2025 年股东大会 · 上午场

2025-05-17 · 原文约 17730 词
译文与英文原文逐段对齐可在本页展开英文,也可打开发布者原址核对上下文。
打开来源正文

引言与季度数据

Introduction and quarterly numbers

沃伦·巴菲特请大家就座。这是我的第 60 次股东大会,也是规模最大的一次,我认为还会是最精彩的一次。开始之前,我想先给大家看几组昨天的数据,因为我们创下了各种各样的纪录。昨天,从中午到下午 5 点之间,有 19,700 人参加了我们的活动,前一年是 16,200 人,那已经是当时最高的纪录了,而我们在每一个方面都破了纪录。喜诗糖果的销售额从去年的 283,000 美元增长到 317,000 美元,这些数字大多受限于接待能力——我的意思是,全天都在排长队。布鲁克斯卖了 310,000 美元,这是他们有史以来最高的单日销售额,而且我想他们周日有近 3000 名跑者报名参加跑步活动,这人数相当多,需要起个大早。我记得以前是 2200 到 2400 人,但这次是 3000 人——这还没把我算进去,也不会把我算进去,我倒是可以站到起跑线附近来回走走。Jazwares 卖了大约 250,000 美元,比去年翻了一番。他们就是卖得有多快就卖多快,大多数柜台前都有人排队等着结账。

WARREN BUFFETTEveryone will please take their seats. This is my 60th annual meeting, and it’s the biggest, and I think it’ll be the best yet. Before I start, I’d like to give you a few figures from yesterday because we have set all kinds of records. Yesterday, we had 19,700 people join us in the afternoon between noon and 5:00, and that was up from 16,200, which was the previous record the year before, and in every aspect, we set records. See’s Candy to the $317,000 against $283,000 the year before, and most of these were limited by capacity. I mean, there were lines throughout the day. Brooks did this 310,000. This was an all-time record sale for them, and I think they have close to 3000 runners lined up for Sunday, which is a lot of people that get up I think we’ve had 2200 to 2400 before, but 3000, and that doesn’t count me, and it won’t count me, and I could go up, and down the line. Jazwares, around 250,000, doubled from the previous year. They just sell as fast as they can, and most place has people lined up at the cash register.

沃伦·巴菲特有时候,排队等待的时间比我们希望的要长得多,但最终我们会摸索出经验的,而且这件事会一直持续下去。每家公司都在创造纪录,我们也无从知道今天在场的确切有多少人。今天,世界各地都有人在收听我们的会议,但我想我们很可能会在许许多多方面创下新纪录。稍后,我们会进入问答环节,但首先,我想介绍一下我们的董事。我是沃伦·巴菲特,在奥马哈出生和长大。我们有格雷格·阿贝尔,他在加拿大出生和长大;还有阿吉特·贾恩,他在印度出生和长大。所以说,我们是一个非常多元化的团队。

WARREN BUFFETTSometimes they’re a lot longer wait than we wish they were, but we’ll learn the game eventually, and it goes on, and on. Every company sets records, and there’s no way of knowing how many people we have here. Today, we have people listening in around the world, but I think we’ll probably set records in a great variety of ways, and we’re going to have, in a minute, we’ll get to the question, and answer, but I would like to first introduce our directors, and I’m] Warren Buffett, and I was born, and bred right here in Omaha. We have Greg Abel. He was born and bred in Canada, and we have Ajit Jain, who was born and bred in India, so we have a very diverse group.

沃伦·巴菲特在场的董事们,我将按姓氏字母顺序介绍他们,等念到名字时,麻烦大家站起来,我知道这得费点劲。但请把掌声留到最后,这样我们才能顺利念完名单。我们从霍华德·巴菲特开始,请你站起来。掌声先留着,留给待会儿说到的他。苏珊·巴菲特。我们有史蒂夫·伯克、肯·切诺特、克里斯·戴维斯,还有苏·德克尔。苏是我们的首席董事。夏洛特·戴蒙德、小汤姆·墨菲、罗恩·奥尔森,我还会再念几位,等全部介绍完,我还要再说一点关于他的事。沃利·怀特、梅里尔·惠特默。好了,这就是我们的全明星阵容。

WARREN BUFFETTIn the audience, I will introduce them alphabetically, and if they stand as I introduce them, I know it will be an effort. But withhold your applause till the end so that we can get through the list, but we’ll start alphabetically with Howard Buffett, how I wish you would stand. Withhold the applause, and go to his head. Susan Buffett. We have Steve Burke, Ken Chenault, Chris Davis, and Sue Decker. Sue’s our lead director. Charlotte Diamond, Tom Murphy Jr, Ron Olsen, and I’ll have a few, and when we finish all of it, a few more things to know about him. Wally White, Merrill Whitmer, and with that, you’ve got our All-Star cast.

