纽约来信
Memo to:
Memo to:
Oaktree Clients
Oaktree Clients
From:
From:
Howard Marks
Howard Marks
Re:
Re:
来自纽约的笔记
Notes from New York
或许你已经读够了上周发生的事件,如果是这样,你大可随意丢弃这份备忘录。当阅读带来痛苦时,并没有道德义务要求继续读下去。我们每个人都可以自己决定何时适可而止。
到现在,我们大多数人已经对周二发生在世界贸易中心和五角大楼的事件了解得足够多了。我不会复述这些事件的事实,而是想谈谈它们给我留下的思考。
我从周二到周五都待在纽约——和许多人一样,是身不由己。我本没打算就这个话题写备忘录。但周六早上醒来,一周来第一次待在家里,关于纽约的思绪却占据了我的脑海。我排解这些思绪的方式,就是把它们写成句子和段落。
这份备忘录可能没有多少对你来说是新鲜的,但和往常一样,我会试着把自己的一些想法,以及从别处听来和读到的东西整理在一起。它不会涉及投资建议或对经济和市场的预测。内容涵盖从袭击后纽约的细碎描述,到对已显现及可能随之而来的大局影响的、希望是有意义的观察。
最后,我当然不愿意写任何冒犯人的话。但大家的神经都很紧张,无意中可能仍会得罪人,若如此我在此致歉。我只有良好的意愿,希望它能以这样的方式呈现出来。
我的角色——在上周的事件中,我只是一个旁观者。我在情感上和行动上都受到了影响,但并未卷入其中。我父亲和女儿都住在纽约,他们都平安无事。我在世界贸易中心没有朋友或同事。至于我自己,周一在克利夫兰参加完晚宴后,午夜时分抵达纽约。我原计划周二上午在养老金东部论坛上发言,然后飞往柏林参加一个机构投资者会议。
Maybe you've already read enough about last week's events, in which case you should feel free to discard this memo. There is no moral obligation to keep reading when doing so brings pain. Each of us can decide when enough is enough. By now most of us know all we need to about Tuesday's events at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. I will not recount the facts relating to these events, but rather the thoughts they have left me with. I spent Tuesday through Friday in New York – like so many, against my will. I had no plans for a memo on this subject. But when I woke up Saturday, at home for the first time in a week, thoughts of New York monopolized my mind. My way of dealing with them is to turn them into sentences and paragraphs. This memo may not include much that is new to you but, as usual, I will attempt to pull together my own thoughts and what I've heard and read elsewhere. It won't touch on recommendations for investing or predictions for economies and markets. Its contents will range from trivial descriptions of New York after the attack to hopefully-meaningful observations on the big-picture ramifications that have been seen and that may follow. Lastly, I certainly do not wish to write anything that offends. But nerves are frayed, and unintended offense might be taken, for which I apologize. I mean only the best, and I hope it comes out that way. My Role – I was merely a bystander at the events of last week. I was affected emotionally and logistically, but not involved. My father and daughter, both of whom live in New York, were safe. I had no friends or colleagues at the World Trade Center. As for me, I had arrived at midnight Monday after a dinner in Cleveland. I planned to speak to a Pensions East forum on Tuesday morning and then fly to Berlin to participate in an Institutional Investor conference.
U
U
U
U
事件经过——飞机撞入世贸中心和五角大楼,是对美国本土发起的首次大规模外来攻击。这场袭击大胆、策划周密、协同有序,且成功得令人震惊。它展示了进步的果实——世界最先进的客机——如何被用来对付我们。它表明,在这个时代,来自一个规模不大、组织结构松散的敌人的寥寥数人,就能造成与其人数或物资完全不成比例的破坏。
The Events – The crashing of planes into the WTC and the Pentagon represented the first large-scale foreign attack on continental United States soil. It was daring, well planned, coordinated and startlingly successful. It showed how the fruits of progress – the world's great airliners – can be used against us. It showed how, in this age, a handful of men from a smallish, amorphous enemy can cause destruction totally disproportionate to their number or materiel. U
U
U
2001 年,橡树资本管理公司(Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.)
