2017 年 Charlie Rose:Bill Gates and Warren Buffett
比尔·盖茨和沃伦·巴菲特
Bill Gates and Warren Buffett
2017 年 1 月 27 日,星期五
Friday 01/27/2017
https://charlierose.com/videos/29774
https://charlierose.com/videos/29774
与伯克希尔·哈撒韦的沃伦·巴菲特和比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会的比尔·盖茨——共同发起慈善事业“捐赠誓言”的两位——共度一小时。
An hour with Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway and Bill Gates of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, co-founders of the philanthropic cause the Giving Pledge.
查理·罗斯:比尔·盖茨和沃伦·巴菲特来到了我们节目。盖茨是比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会的联合主席,该基金会专注于教育、贫困和全球健康领域。沃伦·巴菲特是伯克希尔·哈撒韦的董事长兼首席执行官,这家公司是过去五十年来最成功的公司之一。众所周知,两人已是超过 25 年的挚友。2010 年,他们共同发起了“捐赠誓言”,这项倡议鼓励全球最富有的人将大部分财富捐给慈善事业。巴菲特在 2006 年承诺将大部分财富捐给盖茨基金会,此后已向慈善机构捐赠超过 240 亿美元。我很高兴能再次邀请他们两位坐在这个桌前。欢迎二位。我必须声明,为了充分透明,我们不久前在哥伦比亚大学刚为上千名学生做过类似的活动。你们此前也做过这样的事。年轻人怀有好奇心和兴趣,想知道如何向你们学习,想知道如果你们重新开始会怎么做,想知道关于价值观的问题——这其中有种特别的力量。你们做了很多这样的交流。
Charlie Rose: Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are here. Gates is the co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The philanthropy focuses on education, poverty, and global health. Warren Buffett is Chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway. The company is one of the most successful companies of the last five decades. The two have famously been friends for more than 25 years. Together they started the Giving Pledge in 2010, the initiative encourages the world's richest to donate the majority of their wealth to philanthropic causes. Buffet pledged the bulk of his wealth to the Gates Foundation in 2006, and has since given more than $24 billion to charities. I am pleased to have both of them back at this table. Welcome. And I have to say in the interest of full disclosure, we just did something like this at Columbia University with a thousand students. You two do this before. There is something special about the curiosity and the interest of young people wanting to know how do they learn from you. Wanting to know if you were starting over what would you do? Wanting to know about values. You do a lot of this.
沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,说到友谊,我们是在 1991 年 7 月 5 日认识的,一见如故。比尔一开始有点不情愿,但后来也就欣然接受了。
Warren Buffett: Well, about the friendship, we met on July 5, 1991, and hit it off immediately. Bill was a little reluctant at first, but he got there.
查理·罗斯:并不想来。
Charlie Rose: Reluctant to come.
沃伦·巴菲特:对,要不是他母亲,我们俩很可能根本不会认识。从那以后,我们一直相处得很愉快。我们在很多事情上合作,尤其是在“捐赠誓言”上,其他方面也一样。我得说,这一切的结果都很圆满。
Warren Buffett: Yes, if it wasn't for his mother, we probably wouldn't know each other. And we have had a good time ever since. And we've cooperated on, particularly on the Giving Pledge, but other things as well. And I have to say, everything about it has turned out well.
查理·罗斯:他是你的董事会成员。
Charlie Rose: He sits on your board.
沃伦·巴菲特:他是伯克希尔董事会成员,我们聊很多事情,特别开心。但我们那些讨论中真正催生的最大成果,其实是“捐赠誓言”。这个计划的结果远超我当初的预期,查理。我是说,我当时想,如果能拉到三四十个人就不错了——
Warren Buffett: He sits on the Berkshire board, and we have a lot of fun talking about a lot of things. But the big thing that really came out of one of those discussions really was the Giving Pledge. That's worked out so much better than I ever anticipated, Charlie. I mean, I thought if we got 30, 40 people, you know--
查理·罗斯:那你们现在已经有多少——
Charlie Rose: And how many have you --
沃伦·巴菲特:我想现在大概有 156 位成员了,差不多这个数。而且,我们现在已经扩展到了美国以外,这我一开始真没料到。我们的成员们正在学习如何进行更有效的慈善事业。他们了解到哪些做法行不通,也了解到那些富裕的家族内部是怎么处理这些事的。结果比我六七年前预想的要好太多了。
Warren Buffett: I think we're at 156 or something like that. And the people -- and now we've gone beyond the borders of the United States, which I didn't feel would originally happen. And people are learning more, our members, about effective philanthropy. They're learning about things that didn't work. They're learning about how people handle, within their families, wealthy families, and it's just worked out so much better than I would've guessed six years ago or seven years ago.
查理·罗斯:你们两位都说过——得益于成功和技术,现在有很多年纪轻轻就腰缠万贯的人。
Charlie Rose: Both of you have made the point that there are a lot -- because of success and technology, there are a lot of people with a lot of money who are much younger.
比尔·盖茨:是的,这些公司做得这么好,是件很棒的事。而且整体来看,我会说这是一个特别有慈善精神的群体。我本人直到 45 岁才做出巨额捐赠。而他们中的一些人,三十多岁就已经在做很了不起的事情了。
Bill Gates: Yes, it's a great thing that these companies are doing so well. And as a group, I would say it's a particularly philanthropic group. I didn't give huge gifts until I was 45. Some of them in their 30s are already doing amazing things.
查理·罗斯:那你为什么——如果“不情愿”这个词合用的话——在此之前一直不太情愿做捐赠呢?
Charlie Rose: Why were you -- if the word is reluctant, reluctant to give earlier than that?
比尔·盖茨:我一直没花时间去了解哪些领域能产生巨大回报,而且当时我满脑子都是微软。直到快四十岁的时候,在妻子梅琳达的鼓励下,我才开始研究慈善,和她一起讨论。我们原本知道,自己到六十岁时肯定会做慈善,但在学习过程中,我们决定应该把时间表提前。而且,你知道,我们找到了很多我们认为能够产生重大影响力的途径。
Bill Gates: I hadn't taken the time to understand where the huge payoffs were, and I was pretty maniacal about Microsoft. And only in my late 30s, with some encouragement from my wife Melinda, did I start to study it, talk with her about it. We knew we would do it by the time I was 60, but as we were doing that learning we decided we should accelerate it and, you know, we found a lot of ways that we thought we could have high impact.
查理·罗斯:而那个原则,某种程度上,使命的召唤就是——所有生命都是平等的。
Charlie Rose: And the principle, sort of, mission call was that all lives are equal.
比尔·盖茨:没错。而且美国之外的很多投资,都用来挽救生命,让孩子们健康成长。
Bill Gates: That's right. And a lot of that outside the United States has gone to save lives and have kids grow up to be healthy.
查理·罗斯:你是怎么决定要把钱捐给盖茨基金会,而不是成立自己的基金会,再找人来运作、做你想做的事?
Charlie Rose: How did you decide that you would rather give your money to the Gates Foundation than create some foundation of your own, and go out and find people to run it and do whatever you wanted to do.
沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,我和第一任妻子苏西在 50 多年前就创立了一个基金会,我们从二十几岁时就开始聊这件事。我一直以为自己会早走,没想到没走成——我跟她说,如果我按自己期望的速度让钱复利增长,以后会积累出相当大一笔钱,你擅长把钱花出去,我擅长赚钱,那就我先赚,你来花。她觉得这说法一半是借口,一半倒也有道理。(笑声)
Warren Buffett: Well, my first wife, Susie and I actually started a foundation over 50 years ago, and we had talked about it since we were in our 20s. And I always thought I'd be red sheeted, didn't think I would be, but -- and I said to her, if I compound money at the rate I hope to compound money, there will be really large sums later on, and you're good at giving it away, I'm good at making it, so I'll make it first and you give it away. And she thought that was sort of half a cop-out and half logical. (LAUGHTER)
查理·罗斯:而且很可能早就告诉过你了。
Charlie Rose: And probably told you so.
沃伦·巴菲特:是的,确实如此。所以我们做了一件事,就像我说的,那是在 50 多年前开始的,但我当时确实认为后面会有大笔资金,而且她特别擅长与人共情,理解他们的需求,投入个人精力,方方面面都是。她在捐钱方面会比我做得更好,但她于 2004 年去世了,这你也知道。于是我不得不重新思考自己要怎么做。所以在 2006 年,我决定,基本上,五家基金会,其中比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会是最大的,我在寻找那些在慈善事业上和我有相似目标的人。而每个生命都具有同等价值这个理念,对我来说是根本性的。你知道,凭你的运气,你也能交好运。
Warren Buffett: Yeah, absolutely. And so we did something, like I say, it was started over 50 years ago, but I really thought that there would be large sums later on, and that she was particularly good at empathizing with people, understanding their needs, putting the personal energy into it, everything. She would be better at giving away money than I would be, and she died in 2004, as you know. So then I had to re-think what I was going to do. And so in 2006, I decided that, essentially, five foundations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation being the largest, and I'm looking for people that had similar goals with philanthropy that what I had. And the idea that every life is of equal value is just fundamental to me. You know, with your luck you can be lucky.
查理·罗斯:而且你知道比尔会把它经营好。
Charlie Rose: And you knew Bill would run it well.
沃伦·巴菲特:哦,那当然。我是说,他投进了自己的钱——这是件大事。但远不止于此,你想想看,两个年轻得多的人,非常聪明,非常勤奋,他们干这行比这个国家大多数人在自己工作上的投入还要多。他们走的跟我是一条路子,一切都是被验证过的,方方面面都说得通。而且十年后,这条路还是说得通。
Warren Buffett: Oh, of course. I mean, he was putting -- he had his own money up which is a big deal. But, far more than that, I mean, you had two much younger people, very bright, very hard working. They work much harder at this than most people do in this country in their jobs. And they were on the same track I was on, a proven quantity, I mean, everything about it made sense. And it's continued to make sense ten years later.
查理·罗斯:比尔刚才提到梅琳达对他的影响。你曾对我说起过你的亡妻苏茜,你说“在遇到苏茜之前,我的人生一团糟。”
Charlie Rose: Bill talked about Melinda's influence. You have said to me about Susie, your late wife, I was a mess until I met Susie.
沃伦·巴菲特:我觉得这还说轻了。(笑声)她改变了我的生活,这一点毫无疑问。
Warren Buffett: I think that's understating it. (LAUGHTER) She changed my life, there's no question about that.
查理·罗斯:她是怎么改变你的人生的?
Charlie Rose: How did she change your life?
沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,我曾经是个严重偏科、不太适应社会的人,只是恰好非常擅长一件事,而她把我拼凑完整了。我是说,这也不是一蹴而就的,但她就像拿着那把小小的洒水壶,持之以恒地浇灌,最后,她看到了几棵嫩芽破土而出。
Warren Buffett: Well, I was a very lop-sided, not well adjusted person who happened to be very good at one thing, and she put me together. I mean, it wasn't overnight, either, but she just had that little sprinkling can, and finally, she saw a few sprouts come up.