沃伦·巴菲特罗恩,你要是不介意站一下的话,我想特别提一句——罗恩和董事会的人终于定下了伯克希尔的董事年龄限制。我想不久之前,我们这里还有五位超过 90 岁的董事。但我们定下了最高的年龄上限,至少苏告诉我,这是她查过的公司里最高的年龄限制。但罗恩已经在董事会任职 28 年,并且与查理·芒格渊源颇深——芒格在更早的许多年里就与罗恩相识——罗恩在伯克希尔经历危机、喜悦、失望、惊喜以及所有其他波折的各种时刻都一直在场,对我们帮助极大。所以我想请大家给罗恩·奥尔森来一次格外热烈的鼓掌。

WARREN BUFFETTAnd Ron, if you don’t mind standing, I would like to point out that Ron and they finally got through an age director thing at Berkshire, I think we had five that were over 90 here not so long ago. But we put in the highest. Sue tells me anyway that it’s the highest age limit any of the companies she checked out came up with. But Ron has been on the board for 28 years and has been associated with Charlie Munger. Munger tolls for many years beyond that, and has been around it in a variety of times of crisis, joy, disappointments, surprises, and everything else at Berkshire, and has been of invaluable help to us. So I think I’d like to give a special hand to Ron Olson.

沃伦·巴菲特我还想做一件在股东大会上通常不会做的事,但我一直没找到机会。周四下午我听了他的电话会,这是我唯一会听的季度投资电话会议——我听了蒂姆·库克的电话会。我知道从台上找到他有点困难,但蒂姆·库克,他就在那里。说句让我颇有些不好意思的话:蒂姆·库克为伯克希尔赚到的钱,比我为伯克希尔·哈撒韦赚到的钱要多得多。所以,功劳应归于他。乔布斯我见过几次面,当然,乔布斯在打造苹果的过程中完成了别人谁也做不到的事,但乔布斯挑选了蒂姆来接替他,这确实是一个非常正确的决定。要知道,乔布斯英年早逝。除了乔布斯,谁也创造不出苹果,但谁也不一定能做到——而蒂姆却能把它发展壮大。我实在是不得不这么说。所以,我代表伯克希尔全体,谢谢你,蒂姆。还有几位我也想感谢一下。在伯克希尔,整个这场大秀也好,其他事情也罢,我其实什么活都不干。今天你们看到的一切,都是伯克希尔许许多多人的心血结晶。

WARREN BUFFETTAnd I think I’ll do something else that isn’t done usually in annual meetings, but I haven’t had a chance. I listened to him on Thursday afternoon. It’s the only investment quarterly call that I listened to, but I listened to Tim Cook, and I understand it’ll be tough for me to see him from up here. But Tim Cook, there he is. I’m somewhat embarrassed to say that Tim Cook has made Berkshire a lot more money than I’ve ever made for Berkshire Hathaway. So, credit should be given to him, for I knew Steve Jobs briefly, and Steve, of course, did things that nobody else could have done in developing Apple, but Steve picked out Tim to succeed him, and he really made the right decision. Steve died young, you know, and nobody but Steve could have created Apple, but nobody couldn’t. But Tim could have developed it. I have to ask so. So, on behalf of all of Berkshire, thank you, Tim. There are a couple of other people I’d like to thank. I don’t do any work, in terms of the show or anything else around Berkshire, but what you see today is the product of a lot of people at Berkshire.

沃伦·巴菲特要知道,他们不会认为自己的工作只是拧上灯泡,然后等别的专家来处理其他事情。伯克希尔的员工每年都为这场盛会全力以赴,我们的首席财务官以及每一个人都参与其中。在这方面,这是一个很了不起的组织,而过去这几年,这件事是由梅丽莎·夏皮罗牵头负责的,她把这一切都安排得井井有条。然后,我们前一阵子有了一个想法——嗯,其实是很久以前了。我想再往前追溯大概 65 年吧。我认识了卡丽·索娃的祖父和他的妻子,他们有九个孩子。苏茜和我当时参加了一个戏剧社。我看上去不像是会加入戏剧社的那种人,但事实证明,这在很多方面都是很正确的决定。首先,我喜欢那些剧目;除此之外,我不仅认识了卡丽的祖父——他在奥马哈经营一家保险公司,也就是比尔·凯泽。