2001 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
保留所有权利。
All Rights Reserved
《纽约时报》一篇文章让我印象深刻,文中说这些恐怖分子并未丧失理智。他们是极端分子,信奉的教义多数穆斯林并不认同。他们被深度洗脑,或许可以说是被彻底灌输。但他们智商在线,训练有素,会不折不扣地执行命令,摧毁他们认为的敌人。我们习惯指望别人按自身利益行事,这让他们行为可预测,便于我们应对。但恐怖分子不在此列,他们几乎不在乎自身生死。这大大增加了他们带来的危险。
事后感想——周二下午,我离开橡树资本纽约办公室,去接我的女儿和朋友们的孩子,出于本能,想确保大家安全,想找回那种久违的把一切安排得井井有条的掌控感。我沿街向北走,街道出奇地正常,却又透着不寻常。游客还在,拿着相机和地图。没有烟雾,没有灰烬。路上人比平时稍多,几乎都朝一个方向走:向北,远离世贸中心。没有尖叫,没有哭泣,没有奔跑,没有恐慌,只是偶尔有几群人围在收音机旁。
I was struck by a New York Times article saying these terrorists are not insane. They are extremists who follow a dogma that most Muslims do not. They are highly indoctrinated and perhaps brainwashed. But they are intelligent, highly trained soldiers who will carry out orders to destroy what they believe is their enemy. We count on others to act in their own self-interest; this makes them predictable and helps us know how to deal with them. It is not there in the case of the terrorists, in that they care little about their own survival. This adds greatly to the danger they pose. Reaction – I left Oaktree's New York office Tuesday afternoon to collect my daughter and the children of friends in a natural desire to assure safety and feel the sorely-missed ability to create order. I walked north through streets that were strangely normal but not quite. The tourists were there, with their cameras and maps. There was no smoke and no ash. There were a few more people than usual, and almost all were moving in one direction: north, away from the WTC. There was no screaming or crying, no running or panic, just occasional knots of people gathered around radios. U
U
U
只有熟悉内情的人才能看出其中的变化。当时很少有人交谈,目光也不交汇——这在纽约并不稀奇。显然没有笑容。浮现在脑海里的词是“压抑”“阴沉”和“无力”,这些感受整整萦绕了我一周。紧张与压力无处不在。
有些事变得截然不同,而有些表面如常的事,感觉也变了。头顶不再有客机飞过,这一点显而易见;当战斗机取而代之掠过天空时,场面令人震撼。在少了嘈杂噪音的背景下,警笛声听得格外清晰,也显得更加不祥——就像洛杉矶暴乱和地震期间那样。第一晚,行人和车辆都很稀少,之后才逐渐增多。超市里人满为患;街边餐厅坐满了人;很明显,生活还会继续下去。
我们每个人都找到了自己在阅读、观看和谈论这些事件上的承受极限。但与此同时,谈论别的事或做别的事似乎又不合时宜。在我有限的观察范围里,孩子们更容易转向其他话题——而我很高兴看到,他们的生活虽然或许已被永远改变,却终将恢复过来。
通讯——我的手机和黑莓无线电子邮件设备至关重要。我再次忍不住问自己:“没有这些东西,我们以前是怎么过来的?”周二那天电话很难打通,但之后每天都有所好转。我的黑莓始终能正常工作,让我得以与橡树资本的同事们保持联系。
Only knowledgeable onlookers would have detected the differences. Few people were talking. Eyes didn't meet – which is not unusual in New York. There clearly were no smiles. The words that came to mind were "subdued," "somber" and "enervated," and they stayed with me all week. Stress and tension were everywhere. Some things were very different, and some that were the same felt different. The absence of airliners overhead was obvious, and the effect was dramatic when fighter jets replaced them. Sirens were heard more clearly in the absence of competing noise, and they seemed more ominous – as was the case in Los Angeles during the riots and earthquakes. Pedestrian and vehicular traffic was light the first night, and it grew only gradually. Grocery stores were crowded; sidewalk restaurants were populated; it was clear life would go on. Each of us found his or her individual limit on how much we wanted to read, watch and talk about these events. At the same time, however, it seemed inappropriate to talk about or do anything else. In my limited sample, the kids found it easier to move on to other topics – and I was so glad to see that their lives, albeit probably changed forever, would rebound. Communication – My cell phone and Blackberry wireless e-mail device were absolutely essential. I was again reminded to ask "How did we ever get along without these things?" It was very hard to make phone calls on Tuesday, but that, too, got a little better each day. My Blackberry always worked and made it possible for me to keep in contact with my Oaktree colleagues.