查理·罗斯:你们俩是互补型的组合吗?
Charlie Rose: Was it a coming together of opposites or?
沃伦·巴菲特:不,不,我不会这么说。我们的价值观非常相近,在很多重大方面都高度一致,但她比我成熟得多。我们结婚时她 19 岁,我 21 岁。我的情感年龄大概只有 12 岁。是她把我拼凑起来。就像我说的,这花了不少时间,但改变了我的生活。我根本不可能过上现在这样的人生。
Warren Buffett: No, no, I wouldn't say that. We had very similar values, we were in sync in a very big way, but she was way more mature than I was. She was 19 when we got married, I was 21. I was about 12 emotionally. And she put me together. And like I say, it took time, but it changed my life. I would not have had roughly anything like the life I have had.
查理·罗斯:查理·芒格又带来了什么?
Charlie Rose: And what did Charlie Munger add?
沃伦·巴菲特:查理·芒格,我 57 年还是 58 年的搭档,他极为睿智。他是个了不起的朋友。我们搭档了那么久,他意志坚定,我也意志坚定,我们偶尔有分歧,但这么多年从没吵过架,以后也不会。
Warren Buffett: Well, Charlie Munger, my partner of 57 or 58 years, and he's extremely wise. He's a wonderful friend. We've been partners that time, and he's strong minded, I'm strong minded, we disagree sometimes, we have never had an argument in that whole time, and we never will.
查理·罗斯:从来没有过争执?
Charlie Rose: Never had an argument?
沃伦·巴菲特:从没有过争执。我不骗你。这千真万确。
Warren Buffett: Never had an argument. I won't lie. That's absolutely true.
查理·罗斯:但你俩肯定有意见不合的时候。
Charlie Rose: But you must disagree on things.
沃伦·巴菲特:当然,我们有意见不合的时候。
Warren Buffett: Absolutely, we disagree.
查理·罗斯:那如果有分歧,你怎么决定——
Charlie Rose: So if you disagree, how do you decide to--
沃伦·巴菲特:他最后总会来这么一句——当我们意见不合时,他说:“沃伦,你最后会同意我的,因为你聪明,而且我是对的。”(笑声)你让我怎么反驳这种话?
Warren Buffett: Well, what he says at the end is -- when we disagree, he says, well, Warren, you'll end up agreeing with me because you're smart and I'm right. (LAUGHTER) You know, where do I attack that particular problem?
查理·罗斯:我是对的,你聪明,你终究会发现我是对的。
Charlie Rose: I'm right, you're smart, you'll figure out I'm right.
沃伦·巴菲特:他经常是对的。我得这么说。听着,每次他给我提意见,我都极为尊重他的看法。我也尊重比尔(盖茨)的意见。我是说,跟伙伴一起做事更有趣。最有趣的,显然是婚姻伴侣。那是最重要的关系,但有个商业伙伴——如果所有这些事都是我一个人做的——事情不会像现在这样发展。但假设我的成果翻倍了,跟查理一起做仍然更有趣。
Warren Buffett: Often he's right. I have to say that. Listen, I respect his opinion enormously whenever he gives it to me. I respect Bill's opinion. I mean, but it's more fun doing thing with partners. I mean, the most fun is, obviously, a marriage partner. And that's the most important relationship, but having a business partner, if I had done everything I had done -- it wouldn't have worked out this way, but let's say I got double the results, it's been more fun doing it with Charlie.
查理·罗斯:谁会对比尔·盖茨说不?
Charlie Rose: Who says no to Bill Gates?
比尔·盖茨:嗯,梅琳达·盖茨。(笑声)
Bill Gates: Well, Melinda Gates. (LAUGHTER)
沃伦·巴菲特:我亲眼见过。(笑声)
Warren Buffett: I've seen it happen. (LAUGHTER)
比尔·盖茨:有个人能看出你什么时候可能行动太快或过于乐观,是件很好的事。或者,一个团队过来汇报,我指出他们还没做到的事,之后他们可能就没那么有干劲了。于是,他们会让我纠正这一点。我成熟了很多,我把这很大程度上归功于梅琳达。她还得继续下功夫,但我觉得自己在慢慢改进。优势互补、目标一致,是件非常棒的事。在微软早期,我和保罗·艾伦就有过这样的关系。微软发展起来后,我和史蒂夫·鲍尔默也是如此。现在,无论在我的家庭生活还是基金会里,这个人就是梅琳达。
Bill Gates: It's great when somebody knows, you know, when you might move too fast or be over optimistic. Or, you know, if a team comes in and I'm pointing out things we haven't done and, you know, maybe they're not as motivated afterwards. So, you know, they get me to correct that. I've matured a lot and I give Melinda immense credit. She still has work to do, but I think I'm getting there. And complementary strengths where you share the same goal is a great thing. I had that with Paul Allen in the early days of Microsoft. I had that with Steve Ballmer as Microsoft got going. Now both in my family life and the foundation, it's Melinda.
查理·罗斯:你在微软花多少时间?
Charlie Rose: How much time do you spend at Microsoft?
比尔·盖茨:我大概 15% 的时间在那儿。我只专注于研发那块,跟人一起头脑风暴,琢磨着,好,我们怎么用这个人工智能,让它理解你,帮你更好地利用时间。软件行业眼下是个非常激动人心的时期。有五家公司,可以说处在相当强势的位置上。微软在一些特别酷的东西上处于领先地位,所以——
Bill Gates: I'm there about 15 percent of the time. And I get to work just on the R&D part, brainstorming with people, thinking, OK, how are we going to take this artificial intelligence and make it understand, help you use your time better. It's a very exciting time in software. There's five companies that are, you know, in a really strong position. Microsoft is leading in some really cool stuff so --
查理·罗斯:比如?(笑声)
Charlie Rose: Like? (LAUGHTER)
比尔·盖茨:哦,企业获取客户信息的方式、与客户沟通的方式、审视数据的方式,以及真正用数据驱动人工智能、让所有员工因为看到更多信息而提升生产力的那项使命——在这些方面,微软是领导者。这是一个极好的细分市场。你知道,这是一个规模数千亿美元的细分市场,他们在其中强势得很。未来两年,他们沿这条路推进的创新,将超过我们历史上的任何时期。
Bill Gates: Oh, the way that a business takes information about customers, about communication with customers, looking at data, that mission of really using data in A.I. and getting the productivity of all those workers up because they see more information, Microsoft is the leader on that. And it's a wonderful niche. You know, it's a multi-hundred billion-dollar niche that they're strong in. And they will be innovating along that line more in the next two years than ever in our history.
查理·罗斯:你对人工智能充满热情,确实如此。
Charlie Rose: You have a passion for artificial intelligence, you do.
比尔·盖茨:没错,当你开始做软件时,终极梦想就是让计算机拥有人类那种深刻的理解力和智能。所以它一直是圣杯——计算机什么时候能学会玩游戏,什么时候能学会阅读,什么时候能理解语音。而像语音和视觉这些领域,近年来取得了巨大的进步。我的意思是,你一直在追踪这些进展,并让你的观众看到其中一些,因为我怎么强调也不为过,即便是对这个领域的人来说,现在也是一个相当神奇的时代。
Bill Gates: Yes, it's the ultimate dream when you start working on software is the kind of deep understanding and intelligence that humans have. So it's been the holy grail of when can the computer learn to play games, when can the computer learn to read, when can it understand speech. And things like speech and vision have made such progress in recent years. I mean, you've been tracking this and exposing your viewers to some of it, because I can't overstate that even for people in the field, it's a pretty magical time.
查理·罗斯:它的潜力在于做什么?改变一切?
Charlie Rose: And its potential is to do what? Change everything?
比尔·盖茨:嗯,首先,它会成为有史以来最好的助手,查看你所有的信息,帮你在会议间隙的几分钟里了解该关注什么,或者在你试图规划旅行、安排事务时,帮你组织各种事情——比现在的助手强得多得多得多。然后,最终,某些机械性任务,比如仓库工作或驾驶,也会由它接管。但对于智力型工作,它只会放大创造力,让你的时间更有价值。
Bill Gates: Well, in the first instance, to be the best assistant ever, to look at all your information and help you know in the few minutes between meetings what you should look at, or when you're trying to, you know, plan a trip, organize things, the things to be a much, much, much, much better assistant than it is today. And then, eventually, certain mechanical tasks like warehouse work or driving, that it would take that over. But for intellectual work, it will just magnify the creativity and make your time more valuable.
查理·罗斯:你对技术感兴趣吗?
Charlie Rose: Are you interested in technology?
沃伦·巴菲特:我没有足够的——我觉得我天生就没有——那种倾向,而且我已经落后太多了。我永远追不上那些一直在这方面下功夫的人。这不是我能赢的游戏。
Warren Buffett: I don't have enough -- I don't think I have a natural -- bent that way to start with and I would be so far behind. I never would catch up with people that have been working on it. It would not be a game I would be winning.
查理·罗斯:对你来说,理解这项业务是不是一个核心标准?
Charlie Rose: Is a principle criteria for you understanding the business?
沃伦·巴菲特:是的,我必须理解这家企业。有很多企业我不理解,有些几乎是无法理解的,另一些则刚好超出了我的能力圈。
Warren Buffett: Yes, I have to understand the business. And there's lots of businesses I don't understand, some of them may be almost un-understandable, and others are just outside my sphere of confidence.
查理·罗斯:但你现在确实招来了具备那种专长的人。
Charlie Rose: But you do have people now that do have that kind of expertise that you have brought in.
沃伦·巴菲特:我有两位同事,他们各自的能力圈不同,但选他们不是因为能力圈不同,他们之间有很多重合的部分,重合度很高。关键不在于能力圈有多大——能力圈大当然好,但更重要的,是知道它的边界在哪里。就算你只懂全美国 5% 的生意,也能做得非常好。(笑声)
Warren Buffett: I have two people who themselves have different circles of competence, but they aren't chosen because they have a different circle, there is a lot of overlap, there's overlap between them, and the important thing is not how -- it's nice to have a huge circle of competence, it's much more important to know where the limits are of it. You can do very well if you only understand five percent of the businesses in the country. (LAUGHTER)
查理·罗斯:而且能找到大量机会。
Charlie Rose: And find plenty of opportunities.
沃伦·巴菲特:你知道是哪 5%,那 5% 就在那个圈子里。
Warren Buffett: And you know which five, you've got the five percent are in that circle.
查理·罗斯:我的意思是,2016 年你做出了一笔巨额收购。精密铸件公司是在 2016 年买下的,成交价 370 亿美元。
Charlie Rose: I mean, you've made a huge purchase in 2016. Precision was bought in 2016, $37 billion.
沃伦·巴菲特:包含债务在内,支付 33 亿或 40 亿美元现金,并承担约 40 亿美元债务。
Warren Buffett: Including debt, $33 or 4 billion cash, and assumption of about $4 billion in debt.
查理·罗斯:是不是因为……越来越难找到合适的收购对象了?
