN BUFFETT100 BASIS POINTS, IS NOT – IF INTEREST RATES, IF YOU GUARANTEE ME INTEREST RATES WOULD BE AT 100 BASIS POINTS HIGHER THAN THIS FOR THE NEXT 20 YEARS, I WOULD BE BUYING STOCKS HAND OVER FIST.
贝基·奎克我们知道你参与了很多股票。美国银行就是其中之一。我记得你持有的是无投票权股份和认股权证?
BECKY QUICKWE KNOW THAT THERE ARE A LOT OF STOCKS THAT YOU'VE BEEN INVOLVED WITH. BANK OF AMERICA IS ONE OF THEM. I THINK YOU OWN NONVOTING SHARES AND WARRANTS?
沃伦·巴菲特对,无投票权股份。
WARREN BUFFETTYEAH, NONVOTING SHARES.
贝基·奎克所以你没有机会就这事投票,但我们还是会问你看法。美国银行,围绕布莱恩·莫伊尼汉(Brian Moynihan)同时出任 CEO 和董事长一事争议很大。这有违 2009 年一次要求这两个职位分设的股东投票决议。现在他们准备直接征求股东意见。你怎么看?
BECKY QUICKSO YOU WON'T GET THE CHANCE TO VOTE THIS, BUT WE'LL ASK YOU YOUR OPINION ANYWAY. BANK OF AMERICA, THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF TURMOIL ABOUT THE IDEA OF BRIAN MOYNIHAN TAKING THE ROLE OF BOTH CEO AND CHAIRMAN. IT WENT AGAINST A 2009 PROXY VOTE THAT WAS TO KEEP THOSE TWO ROLES SEPARATE. NOW THEY'RE GOING TO BE ASKING SHAREHOLDERS DIRECTLY. WHAT DO YOU THINK?
沃伦·巴菲特如果我能投票,我会按管理层的建议投,也就是让布莱恩同时担任 CEO 和董事长。
WARREN BUFFETTWELL IF I COULD VOTE, I WOULD VOTE AS MANAGEMENT SUGGESTS, WHICH IS TO HAVE BRIAN TAKE ON THE CEO AND CHAIRMAN JOB.
贝基·奎克那这件事的具体操作方式你有没有不舒服?董事会就这么做了,直接无视 2009 年那次具有约束力的股东投票?
BECKY QUICKARE YOU BOTHERED BY THE IDEA OF JUST HOW IT WAS DONE? HOW THE BOARD DID THIS AND IGNORED WHAT WAS A BINDING PROXY VOTE FROM 2009?
沃伦·巴菲特我想他们现在是把这事重新交回给股东决定了,所以我并不介意——我不认为这是什么了不得的事。我认为布莱恩所做的,他已经做到的,是接手了一家一塌糊涂的公司,我的意思是,这家公司当时几乎已经被毁掉了,公众恨它,政府也恨它。各种诉讼铺天盖地,员工士气极其低落。而他让公司起死回生,我认为他的工作做得极为出色。如果他要兼任董事长,老天保佑他。
WARREN BUFFETTI GUESS THEY'RE PUTTING IT BACK TO THE SHAREHOLDERS NOW, SO I'M NOT BOTHERED – I DO NOT THINK THAT'S A BIG DEAL. I THINK THAT WHAT BRIAN DOES, BRIAN HAS DONE, HE TOOK A COMPANY THAT WAS JUST A TERRIBLE MESS, I MEAN IT'S BEEN VIRTUALLY DESTROYED, THE PUBLIC HATED IT, THE GOVERNMENT HATED IT. THEY HAD ALL KINDS OF LAWSUITS COMING IN AND EMPLOYEE MORALE WAS TERRIBLE. AND HE'S RESUSCITATED IT AND I THINK HE HAS DONE A FIRST CLASS JOB. AND IF HE IS THE CHAIRMAN AS WELL AS THE CEO, GOD BLESS HIM.
