“足够”
“够了” 毕业演讲 —— 约翰·C·博格,先锋集团创始人,在乔治城大学麦克多诺商学院工商管理硕士毕业典礼上的致辞,获颁荣誉人文学博士学位,2007 年 5 月 18 日。我是这样回忆那则绝妙故事的,它为我今天的演讲定下了基调:已故的库尔特·冯内古特在谢尔特岛一位亿万富翁举办的派对上,告诉他的朋友、作家约瑟夫·海勒,他们的东家——一位对冲基金经理——一天赚的钱,比海勒那部风靡一时的小说《第二十二条军规》整个发行史上的收入还要多。海勒回答说:“没错,但他有一样东西永远不会有……够了。”
“Enough” Commencement Address MBA Graduates of the McDonough School of Business by John C. Bogle, founder, The Vanguard Group Upon receiving the Honorary Degree of Doctor of Humane Letters from Georgetown University May 18, 2007 Here’s how I recall the wonderful story that sets the theme for my remarks today: At a party given by a billionaire on Shelter Island, the late Kurt Vonnegut informs his pal, the author Joseph Heller, that their host, a hedge fund manager, had made more money in a single day than Heller had earned from his wildly popular novel Catch 22 over its whole history. Heller responds, “Yes, but I have something he will never have . . . Enough.”
够了。我被其简洁而富有感染力的表述所震撼,更别提它与当今美国社会面临的诸多重大问题息息相关。其中许多问题都围绕着金钱——没错,就是金钱——在我们这个“唯利是图”的社会里,金钱日益成为衡量声望的伟大上帝、评价男女的终极标尺。因此,今天早上我斗胆请你们这些即将获得 MBA 学位的毕业生——你们大多数人将步入商界——与我一起思考“足够”在我们这个社会的商业和创业中的角色,“足够”在金融体系主导我们经济中的角色,以及“足够”在你们将带入所选职业领域的价值观中的角色。
Enough. I was stunned by its simple eloquence, to say nothing of its relevance to some of the vital issues arising in American society today. Many of them revolve around money—yes, money—increasingly, in our “bottom line” society, the Great God of prestige, the Great Measure of the Man (and Woman). So this morning I have the temerity to ask you soon-to-be-minted MBA graduates, most of whom will enter the world of commerce, to consider with me the role of “enough” in business and entrepreneurship in our society, “enough” in the dominant role of the financial system in our economy, and “enough” in the values you will bring to the fields you choose for your careers.
库尔特·冯内古特很喜欢对大学生讲话。如果容我稍作转述,他相信,“我们应该在年轻人成为首席执行官、投资银行家、顾问和资金管理人(尤其是对冲基金经理)之前抓住他们,尽我们所能用人文精神毒害他们的心灵。”今天上午的发言里,我会试着用那么一点点人文精神来毒害你们的心灵。_________ 注:这些发言中表达的观点并不一定代表先锋集团现任管理层的看法。
Kurt Vonnegut loved to speak to college students. He believed, if I may paraphrase here, that “we should catch young people before they become CEOs, investment bankers, consultants, and money managers (and especially hedge fund managers), and do our best to poison their minds with humanity.” And in my remarks this morning, I’ll try to poison your minds with a little bit of that humanity. _________ Note: The opinions expressed in these remarks do not necessarily represent the views of Vanguard’s present management.
过去两个世纪里,我们的国家从农业经济转型为制造业经济,再转型为服务业经济,如今则主要成了金融经济。但我们的金融经济,顾名思义,是在从生产型企业创造的价值中做减法。想一想:虽然企业主享受着资本主义体系创造的股息收益和盈利增长,那些在金融市场上博弈的人,只有在扣除金融中介成本之后,才能拿到那些投资回报。因此,虽然投资美国企业是一场赢家的游戏,但在扣除那些成本之前击败股市是一场零和游戏。但在扣除中介成本之后,对我们所有人作为一个整体来说——击败股市就变成了一场输家的游戏。
Over the past two centuries, our nation has moved from being an agricultural economy, to a manufacturing economy, to a service economy, and now to a predominantly financial economy. But our financial economy, by definition, subtracts from the value created by our productive businesses. Think about it: while the owners of business enjoy the dividend yields and earnings growth that our capitalistic system creates, those who play in the financial markets capture those investment gains only after the costs of financial intermediation are deducted. Thus, while investing in American business is a winner’s game, beating the stock market before those costs is a zero-sum game. But after intermediation costs are deducted, beating the market—for all of us as a group—becomes a loser’s game.