Charlie Rose: Is it harder and harder to find an acquisition candidate because...
沃伦·巴菲特:当然,我的意思是,我们要在 4000 亿美元的市值上有所推动。你知道,如果我们赚了 10 亿美元,那也只是四分之一个百分点,而且这还是税后。要知道,那税前可是超过 15 亿美元。所以,很难找到这样的机会。如果我管理的资本规模小得多,我的收益率会更高。
Warren Buffett: Sure, I mean, we've got to move the needle on $400 billion of market value. And, you know, if we make a billion dollars, you know, we're talking a quarter of one percent, and that's after tax. I mean, that's more than a billion and a half pre-tax. So it's hard to find things. I would do better percentage-wise if I was working with a much smaller amount of capital.
查理·罗斯:你是怎么找到这些公司的?
Charlie Rose: How do you find them?
沃伦·巴菲特:这事儿挺有意思。我有时坐着正琢磨各种事情,就接到了电话。收购私人公司这块,都是卖家直接打电话给我。不过偶尔我也会自己决定主动出击,我们从不做恶意收购——我说的是收购整家公司这种交易。
Warren Buffett: It's interesting. I get a call, be sitting thinking, I mean, different things. In terms of buying private businesses because I get a call from a private seller, but occasionally I just decide to act, and we never do anything unfriendly, but in terms of buying whole businesses.
查理·罗斯:有没有了解你、与你亲近的人,替你到处留意机会?
Charlie Rose: But are there people who know you and are close to you on the lookout for you?
沃伦·巴菲特:不太多。(笑声)查理,从大选以来我们净买入了 120 亿美元的普通股。我心里清楚挑的是哪些。跟我一起工作的那两位伙计,他们可能也买了一点、卖了一点,但这些想法要么是我从某个不同的角度琢磨出来的,要么就是别的什么情况。
Warren Buffett: Not much. (LAUGHTER) Charlie, we've net bought 12 billion of common stocks since the election. It's in my mind which ones I pick. Now, the guys that work with me, the two fellows they probably bought a little bit or sold a bit too, but those are just ideas that I've either come at from a different slant in some way, or whatever it may be.
查理·罗斯:航空公司是其中之一吗?
Charlie Rose: Is airlines one of those?
沃伦·巴菲特:已经披露了——我什么都不会跟你说——9 月 30 日的持仓文件显示我们持有一些航空公司。
Warren Buffett: It was shown -- I won't tell you anything -- it was shown on September 30th that we own some airlines.
查理·罗斯:对。
Charlie Rose: Right.
沃伦·巴菲特:一些股票。
Warren Buffett: Some stocks.
查理·罗斯:那你为什么这么做呢?
Charlie Rose: And so why did you do that?
沃伦·巴菲特:这个我就不展开说了。(笑声)但这主要是我做的决定。
Warren Buffett: Well, that I won't get into it. (LAUGHTER) But it was in large part my decision.
查理·罗斯:有个老笑话,你也知道——
Charlie Rose: The old joke is, as you know --
沃伦·巴菲特:当然。
Warren Buffett: Absolutely.
查理·罗斯:——怎么才能成为百万富翁?先当上亿万富翁,再买一家航空公司。
Charlie Rose: -- how do you become a millionaire, start as a billionaire and buy an airline.
沃伦·巴菲特:毫无疑问,这行是吞噬巨额资金的坟场。
Warren Buffett: There is no question it's been a graveyard for a lot of money.
查理·罗斯:没错。但交通运输一直是个重要领域。
Charlie Rose: Yes. But transportation has been something.
沃伦·巴菲特:没错,但两者没有关联。
Warren Buffett: Yes, but they're not related.
查理·罗斯:铁路行业。
Charlie Rose: Railroads.
沃伦·巴菲特:铁路和航空公司不是一回事。
Warren Buffett: The railroads and airlines are not related.
查理·罗斯:完全不是?
Charlie Rose: At all.
沃伦·巴菲特:它们是不同类型的生意。铁轨搬不走,飞机却可以到处调来调去。我的意思是,航空公司和铁路,都有某种浪漫色彩,就像好莱坞之类的东西。所以人们确实会一脚踏进这个行业。过去差不多 25 年里,有超过 100 家航空公司破了产,所以这完全是另一类生意。
Warren Buffett: They're different kind of businesses. You can't move the track, you can move planes around. I mean, airlines and track people, there is a certain romance to it like Hollywood does or something. And so you can actually go into the business, and more than 100 airlines have gone broke in the last 25 years or something like that, so it's a different sort of business.
查理·罗斯:认识比尔之后,他如何改变、影响或加深了你对世界运转方式的看法?
Charlie Rose: How has knowing Bill changed, or influenced, or enhanced your sense of the way the world works?
沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,我向他学习。我喜欢向所有朋友学习,而比尔恰好是一个特别好的学习来源。不过,有朋友的乐趣就在这儿啊,查理。我觉得我很难跟一个我学不到任何东西的人做朋友。他们大概会觉得我挺烦的——那家伙怎么老在聊股票?(笑声)
Warren Buffett: Well, I learn from him. I like to learn from all friends, and Bill happens to be a particularly good source. But that's the fun of having friends, Charlie. I don't think I would be -- would be hard for me to be a friend with anyone I don't learn something from. They probably get kind of bored with me -- who's that guy talking about stocks? (LAUGHTER)
查理·罗斯:比尔,你跟他交往,学到了什么?
Charlie Rose: And Bill, what have you learned from him being associated with him?
比尔·盖茨:嗯,学到的东西太多了。你知道,他在《财富》杂志上写过一篇文章,我在认识他之前读过,文章讲的是给子女留大笔遗产未必是好主意。那是个相当根本的理念。我记得当时读到那篇文章,就确信这个观点是对的,然后心想,哇,现在你得想想怎么把钱捐出去了。我还记得沃伦给我看他的日程表。
Bill Gates: Well, an immense amount. You know, he wrote an article for "Fortune Magazine" that I read before I met him about -- that it's not necessarily a good idea to leave large sums to your children. So that was pretty fundamental. And I remember reading that and I was convinced that that was right, and I thought, wow, now you have to think of how to give it away. I also remember Warren showing me his calendar.
查理·罗斯:哦,这个我喜欢。
Charlie Rose: Oh, I love this.
比尔·盖茨:你知道,我以前每一分钟都排得满满的,以为那是做成事的唯一方式。而他非常注重——他会有那种完全空白的日子。
Bill Gates: You know, I had every minute packed and I thought that was the only way you could do things. And the fact that he is so careful about -- he has days.
查理·罗斯:上面什么都没写。
Charlie Rose: That there's nothing on it.
比尔·盖茨:那是空白的。
Bill Gates: That's there's nothing on it.
沃伦·巴菲特:绝对没错。(笑声)
Warren Buffett: Absolutely. (LAUGHTER)
比尔·盖茨:这技术含量很高,小心点,你可能搞不懂。
Bill Gates: It's very high tech, be careful, you might not understand it.
查理·罗斯:这是四月的一周,那一整周只有三项安排。
Charlie Rose: This is the week of April, of which there are only three entries for a week.
沃伦·巴菲特:到四月份也许会有四项。(笑声)
Warren Buffett: There will be four maybe by April. (LAUGHTER)
比尔·盖茨:报税。
Bill Gates: File taxes.
查理·罗斯:那你从中学到了什么?别把自己排得太满,给自己留出读书和思考的时间……
Charlie Rose: So it taught you what, not to crowd yourself too much and give yourself time to read and think and...
比尔·盖茨:没错。你掌控自己的时间。静坐思考这件事,可能比一个普通 CEO 的要优先得多——普通 CEO 有各种需求压过来,让你觉得必须去见所有人。日程表排得满满当当,并不能证明你有多认真。
Bill Gates: Right. You control your time. And that sitting and thinking may be a much higher priority than a normal CEO, where's there all these demands and you feel like you need to go and see all these people. It's not a proxy of your seriousness that you fill every minute in your schedule.
沃伦·巴菲特:而且人们会想要你的时间。我是说,这是你唯一买不到的东西。基本上我可以买任何我想要的东西,但我买不到时间。
Warren Buffett: And people will want your time. I mean, it's the only thing you can't buy. I mean, I can buy anything I want, basically, but I can't buy time.
查理·罗斯:所以说,拥有时间是你最宝贵的东西。
Charlie Rose: And so to have time is the most precious thing you can have.
沃伦·巴菲特:我最好小心着点用。我绝不可能再买到更多时间了。
Warren Buffett: I better be careful with it. There is no way I will be able to buy more time.
查理·罗斯:住在奥马哈让这件事变得更容易了?
Charlie Rose: And living in Omaha makes that easier?
沃伦·巴菲特:那容易太多了。五十四年来,我上班单程只要五分钟。你想想看,如果单程得花半小时,我也就是多背下几首歌的歌词罢了。
Warren Buffett: That makes it a lot easier. For 54 years, I spent five minutes going each way. Now, just imagine that was half an hour each way, I would know the words to a lot more songs, and that's about it.
查理·罗斯:时间累加起来很可观,对吧?
Charlie Rose: It adds up, doesn't it?
沃伦·巴菲特:确实很可观。如果每天通勤多花一小时往返,那就相当于一个人每周工作时间的 2.5%,40 年下来,就是整整一年。
Warren Buffett: It really adds up. If you're talking an hour a day difference coming and going, and that's two and a half percent of the person's work week, that means 40 years, you're talking about a year.
查理·罗斯:你们在政治观点上一致吗?
Charlie Rose: Do you agree politically?
比尔·盖茨:几乎在所有事情上。我是说,那种总的方向——要让经济持续向上,产出越来越多,而且还要以公平的方式进行分配。是的,在这个基本框架上,我们看法非常一致。
Bill Gates: On almost everything. You know, the general sense that you've got to keep the economy turning up greater output, and that you have to allocate it in a fair way. Yes, that basic framework we see very much the same.
查理·罗斯:你们俩都认为我们能实现 4% 的增长率吗?
Charlie Rose: Do both of you believe we can achieve a four percent growth rate?
沃伦·巴菲特:那个数字非常高。
Warren Buffett: That's very high.
查理·罗斯:相当高。
Charlie Rose: Pretty high.
沃伦·巴菲特:不过,两——
Warren Buffett: But, a two --
查理·罗斯:就说 2016 年吧,我记得第四季度增长好像是 1.6 左右之类的。
Charlie Rose: By just -- like, 2016, I think the last quarter was like 1.6 or something.
沃伦·巴菲特:查理,如果增长率定在 2%,而人口增长率略低于 1%(我们大概率会是这样),一代人——也就是 25 年,现在人们要孩子会稍晚一些——那么我们的人均实际 GDP 会增加 1.9 万美元。一个四口之家,一代人之后就会多出 7.6 万美元的实际 GDP。也就是说,平均每个四口之家在 25 年后会多拥有价值 7.6 万美元的东西。我的意思是,我们会有更多——这只鹅还会继续下更多的金蛋。我们拥有一套很了不起的体系。
Warren Buffett: Charlie, a two percent growth rate, if we have little less than one percent population growth, which we probably will. In one generation, 25 years, now people have kids a little later, we'll add 19,000 per capita, family of four, 76,000 to real GDP. So a family of four on average, there would be 76,000 more stuff per family of four in one generation. I mean, we are going to have more -- the goose is going to keep laying more golden eggs. We've got a wonderful system.