U
U
U
U
那一天的首个交易日邮件并没有遭到垃圾邮件轰炸,但后来它们也确实卷土重来了。求职简历、初创企业的商业计划书、以及出售资产管理公司的报价,这些内容一方面看上去实在不合时宜,但我想,它们同样也在预示着一切正逐步回归常态。
Spam e-mail was absent that first day, but it also came back. Resumes, start-up business proposals and offerings of money management firms for sale seemed incredibly inappropriate on the one hand, but I guess they, too, are part of the return to normalcy.
2001 年,橡树资本管理有限合伙企业(Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.)。
2001 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
2
2
版权所有,保留所有权利。
All Rights Reserved
报复——武力回击自然是空袭发生之后最先浮出水面的话题之一。总统在周二晚已作出承诺,这也是我们所有人心中挂念之事。但谁也不应低估其中的挑战。恐怖分子正如我所说,行踪飘忽、无处不在。他们遍布四方,却没有总部;他们意志坚定,却不穿军装、不举旗帜。找到他们、对付他们并不容易。过去我们相信美国不可战胜,相信自己有能力铲除邪恶、取得胜利。这方面仍有积极迹象,但也有相反的证据。
Retaliation – Armed response was, of course, one of the first issues to arise after the crashes. The President promised it Tuesday evening, and it is on the minds of us all. But no one should underestimate the challenges involved. The terrorists are amorphous, as I said, and pervasive. They exist everywhere but have no headquarters. They are dedicated but wear no uniform and fly no flag. They will not be easy to find or deal with. In the past we believed in the invincibility of the U.S., and thus in our ability to root out evil and prevail. There is still positive evidence on this subject, but also evidence to the contrary.
U
U
U
U
海湾战争是我们最干脆利落、最决定性的胜利之一。我们也得以平息巴尔干地区的敌对行动。另一方面,越南战争则表明,对付一个融入环境的游击敌人是多么艰难,而上周的事件强烈质疑我们情报工作的效力。
世界各国——甚至中东的大多数国家——都迅速表达震惊,并誓言支持美国。有多少是真心实意,有多少是为了避免我们的怒火而虚与委蛇?我当然希望是前者。
我们反应的迅速和力度,在很大程度上取决于我们愿不愿意偏离某些美国理想,因此需要一些艰难的决定。我们在采取行动之前,需要有多大把握?如果犯错,我们是否愿意承担失去世界支持的风险?我们是否愿意杀死非战斗人员?我们是否愿意让自己的男女军人承受伤亡?