贝基·奎克那是一家深陷危机的公司。作为一个在商界打拼多年的人,你自己也经历过一两次危机。我记得你甚至总结出一条信条,让大家去坚守:先把事情做对,然后做快、做完,但首先要做对。这一直是你的处事方式。
BECKY QUICKIT WAS A COMPANY IN CRISIS AND AS SOMEBODY WHO HAS BEEN IN BUSINESS FOR A LONG TIME YOU'VE BEEN THROUGH A CRISIS OR TWO YOURSELF. AND I THINK YOU'VE EVEN COME UP WITH A MOTTO THAT YOU TELL PEOPLE TO STICK WITH: GET IT RIGHT, GET IT FAST, GET IT OVER, BUT GET IT RIGHT FIRST. AND THAT HAS BEEN YOUR WAY.
沃伦·巴菲特对,你得先把事情做对,然后做快,公布出去,让它翻篇。但首先必须做对。这也就是他一直在努力做的。
WARREN BUFFETTYEAH, YOU GOT TO GET IT RIGHT, THEN GET IT FAST, GET IT OUT AND GET IT OVER. BUT YOU GOT TO GET IT RIGHT FIRST. AND THAT'S WHAT HE'S WORKED AT DOING.
贝基·奎克你觉得希拉里·克林顿(Hillary Clinton)处理电邮事件的时候,也是这么做的吗?
BECKY QUICKDO YOU THINK THAT'S WHAT HILLARY CLINTON HAS DONE WITH THE EMAIL SITUATION?
沃伦·巴菲特这个嘛,话题有点滑。要我说的话,不,我认为那是个错误。架设私人服务器就是个错误,我认为是个错误。她第一次谈到这件事时,承认过自己原本会换一种做法,我觉得在这种事情上最好就是非常直截了当。就说我犯了个错误,而且你知道,万幸的是,并没有因此导致任何安全或机密泄露。但最好的办法就是让这事过去。
WARREN BUFFETTWELL THAT'S SLIPPERY. I WOULD SAY THAT NO, I WOULD SAY IT WAS A MISTAKE. IT WAS A MISTAKE TO HAVE THE PRIVATE SERVER AND I THINK IT WAS A MISTAKE. IN THE FIRST TALK SHE ACKNOWLEDGED THE FACT SHE WOULD HAVE DONE IT DIFFERENTLY, I THINK IT'S BETTER JUST TO BE VERY BLUNT IN THOSE KIND OF SITUATIONS. SAY I MADE A MISTAKE AND YOU KNOW, FORTUNATELY, IT DID NOT RESULT IN ANY BREACH OF SECURITY OR CONFIDENTIAL. BUT THE BEST THING TO DO IS GET IT BEHIND YOU.
贝基·奎克这事已经拖了好几个月。而且就在上个月,她还在拿它开玩笑。有点把它比作 Snapchat。你作为支持者,这会让你不舒服吗?
BECKY QUICKIT'S BEEN MONTHS AND MONTHS OF THIS. AND AS RECENTLY AS LAST MONTH SHE WAS MAKING JOKES ABOUT IT. KIND OF COMPARING IT TO SNAPCHAT. DOES THAT BOTHER YOU AS A SUPPORTER?
沃伦·巴菲特谈不上不舒服,但我不认为这是最好的处理方式。不过并没有让我不舒服。关于希拉里,我在意的是如果她成为美国总统会做些什么,以及她有没有能力做到。就这两方面来说,我是她极其坚定的支持者。
WARREN BUFFETTIT DOESN'T BOTHER ME, BUT I DON'T THINK IT WAS THE BEST WAY TO HANDLE IT. BUT IT DOESN'T BOTHER ME. WHAT I CARE ABOUT WITH HILLARY IS I CARE ABOUT WHAT SHE WOULD DO IF SHE WERE PRESIDENT OF THE STATES AND HER ABILITY TO DO IT IF SHE BECOMES PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. AND I THINK IN THOSE BOTH RESPECTS, I'M A TERRIFIC SUPPORTER.
贝基·奎克我们一直在跟踪她的民调数字,最新的民调显示,伯尼·桑德斯(Bernie Sanders)在新罕布什尔州和艾奥瓦州实际上已经领先于她了。你对此感到意外吗?
BECKY QUICKWE'VE BEEN WATCHING HER POLL NUMBERS, THE MOST RECENT POLL SHOWS THAT YOU ACTUALLY HAVE BERNIE SANDERS WHO HAS TAKEN A LEAD OVER HER IN NEW HAMPSHIRE AND IOWA. ARE YOU SURPRISED BY THAT?