查理·罗斯:嗯,但有些事情可能会拖后腿。
Charlie Rose: Well, but there are certain things that could get in the way of that.
沃伦·巴菲特:2%?我觉得我们可以做到 2%。
Warren Buffett: Two percent? I think we'll do two percent.
查理·罗斯:不,你肯定会做到 2%。
Charlie Rose: No, you'll do two percent.
沃伦·巴菲特:是的,而且 2% 就能创造奇迹。
Warren Buffett: Yes, and two percent will produce miracles.
查理·罗斯:对,但 3% 可能也能实现,不是吗?
Charlie Rose: Yes, but three percent is probably possible, isn't it?
沃伦·巴菲特:有可能,但那就太惊人了。
Warren Buffett: It could be, but that would be fabulous.
查理·罗斯:对。
Charlie Rose: Right.
沃伦·巴菲特:而且——但两个百分点就会带来——人均 1.9 万美元,这已经超过了许多国家现有的水平,这些还要再往上加。问题是我们怎么用它。
Warren Buffett: And -- but two percent will -- 19,000 per capita, that's greater than exists in a whole lot of countries, that will be added. The question is what we'll do with it.
查理·罗斯:你如何看待中国的未来?
Charlie Rose: How do you see the future of China?
比尔·盖茨:嗯,他们在某些方面做得非常出色。中国不是一个民主国家,他们的政治体制将如何演变,现在还难以预料。但在提高收入、消除贫困和改善健康方面,他们以自己独特的方式拥抱了市场经济,这真是一个令人难以置信的奇迹。确切地说,自 1990 年至今,他们干得相当不错。所以,中国现在是世界第二大经济体。他们在贸易上态度很认真,在清洁能源上也是认真的。他们是极其重要的角色。世界上最重要的双边关系,就是美中关系。
Bill Gates: Well, they've done a great job on some things. They're not a democracy, so it hangs in the balance how their political system will evolve. But in terms of raising incomes, getting rid of poverty and improving health, it's an unbelievable miracle that they embrace in their own special way of the market since really just 1990, they've done very well. And so they're the second biggest economy in the world. They're serious about trade. They're serious about clean energy. They are super important. The most important relationship in the world is the U.S.-China relationship.
查理·罗斯:显然是这样,因为它们是世界上两个最大的经济强国。
Charlie Rose: Clearly, because they're the two biggest economic powers in the world.
比尔·盖茨:没错,而且它们还在上升——
Bill Gates: Right, and they're rising --
沃伦·巴菲特:而且它们还会继续处在这样的位置。
Warren Buffett: And they'll continue to be.
比尔·盖茨:而我们也很强,而且我们会保持非常强。
Bill Gates: And we're strong and we're going to stay very strong.
查理·罗斯:什么东西会让我们不再保持强大?
Charlie Rose: What could make us not stay strong?
比尔·盖茨:我们几十年来积累了雄厚的实力,我们的科研方式、大学体系、人们承担风险的精神,正是这些让我们的科技公司至今仍极为强大,我们的生物科技公司也同样强大。教育体系是我们需要回头去审视的一块,它是不平等的一个巨大根源,因为如果你能接受到优质教育,最终结果其实相当不错。
Bill Gates: There's a lot of strength that we've built up over decades, the way we do research, our universities, the way that people take risks, and that's why our technology companies are still so strong. Our biotech companies are still so strong. So the education system is one that, you know, we need to go back and look at, you know, and that is one huge source of inequity, because if you get a great education, actually, the outcomes are pretty good.
查理·罗斯:经验告诉过你——是你自己的经验告诉你,这比你想像的还要难得多。
Charlie Rose: Experience has told you -- your experience has told you it's much harder than even you imagined.
比尔·盖茨:你是说改善美国教育体系吧,是的。辍学率已经下降了一些,这很好。但整体的阅读成绩、数学成绩以及教育不平等,在过去十年里几乎没有变化。我们基金会的一个目标,就是与合作伙伴一起改变这种局面。到目前为止,事实证明,这是最棘手的问题之一。我们仍然认为它至关重要,而且前景相当可期,只要着眼于具体学校,我们能看到很棒的成果,所以我们仍然相信这是可以实现的。
Bill Gates: Improving the U.S. education system, yes. The dropout rate has gone down a bit, so that's great. But the overall reading scores, math scores, and the inequality hasn't budged much in the last ten years. One of the goals of our foundation is to, working with partners, change that, and, so far, it's proven to be one of the tougher ones, we still believe that it's super important, and they are promising, if we look at individual schools, we see great things, so we still believe it's achievable.
查理·罗斯:所有关于移民的讨论,我想稍为谈一下,现在的情况是不是依然如此:一些最优秀、最聪明的海外人才来到这里,接受教育,然后回到印度、中国或其他地方,而不是留在这里?
Charlie Rose: All the talk about immigration, I want to talk about it a little bit, but all the talk about immigration, are we still looking at a situation where some of the best and brightest from overseas come here, get an education, and then go back to India, or China, or wherever, rather than staying here?
比尔·盖茨:嗯,很多人确实留下来了。美国有史以来最重要的进口,毫无疑问,是人才。全世界几乎所有国家那些最勤奋、最出类拔萃的人都想来美国,这对我们一直是有利的。所以你看大学的院系,或是医生、工程师、创办企业、制造就业岗位的人,这一直是我们巨大的优势所在。我们并非一直让这件事顺利到毫不费力,但它确实运行得极其有效。因此,回国的人有一定规模,但净算下来,我们仍然是人才净流入的巨大受益者。
Bill Gates: Well, a lot do stay. And the most important import the U.S. has ever had by far is human talent. It's been to our benefit that a lot of the hardest working, best and brightest from almost every country in the world have wanted to come to the U.S. And so if you look at university departments or, you know, doctors, engineers, people starting up companies, building jobs, it's been a huge strength of ours. We haven't always made it super easy for that to work, but it has worked very, very well. So the number going back, it's meaningful, but net we are still a huge beneficiary of human talent.
查理·罗斯:但过去有种说法——我记得是汤姆·弗里德曼最先写的——我们应当给每张文凭都订上一张绿卡。
Charlie Rose: But it used to be said and Tom Freedman, I think, first wrote this, we ought to staple a green card to every diploma.
比尔·盖茨:是的,我认同这个观点。这是不是一种偏差呢,因为我来自科技行业,而在这个行业里,我们可以围绕一名工程师在国内创造多个工作岗位,而不用把这些工作放在美国以外?是的,我相信把人才留在国内是一件极大的好事。
Bill Gates: Yes, I believe that. Now, is that a bias because I'm from the tech industry where we can create multiple jobs around the engineer instead of having to do that outside the United States? Yes, I believe that keeping talent in the country is a great thing.
查理·罗斯:给我们讲个故事吧,你之前跟我讲过,我以前没听过——你认为美国历史上第二重要的文件,大概是排在《独立宣言》之后,也许是《美国宪法》之后,或者两者都排在其后,你记得的,就是一封由两位移民写的信。
Charlie Rose: Tell us a story, because you told me the story and I didn't have it before -- you think the second most important document in America's history after the Declaration of Independence, or perhaps the U.S. Constitution, or both, you know, is this letter by two immigrants.
沃伦·巴菲特:一封由两位犹太移民写的信。这事儿听起来没什么了不起,直到我告诉你其中一件事。在 1939 年 8 月,就在德国入侵波兰之前,利奥·西拉德,这个名字不太为人所知,他出生于匈牙利,后来去了德国,在德国与阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦一起工作。我相信在 1933 年,两人都离开了德国,他们去了哪儿呢?他们来到了美国,成了美国公民。他们联名给罗斯福总统写了一封信,其实是西拉德算是连哄带拉让爱因斯坦签的名,因为爱因斯坦的名字分量更重。那封信,你们在网上能看到,不到一整页,大意是说,德国——我是在转述——德国即将造出原子弹,而且可能成功。信里没说一定会成功。但我们最好也动手研制。曼哈顿计划就是由此而来,我不知道——谁知道二战会走向什么结局呢,第一,如果希特勒不是那么狂热的反犹分子,我的意思是——那些杰出的科学家等等;第二,如果那两人没有选择移民美国。我是说,美国,它接纳了他们,而他们可能拯救了这个国家。他们可能拯救了这个国家。
Warren Buffett: A letter written by two Jewish immigrants. That doesn't sound like much until I tell you one of the things, but in August of 1939, just before Germany moved into Poland, Leo Zolard, whose name is not well known, who was born in Hungary, but he went to Germany, and he worked in Germany with Albert Einstein. And in 1933, I believe both of them left Germany, and where do they come? They come to the United States, and they become United States citizens. And they co-sign a letter to President Roosevelt, it was a lark he got Einstein to sign it because his name carried more weight. And that letter which you can see on the internet, not even a full page, says, Germany -- I'm really paraphrasing here, but Germany is going to get an atom bomb and it may work. It didn't say for sure it would. And we better get to work on one. And the Manhattan Project came out of that and I don't -- who knows what would have happened in World War II, A, if Hitler hadn't been so anti-Semitic basically, I mean -- great scientists and everything. And secondly, if those two hadn't chose to emigrate to the United States. I mean, the United States, you know, it welcomed them, and they may have saved this country. They may have saved this country.
查理·罗斯:所以,德国人没搞出来,而我们搞出来了。
Charlie Rose: So Germany did not get it and we did.
沃伦·巴菲特:还有那些打向英国的那些 V1 和 V2,从德国人的立场看,它们的弹头就没对过。如果我们再晚三年才开始,谁知道历史的结局会怎样?都是非凡的人物,而且两人都是移民。
Warren Buffett: And all those D1s and D2s that were lobbed over there in England, they just didn't have the right warhead from the standpoint of the Germans. And if we had started three years later, who knows what would have happened? Remarkable men and they were both immigrants.
查理·罗斯:大概一个月前你给我发了个便条,你的意思基本上是说,你并不担心美国经济。
Charlie Rose: You sent me a note maybe a month ago, and you basically said I'm not worried about the American economy.
沃伦·巴菲特:没错。
Warren Buffett: That's right.
查理·罗斯:我担心的是,我们不知怎的就会在核武器的部署上犯个大错。或者有某个恶人去买来或偷走它们。
Charlie Rose: What I'm worried about is that somehow in some way we'll make a mistake in terms of the deployment of nuclear weapons. Or some bad character will buy them or steal them.
沃伦·巴菲特:大规模杀伤性武器就摆在那里。
Warren Buffett: Weapons of mass destruction are out there.