WARREN BUFFETTYou know that they don’t think of themselves as the ones who are supposed to screw a light in and leave for somebody else specialists to come along, and do other things. The people of Berkshire put on this show every year, and our Chief Financial Officer and just everybody pitch in. It’s a remarkable organization that way, but it’s been led this year, in the last few years, by Melissa Shapiro, and she’s made this whole thing work. And then we got an idea a while back. Well, many years ago. Well, I’m thinking all the way back, maybe 65 years ago. I met Carrie Sova’s grandfather, and his wife, who had nine children, and Susie, and I joined a playhouse group. I don’t look like the kind of guy who would join the playhouse group, but it turned out to be a great move in many ways. First of all, I enjoy the plays, but beyond that, I met not only Carrie’s grandfather, who ran an insurance company in Omaha, Bill Kizer.

沃伦·巴菲特而且我还认识了“南瓜小子”的父母——路易和弗朗西斯。所以,在我二十多岁时,因为这样一种机缘巧合,我收获了一连串的好缘分。再说到卡丽,她父亲经营一家名为 Central States 的公司,后来我们收购了那家公司,她父亲继续经营着它。她姐姐几年前在伯克希尔工作过,后来决定组建家庭,前后生了四个孩子,于是就离开了,但卡丽很快就接替上来。卡丽身上藏着令人惊叹的才华,就像我身边很多具有你意想不到的才华的人一样,你给他们一些责任,他们就能迸发出来。于是,大约十到十一年前,我请卡丽为伯克希尔做一本 60 周年纪念册。我说,你只管发挥想象力,不需要来找我请示,也不用我做任何事。她以前从没编过书,从没出版过书,也从没跟印刷商打过交道,但她就是走出去,很快就组织出了这本 60 周年纪念册。

WARREN BUFFETTBut I also met the pumpkin boys’ parents, Louie and Francis. So in one sort of accident, when I was in my 20s, I came up with all kinds of good things, and in connection with Carrie, her father ran a company called Central States, and later on, we bought that company, and then her father ran the company. Her sister worked for Berkshire some years ago, and then she decided to have a family, and subsequently had four kids, so she left, but Carrie moved right in, and Carrie has amazing talent behind, just like I’ve got many people who have talent you don’t realise. You give them some responsibility, and so, 10 or 11 years ago, I asked Carrie to do a 60th-anniversary book about Berkshire, and just use your imagination, she didn’t need to check with me or do anything. She never edited the book. She’d never published the book. She’d never dealt with the printers before, but she just went out and promptly put together this 60th-anniversary book.

沃伦·巴菲特然后到了今年——当然,卡丽结婚了,有了三个孩子,所以她不得不离开我们。但我们每年会去看一场棒球赛,会邀请像卡丽这样杰出的前同事一起来。而卡丽呢,尽管她正在抚养三个孩子——你可能前天或昨天见过其中一两个——她主动提出要一起完成这本 60 周年纪念册,这也是我请她做的,她再一次全程接手。她真的就做到了。她一边照料孩子,一边不停地推进这件事,我不时会问她进展如何,她也都告诉我。就这样,她把这本 60 周年纪念册做了出来,赶在大会前大概一个星期完成了——因为我这项任务交得实在太晚了。

WARREN BUFFETTAnd then this year, well then, Carrie, of course, got married, and had three kids, so she had to leave us. But we go to a baseball game once a year, and we invite some of our distinguished alumni, like Carrie, to join us, and Carrie, even though she was raising three children, and you may have met one or two of them on the last day or so, she volunteered to bring together the 60th-anniversary book, and which I asked for, and again, she took the whole thing. She just did it. She kept doing the things with her kids, and every now, and then I’d ask her how it was going, and she tells me how it was going, and so she put together this 60th anniversary book, and got it done by maybe a week before the meeting, because I get rid of the assignment very late.