是的,我们的金融体系攫取得越多,投资者赚到的就越少。然而,金融领域正是现代美国财富的集中地,是美国最富有的公民的温床。(如果你去年赚的钱低于 1.4 亿美元,那就不足以跻身收入最高的 25 位对冲基金经理之列。)当我们把所有对冲基金的费用、所有共同基金管理费和运营开支、所有支付给券商和理财顾问的佣金及费用、所有并购和首次公开发行所涉及的投行及法律费用、以及分销金融产品所必需的巨额营销和广告支出加在一起,我们谈的可是每年大约 5000 亿美元。这笔钱,从股票和债券市场慷慨给予投资者的回报中抽走,如果你愿意这么想的话,足以严重削弱那些为退休而存钱的美国公民取得成功的胜算。
Yes, the more that our financial system takes, the less our investors make. Yet the financial field is where the money is made in modern-day America, the breeding ground for the wealthiest of our citizens. (If you made less than $140 million dollars last year, you didn’t make enough to rank among the 25 highest-paid hedge fund managers.) When we add up all those hedge fund fees, all those mutual fund management fees and operating expenses; all those commissions to brokerage firms and fees to financial advisors; investment banking and legal fees for all those mergers and IPOs; and the enormous marketing and advertising expenses entailed in the distribution of financial products, we’re talking about some $500 billion dollars per year. That sum, extracted from whatever returns the stock and bond markets are generous enough to deliver to investors, is surely enough, if you will, to seriously undermine the odds in favor of success for our citizens who are accumulating savings for retirement.
然而事实是,金融业已成为美国企业利润的最大来源,其利润额甚至超过了庞大的能源业与医疗保健业的利润总和,几乎是制造业或信息技术业利润的三倍。¹ 25 年前,金融业在构成标普 500 指数的 500 家巨型公司盈利中仅占约 6%。10 年前,金融业的利润份额已升至 20%。而去年,金融业利润更是飙升至 27% 的历史最高水平。如果再算上大型制造企业旗下金融子公司的利润(例如通用电气资本,或汽车制造商的金融信贷部门——作为记录,2006 年标普 500 成分公司的经营利润总额为 7870 亿美元。各大板块的利润(单位:十亿美元)分别为:金融业 2150 亿;能源业 1210 亿;医疗保健业 790 亿;制造业与科技业各 810 亿。)
Yet the fact is that the finance sector has become by far our nation’s largest generator of corporate profits, larger even than the combined profits of our huge energy and health care sectors, and almost three times as much as either manufacturing or information technology.1 Twenty–five years ago, financials accounted for only about 6 percent of the earnings of the 500 giant corporations that compose the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index. Ten years ago, the financial sector share had risen to 20 percent. And last year, the financial sector profits had soared to an all-time high of 27 percent. If we add the earnings of the financial affiliates of our giant manufacturers (think General Electric Capital, for example, or the auto financing arms of For the record, the 2006 operating earnings of the S&P 500 totaled $787 billion. The earnings of the major sectors (in billions) were: Financials $215; Energy $121; Health Care $79; Manufacturing and Technology each $81.
如果将通用汽车和福特算入这一总数,金融板块的盈利如今很可能已超过标普 500 指数总盈利的 33%。这一占比是否足够尚不确定,但大概率会继续增长,至少短期内如此。
General Motors and Ford) to this total, financial earnings now likely exceed 33 percent of the earnings of the S&P 500. While that share may or may not be enough, it seems likely to continue to grow, at least for a while.
看起来我们正在走向这样一个世界:这个国家已经不再制造东西了;我们只是在一张张纸片上做交易,互相之间不停地倒卖股票和债券,并付给我们的金融庄家一笔真正的财富。我们还通过创造越来越复杂的金融衍生品,在金融体系内堆积巨大且无法估量的风险,从而进一步推高了成本。“当企业沦为投机漩涡中的一层泡沫,”伟大的英国经济学家约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯 70 年前就曾警告我们,后果可能非常可怕。“当一个国家的资本发展沦为赌场活动的副产品时,资本主义那份工作很可能就干砸了。”
We’re moving, or so it seems, to a world where we’re no longer making anything in this country; we’re merely trading pieces of paper, swapping stocks and bonds back and forth with one another, and paying our financial croupiers a veritable fortune. We’re also adding even more costs by creating ever more complex financial derivatives in which huge and unfathomable risks are being built into our financial system. “When enterprise becomes a mere bubble on a whirlpool of speculation,” as the great British economist John Maynard Keynes warned us 70 years ago, the consequences may be dire. “When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job of capitalism is likely to be ill-done.”