查理·罗斯:某种悲剧性事故,也许是电脑出了个小故障。
Charlie Rose: Some tragic accident, maybe a computer blip.
沃伦·巴菲特:任何一天来看,这种概率都极小极小。但确实有人对我们心怀恶意,有人想杀死数百万美国人。世界上总有那么一些精神错乱者、宗教狂热分子、自大狂,我是说这世界总有一定数量这样的人,如果他们身处错误的位置,又掌握了知识和能力,就会有人乐意杀死数百万美国人,而武器也摆在那里。我是说,当——爱因斯坦在那时所谓的原子弹问世后不久就说过:我不知道第三次世界大战会用什么武器打,但第四次世界大战一定是用棍棒和石头打。这种可能性确实存在。无论是哪位美国总统,都承认这一点:总统的首要任务就是尽最大可能保护我们免受大规模杀伤性武器的威胁。这些武器可能掌握在个人手里,但你不太需要担心那种情况(个人的意图),更应该担心的是组织,甚至可能是一些国家。长期来看,这是美国头顶上唯一真正的阴云。经济问题我们总能解决,但这件事是头等大事。
Warren Buffett: It's a tiny, tiny probability any given day. But there are people who wish us ill. There are people would like to kill millions of Americans. And there's some psychotics, there's religious fanatics, there's megalomaniacs, I mean the world has a certain number of them, and if they get in the wrong position and they have the knowledge and they have the ability, there are people who would love to kill millions of Americans and the weapons are there to do it. I mean, when we -- Einstein said shortly after the launch of what was then called the atomic bomb, he said, I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. And that probability exists. And it's the number one job of the president of the United States, whichever president acknowledges, is to the extent possible, protect us from weapons of mass destruction. And they can exist with individuals, but you don't worry too much about that, the intent, but with organizations and maybe even with a couple of nations. And it's the only real cloud on America over time. We'll solve the economic problems, but that's number one.
查理·罗斯:你同意吗?
Charlie Rose: You agree?
比尔·盖茨:我同意,而且不光是核武器。
Bill Gates: I agree, and it's not just nuclear weapons.
沃伦·巴菲特:不。
Warren Buffett: No.
比尔·盖茨:生物恐怖主义那块也相当棘手,而且——
Bill Gates: The bioterrorism piece is also quite daunting, and --
查理·罗斯:生物恐怖主义那块呢?
Charlie Rose: What's the bioterrorism piece?
比尔·盖茨:嗯,在极端情况下,有人会重建,比方说,天花病毒,并让它在人群中传播,那不仅会杀死数百万人,还可能杀死数十亿人。
Bill Gates: Well, in an extreme case, somebody would reconstruct, say, a smallpox virus and have that spread, and it would not only kill millions, it could potentially kill billions.
沃伦·巴菲特:我记得《纽约时报》近两年内登过一篇专栏文章。我去跟比尔确认,因为我对这玩意儿一窍不通,他说,没错,这说得通。从可行性角度来说——那篇文章讲的基本就是重建天花病毒。我是说,这个世界上有人,也许有组织,很可能有组织,会乐于制造一场天花疫情。
Warren Buffett: I think there was an op-ed piece in "The New York Times" within the last two years. I check with Bill because I don't understand this stuff, and he said, yes, it makes sense. That in terms of being feasible -- and it was basically about reconstituting small pox. I mean, there are people in the world, there are maybe organizations, probably are organizations, that would love the idea of creating a small pox epidemic.
查理·罗斯:那你怎么防止他们那么做?
Charlie Rose: And how do you prevent them from doing that?
比尔·盖茨:嗯,你得有监控手段,尽早发现疫情。还要有医疗工具,能研发出疫苗保护人群。科学在防御端发力,同时也在让攻击端变得稍微容易一点。所以,如果我们保持警惕,有很多步骤可以降低风险,就像严格控制裂变材料的获取就能显著降低核武器的威胁一样。
Bill Gates: Well, you want to have surveillance to catch it as soon as you can. You want to have medical tools where you can create a vaccine and protect people. Science is working on the defense part of this, at the same time it's making the offense slightly easier. So if we're vigilant, there is a lot of steps we can take to make the risk lower, just like minimizing access to fissile materials meaningfully reduces the chance of a nuclear weapon.
查理·罗斯:有些人认为,下一次战争不会是核战争,甚至可能也不是生物恐怖主义,而会是一场网络战争。
Charlie Rose: There are some who argue that the next war will not be a nuclear war, or it may perhaps not even bioterrorism, it will be a cyber war.
比尔·盖茨:这是第三个领域。我个人觉得——虽然只有这三个,但这并不能让人安心多少。没错,现代社会依赖电力、通信和信息流动,如果你能在相当长一段时间内破坏这些系统,那么很多系统,包括医院如何运作、食物如何运输、航空公司如何决策——或者,是啊,银行账户,那个银行账户本该是什么样?所以,现在很多政府和企业的专家都在花时间思考,好吧,怎么把这种风险降到最低?怎么建立冗余、备份,大量复杂精密的措施正在投入其中。
Bill Gates: That's a third area. And I, you know, personally -- there's only the three, but that's not much comfort. Yes, the -- a modern society depends on electricity and communications and information flow, and if you can, for a substantial period of time, disrupt that, then a lot of systems, you know, including how a hospital organizes itself, or how food gets moved around, or an airline decides what to do -- or, yes, bank accounts, you know, what was that bank account supposed to be? And, so, a lot of experts in government and companies now are spending time thinking about, okay, how do you minimize that? How do you have duplicates, backup, a lot of sophistication going into that.
查理·罗斯:美国能冒险与中国或墨西哥打贸易战吗——或者说——这会带来什么——
Charlie Rose: Can the United States risk a trade war with China or with Mexico or -- will it have a --
沃伦·巴菲特:这不是个好主意。
Warren Buffett: It's not a good idea.
查理·罗斯:这不是个好主意。(笑声)
Charlie Rose: It's not a good idea. (LAUGHTER)
沃伦·巴菲特:贸易确实有好处。贸易的问题在于,好处是分散的、看不见的。你走进店里买一双鞋、几件内衣或什么东西,上面不会写着“这件商品是别人采购来的,所以你省了 12%”。3.2 亿人都在买东西——香蕉效应——他们买到的商品比原本的价格更便宜。但负面影响呢,让某个干了 25 年的人丢掉工作,等他已经来不及再去学别的东西了,这种影响非常具体,而且很可怕。我们要想办法做的,就是保住整个社会从贸易中获得的好处,同时照顾好那些——你知道的——基本上沦为“路倒”的人。而且一定会有“路倒”。我是说,自欺欺人没意义。我们伯克希尔一开始做的就是纺织生意。一半工人只会说葡萄牙语。他们在高温、嘈杂的环境里干活,在织布机前一干就是 20 年、25 年。等到纺织业迁到别处,他们的生计——经济生计——就毁了。这种事还会发生。这是贸易的一部分,而好处呢,你知道的,当有人买我们生产的纺织品、手帕或随便什么东西时,他们或许买得便宜了一点。我们必须把贸易的好处保留给所有人——我们和他们——作为整个社会,它又让某些人遭受了极其严重的打击,而我们必须照顾好那些受到伤害的人,因为我们有这个资源。
Warren Buffett: Trade benefits. The problem of trade is that the benefits are diffused and invisible. So, you don't walk in and buy a pair of shoes or some underwear or anything and it says, you just saved 12 percent because this was purchased by somebody. So, 320 million people are buying things -- the banana syndrome -- they're buying things cheaper than they would otherwise. But, the harmful effects, taking somebody out of a job they've had for 25 years when it's too late to retrain them for anything, they are very specific and terrible. What you want to figure out a way is to keep the societal benefits and take care of the people that really are the -- you know, the road kill basically. And there will be road kill. I mean, there is no sense kidding yourself. I mean, we started with a textile model at Berkshire. Half our workers only spoke Portuguese. They worked in hot conditions, loud conditions, and they spent 20, 25 years on looms. When textiles moved elsewhere, their lives -- economic lives were ruined. And that is going to happen. That is part of trade, and the benefits, you know, when somebody buys whatever textiles we were turning out, handkerchiefs, or whatever, anything, they may buy them a little cheaper. And we got to keep the trade benefits to everybody, us and them, as a society, it penalizes certain people terribly, and we got to take care of the people getting hurt because we got the resources.
查理·罗斯:你说的照顾好是什么意思?
Charlie Rose: And take care means what?
沃伦·巴菲特:意思是,你必须在某些方面——你得有再培训之类的措施,在可行的时候;但不可行的时候,比如你只会说葡萄牙语,在纽贝德福德生活,55 岁了,一辈子都在纺织机前度过,那就得确保这个人有一份与过去相称的收入。作为一个社会,我们做得到,我们也不想让这些个例影响我们对贸易整体利益的判断,但我们也不能因为大家都受益,就对这个人说“去你的”。我们负担得起,也应该这么做,这样才能有一套好的贸易政策。
Warren Buffett: It means that somehow you have to have some kind of -- you got to have retraining and all that when that's feasible, but when it isn't feasible, when you only speak Portuguese and you're in New Bedford and you're 55 years old and you spent your whole life on a loom, you got to make sure that person has an income that's commensurate. We can do it as a society and we don't want to let the individual case prejudice us against trade benefits for everybody, but we don't want to say because everybody is benefiting to hell with this guy. We can afford that and we should do it and that's how we'll get a good trade policy.
查理·罗斯:比尔,你当时意识到民间弥漫的经济不安全感了吗?唐纳德·特朗普在政治上利用了这一点。
Charlie Rose: Did you appreciate, Bill, the economic insecurity that was out there that Donald Trump was able to tap into politically?
比尔·盖茨:没有,我对政治情绪不在行,在捕捉这类趋势方面,我并不比别人强。
Bill Gates: No, I'm not an expert on political sentiment, so I was no better at seeing those trends than other people.
查理·罗斯:英国脱欧,还有——
Charlie Rose: Brexit and --
比尔·盖茨:同样,英国脱欧的投票结果也让我很意外。
Bill Gates: Again, I was surprised by the Brexit vote.
查理·罗斯:对。而且那股民粹主义反抗浪潮,正是靠汲取这种情绪才兴起来的。
Charlie Rose: Yes. And the notion of the populist uprising that have taken place in the sense of feeding off of that.
比尔·盖茨:嗯,毫无疑问,年轻人和城市居民,从他们的社会观念来看,也被认为从新技术和现有事物中相对获益更多,这中间确实存在某种分歧。这种分歧最终导致这些政治结果,算是一记警钟,让我们说,好吧,在经济和社会议题上,我们能不能通过改善医疗、改进教育体系,来回应那些负面看法,并引导他们对未来抱有更积极的期待。对我来说,最大的意外并不是人们怎么投票——我不觉得我在这方面有什么专长——而是那个普遍的问题:你觉得你的孩子会过得比你好吗?我相信他们的孩子会过得更好。但事实是,他们自己并不这么觉得,尽管健康水平在提高,未来也会有新产品供他们使用。
Bill Gates: Well, there is no doubt that younger people and urban people in terms of their social mores and being seen to benefit relatively more from the new technology and things that are out there, there is somewhat of a divide there. The fact that that would lead to these political results is a bit of a wake up call to say okay, what is in terms of economic and social issues are, you know, can we buy improving medicine, improving the education system, can we take what the negative views are there and engage in an -- uplift their views to the future. To me the greatest surprise of all isn't how people voted, because I didn't think of myself as having expertise on that, but this general question when you say will your children be better off than you? I believe their children will be better off. But the fact they don't feel that way, that the improvements in health and the new products that will be available to them.