沃伦·巴菲特昨天,我们卖出了——我想是 4000 多本,也许是 4500 本。等等,等等,是 4400 本。我们印了 8000 本。我们原本打算印 5000 本,但昨天卖出了 4400 本,今天外面大概还剩下 3600 本左右——这本书的风格有些随性,但内容准确,她就这么完成了。我希望她能到场展示一下这本书。然后,在整个出版过程中,卡丽一分钱都不肯收。不过我设法让她指定了一家慈善机构,这便是史蒂文斯中心(Stevens Center),他们负责照顾所有那些人,还做了很多其他的事。该中心就在我们这里往南大约五六英里的地方,她的工作一直非常出色。她的祖父福尔曼(Forman)帮过忙,现在她的丈夫也加入了董事会。我们正在卖 20 本——这里是商业场所,对吧?——其中 10 本我们在股东大会前就已经卖掉了。我们只允许他们卖这么多,通过这种方式我们筹到了几十万美元。我记得有一本卖了 10 万美元。

WARREN BUFFETTAnd yesterday, we sold, I think it’s 4000 plus, 4500 maybe. Wait, wait, 4400. We printed 8000. We intended to print 5000, but we sold 4400 books yesterday, and we’ll have, I guess, some roughly 3600 out there today, it is kind of whimsical but accurate, and she came out with just the book. I hope she will come out with it, and then, as we went through this publishing experience, Carrie wouldn’t take a dime. But I did get her to name her; they were charity, and this Stevens Center, which takes care of all those people, and does a great many other things. It’s located about five or six miles from where we are here, south, and she has been doing a wonderful job. Her grandfather helped, Forman. Her husband now joins the board, and we are selling 20 copies of–this is a commercial place, isn’t it? We are selling 20 copies which we have sold 10 prior to the meeting. That’s all we let them sell, and we raised a few hundred thousand dollars in doing that. I think we sold one for $100,000.

沃伦·巴菲特但我们限量 10 本。25 美元的版本,唯一的区别就是卡丽和我签了名。但我们昨天留了 6 本,这 6 本拍出了 148,000 美元,平均每本大约 20,000 多一点儿,相当不错。然后我又让他们多留了 4 本。所以今天下午 1 点散场的时候,在咱们后面那块区域,书店会把所有东西都摆好。他们会卖出最后这 4 本,等全部卖完,他们筹的钱会与前面 20 本筹到的钱加在一起,我们将会给史蒂文斯中心一笔捐款,既在资金上帮他们一把,也提高一下它的知名度。

WARREN BUFFETTBut we limited it to 10, and the only difference in the $25 version is that Carrie and I signed them, but we saved six for yesterday, and the six brought $148,000, which is a pretty good average per book of about $20,000, and then I had them save four more. So this afternoon, when we disbanded at 1:00, the area right behind us had all the goods in the bookstore. They will sell the final four, and when they get all through, they’ll match whatever we’ve raised for the 20, and we’ll give the Stevens Center a boost both financially and in awareness.

沃伦·巴菲特当你翻阅那本书的时候会明白,卡丽确实包揽了全部工作。我的意思是,书里有大量信息,都是她去深入挖掘的。她中间来过几次,也许是为了核实一两个事实,但她还从芒格家族那里拿到了资料。她做得非常出色,而我连一分钱都没能说服她收下。所以,我今后得用很多其他方式来弥补了。

WARREN BUFFETTAnd when you look at that book, Carrie really did the whole thing. I mean, there’s a lot of information in there, and she dug her within, and she came through a couple of times, maybe to check a fact or two, but she got material from the Munger family. She did a wonderful job, and I couldn’t get her to take a penny for it. So I’m going to have to do a lot of other things in the future.

沃伦·巴菲特好。到此为止,我想业务方面的事都讲完了。贝基手上有一批来自全国各地、甚至可能是国外发来的问题,她从中挑选了一组,事先没有给我看过。我们会在贝基的问题和现场股东的提问之间交替进行,现场按区域划分。那么,现在我把第一个问题交给贝基。

WARREN BUFFETTOK. With that, I think we’ve covered all the business. Becky has questions that she’s received from all over the country, and perhaps outside the country, and she’s picked out a group of them that she has not shared with me, we will alternate questions between Becky, and the audience, which we have by zones, and that I will turn things over to Becky for the first question.

沃伦·巴菲特对关税的看法

Warren Buffett’s view on tariffs

贝基·奎克谢谢,沃伦。第一个问题来自比尔·米切尔。关于这个话题,我收到的问题比任何其他问题都多。他写道:“沃伦,在 2003 年《财富》杂志的一篇文章中,你曾主张采用进口证书来限制贸易逆差,并说这些进口证书本质上等同于关税。但最近,你又把关税称为一种经济战争行为。你对贸易壁垒的看法是否发生了变化,还是你认为进口证书在某种程度上与关税不同?”