几百年来本土免遭攻击,几十年来在动荡世界中相对安全,让美国人得以享受道德笃定、个人自由和安全的奢侈。随着我们看似坚不可摧的壁垒被穿透,我们必须讨论这些奢侈要在多大程度上被舍弃。
我们的战术——我们在追求安全与正义时将采用的战术,必定会有审视和争论。近年来,有一种立场在抬头,我将其概括为“我们不会作恶,即使是为了行善”。因此,中央情报局被决定不得执行暗杀,也不得雇用有犯罪或侵犯人权记录的“情报资产”。
The Gulf War was one of our swiftest and most decisive triumphs. We were also able to calm the hostilities in the Balkans. On the other hand, Vietnam showed how hard it is to deal with a guerilla enemy who melts into the scenery, and last week's events strongly call into question the efficacy of our intelligence effort. The nations of the world – even most of those in Middle East – have been quick to express horror and swear their support of the U.S. How many mean it, and how many have done it falsely to avoid our wrath? I certainly hope it's the former. The swiftness and forcefulness of our response will depend to a great deal on how willing we are to diverge from some American ideals, and thus will require some difficult decisions. How sure will we have to be before we take action? Will we accept the risk of losing world support if we make mistakes? Are we willing to kill non-combatants? Are we willing to bear casualties among our own servicemen and women? Centuries of immunity from attack on our soil, and decades of relative safety in a world in turmoil, have allowed Americans to enjoy the luxuries of moral certitude, personal freedom and safety. With our apparent wall of invulnerability penetrated, we will have to debate the extent to which these luxuries will be dispensed with. Our Tactics – There is bound to be review and debate regarding the tactics we will employ in pursuit of safety and justice. In the recent past, there has been a rise in the position I paraphrase as "we will do no evil, even in the interest of doing good." Thus it was decided that the CIA would not perform assassinations or employ "intelligence assets" with records of crimes or human rights violations. U
U
U
这些原则性立场,日后或许会被视为我们再也负担不起的奢侈品。
当检方获得合作证词时,通常来自罪犯——因为罪犯才是检方调查对象所交往的人,也只有他们才能被策反来指证对方。如今已明确,我们需要关于即将来临的恐怖行动的情报,而这类情报必须来自恐怖组织内部。那些我们不愿与之交往的人——或许只有恐怖分子本人——才能最有效地获得这种渠道。他们或许最擅长突破语言障碍和恐怖组织内部的紧密结构。难道我们能承担得起不用他们的代价吗?
公民自由与替罪羊——这些事件及其余波,可能会让我们得出结论:完全的公民自由与完全的国内安全,二者可能无法兼得。
These principled stances may come to be viewed as luxuries we can no longer afford. When prosecutors obtain cooperating testimony, it is usually from criminals – because that's who the targets of prosecution associate with, and that's who can be turned against them. It is now clear that we need intelligence regarding upcoming terrorist operations, and that intelligence must come from inside terrorist cells. People we might not wish to associate with – perhaps only terrorists themselves – can best gain that access. They may be the ones most able to penetrate the obstacles posed by language and the close-knit nature of the cells. Can we afford not to employ them? Civil Liberties and Scapegoating – These events and their aftermath may make us conclude that full civil liberties and full domestic security may be mutually exclusive. U
2001 年橡树资本管理有限合伙企业(Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.)