曾经,这个行业的业务是从属于职业的;如今,在资产管理领域和华尔街,职业已经沦为了业务的附庸。哈佛商学院教授拉凯什·库拉纳说得对,他用这样一句话定义了真正专业人士的行为:“我要为社会创造价值,而不是从中攫取价值。”然而,资产管理,就其定义而言,正是从企业所赚取的回报中抽取价值。沃伦·巴菲特那位睿智的伙伴查理·芒格直言不讳地指出:“大多数赚钱活动都包含着深刻反社会的影响……随着高成本模式日益流行……这种活动加剧了当前有害的趋势——越来越多的国家精英青年才俊被吸引到高回报的资产管理及其伴随的现代摩擦之中,而不是去从事能为他人创造更多价值的工作。”
Once a profession in which business was subservient, the field of money management and Wall Street has become a business in which the profession is subservient. Harvard Business School Professor Rakesh Khurana was right when he defined the conduct of a true professional with these words: “I will create value for society, rather than extract it.” And yet money management, by definition, extracts value from the returns earned by our business enterprises. Warren Buffett’s wise partner Charlie Munger lays it on the line: “Most money-making activity contains profoundly antisocial effects . . . As high-cost modalities become ever more popular . . . the activity exacerbates the current harmful trend in which ever more of the nation’s ethical young brain-power is attracted into lucrative money-management and its attendant modern frictions, as distinguished from work providing much more value to others.”
但我不是劝你别进入资产管理这个高利润行业。相反,我要提出三点告诫:* 第一,如果你真要踏入这一行,务必睁大眼睛行事,要清醒认识到:任何从客户身上榨取价值的行当,在比当下更艰难的时刻来临时,都可能发现自己被自己的手段反噬了。华尔街有句老话说得对——“金钱没有良心”,但别让这句话蒙蔽了你自己的良知,也别让这句话改变你的行为与品格。
But I’m not telling you not to go into the highly-profitable field of managing money. Rather, I present three caveats: * One, if you do enter this field, do so with your eyes wide open, recognizing that any endeavor that extracts value from its clients may, in times more troubled than these, find that it has been hoist by its own petard. It is said on Wall Street, correctly, that “money has no conscience,” but don’t allow that truism to let you ignore your own conscience, nor to alter your own conduct and character.
- 其二,当你开始投资、为几十年后的退休生活积蓄时,请选择一种能最大程度减少金融界从企业创造的回报中“抽成”的方式。没错,这算是一个有点“利己”的建议:投资于低成本的美国及全球股市指数基金。这是唯一能确保你公平分享金融市场慷慨回报的方式——无论这些回报是多少。
- Two, when you begin to invest so that you will have enough for your own retirement many decades hence, do so in a way that minimizes the extraction by the financial community of the returns generated by business. This is, yes, a sort of self-serving2 recommendation to invest in low-cost all-U.S.—and global—stock market index funds, the only way to guarantee your fair share of whatever returns our financial markets are generous enough to provide.
- 第三,无论你选择什么职业,都要尽力坚守该行业传统职业价值观——这些价值观如今正迅速式微——即服务客户始终是最高优先级。同时,不要忽视你的社区、国家乃至整个世界更高的福祉。正如威廉·潘所说:“我们在这个世界只走一遭,所以趁现在,尽你所能行一切善,施一切善,因为我们不会再有第二次机会踏上这条路。”
- Three, no matter what career you choose, do your best to hold high its traditional professional values, now swiftly eroding, in which serving the client is always the highest priority. And don’t ignore the greater good of your community, your nation, and your world. After William Penn, “we pass through this world but once, so do now any good you can do, and show now any kindness you can show, for we shall not pass this way again.”