BECKY QUICKThanks, Warren. This first question comes from Bill Mitchell. I received more questions about this than any other question. He writes, “Warren, in a 2003 Fortune article, you argued for import certificates to limit trade deficits, and said these import certificates basically amounted to a tariff. But recently, you called tariffs an act of economic war. Has your view on trade barriers changed, or do you see import certificates as somehow distinct from tariffs?”

沃伦·巴菲特是的,进口证书确实不一样,但它的目标是要让进口与出口取得平衡,从而避免贸易逆差变得过于巨大。实际上,它里面还有若干其他条款,用来帮助第三世界国家——当时是这样称呼的——或许能帮它们稍稍追赶上来一些,这个方案包含多个不同方面。但根本上,它是为平衡贸易而设计的。我认为,你可以为贸易平衡对世界有益这一观点找出不少相当有力的论据,而且贸易越平衡,未来就越会持续变好。

WARREN BUFFETTYeah, well, the import certificates were distinct, but their goal was to balance imports against exports. So that the trade deficit would not grow in an enormous way. In fact, it had various other provisions in it that helped third world countries, at that time as they were called, perhaps catch up a little bit, and they had a variety of aspects to them, but basically, they were designed to balance trade, and I think you can make some very good arguments for the fact that balanced trade is good for the world, and the more balanced trade there is the better it will continue to be better.

沃伦·巴菲特加纳种可可、哥伦比亚种咖啡,还有其他几样东西,而随着时间推移,美国工业已经从农业国演进过来。这里原本纯粹就是个农业国,我是说,基本如此,而那不过是 250 年前的事。我们已经变成了一个高度工业化的国家,我们并不想造成这种局面。在我看来,我们不断推高赤字,在各个层面欠下的债务越积越多。我设计过那个进口凭证方案,查理觉得那太像个鲁布·戈德堡机械了。我不知道当时他们从哪找来的这个说法,反正挺花哨的。但我觉得这方案肯定比我们现在正在讨论的好得多,而且毫无疑问,贸易可以是一种战争行为。

WARREN BUFFETTFor cocoa to be raised in Ghana, coffee in Colombia, and a few things, and over time, the American industry has gone from being an agricultural country. This was nothing but an ag country, I mean, but virtually, and that was only 250 years ago. We have become a very industrial country, and we did not want to make that a situation. In my view, we run greater, and greater deficits, building up greater, and greater debts against every side. I designed this import certificate thing, which Charlie thought was too much like a Rube Goldberg. I don’t know where they got, at the time, the name is, but it’s gimmicky. It’s certainly a lot better than, I think, we’re talking about now, and there’s no question that trade can be an act of war.

沃伦·巴菲特我认为贸易战已经导致了糟糕的后果。单是在美国国内激起的种种态度就不好。我的意思是,我们应当寻求与世界各地进行贸易,我们该做我们最擅长的事,他们该做他们最擅长的事。这原本就是我们最初的做法。250 年前我们生产烟草和棉花,用它们进行贸易,我们想要一个繁荣的世界。如今八个国家拥有核武器,其中还包括几个我认为相当不稳定的国家。我不认为试图构建一个让少数国家高喊“哈哈哈,我们赢了”,而其他国家都满怀嫉妒的世界,是个好主意。所以,我的进口凭证想法没掀起什么水花。我们手里还有副本,这些副本的需求不大,如果你想要,可以给办公室写信,我想我们大概能给你寄一份,但关键是,贸易不应该被用作武器。

WARREN BUFFETTAnd I think it’s led to bad things. Just the attitudes that have been brought out in the United States. I mean, we should be looking to trade with the rest of the world, and we should do what we do best, and they should do what they do best. That’s what we did originally. I mean, we’re producing tobacco, and cotton 250 years ago, and we traded it, and we want a prosperous world. With eight countries with nuclear weapons, including a few others, what I would call quite unstable. I do not think it’s a great idea to try and design a world where a few countries say, “Hahaha, we’ve won”, and other countries are envious. So, my import certificate idea went to no place. I think we’ve got extra copies, with not a great demand for them copies, and if you’d like, and write to the office, I think we could probably send you a copy of it, but the main thing to do is that trade should not be a weapon.