2001 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
U
U
3
3
版权所有,保留所有权利。
All Rights Reserved
过去八年里,朱利安尼市长采用那些在高犯罪率地区削弱公民自由的手段,把纽约的谋杀率削减了三分之二。人们在街上被拦下搜身,还有流动的便衣警察小队——其中一些人误杀了阿马杜·迪亚洛。朱利安尼被骂成法西斯分子,尤其是被自命清高的《纽约时报》痛批。但上周我看出两条共同的线索:“他的应急准备很恰当,并不过分”,以及“他就是我们未来几年需要的那种市长。”
恐怖袭击的规模以何种方式、蔓延多远还不确定,但我们或许会开始看到,在人群聚集的地方出现武装人员。他们可能需要有权搜查他们怀疑的人。我们可能会看到监控摄像头、电脑面部和指纹识别技术,以及身份特征排查的运用。互联网和电话隐私可能会被削弱。出行会变得不那么方便,我们的边境关卡可能会收紧。这些话题大概会引起激烈争论,但争论肯定会从新的角度展开。我想,得出的答案很可能与一周之前会有的答案不同。
周二那天,我的本能反应之一是想起最近的一部电影——《围困》。片子里,一名纽约警探试图应对穆斯林在纽约制造的恐怖统治。与此同时,一群愤怒的民众对中东人动用私刑式正义,总统则派军队进驻,领军的是个只谈公事的将军。他宣布戒严,中止公民自由,按族裔把纽约人圈起来。这不是一部多么了不起的电影,但它的切题程度,不亚于《摇尾狗》对克林顿弹劾前夕发动轰炸的影射。你会高兴地得知,结局是威胁被化解,美国理想得以保全。
针对中东裔美国人的暴力事件将会发生——已经发生了。但要知道这一点:人们说,如果我们放任股市下跌,如果不重建双子塔,或者不恢复正常生活,那我们的敌人就赢了。这些话都对,但如果上周的事件能够挑动美国人反目成仇,侵蚀那些让这个国家伟大的价值观,那他们同样赢了。
恐慌与误传——我亲眼目睹了情绪加上零散信息如何酿成错误。周四下午,我听说有三四个穿飞行员制服的人试图登机时被拦下。到傍晚,这个数字涨到了七个。可周五才发现,其实只有一个。
Over the last eight years, Mayor Giuliani cut New York's murder rate by two-thirds using tactics that eroded civil liberties in high-crime areas. People were stopped and frisked on the street, and there were roving squads of undercover policemen – including those who mistakenly killed Amadou Diallo. Giuliani was assailed as a fascist, especially by the high-minded New York Times. But I detected two common threads last week: "his emergency preparations were appropriate, not excessive," and "he's the kind of mayor we'll need in the years ahead." Depending on how far and in what ways the terrorist campaign spreads, we might begin to see armed personnel where people gather. And they might need to be able to search those they suspect. We may see surveillance cameras, computer facial and fingerprint recognition and the use of profiling. Internet and telephone privacy may be abridged. Travel will be less convenient, and our borders may be made less porous. These subjects are likely to be hotly debated, but the debate is certain to be conducted from a new perspective. And I think the answers are likely to be different from what they would have been a week ago. One of my reflexes on Tuesday was to think about a recent movie, "The Siege." In it, a New York police detective tries to cope with a Muslim reign of terror in New York. At the same time, members of an outraged populace pursue vigilante justice against Middle Easterners, and the President sends in the army, led by an all-business general. He declares martial law, suspends civil liberties and rounds up New Yorkers based on ethnicity. It's not a great movie, but it is as relevant as "Wag the Dog" was to Bill Clinton's impeachment-eve bombing raids. You'll be glad to know it ends with the threat defused and American ideals preserved. There will be – already has been – violence against Americans of Middle Eastern origin. But know this: People say that if we let stocks fall, if we don't rebuild the Towers, or if we don't return to normalcy, then our enemies will have won. All of this is true, but if the events of the week are able to turn Americans against Americans and erode the values that have made this country great, they also will have won. Hysteria and Miscommunication – I witnessed, first-hand, the ability of emotion and fragmentary information to combine for error. On Thursday afternoon, I heard that three or four men in pilots' uniforms had been stopped trying to board planes. By early evening it had grown to seven. But on Friday it turned out to have been one. U