沃伦·巴菲特嗯,我是有些意外,但我认为伯尼·桑德斯是一位极其出色的竞选者。我觉得他竞选的方式,恰恰是我如果作为一个候选人,会希望自己能做到的那种。
WARREN BUFFETTWELL I'M SURPRISED, BUT I THINK BERNIE SANDERS HAS BEEN A TERRIFIC CAMPAIGNER. I THINK HE CAMPAIGNS EXACTLY AS I WOULD HOPE THAT I WOULD CAMPAIGN IF I WERE A CANDIDATE.
贝基·奎克怎么说?
BECKY QUICKHOW SO?
沃伦·巴菲特嗯,他一直坦诚直率。他没有去攻击其他候选人。他没有——他没有到处去说别人的坏话。他只是说,这是我的政见。如果我当选,我希望任何法官都承诺推翻“公民联合会案”,我关心所有那些被时代落下的人。我认为他展开了一场堪称典范的竞选。他不会胜选,但我认为他——我钦佩他。
WARREN BUFFETTWELL, HE'S BEEN FORTHRIGHT. HE'S NOT BEEN KNOCKING THE OTHER CANDIDATES. HE DOESN'T – HE'S NOT GOING AROUND SAYING NASTY THINGS ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE. HE'S JUST SAYING HERE'S MY PROGRAM. IF I GET ELECTED I WOULD WANT TO HAVE ANY JUDGE BE PLEDGED TO GETTING RID OF CITIZENS UNITED THAT I CARE ABOUT ALL THE PEOPLE THAT ARE BEING LEFT BEHIND. I THINK HE'S RUN A MODEL CAMPAIGN. HE'S NOT GOING TO GET ELECTED, BUT I THINK HE – I ADMIRE HIM.
贝基·奎克说到乔·拜登(Joe Biden)有可能参选,你认识他吗?你觉得他怎么样?
BECKY QUICKIN TERMS OF JOE BIDEN POTENTIALLY GETTING INTO THE RACE, DO YOU KNOW HIM? WHAT DO YOU THINK OF HIM?
沃伦·巴菲特我这辈子大概只见过他一两次。他两次竞选总统,在政坛待了 40 年。一个人都两次竞选总统、还当上副总统了,要是觉得自己有希望,有相当希望的话,不可能不去考虑再次参选。我肯定他正在权衡这件事。再说他还有一些个人问题要处理,但我认为,如果他认为有相当机会拿到提名,他会参选的。不过随着时间一周一周过去,难度确实在加大。
WARREN BUFFETTI PROBABLY ONLY MET HIM ONCE OR TWICE IN MY LIFE. HE'S RUN FOR PRESIDENT TWICE. HE SPENT 40 YEARS IN POLITICS. NOBODY RUNS FOR PRESIDENT TWICE AND GETS TO BE VICE PRESIDENT THAT DOESN'T CONSIDER RUNNING AGAIN, IF THEY THINK THEY HAVE A CHANCE, A REASONABLE CHANCE. AND I'M SURE THAT'S WHAT HE'S WEIGHING. PLUS HE HAS ALL THE PERSONAL PROBLEMS TO DEAL AS WELL, BUT I THINK IF HE THINKS THERE'S A REASONABLE CHANCE OF GETTING THE NOMINATION, I THINK HE'LL RUN. BUT IT DOES GET TOUGHER AS THE WEEKS GO BY.
贝基·奎克你说的个人问题,是指他儿子的去世——他还在努力迈过这道坎?
BECKY QUICKTHE PERSONAL PROBLEMS, YOU MEAN THE DEATH OF HIS SON – STILL GETTING PAST THAT?
沃伦·巴菲特对,那确实是非常、非常——而且他儿子生前对他说,希望他能参选。这实际上又给他多压了一层担子。
WARREN BUFFETTYES I MEAN THAT IS A VERY, VERY – AND HIS SON EXPRESSING TO HIM THAT HE HOPED HE WOULD RUN. THAT'S AN ADDED BURDEN IN EFFECT.
贝基·奎克我们一直在密切关注唐纳德·特朗普,我知道我们跟你聊过——
BECKY QUICKWE HAVE BEEN WATCHING DONALD TRUMP VERY CLOSELY AND I KNOW WE'VE SPOKEN WITH YOU –
沃伦·巴菲特你和另外 3.2 亿美国人都在密切关注,没错。
WARREN BUFFETTYOU AND 320 MILLION OTHER AMERICANS, YEAH.