沃伦·巴菲特美国,我们确实赢了。我的意思是,250 年前我们从一无所有起步,如今成了举足轻重的国家,历史上从未有过先例。在我看来,当全世界 75 亿人不太喜欢你,而你那 3 亿同胞却还在以某种方式洋洋自得于自己过得有多好时,这就犯了大错。我认为这样不对,也不明智。我确实相信,世界其他地区越繁荣,不会是以牺牲我们为代价的。我们越繁荣,我们的安全感就越强,将来你的孩子们也会感到更安全。但别指望我的进口凭证方案能跟亚当·斯密的《国富论》齐名。好了,我们进入 1 号区域。

WARREN BUFFETTAnd the United States, we’ve won. I mean, we have become an incredibly important country starting from nothing 250 years ago. There’s nothing been anything like it, and it’s a big mistake in my view when you have 7 1/2 billion people that don’t like you very well, and you have 300 million that are crawling in some way about how well they’ve done. I don’t think it’s right, and I don’t think it’s wise. I do think that the more prosperous the rest of the world becomes, it won’t be at our expense. The more prosperous we become, and we’ll then the safer we’ll feel, and your children will feel someday. But don’t expect my import certificate idea to go down there with Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. OK. Let’s go to Area 1.

日本的利率

Interest rates in Japan

ST Jang巴菲特先生、阿贝尔先生、贾恩先生,早上好。我是 ST Jang,来自香港。过去五六年里,巴菲特先生和芒格先生在日本做了一笔非常出色且成功的投资。目前日本的 CPI 已超过 3%,距其 2% 的目标并不遥远。日本央行似乎非常坚定地要加息,而美联储、欧洲央行和其他央行却在考虑降息。您认为日本央行继续加息是否合理?其计划中的加息会阻止您进一步投资日本股市,甚至让您考虑兑现现有利润吗?非常感谢您每年都安排这场盛会。最后,祝您永远健康,一直把股东大会办下去。

ST JANGMr. Buffett, Mr. Abel, and Mr. Jaen. Good morning. I’m ST Jang. I’m from Hong Kong. Mr. Buffett and Mr. Munger made a very good and successful investment in Japan in the past five or six years. The recent CPI in Japan is currently above 3%. Not far away from its 2% target. The Bank of Japan seems very determined to raise rates while the Fed, ECB, and other central banks are considering cutting them. Do you think the BOJ, Bank of Japan, makes sense to proceed with the rate hike? Will its planned rate hike deter you from further investing Japanese stock market or even considering realising your current profits? Thank you very much for arranging this great event every year. Finally, I wish you healthy always and keep holding this shareholder meeting.

沃伦·巴菲特谢谢。嗯,我要把刚才你对我表现出的善意,同样回赠给日本。我让日本人民自己来定,在经济方面什么才是他们最好的行动方案。这是个不可思议的故事,到现在差不多六年了,正如你指出的。我当时正好在一本小册子里翻,里面大概有两三千家日本公司。我现在碰到一个问题:这本小册子我已经没法再看了,因为字号太小了。那里面有五家贸易公司,在日本它们有个专门的名称,可它们的股价卖得低得离谱。

WARREN BUFFETTThank you. Well, I’m going to extend the same goodwill to Japan that you just extended to me. I let the people in Japan determine their best course of action in terms of economics. It’s an incredible story, and it’s been about six years now, as you pointed out, I was just going through a little handbook that probably had two or 3000 Japanese companies. The one problem I have is that I can’t read that handbook anymore because the print is too small, and there were these five trading companies that had a special name form in Japan, but they were selling it at ridiculously low prices.

沃伦·巴菲特所以,我花了大概一年时间收购这些股票,之后我们更深入地了解里面的人,在这个过程中,我和格雷格看到的一切都让我们越来越喜欢。我们由此很接近了 10% 的持股上限——我们曾告知公司,未经他们同意我们绝不会超过这个比例——于是最近我们确实问了他们,这个上限能否放宽一些,目前正在逐步放宽。我想,我可以替我的继任者说一句:在接下来的 50 年里,我希望由他掌管一切,我们根本不会考虑卖掉这些股票。我是说,日本的记录一直极为出色。我猜蒂姆·库克会告诉你,iPhone 在那里的销量几乎超过美国以外的任何国家。美国运通会告诉你,他们在日本的产品销售非常、非常好。我们的投资对象可口可乐,在日本也表现得极为出色。他们这个文明社会里有不少习惯,与我们的运作方式不同。

WARREN BUFFETTSo I spent about a year acquiring them, and then we got to know the people better, and everything that Greg and I saw we liked better as we went along. So we got fairly close to the 10% limit that we told the company we would never exceed without their permission, and so we did ask them recently whether that limit could be relaxed, and it’s in the process of being relaxed somewhat. I would say that I’ll speak for the great beyond me that in the next 50 years, and I hope he’s running things in, we won’t give a thought to selling those. I mean, Japan’s record has been extraordinary. My guess is that Tim Cook would tell you that iPhone sales there are about as great as any country outside the United States. American Express would tell you that they sell their product very, very well in Japan. Coca-Cola, our investment, does extraordinarily well in Japan. They have a number of habits in a civilization that operate differently from ours.