U
U
我确实听到有人把最近一份政府恐怖主义报告的存在,和布什总统访问纽约可能不安全这类想法,再加上其他几点,串联起来,用来支持一个警告:周五会有化学或生物武器被释放。危机中,恐慌是自然的,但希望它能消退——同时希望警惕心能保持下去。
英雄主义——正如狄更斯所言,最坏的时代能激发出最好的一面。那些以承担风险、帮助他人为职业的人的故事,以及那些挺身而出、达到伟大高度的普通人的事迹,让我深受感动。
I actually listened as the existence of a recent government report on terrorism was interwoven with thoughts that it might be unsafe for President Bush to visit New York, as well as a few other elements, to support a warning that chemical or biological weapons would be unleashed on Friday. Hysteria is natural in crises, but hopefully it will subside – while hopefully vigilance will remain. Heroism – As Dickens suggested, the worst of times can bring out the best. I am incredibly moved by the accounts of people in careers based on bearing risk to help others, and of everyday people who rose to great heights. U
U
U
2001 年 橡树资本管理公司
2001 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
4
4
版权所有,保留所有权利。
All Rights Reserved
上周五的《华尔街日报》刊登了一篇令人难以置信、感人至深的文章,向纽约消防员的英勇致敬。文中写道:“在消防学院,新兵们学到,消防员职业生涯中只需一次英勇之举,那便是宣誓就职的时刻。此后所做的一切,据说都不过是职责所在。”我每次读到这里,都无法不被深深打动。
上周证明了美国不乏英雄:那位素不相识却背着一名女性走下世贸中心五十层楼梯的男子;那些驱车数百英里前来参与救援和清理工作的人们;还有最伟大的英雄——联合航空 93 号航班上的乘客们,他们宁愿让飞机坠毁在宾夕法尼亚州,也不愿它沦为又一颗可怕的炸弹。我们之中,有谁能为了拯救成百上千的陌生人而让自己所乘的飞机坠毁呢?
人员损失——正如我上周所写,橡树资本很幸运,没有人员损失。特蕾莎·奥哈根的丈夫和他的四个兄弟都是纽约的消防员;有几位一度失联或下落不明,但最后都安然无恙。我和她交谈时情绪激动,感受到我们俩心中涌动的感情,我忍不住失声痛哭。诺琳·基根和泽诺比亚·瓦尔吉的丈夫都是警察,他们也平安无事。虽然多等了些时日,但埃里克·利文斯通的女友和尼尔萨·维拉斯的母亲也最终被证实安然无恙。
Friday's Wall Street Journal carried an incredible, eloquent tribute to the bravery of New York's firemen. It said "In the academy, recruits learn that a firefighter performs but one act of bravery in his career, and that's when he takes the oath of office. Everything after that, it is said, is simply in the line of duty." I cannot read this without being moved profoundly. Last week proved that America is rich in heroes: The man who carried a woman he didn't know down fifty flights of WTC stairs. The people who drove hundreds of miles to offer their services in the rescue and cleanup effort. And the ultimate heroes, the passengers who crashed United flight 93 in Pennsylvania rather than let it be used as another terrible bomb. Who among us could crash the plane we're on to save hundreds or thousands of strangers? Loss – As I wrote last week, Oaktree was fortunate in having no losses. Teresa O'Hagan's husband and his four brothers are New York firemen; some were missing or incommunicado for periods of time, but all turned up safe. I lost it when I spoke with her and felt the emotion flowing through both of us. Noreen Keegan and Zenobia Walji have husbands who are policemen, and they, too, are fine. It took a while longer, but Eric Livingstone's girlfriend and Nilsa Veras's mother also proved to be safe. U
U
U
然而,我们大多数人身边都认识一些不那么幸运的人,这让悲剧变得真切。对我来说,这人是弗雷德·阿尔杰管理公司的掌门人大卫·阿尔杰,三月份我曾与他同台演讲。关于他,我只读到过赞誉。
这些事件清楚地证明,“随机暴力”并不意味着“均匀分布”。我震惊于那些令人难以置信的集中损失。一些世贸中心的租户公司毫发无损,而坎托·菲茨杰拉德公司和弗雷德·阿尔杰公司却损失了极高比例的雇员。超过 300 名纽约消防员失踪并推定死亡,其中有整个消防队。橡树资本的凯文·克莱顿住在一个人口大量通勤至曼哈顿下城的社区,他的教区有 10 人失踪,而包括他所在城镇在内的周边地区,失踪人数超过 100。几分钟内数千人丧生——以及那种局部而集中的损失——是我希望永远不要再经历的事。
结果——人们说每朵乌云都有一线银边,但在这场灾难中很难看到好的一面。那些英雄主义和牺牲的故事固然感人,但我宁愿没有读到它们的机会。