查理·罗斯:技术能让他们做些什么,诸如此类的好处。
Charlie Rose: What technology enables them to do and all of that.
比尔·盖茨:没错。这很令人担忧,因为如果人们看不到时间箭头指向更美好的事物,就不会有加倍投入更多研究、推广最好的教育的想法,反而会滋生出一种萎靡不振的情绪——没有了方向感,没法振作起来说:嘿,有些事已经见效了,让我们再多做这些事吧。
Bill Gates: Right. That is a concern because if people don't see the arrow of time pointing towards greater things, the idea of doubling down on more research and taking the best education and getting that spread around, it creates a sense of malaise where you don't have the guidance and say, hey, some things are working, let's do more of those things.
查理·罗斯:但我还想问的是,美国会输吗?我是说,如果看今天,我们有最强大的军队、最繁荣的经济、最顶尖的大学、最出众的人才,以及最非凡的创新和创造精神——我们会失去这一切吗?
Charlie Rose: But the question I ask also is can America lose? I mean, if you look at today, we have the best military, we have the best economy, we have the best universities, we have the best talent, and we have the best spirit of innovation and creativity, could we lose that?
沃伦·巴菲特:我不认为我们会失去。我想这种可能性非常——
Warren Buffett: I don't think we will. I think the odds of losing that are very --
查理·罗斯:这就是你说的独门秘方?
Charlie Rose: This is what you call the special sauce?
沃伦·巴菲特:我们有过独门秘方,现在仍然有。如果世界其他地方都从这独门秘方里学到了东西,这不是零和游戏,这好极了,但也不会让我们失去优势。所以总体来看,整体而言,再过十年、二十年、三十年,我们的社会会比现在富裕得多,你只要看整体,我们的孩子会过得更好。关键的问题是,它会不会继续让很多人掉队?专业化的市场体系一定会让人掉队。如果有人——不管你用什么标准去衡量——比平均水平低 10%,他们在当今世界的机会跟三四十年前相比,丝毫没有改善。一个经典的例子是福布斯 400 富豪榜。1982 年,排名第一的是丹·路德维格,这人你根本没听说过,当时身家是 20 亿美元。如今这个数字大概要到那时的三四十倍。三四十倍。这种高度专业化的经济,年复一年,跟两百年前那种农业经济不同,会造就越来越多顶层的人大获全胜,赢得极其、极其、极其丰厚。而且,如果没有某些类型的政策配合,它确实不会给那些在市场上没有任何特殊技能的人带来多少好处。一个普通人——或者说在市场天赋方面尤其略低于平均水平的人——不会过得特别好,除非我们制定政策,确保他们能以某种方式参与进来。与此同时,处在顶层的人会继续越做越好。
Warren Buffett: We've got the special sauce and we still got a special sauce. If the rest of the world learns from that special sauce, then it's not a zero sum game, that's terrific, but it won't deprive us. So overall, in aggregate, our society will be far richer ten, 20, 30 years ago, and you just take an aggregate, our children will live better. The real question is, will it continue to leave lots of people behind? A specialized market system will leave people behind. There is -- if somebody is, however you want to measure it, ten percent below average, their opportunities in this world today have not improved at all from 30 or 40 years ago. The classic situation is you take the Forbes 400. In 1982, the number one guy was Dan Ludwig which you've never heard of and had $2 billion. Now it would be 30 or 40 times that. 30 or 40 times. And this more highly specialized economy, year after year, different from that agrarian economy of 200 years ago, it's going to be more and more people at the very top winning big, big, big time. And it really won't do, absent certain types of programs, it won't do much for the person who really doesn't have any special skills for the market. The average person -- or slightly below average person in terms of particularly market talents -- is not going to do very well unless we have a policy to make sure that they participate in some way. And the guys at the top are going to keep doing better.
查理·罗斯:政府出手的政策吗?
Charlie Rose: Policies from the government?
沃伦·巴菲特:这必须由政府来做。政府始终是——我的意思是,市场体系就像一个交通警察。它能配置资源,能引导人才,而且做得相当出色,但它也会把所有赢家都导向一个方向。它会持续让更多的人聚集到顶层。政府通过社会保障介入,重新分配赢家,所以并非完全是市场体系在决定谁赢。但我绝不想扼杀市场体系的生产能力。我们想要越来越多的物质财富,但同时也会有越来越多的人,相对来说,落后得越来越远,这不是一个好结果。我的意思是,我们负担得起,我们也能做得更好。
Warren Buffett: It has to be government. Government is always -- I mean, the market system is a traffic cop. It directs resources, it directs brains, and it does a great job of it, but it also directs all the winnings. It will continually favor more people at the top. Government came in with social security and government redirects the winnings so it isn't totally the market system that delivers the winnings. But I don't want to kill the market system in terms of producing at all. We want more and more stuff, but there will be more and more people falling further, relatively, behind, and that's not a good result. I mean, we can afford and we can do better.
查理·罗斯:我敢说你肯定看到过这条新闻,上周有份报告说,八位亿万富翁拥有的财富比全世界底层一半人口——全球 50% 的人——的总财富还多。
Charlie Rose: I'm sure you saw this, I mean, there was a report I think last week that suggested, it took eight billionaires and basically said they have more wealth than the bottom half of the population in the world, 50 percent of the people in the world.
沃伦·巴菲特:在这个国家,如果你拿《福布斯》400 富豪榜来说,1982 年他们拥有 930 亿美元,现在是 2.4 万亿美元,是 35 年前的 25 倍——不完全是同一批人,但就这 400 人而言——相信我,这一点对一个每周工作 40 小时、靠这点收入养一两个孩子、却发现——
Warren Buffett: In this country, if you took the Forbes 400, they have $93 billion in 1982 and they $2.4 trillion now, 25 times as much as -- not exactly the same people, the 400 -- 25 times as much as 35 years ago, and, believe me, that does not strike somebody that's working 40 hours a week and trying to support a couple of kids on it and finding --
查理·罗斯:而他们的收入仍然保持不变,甚至更少了。
Charlie Rose: And their income has remained the same or less.
沃伦·巴菲特:他们就是不参与。
Warren Buffett: They just aren't participating.
查理·罗斯:或者被他们无法理解的力量所威胁。
Charlie Rose: Or threatened by forces they can't comprehend.
沃伦·巴菲特:他们没法——市场体系就是会让收入差距越来越大——打个比方,说你是中量级拳击手。在 30 年代,你连麦迪逊广场花园的垫场赛都上不了,机会很有限。但后来电视出现了,有线电视来了,按次付费也来了。收入就变成几千万、几亿美元。所以顶级拳手赚得盆满钵满。但如果你是全国排名第 45 的中量级拳手,收入和 30 年代差不多。差距就这么拉大了。如果你是弗兰克·辛纳屈,有电视的时代肯定比你当年在纽约小剧场起步时好得多。这种效应扩散到各个领域。你有个好点子,就能拿到资本,光靠这个想法就能赚几十亿。竞争更激烈了。而回到 1800 年,你有把子力气、肯干活,你的价值就能达到农场里最顶尖那人的九成。这个差距还会继续拉大,市场体系会朝这个方向推,但政府的作用就是——
Warren Buffett: They can't -- the market system just pays more and more -- just to say, say you're a middle-weight boxer. In the '30s, you wouldn't even get on the under card of Madison Square Garden and it was limited. But then television comes along and cable comes along and pay-per-view. And tens and tens of millions of dollars. So at the top, it's terrific. But if you're the 45th middle-weight in the country, it's pretty much the same as it used to be in the '30s. So the spread gets wider. If you're Frank Sinatra, you're a lot better off if you got television than playing a theater in New York where you started. It's magnified throughout. If you got a good business idea, you can get it capitalized and become worth billions just on the idea. It's just tougher. Whereas, you know, you go back to 1800, and if you were reasonably strong and willing to work hard, you were worth 90 percent as much on a farm as the very best guy. And it will keep widening, the market system will push it in that direction, but government is there to --
查理·罗斯:如果能改变一件事,你会改什么?
Charlie Rose: What would you change if you could?
沃伦·巴菲特:这个嘛,我会大幅调整劳动所得税抵免制度。你知道,我能有今天,完全不是靠我自己。我是说,这个国家有 3.2 亿人,还有无数人曾在诺曼底海滩上献出生命等等。我能极大受益,仅仅是因为我赶上了我出生的时代和地方。有些人赶上了,有些人没赶上。一个市场体系奖励那些为数百万人的生活带来改善的人,这本身没有任何问题。他们理应得到巨大的回报。但你必须照顾好那些恰好无法适应这个特定赛道的人。如果这个国家是根据运动能力来付钱的,那我一天练八小时也没用——我照样会上擂台之类的地方,然后十秒钟就被打趴下。所以,市场体系奖励的那些才能很重要,因为它们能给我们带来国家想要的更多商品和服务,让我们的生活发生各种令人难以置信的改善,但它们也会把一些人抛在后面。这个问题光靠教育是解决不了的。你想让每个人都——
Warren Buffett: Well, I would change the earned income tax credit big time. You know, I am where I am not by myself at all. I mean, there are 320 million Americans out there and a lot of crosses over Normandy and everything else. And it just I benefit enormously by having come along when I came along and where I came along. And some people did and some people didn't, and there is nothing wrong with a market system that rewards anybody that makes life better for millions of people. They ought to get enormously rewarded. But you've got to take care of the people that just don't fit well into that particular niche. If this country paid off based on athletic ability, I could study eight hours a day and have all these -- I'm still going to get in the ring or something like that and ten seconds later I'm on my back. So the talents that get rewarded in a market system are important because they bring us more of the goods and services that the country wants and make all kinds of improvements in how we live, just incredible, but they leave people behind and it won't be solved simply by education. You want everybody to --
查理·罗斯:政府是否有责任对此采取行动?
Charlie Rose: Is it the responsibility of government to do something about it?
沃伦·巴菲特:当然算。
Warren Buffett: Sure, it is.
查理·罗斯:请讲。
Charlie Rose: Go ahead.
比尔·盖茨:政府也得确保商业环境健康,让企业有动力做正确的事。把握好这个平衡,应该成为政治对话的核心。
Bill Gates: The government also has to keep, you know, business in shape that it has the incentive to do things right, and striking that balance, you know, should be at the heart of political dialogue.