沃伦·巴菲特在日本,他们的饮料容器、软饮料,整个分销体系都跟我们完全不一样。但我们受到了那五家公司极其好的对待。他们主要是跟格雷格谈。我一两年前去过那边。格雷格比我更国际化,所以他其实话不多。不知道你觉得你跟那些公司的代表见过多少次了?

WARREN BUFFETTIn Japan, their containers, their soft drinks, they have a whole different sort of distribution system there. But we have been treated extremely well by the five companies. They talked with Greg primarily. I went over there a year or two ago. Greg’s more cosmopolitan than I am, so he isn’t saying much, actually. I don’t know how many times you think you’ve met with representatives of one company or the other?

格雷格·阿贝尔嗯。说到这五家公司,我们每年肯定会碰面几次,沃伦。我觉得我们跟这五家公司建立的东西,一是这确实是一笔很好的投资,但正如沃伦刚才提到的,我们确实打算把这笔投资持有 50 年甚至永远。不过我认为,我们也在跟每家公司建立关系,以便今后逐步展开更多合作,而且我们真的希望跟它们在全球范围内做成大事。它们带来不同的视角和不同的机会,我们看到了这一点,这就是为什么我们要跟它们建立长期关系。

GREG ABELYeah. When you think of the five, there’s definitely a couple of meetings a year, Warren, and I think the thing we’re building with the five companies is one, it’s been a very good investment, but we are really, as Warren touched on, we envision holding the investment for 50 years or forever. But I think we are also building relationships to do incremental things with each of those companies, and we really do hope to do big things with them globally. They bring different perspectives and different opportunities, and we see that’s why we’re building that long-term relationship with them.

沃伦·巴菲特这是超长期的投资。他们有不同的习惯、不同的商业经营方式,世界各地都是这样。我们完全没有打算以任何方式去改变他们已有的做法,因为他们做得非常成功。我们的主要活动就是鼓掌叫好。这事儿我现在 94 岁了还干得动。所以,我们会一直持有这些股份。

WARREN BUFFETTIt’s super long term, and they have different customs, they have different approaches to business, that’s true around the world. We don’t have any intention, in any way, of trying to change what they’ve done because they do it very successfully, and our main activity is just to cheer and clap. I can still do it, 94. So, we will own those.

沃伦·巴菲特我们不会卖出任何股票。我是说,这种事在未来几十年内都不会发生。我猜他们会找到一些标的,因为那五家贸易公司几乎覆盖了全球。我们会偶尔发现一些机会,对其中某家公司而言可能规模很大。在某些方面,我们带去的一些帮助或许能助他们一臂之力,但那将是一段不断扩大的关系。伯克希尔的体量变得这么大,真的是太可惜了,因为我们热爱这个仓位,我巴不得它能比现在大得多。但即便这五家公司规模已经很大——它们在日本都是大公司,我们投入了约 200 亿美元市值的头寸——我宁愿有 1000 亿,也不愿只有 200 亿,这就是我对这件事的真实想法。

WARREN BUFFETTWe will not be selling any stock. I mean, that will not happen in decades. My guess is that they will find things because they cover the world pretty much, the five trading companies. We will find things occasionally that may be large for any individual company there. They may, in some way, be assisted by some help we bring to the situation, but that will be an expanding relationship. It’s too bad that Berkshire has gotten as big as it is because we love that position, and I’d like it to be a lot larger than it is. But even with the five companies, being very large, and they’re large companies in Japan, and we’ve got a market in the range of $20 billion invested, but I’d rather have 100 billion than 20 billion, and that’s the way I feel about it.

沃伦·巴菲特我们还有另外几项投资,但规模是伯克希尔业绩的敌人,我不知道有什么好办法能解决这个问题。查理一直告诉我,有点难题对我有好处。我一直没怎么搞懂这句话,但你要是多听他讲讲,就会明白这根本不是什么完全无解的问题。对日本的投资正合我们的路子。你还想补充点什么吗?

WARREN BUFFETTWe have several other investments, but size is an enemy of performance at Berkshire, and I don’t know any good way to solve that problem. Charlie always told me that having a few problems was good for me. I never quite understood that, but if you listen to him more, you will understand that it’s not an impossible problem at all. The Japan investment has been right up our alley. Did you want to add anything to that?

