原则性思考与AI需要并行

2026 · 随笔 · 原文约 909 词
译文与英文原文逐段对齐可在本页展开英文,也可打开发布者原址核对上下文。
打开来源正文

原则性思维与人工智能需要齐头并进

Principled Thinking and AI Need to Go Together

Ray Dalio, 2026-06-10

Ray Dalio, 2026-06-10

在人类智能与人工智能日益融合的当下,怎样才能做到真正的有效智能?几十年来,我一直在构建计算机化的投资决策系统,如今又在用最前沿的技术把这些系统推向极致,所以这个问题我思考了很多,也经常被人问起。下面这篇文章,我就把想法梳理出来。

What is the best approach to being effectively intelligent now that human intelligence and artificial intelligence are merging? Because I have been building computerized investment decision-making systems for decades and I am now evolving them to be as advanced as possible using the most cutting-edge technologies, I reflect a lot on that question and I am often asked for my thoughts. In this note, I lay out my thinking.

我体会到,要想做到足够好——尤其是在投资领域——绕不开一个事实:决策必须建立在逻辑清晰、可以理解的准则之上,而且要靠人类智慧和人工智能双管齐下。经验告诉我,哪怕是最先进的人工智能,也没有足够的洞察力让人盲目跟从,人类独有的理解和洞见依然无可替代。这一点在投资里尤其突出,因为增值是个零和游戏(大家都知道的所谓增值点,其实没什么价值)。我还认识到,原则性思维是整个过程的关键一环。所以,我写这篇东西的目的,就是要讲清楚:在人工智能辅助决策中,我如何践行原则性思维;为什么我认为它对有效决策不可或缺;以及当今迭代迅速的 AI 技术能怎样把它放大到惊人的程度。

I have found that to be good enough, especially in investing, there is no getting around the fact that one needs to make decisions based on logical, understandable criteria that use both great human intelligences and artificial intelligences. I know through my experiences that even the most advanced artificial intelligences don’t have adequate enough insights to allow one to blindly follow them and that unique human understanding and insights are still invaluable, and that that is especially true in investing where value-added is a zero-sum game (so that, when it comes to adding value, what is widely known is of little value.) I have also learned how principled thinking is an essential part of the process. So, my purpose here is to explain my approach to principled thinking in artificial intelligent decision making, why I believe it’s essential for effective decision making, and how it can be super-powerfully enabled with contemporary and rapidly improving versions of AI.

我说这些不是纸上谈兵。把原则性思维转化为一套能赢的计算机化决策系统,这件事一直是我、我的达利欧家族办公室(DFO)以及桥水基金取得成绩的原因所在,过去如此,现在依然如此。我相信,成功的路径,最好是把最优秀的人类智能和最优秀的人工智能结合起来,而我在下面要讲的这套思维方式,在人类与人工智能共生的新时代里,是必须理解并加以运用的。

I am not being theoretical about developing principled thinking and converting it into a winning computerized decision-making systems, as doing that has been—and still is—the reason for whatever success Bridgewater, my Dalio Family Office (DFO), and I have had. I believe that the path to success is best achieved by putting the best human intelligence together with the best artificial intelligence and that the way of thinking I am describing here is essential to understand and use in the new human/artificial intelligence era.

换句话说,我发现了这样一个道理:要想做事有效,就得用有原则的方式去思考,把自己的原则和决策对齐,最好同时借助人类智能和人工智能。原则性思维,不是边想边做决定,而是把自己的决策准则拿出来审视、系统化。最好的做法是:深入思考自己遇到的具体情况,梳理在这种情况下做决策所依据的准则,然后把这些准则写下来,变成原则条文——这样,以后再碰到类似情形,你就知道该怎么办。原则性思维包含两层内容:第一,描述现实如何运转——也就是因果关系;第二,针对那种情况给出应对的准则和原则。这些准则要尽可能做回测,看看它们在历史上表现如何,然后把它们计算机化、自动化,让它们和你平时的思考一起运作,看看合不合拍。如果有强大的人工智能当搭档,一起做这件事,无论对互相切磋还是对共同决策,价值都不可估量。

In other words, I have found that to be effective one has to think in a principled way and align one’s principles to one’s decisions ideally using both human and artificial intelligence. Principled thinking is the examination and systemization of one’s decision-making criteria rather than just thinking to make decisions. It is best derived by thinking deeply about the circumstances that one is encountering and the criteria one is using to make decisions given those circumstances and then writing these criteria/principles down so that, when analogous circumstances come along, you know what to do. Principled thinking consists of making descriptions of how reality works—the cause:effect relationships—followed by the criteria/principles for what to do in that situation. To the extent possible, these criteria/principles are back tested to see how they would have worked and then computerized and automated so that they work in conjunction with one’s regular thinking to see how they align. Doing this with one or more great AIs (as partners) is invaluable in both teaching each other and making decisions.