沃伦·巴菲特:你有一座全世界最公平的小岛,岛上住着两个人,他们决定怎么分那棵棕榈树——岛上就这么一棵树——但这根本无关紧要。(笑声)
Warren Buffett: You have the fairest island in the world and two guys living on it and deciding exactly how they should divide up the palm tree, it's the only thing on the island, but it won't make any difference. (LAUGHTER)
查理·罗斯:那么除了国家安全问题,未来我们还需要害怕什么?我们谈到有些人认为人工智能会带来某些风险,你也说过这个——它可能失控,你也谈过,其他人也谈过。接下来会出现什么,既能让我们受益——人工智能显然也是其中之一——又可能带来一个可怕的世界,无论是基因编辑还是那种——你会想到这些事吗?
Charlie Rose: So beyond national security issues, what do we have to be fearful of in the future? We talked about some people believe artificial intelligence offers certain types of risk and you've spoken to that, that it can become out of control and somehow, you've spoken to that and other people have. What's around the corner that will both benefit us -- artificial intelligence clearly one of those things, too -- but also offers a scary world, whether it is gene editing or that kind of -- you think about these things?
比尔·盖茨:没错,基因编辑是个好例子,它有望帮助治疗疾病、培育更高产的植物。基因编辑是在修改生命的软件,可以说是终极的软件工作,但如何准确使用它,是个问题。你知道,如果你能让自己的孩子变瘦,或者变得有吸引力,或者具备某些其他特征,这是这项技术的适当用途吗?所以社会将会有——
Bill Gates: Yes, gene editing is a good one where the promise of helping with disease, making plants that are more productive. Gene editing is playing with the software of life, sort of the ultimate software work, and yet, deciding exactly how it should be used. You know, if you could make sure your child was thin or, you know, attractive or had certain other characteristics, is that an appropriate use of the technology? So society will have --
查理·罗斯:你怎么回答这个问题?
Charlie Rose: How do you answer that question?
沃伦·巴菲特:这事我自愿报名做内测。(笑声)
Warren Buffett: I'll volunteer for the Beta testing on that. (LAUGHTER)
查理·罗斯:我是认真的,比尔,你是怎么决定的?
Charlie Rose: I'm serious, Bill, how do you decide that?
比尔·盖茨:那些是政府——
Bill Gates: Those are government --
查理·罗斯:整件事关乎自由与安全之间是否存在某种平衡,这个问题也涉及,你知道,就连解锁一部恐怖分子可能在其中留有未来恐袭线索的手机,也是如此。
Charlie Rose: The whole thing about is there some balance between freedom and security and it came up in terms of, you know, even in terms of getting inside of a phone in which a terrorist might have left future possible terrorist acts, you know.
比尔·盖茨:这个嘛,那又是另一个话题,你知道,要确保政府对金融交易、通信里发生的事不至于一无所知,因为你要相信,政府什么时候、以什么方式动用它获取信息的能力,会有恰当的政策来约束。这又是一个会引发激烈争论的领域,你知道,有些极端派人士可能会说政府真的一点都不该看,另一些人则会说政府什么都该看,但我认为,有可能找到一种两全其美的办法。
Bill Gates: Well, that's another one where, you know, making sure the government isn't completely blind to what goes on in financial transactions, communications, because you trust that the appropriate policies for when and how government's ability to see information is used. That's another one where there will be a big debate about, you know, some extremist might say government really shouldn't see anything, others would say government should see everything, but I think there is the potential for the best of both worlds approach.
查理·罗斯:前提是确实有一套恰当的程序。
Charlie Rose: If in fact there is an appropriate procedure.
比尔·盖茨:没错,而且我们过去是有程序的。不过你知道,有些人觉得即便如此,还是出了一些事。所以外界有一种声音会倾向于“嘿,咱别让政府看这些东西”,这又是另一个政治问题——基因编辑做到什么程度,政府在这方面有多大权限。你知道,我们需要能够切实听取各方优秀意见的政治人物。运营一个医保体系,并在有人发明出极为昂贵的疗法时做出决策,医保到底该不该在经济中占这么大的比重,以至于挤占了在教育和社会服务等方面的投入,这将是政治舞台上另一个会引发巨大争论的难题。
Bill Gates: Right, and we have had procedures. And, you know, some people feel that even so some things went on. So there are voices out there that would tend towards the, hey, let's not let government see things, and that's another political question, how much do we do gene editing, how much the government has this ability. You know, we need politicians who really draw in great opinions. Running a health care system and deciding, when people are inventing super expensive treatments, should health care demand so much of the economy that investing in education and social services and those things, that will be another huge problem that will be debated in the political arena.
查理·罗斯:依你看,谁在医保方面做对了?
Charlie Rose: Who has health care right, in your judgment?
比尔·盖茨:欧洲国家。
Bill Gates: The European countries.
查理·罗斯:是斯堪的纳维亚国家,还是?
Charlie Rose: Scandinavian or?
比尔·盖茨:嗯,英国在医疗上的支出占 GDP 的百分比大概是美国的一半。当然,他们那种体制有排队等待之类的问题,但这个差距之大,几乎没法用语言来形容。两国之间的差额几乎占到 GDP 的 9%。也就是说,美国每天出门上班的人里,每 11 个人当中就有 1 个人是在为多出来的这部分医疗活动而工作。我不是说我们应该照单全收他们的体制,也就是单一支付系统。世上还有其他非常好的体制,并不是单一支付系统。德国、瑞士、法国,都做得相当不错。这是极少数我们做得相当差的事情之一,让民众看得上病这件事,是极少数我们比其他富裕国家明显差出一截的事情之一。有些事情,比如教育,很多富裕国家做得并不怎么好;但医保这件事,我们算是差得出奇。
Bill Gates: Well, the U.K. spends about half as much as a percentage of GDP as the United States. Now, their system has waiting and things like that, but it's hard to express what a mammoth difference that is. You're talking about almost nine percent of GDP difference. You know, that is one out of 11 people who go to work every day are the extra health care activity here in the United States. So I'm not saying we should just wholesale adopt their system which is a single payer system. There are other really good systems that are not single payer systems. Germany, Switzerland, France, they do quite well. It's one of the few things, access to medical care is one of the few things that we actually do quite a bit worse than other rich countries. There are some like education that a lot of rich countries don't do a very good job on. This one is where we're sort of uniquely bad.
查理·罗斯:医保和教育,我们做得不如其他国家、不如其他工业化国家好?
Charlie Rose: Health care and education, we don't do as well as other people, other industrialized nations?
比尔·盖茨:教育方面,大多数富裕国家做得也没那么好,但在顶尖大学等领域,我们绝对是世界第一,而且是遥遥领先,所以教育这块我们大致处于中等水平。按照我们的表现来看,在让民众看得上病这件事上,我们不得不说自己看起来尤其糟糕。
Bill Gates: Most rich countries don't do that well on education and there are pieces like top universities where we are absolutely the best in the world by a lot, so that one we're more middle of the pack, in terms of our treatment, it's health care access where we have to say we look particularly bad.
查理·罗斯:全球变暖是不是有个滴答作响的时钟?
Charlie Rose: Is there a ticking clock on global warming?
比尔·盖茨:是的。好在不会一夜之间发生。重大的负面影响会在 30 年到 70 年的时间范围内显现,不过它现在已经增加了干旱和风暴的概率,而且我们也看到了这些变化。
Bill Gates: Yes. Fortunately, it's not overnight. The really big negative impacts are in the 30-year to 70-year time frame, although it has already increased the chance of drought and storms and we're seeing that.
查理·罗斯:你觉得这里存在直接的因果关系?
Charlie Rose: You can see a direct causation there?
比尔·盖茨:是的,升温效应已经存在。现在,在此基础上叠加了太平洋涛动和正常的天气因素。所以升温信号和这些其他因素各占多少比例,对此你可以有合理的不同看法,但毫无疑问升温效应确实存在。全球平均气温在上升,干旱——尤其是中东或非洲部分地区——已经显现出一些影响。而随着时间的推移,情况会变得严重得多。所以,改变能源体系——这个体系的发明和部署周期很长——我认为这是最紧迫的问题之一。
Bill Gates: Yes, the heating effect is already there. Now, overlaid with that is the Pacific oscillation and normal weather things. So exactly how much of it is the heating signal versus those other things, you can get reasonable disagreement, but there is no doubt that that's there. The global average temperature is rising, and the droughts, particularly in places like the Middle East or parts of Africa are already seeing some of that. And as you go out in time, it gets a lot worse. So changing the energy system which has a long lead time of invention and deployment, you know, I feel this is one of the most urgent problems.
查理·罗斯:那么,迫在眉睫的答案是要寻找替代能源来源吗?
Charlie Rose: And is the urgent answer finding alternative sources of energy?
比尔·盖茨:找到那三个神奇的特性——可靠、清洁、低成本——通往这个目标有很多条路。所以我们必须鼓励大量创新者去尝试不同的东西。如果你能把阳光直接转化为汽油,那会是一种方法,因为这样可以 24 小时储存,而且运输起来也非常方便。还有一些方法涉及把核能提升到新的安全水平并降低其成本,那将成为这个体系的关键一环。我们需要为大量创新想法提供资金支持,政府和私营部门都得参与。
Bill Gates: Finding that magic three characteristics -- reliable, clean, and low cost -- and there are many paths to get there. And so we have to encourage lots of innovators trying different things. If you could take sun and turn it directly into gasoline, that would be an approach because that can be stored 24 hours a day and even moved around very well. There is approaches that involve taking nuclear to a new level of safety and lower level of cost so that would be a key part of the system. We need to fund a lot of innovative ideas, both governments and private sector.
查理·罗斯:如今你的生活,在脑力挑战上,比掌管微软时更大吗?
Charlie Rose: Is your life today more intellectually challenging than when you were running Microsoft?
比尔·盖茨:这很难比较。两件事对我来说学习曲线都很陡。你知道吗,我很享受能结识杰出的人,看到事情做成,也看到事情搞砸。在我人生的这个阶段,我的处境堪称完美,再幸福不过了。
Bill Gates: That's hard to compare. I'm on a steep learning curve in both cases. You know, I love the fact that I get to meet great people, I get to see things work, see things that fail. For this stage of my life, I'm in a perfect position, I couldn't be happier.
查理·罗斯:因为你确实对微软有影响力。我的意思是,不只是在软件层面。
Charlie Rose: Because you have an influence on Microsoft. I mean, not just being software.
比尔·盖茨:我很享受过去交流想法。这么做能让我跟上时代。我们正在用那些数字化赋能手段——比如,为全世界的穷人提供廉价金融服务,或者分析医疗数据。保持对数字化领域的了解,有助于我做好基金会的工作。
Bill Gates: I enjoy going over and sharing my thoughts. I get to keep up to date a little bit because of that. And we're using some of those digital enablement things, like, to get cheap financial services to poor people all over the world, or to look at medical data. And so staying up to date on the digital piece helps me do my foundation work.