贝基·奎克对。你看他的新闻发布会吗?
BECKY QUICKYEAH. DO YOU WATCH HIS PRESS CONFERENCES?
沃伦·巴菲特哦,当然看。你怎么可能不看呢?
WARREN BUFFETTOH SURE. HOW YOU CANNOT WATCH THEM?
贝基·奎克他前几天说了句很有意思的话。他说杰布·布什和希拉里·克林顿都被亿万富翁和特殊利益集团收买了。你应该支持他的理由,正是因为他不像那些人一样被你这样的人收买。你怎么看?他确实戳中了某种——
BECKY QUICKHE SAID SOMETHING VERY INTERESTING THE OTHER DAY. HE SAID THAT JEB BUSH AND HILLARY CLINTON ARE OWNED BY BILLIONAIRES AND BY SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS. THAT THE REASON YOU SHOULD SUPPORT HIM IS BECAUSE HE'S NOT OWNED BY PEOPLE LIKE YOU. WHAT DO YOU THINK? HE'S TAPPED INTO SOMETHING –
沃伦·巴菲特不。这个,我不信这是真的。我认为亿万富翁和特殊利益集团在政治中拥有的影响力,总体上比我希望的要大,我确实觉得“公民联合会”那案子像是在大坝上开了个口子。但要说到那两个人里任何一个被收买,那就不符合事实了。
WARREN BUFFETTNO. WELL, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT'S TRUE. I BELIEVE THAT BILLIONAIRES AND SPECIAL INTERESTS HAVE A GREATER INFLUENCE IN POLITICS GENERALLY THAN I WOULD LIKE THEM TO HAVE AND I THINK CITIZENS UNITED REALLY SORT OF OPENED THE BARN DOOR ON THAT. BUT IN TERMS OF EITHER ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE BEING OWNED, THAT WOULD NOT BE TRUE.
贝基·奎克不过,就他能打动人的那部分来说,他确实跟某些民众建立起了实实在在的联系。
BECKY QUICKIN TERMS OF WHAT HE'S ABLE TO TAP INTO, THOUGH, THERE'S SOMETHING THAT HE'S REALLY CONNECTED WITH.
沃伦·巴菲特那肯定的。
WARREN BUFFETTTHAT'S FOR SURE.
贝基·奎克对现有体制不满的人,他们喜欢局外人。实际上,我看共和党的民调,要是把特朗普、菲奥里纳和卡森加在一起,支持他们的共和党选民超过了一半。
BECKY QUICKFOR UPSET WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT, THEY LIKE PEOPLE FROM THE OUTSIDE. AND IN FACT I THINK IN THE REPUBLICAN POLLS, IF YOU TAKE TRUMP, FIORINA AND CARSON AND ADD THEM UP, IT'S MORE THAN HALF OF THE REPUBLICAN VOTERS WHO ARE SUPPORTING THEM.
沃伦·巴菲特没错。三个从未担任过公职的人。美国民众有一种情绪,甚至可能蔓延到了民主党那边的选战,虽然桑德斯是当过官的。就是那种“我受够了,我就要换个不一样的”情绪。
WARREN BUFFETTRIGHT. THREE PEOPLE THAT HAVE NEVER HELD AN OFFICE. THE FEELING OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, AND THAT MAY EVEN EXTEND INTO THE DEMOCRATIC RACE, ALTHOUGH SANDERS HAS BEEN IN. THERE'S A FEELING I'M FED UP SO I WANT SOMETHING ELSE.
贝基·奎克你觉得接下来会怎样?这局面会如何收场?因为这次跟我们以前见过的确实有点不太一样。
BECKY QUICKWHAT DO YOU THINK HAPPENS? HOW DOES THAT PLAY OUT? BECAUSE THIS IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT FROM WHAT WE HAVE SEEN BEFORE.