需要说明的是,这些准则的最佳来源,不是去看过去什么有效就假设未来也有效——也就是数据挖掘——也不是干脆问 AI 该怎么办。它们来自对事物的逻辑理解,再把这些理解转化成决策系统。这套系统就像电脑里的国际象棋程序,能独立于你走出一步棋,同时它把背后使用的准则和逻辑讲得清清楚楚,而你跟它搭档共事,双方一起学习、一起进步。你的 AI 搭档靠这些系统性准则走棋,你则靠大脑里的准则走棋,两者对照,比较每一步棋以及背后的逻辑,然后对齐。没法系统化的准则,就用主观定性评级和人工酌情覆盖来处理。系统总会主动向你解释它的逻辑(你还可以跟它讨论),这样你们互相理解,思维和行动背后的理由都能保持一致。

To be clear, these criteria are not best derived by looking at what would have worked in the past and assuming that it will work in the future—i.e., data mining—or simply asking an AI what to do. They are based on logical understandings converted into decision-making systems. They work like a computer chess game that makes moves independent of you, with the understandings behind the criteria it is using clearly conveyed and with you operating in partnership with it, so you and your AI partner learn and improve together. Your AI partner makes moves via these systematic criteria while you make moves guided by the criteria in your head, so that you can compare the moves and the logic behind them and then align them. For those criteria that can’t be systemized, you can use subjective qualitative ratings and discretionary overrides. The system always speaks to you, explaining its logic (which you can debate with it) so you can understand each other and align your thinking and the reasons behind your moves.

我要求自己的原则经得起时间和环境的考验,也就是说,我会尽量往前追溯历史,在各种环境、各个国家里检验,看这些原则到底有多普适、多长久。一旦发现它们不奏效,我就深入研究原因,加深对因果关系的理解,然后修正准则。换句话说,我积累了大量准则,基本都表述成“如果发生这个,就做那个,因为 XYZ”的形式,而且把理由写明,输出结果时一并呈现,让逻辑始终一目了然。这样一来,系统的输出既合乎逻辑又清晰易懂,而且它处理复杂关系的能力,比人脑更快、更冷静。

I make sure that my principles are timeless and universal, meaning that I test them as far back as I can and in every type of environment and every country to see how timeless and universal they are. In cases where they don’t work out, I study why to build my understandings of the cause-effect relationships and refine my criteria. Said differently, I build up a number of criteria/principles that are essentially statements of “if this happens, do this because XYZ” and I explain the reasons which are then conveyed in the output so that the reasoning is always apparent. That way, the systems’ outputs are both logical and understandable and the systems can process much more complicated relationships more quickly and unemotionally than one can in one’s head.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

这套方法,是我在创办桥水基金的 50 年里摸索出来并一直使用的,如今我在达利欧家族办公室还在用它,来充分利用新近出现的人工智能技术。这套方法如今在揭示永恒普适的因果关系、增强并系统化人的思考方面,能做到的事情令人叹为观止。我相信,要么你跟上这股前沿浪潮,要么就会失去竞争力。我期待继续为你讲解,尽我和团队所能,帮你站在前沿,保持超强竞争力。

That is the process I developed and used in my 50 years of building Bridgewater and that I am now using at the DFO to take full advantage of newly available AI technologies, and it I want to pass along to you. What this process can now do in creating understanding of the timeless and universal cause:effect relationship and enhancing and systemizing whatever one is thinking is mind-blowing. I believe that you will either stay at the cutting edge of doing this or you will be uncompetitive. I look forward to continuing to explain and help you stay at the cutting edge to be hyper-competitive to the best of my and my team’s abilities.