查理·罗斯:你说过类似这样的话,今天普通人的生活水准比约翰·D·洛克菲勒在世时还好。
Charlie Rose: You said something akin to this, you know, the average person today lives better than John D. Rockefeller did when he was alive.
沃伦·巴菲特:确实如此。
Warren Buffett: That is true.
查理·罗斯:当时的世界首富。“生活得更美好。”
Charlie Rose: The richest man in the world at the time. Live better.
沃伦·巴菲特:是的,过得更好。没错,从你的娱乐选择、旅行选择来看。你以前根本买不到这些。这发生在一辈子之内。太不可思议了。
Warren Buffett: Yes, lived better. Yes, in terms of your entertainment choices, your travel choices. You couldn't buy them. That's in one lifetime. It's amazing.
查理·罗斯:除家庭之外,什么带给你的满足感最大?
Charlie Rose: What brings you the most satisfaction, beyond family?
沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,最大的满足就是身体还硬朗。到了 86 岁,你看事情的角度就有点不一样了。(笑声)
Warren Buffett: Well, the greatest satisfaction is just staying in good health. When you're 86, you look at this a little differently. (LAUGHTER)
查理·罗斯:你身体还好吧?
Charlie Rose: You're in good health?
沃伦·巴菲特:哦,是的。我每一天都过得很快乐。我享受——
Warren Buffett: Oh, yes. I enjoy every day. I enjoy --
查理·罗斯:你享受的是什么?
Charlie Rose: What is it that you enjoy?
沃伦·巴菲特:嗯,如果真要深挖我的内心的话,我很享受经营伯克希尔。
Warren Buffett: Well, I enjoy running Berkshire, if you get right down into my psyche.
查理·罗斯:这正是我想知道的。
Charlie Rose: That's what I want to know.
沃伦·巴菲特:这是我画了 50 多年的画。我想画什么就画什么,不必按华尔街告诉我的去为下一季度之类的事操心。所以我握着画笔,我拥有画布,而且画布没有边际。这是个相当不错的游戏,我每天都能和喜欢的人一起做。我不必和那些让我胃里翻腾的人打交道。要是我从政,就得冲很多我想揍的人微笑。
Warren Buffett: It's been my painting for 50-some years. I get to paint what I want. I don't have to do, you know, follow what Wall Street is telling me to do next quarter or something like that. So I own the brush, I own the canvas, and the canvas is unlimited. It's a pretty nice game and I get to do it every day with people I like. I don't have to associate with anyone that causes my stomach to churn. If I were in politics, I would have to smile at a lot of people that I want to hit.
查理·罗斯:你就是不跟他们谈。
Charlie Rose: You just don't talk to them.
沃伦·巴菲特:我确实捡了个大便宜。我可舍不得放手。(笑声)
Warren Buffett: It's really, I've got a good deal. I'm hanging on to it. (LAUGHTER)
查理·罗斯:我常讲这个故事,布鲁克·阿斯顿曾对我说,我人生大半辈子都在担心别人怎么看我,到后来我只在乎我怎么看他们。(笑声)我只愿意见我喜欢的人。
Charlie Rose: I often repeat this story, Brook Ashton once said to me, I spent too much of my life worrying what people thought of me, and then I only care about what I think of them. (LAUGHTER) I only want to see people that I like.
沃伦·巴菲特:是的,而且我的生意——我很幸运是这样。我是说,做生意比做慈善容易太多了。慈善可能重要得多,但在生意场上,你找的是那种比较轻松的选择,找的是你喜欢共事的人。我是说,在某种程度上,我可以为自己创造一个世界。
Warren Buffett: Yes, and my business -- I'm lucky that way. I mean, business is so much easier than philanthropy. Philanthropy may be a whole lot more important, but in business you're looking for kind of easy choices, you're looking for people that you like to associate with. I mean, to an extent, I can create a world around me.
查理·罗斯:你是说,如果有人走进你的门,想把公司卖给你,而你看出这是个绝佳的机会——
Charlie Rose: Are you saying to me that if somebody walked in your door and wanted you to buy their company and you saw it as a golden --
沃伦·巴菲特:手里揣着下金蛋的鹅,但那个农场主我不喜欢。(笑声)我会说不。
Warren Buffett: Golden goose with a farmer I didn't like. (LAUGHTER) I would say no.
查理·罗斯:你会说不。即使你知道这会——
Charlie Rose: You would say no. Even though you knew it would --
沃伦·巴菲特:查理,为了钱结婚在任何情况下大概都是个坏主意,但如果你已经很有钱了,那就完全没道理了。(笑声)
Warren Buffett: Charlie, marrying for money is probably a bad idea under any circumstances, but if you're already rich, it doesn't make any sense at all. (LAUGHTER)
查理·罗斯:但满足感——衡量满足感的标尺是什么?
Charlie Rose: But the satisfaction -- what's the metric of satisfaction?
沃伦·巴菲特:一家公司越做越大、越来越难管,但它干得还算不错——它正和一大群有意思的人一起做事——就像吉恩·麦卡锡说当橄榄球教练一样,难到刚好让这事有点意思,但其实也没那么难。(笑声)
Warren Buffett: It's doing a decent job of running a place that gets harder to do because of size over time -- but it's working with a whole lot of people on interesting -- it's like Gene McCarthy said about being a football coach, it's just difficult enough to make it interesting but it really isn't that hard. (LAUGHTER)
查理·罗斯:麦卡锡这么说的?
Charlie Rose: McCarthy said that?
沃伦·巴菲特:没错。他有时候就是有本事把人惹毛。
Warren Buffett: Yes. Well, he had a way of getting people irritated sometimes.
查理·罗斯:什么带给你最大的满足感?
Charlie Rose: What brings you the greatest satisfaction?
比尔·盖茨:学习新东西、取得突破。抛开所有美好的家庭部分不谈,这件事本身就很有乐趣。偶尔,如果某件事确实很有道理,而且你能教给别人,分享一个洞见,我觉得那也非常有成就感。你知道,当我和梅琳达坐下来写年度公开信时,心里想的是:好吧,我有机会见识一些事情,那我能分享点什么非常简洁、可能对人有帮助的东西呢?这很有意思。写起来也不容易。这种事不是天天都有,但通过我的学习,以及能够分享我的发现——噢,这事原来比我想的要简单——这给了我极大的满足感。
Bill Gates: Learning things and making breakthroughs. After all the great family stuff, that is a lot of fun. Every once in a while, if something really makes sense and you can teach people about it, share an insight, I think that's also very satisfying. You know, when I sit down with Melinda to write the annual letter, the idea of, okay, I've had a chance to see things, what could I share that is really succinct that might be helpful to people? That is fun. It's hard. It doesn't happen all the time, but between my learning and being able to share where I see, oh, this is simpler than I thought it was, that gives me great satisfaction.
沃伦·巴菲特:查理,我还要说一点。我现在 86 岁了,见过很多上了年纪的人。在我所有的经验里,我从没见过任何一个对自己孩子满意的人——不管他是 70 岁还是随便哪个年纪——对自己的人生感到糟糕的。
Warren Buffett: I would say this, too, Charlie. Now at 86, I've seen a lot of people who've gotten older. And I've never seen anybody who's 70 or pick an age who felt good about their children that felt bad about their life. In all my experience.
查理·罗斯:你从没见过哪个对孩子满意的人,同时却对自己的人生不满意?
Charlie Rose: You never have seen anybody who felt good about their children that also felt bad about their life?
沃伦·巴菲特:是的,而我见过很多非常有钱的人,钱在家庭里却没有带来好结果。
Warren Buffett: Yes, and I've seen plenty of people with lots of money where it hasn't worked out well in the family.
查理·罗斯:他们对自己的孩子不满意。
Charlie Rose: Who didn't feel good about their children.
沃伦·巴菲特:或者是孩子对他们不满意,总之不管哪一边,他们在自己肩负的最重要的教育工作和人际关系上都失败了。虽然有时候这出于外部原因,但我确实从没见过任何人——不论其经济状况如何——觉得自己的人生是失败的……
Warren Buffett: Or the children didn't feel good about them, whichever way, but they failed at the most important teaching job they had and personal relationship, and sometimes it happens for extraneous reasons, but I really have never met anybody, regardless of their economic circumstances, who felt their life was a failure --
查理·罗斯:如果他们的孩子已经有所成……
Charlie Rose: If their children have become.
沃伦·巴菲特:如果他们爱自己的孩子的话。
Warren Buffett: If they love their children.
查理·罗斯:他们的孩子正在——
Charlie Rose: And their children were doing --
沃伦·巴菲特:绝对如此。他们感到欣慰的是——你知道,毕竟孩子是他们带到这个世界上的。
Warren Buffett: Absolutely. They felt good about -- you know, they brought them into the world.
查理·罗斯:——有所成就,感觉好像他们已经为未来奠定好了基础。
Charlie Rose: Achievements and felt like they had put themselves for the future.
沃伦·巴菲特:我认识一个人,极其富有。他把大量钱放在孩子名下,却不想让他们对这些钱有任何控制权。每年一次,他会跟孩子吃顿饭,试图哄他们在空白的所得税申报单上签字。你想象一下。面对这四个孩子,他一个都不指望他们能——他居然对他们毫无信任,这简直荒唐。我是说,他会在那几顿饭上讨好他们,他们心里明镜似的,知道到底是怎么回事。每年一次,然后他会贿赂他们签空白税单,这样他就能去报税,而孩子们根本不知道自己拥有什么。我是说,当你面对的是一群成年人——我一次又一次地看到,那些事业成功的人——当然我也见过不少反面例子——事业成功但在家庭上却一败涂地——我不觉得那样的人生能让他们感觉有多好。
Warren Buffett: I knew one fellow who was extraordinarily rich. He put a lot of money in his kids' names. He didn't want them to have any control over it. Once a year, he would have dinner with them and try and get them to sign their income tax return blank. Just imagine that. These four kids, none of them, he wanted to have enough confidence in them -- it's just crazy. I mean, he would woo them during those dinners, they knew exactly what was going on, once a year, and then he's bribe them to sign their income tax return blank so he could file it and they wouldn't know what they have. I mean, when you have adults -- I've seen just time after time when people who have been successful -- I've seen plenty of the other, too -- but successes at business and failure -- and I don't think they feel that good about life.
查理·罗斯:感谢二位光临,很高兴见到你们。比尔,非常感谢。以上是比尔·盖茨和沃伦·巴菲特在这一小时里与我们分享的内容。感谢大家收看。顺便提一下,HBO 将在 1 月 30 日播出一部名为《成为沃伦·巴菲特》的影片,片中你会看到一个人非凡的成长历程,看到他始终被家人围绕,也会看到 86 年岁月赠予他的教益与经历。下次再见。
Charlie Rose: Thank you for coming, great to see you. Bill, thank you very much. Bill Gates and Warren Buffett for the hour. Thank you for joining us. I should mention on HBO on January 30th, there is a film called "Becoming Warren Buffet" in which you will see a remarkable sense of the evolution of a human being and surrounded by family but also the lessons and experiences that 86 years have given him. See you next time.