大多数毕业典礼演讲者喜欢在结尾引用某位杰出哲学家的话来为自己的观点背书。我也不例外。因此,我现在向你们这些新晋工商管理硕士送上苏格拉底 2500 年前在雅典挑战市民时说过的话。
Most commencement speakers like to sum up by citing some eminent philosopher to endorse his message. I’m no exception. So I now offer to you new Masters of Business Administration these words from Socrates, spoken 2500 years ago, as he challenged the citizens of Athens.
“我尊敬你、热爱你:但你们这些伟大强盛城邦的公民,为何如此热衷于聚敛最多的金钱、荣誉和名声,却对智慧、真理和灵魂的最大提升如此漠不关心?你们不为此感到羞愧吗?……我所做的,无非是四处劝导你们所有人,不要只关注你们的身体和财产,而首先要、也主要是关心灵魂的最大提升。我告诉你们,美德并非来自金钱,而是来自美德,才能产生金钱和人类的一切善。”
“I honor and love you: but why do you who are citizens of this great and mighty nation care so much about laying up the greatest amount of money and honor and reputation, and so little about wisdom and truth and the greatest improvement of the soul. Are you not ashamed of this? . . . I do nothing but go about persuading you all, not to take thought for your persons and your properties, but first and chiefly to care about the greatest improvement of the soul. I tell you that virtue is not given by money, but that from virtue comes money and every other good of man.”
最后,我想回到库尔特·冯内古特讲的那个故事。等我终于找到出处,才发现它原来是一首诗。这首诗妙趣横生,更棒的是它只有 92 个单词。据说是真的,以名誉担保:约瑟夫·海勒——这位已经去世的重要而风趣的作家——和我一起参加了一位亿万富翁在谢尔特岛举办的派对。
I close by returning to Kurt Vonnegut’s story, which, when I finally tracked it down, turned out to be a poem. It’s delightful; even better, it’s only 92 words long: True story, Word of Honor: Joseph Heller, an important and funny writer now dead, and I were at a party given by a billionaire on Shelter Island.
我说:“乔,你觉得这算不算是自私自利?要知道,我可是在 1975 年就创立了世界上第一只指数共同基金。”
I said, “Joe, how does it make you feel Self-serving because I created, in 1975, the world’s first index mutual fund.
光是知道我们这位主持人昨天赚到的钱,可能比你那本小说《第二十二条军规》问世以来赚到的全部收入还要多,你觉得这滋味如何?”
to know that our host only yesterday may have made more money than your novel ‘Catch-22’ has earned in its entire history?”
乔说:“我有一样他永远也得不到的东西。”
And Joe said, “I’ve got something he can never have.”
我说:“乔,那到底是什么?”
And I said, “What on earth could that be, Joe?”
乔说:“我知道自己拥有的已经足够了。”
And Joe said, “The knowledge that I’ve got enough.”
不错!安息吧!
Not bad! Rest in Peace!
但现在还不是各位安享晚年的时候,也不是歇口气的时候。灿烂的未来就在前方。世间有待完成的工作,永远缺少怀有坚定之心、勇敢品格、睿智头脑和理想情怀的公民。是的,我们的世界已经充斥着枪炮、政治套话、傲慢、虚伪、自私、势利、肤浅、战争,以及确信上帝只站在某一边的自以为是。但这个世界从不缺少良知,也不缺少宽容、理想主义、正义、同情、智慧、谦卑、为更大福祉的自我牺牲、正直、礼貌、诗意、欢笑,以及物质与精神上的慷慨。正是这些品质,我恳请你们带入自己的职业生涯,并记住:人生这场伟大的游戏,不在于金钱,而在于竭尽全力,将这个世界重新建造。
But it’s not time for any of you to rest in peace, or to rest in any other way. Bright futures lie before you. There’s the world’s work to be done, and there are never enough citizens with determined hearts, courageous character, intelligent minds, and idealistic souls to do it. Yes, our world already has quite enough guns, political platitudes, arrogance, disingenuousness, self-interest, snobbishness, superficiality, war, and the certainty that God is on one side or the other. But it never has enough conscience, nor enough tolerance, idealism, justice, compassion, wisdom, humility, self-sacrifice for the greater good, integrity, courtesy, poetry, laughter, and generosity of substance and spirit. It is these elements that I urge you to carry into your careers, and remember that the great game of life is not about money; it is about doing your best to build the world anew.
这就够了……至少今天到此为止。
And that’s enough . . . at least for today.