沃伦·巴菲特共和党的选战让我想起在游乐园里看着小孩们玩碰碰车。眼前是 1700 辆碰碰车在一块儿撞来撞去。我觉得最后自然会见分晓,但毫无疑问,你现在看到的局面,反映出美国民众对华盛顿的政客——也许在一定程度上也对媒体——普遍相当不满。
WARREN BUFFETTTHE REPUBLICAN RACE REMINDS ME OF BEING AT AN AMUSEMENT PARK AND WATCHING ALL THE KIDS IN BUMPER CARS. YOU'VE GOT 1700 BUMPER CARS SMACKING INTO EACH OTHER. AND I THINK IT WILL GET SORTED OUT, BUT THERE'S NO QUESTION THAT WHAT YOU'RE SEEING IS INDICATIVE OF A LOT OF DISSATISFACTION IN THE COUNTRY WITH WASHINGTON POLITICIANS AND PERHAPS THE MEDIA TO SOME EXTENT, TOO.
贝基·奎克好,沃伦,你今天抽出这么多时间,非常谢谢你。我们真的很感激。
BECKY QUICKOK WELL, WARREN, I WANT TO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME TODAY. WE REALLY APPRECIATE IT.
沃伦·巴菲特好的,谢谢。
WARREN BUFFETTOK. THANK YOU.
贝基·奎克我们希望你午餐愉快。
BECKY QUICKAND WE HOPE YOU ENJOY YOUR LUNCH.
沃伦·巴菲特会的。谢谢。关于 CNBC:通过 CNBC 美国、CNBC 亚太、CNBC 欧洲、中东和非洲、CNBC World 和 CNBC HD,CNBC 是公认的全球商业新闻领导者,向全球约 3.71 亿个家庭提供实时金融市场报道和商业信息,其中包括美国和加拿大超过 1 亿个家庭。CNBC 还每天向中国 4 亿个家庭提供商业资讯。该频道在北美每天直播 15 小时的商业节目(工作日美国东部时间早上 4:00 至晚上 7:00),节目在 CNBC 位于新泽西州恩格尔伍德克利夫斯的全球总部制作,内容涵盖 CNBC 全球新闻局发回的报道。CNBC 晚间节目融合全新的纪实类节目、CNBC 独家制作的热门系列节目以及多部独具特色的自制纪录片。CNBC 还拥有庞大的数字产品组合,通过多种平台提供实时金融市场新闻和信息。这些产品包括全球商业门户网站 CNBC.com;提供实时全球市场数据和 CNBC 全球节目直播观看的高级集成桌面/移动服务 CNBC PRO;以及一系列 CNBC 移动产品,包括 CNBC 实时行情 iPhone 和 iPad 应用。媒体人士可通过 NBC 环球媒体村网站 http://www.nbcumv.com/mediavillage/networks/cnbc/ 获取更多关于 CNBC 及其节目的信息。有保密新闻线索?我们希望听到您的声音。订阅免费新闻通讯,获取更多 CNBC 内容直达您的收件箱。获取此内容直达收件箱,以及关于我们产品和服务的更多信息。© 2026 Versant Media, LLC. 版权所有。Versant Media 旗下公司。数据为实时快照 *数据至少延迟 15 分钟。全球商业和金融新闻、股票报价、市场数据和分析。数据亦由
WARREN BUFFETTI WILL. THANK YOU. About CNBC: With CNBC in the U.S., CNBC in Asia Pacific, CNBC in Europe, Middle East and Africa, CNBC World and CNBC HD , CNBC is the recognized world leader in business news and provides real-time financial market coverage and business information to approximately 371 million homes worldwide, including more than 100 million households in the United States and Canada. CNBC also provides daily business updates to 400 million households across China. The network's 15 live hours a day of business programming in North America (weekdays from 4:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. ET) is produced at CNBC's global headquarters in Englewood Cliffs, N.J., and includes reports from CNBC News bureaus worldwide. CNBC at night features a mix of new reality programming, CNBC's highly successful series produced exclusively for CNBC and a number of distinctive in-house documentaries. CNBC also has a vast portfolio of digital products which deliver real-time financial market news and information across a variety of platforms. These include CNBC.com, the online destination for global business; CNBC PRO, the premium, integrated desktop/mobile service that provides real-time global market data and live access to CNBC global programming; and a suite of CNBC Mobile products including the CNBC Real-Time iPhone and iPad Apps. Members of the media can receive more information about CNBC and its programming on the NBC Universal Media Village Web site at http://www.nbcumv.com/mediavillage/networks/cnbc/. Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you. Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inbox Get this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. © 2026 Versant Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. A Versant Media Company. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes.
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by