Most of us, however, knew someone who was not as lucky, and that brings it home. For me it was David Alger, head of Fred Alger Management Inc., with whom I shared a podium in March. I have read only good things about him. These events clearly prove that "random violence" does not mean "spread evenly." I am struck by the incredible pockets of loss. Some WTC tenant firms had no losses, but Cantor Fitzgerald and Fred Alger lost huge percentages of their employees. More than 300 New York firemen are missing and presumed dead, including entire fire companies. Oaktree's Kevin Clayton lives in an area from which many people commute to lower Manhattan. Thus ten people are missing from his parish, and well more than 100 from the nexus of towns that includes his. The loss of thousands of people in a few minutes – and the localized, concentrated losses – are things I hope never to live through again. The Results – They say every cloud has a silver lining, but it's hard to see the good in this one. The tales of heroism and sacrifice have been wonderful, but I'd rather not have had occasion to read them. U
U
U
与此同时,同样令人难以置信的是,这些事件也把美国人中最丑陋的一面从阴暗角落里引了出来。听到那些模仿式的炸弹恐吓、企图从悲痛家属手中骗取失踪者社保号码的电话,以及假冒捐款的骗局,我深感恶心。
生命损失惨重。重建纽约和五角大楼、援助航空公司、加强安保措施,以及弥补商业损失的财务代价,将是巨大的。
At the same time, and equally incredibly, these events have brought the worst of Americans out from under their rocks. I am sickened to hear of the copycat bomb scares, phone calls designed to pry the social security numbers of the missing from their grieving families, and phony contribution scams. The loss of life has been massive. The financial cost – to rebuild New York and the Pentagon, to the airlines, for stepped-up security, and for business lost – will be enormous.
2001 年橡树资本管理有限合伙公司
2001 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
5
5
版权所有,保留所有权利。
All Rights Reserved
美国那种与世隔绝、固若金池的美妙感觉已被打破。我们日常生活的脆弱性在攻击面前暴露无遗。这里的生活或许再也不复往日的无忧无虑。上周我告诉儿子安德鲁,难以置信的是,柏林会议居然照常进行。他说:“有什么难以置信的?每次世界某个地方发生爆炸,这里的生活照旧不受影响。”从很多方面看,我们现在被拖入了一个在世界各地司空见惯的现实——这很可能正是恐怖分子的目标之一。
上周的事件证明,金钱、地位和技术并非我们生活中最强大或最重要的东西。我们生活的基石,是家庭、信念和原则、我们确信可以信赖的朋友和同事,以及美国精神。这些才是我们应当感恩的东西……也许现在我们比以往任何时候都更加明白这一点。
The wonderful feeling that the U.S. was insulated and impregnable has been breached. The vulnerability to attack of our everyday life has been made clear. Life here may never seem as carefree. Last week I told my son Andrew that, incredibly, the Berlin conference was still going on as usual. He said "What's so incredible? Each time there's been a bombing somewhere in the world, life here has gone on without skipping a beat." In many ways, we now have been dragged into a reality that is commonplace throughout the world – which may well have been one of the terrorists' objectives. Last week's events proved that money, position and technology are not the most powerful or important things in our lives. The cornerstones of our lives were shown to be family, faith and principle, friends and colleagues we know we can count on, and the American spirit. These are the things we have to be thankful for . . . maybe now, we realize, more than ever.
September 16, 2001
September 16, 2001
2001 年 橡树资本管理有限合伙企业(Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.)
2001 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
6
6
保留所有权利。
All Rights Reserved