格雷格·阿贝尔不了,你已经说到点子上了。正如你所说,这正好在我们的能力范围内,我完全同意,沃伦。我确实相信,长期来看我们会看到一些非常大的机会,而这正是这段关系带来的一个巨大加分项。

GREG ABELNo, I think you’ve touched it. As you said, it’s right up our alley, and I absolutely agree, Warren. I do believe we’ll see some very large opportunities long term, and that’s just been a great plus of that relationship.

沃伦·巴菲特是啊,我想说,他们愿意把机会摆到我们面前。我们也乐意接受。我们有资金。我们彼此相处得非常融洽,只是他们的习惯跟我们不太一样。他们喝的是可口可乐的头号产品。他们在那边喝一种叫“乔亚咖啡”的东西。所以,我没能说服他们改喝樱桃可乐,他们也没能让我爱上乔亚咖啡。但这是一段堪称完美的关系。我只希望这样的合作能再多一些。

WARREN BUFFETTYeah, I would say they would like to present us with opportunities. We would like to receive them. We’ve got the money. We both get along very well with each other, and they have different they have different customs than we have. They drink the number one Coca-Cola product. They drink over there, something called Georgia Coffee. So I haven’t converted them to Cherry Coke, and they’re not going to convert me to Georgia coffee. But it’s a perfect relationship. I just wish we could get more like it.

沃伦·巴菲特当年我拿起那本小手册的时候,从没想过会有今天。那本册子大概这么厚,有时候一页上印两家公司,好像有几千页。但神奇的是,你只要一页一页翻下去,就会有所发现。去年我们放了一部电影,叫《翻遍每一页》,我想说翻遍每一页正是投资领域里一条重要的门道。很少有人愿意这样做:一页一页地去翻。而那些真正翻遍每一页的人,也不会把他们找到的东西告诉你。

WARREN BUFFETTI never dreamt of that when I picked up that little handbook, it was about that thick, but sometimes two companies to a page, and a couple of thousand pages, I believe. But it’s amazing what you can find when you just turn the page. We showed a movie last year about Turn Every Page, and I would say that turning every page is one important ingredient to bring to the investment field. That’s what very few people do: turn every page, and the ones that turn every page aren’t going to tell you what they’re finding.

沃伦·巴菲特所以你得自己去翻一翻,好吗?贝基?

WARREN BUFFETTSo you’ve got to do a little of it yourself, OK? Becky?

伯克希尔·哈撒韦的现金

Berkshire Hathaway’s cash

沃伦·巴菲特我不会做什么高尚到为了日后让格雷格脸上有光,自己就忍住不投资的事。不过,要是他真从我留下来的东西里占到什么便宜,那我可要心里不痛快了。我们的现金规模——比如说,就在不久前,我们差一点就花出去 100 亿美元。我是说,我们花过 1000 亿美元,做那些决定并不难——当有人拿出对我们有意义、我们能理解、出价公道、而且我们不用担心亏钱的东西时。投资这门生意有一个问题:机会不会井然有序地出现,而且永远不会。我的意思是,并不是每天都有长期回报能惊艳众人的机会。但这东西不是流水线产品,造不出来。

WARREN BUFFETTI wouldn’t do anything nearly so noble as to withhold investing myself just so that Greg could look good later on. Now, if he gets any edge from what I leave, I’ll resent that. The amount of cash we have–We came pretty close to spending ten billion not that long ago, for example. We spend 100 billion, I mean, and those decisions are not tough to make. When something is offered that makes sense to us, and that we understand, offers good value, and where we don’t worry about losing. The one problem with the investment business is that things don’t come along in an orderly fashion, and they never will. I mean, it isn’t like every day the long-term record is sensational. But that is not a product.

沃伦·巴菲特你看,200 个交易日,乘以 80 年,那就是 16000 个交易日。要是每天都能碰到四次左右的机会,而且预期吸引力都差不多,那当然很美。要知道,如果我做的是猜数字私彩,那么每天都有一样的期望值——我拿总投注额的 40%,唯一的问题就是我们能收进来多少流水——但我们做的不是那种生意。我们做的是一种极、极、极度依赖机会的生意。查理以前总嫌我做的事太多。我的看法是,一辈子如果只做五件事,到头来会比做五十件事业绩更好,而我们从来都没做到足够集中。

WARREN BUFFETTSee how we had 200 trading days times 80 years on it. I mean, 16,000 trading days. It would be nice if every day you got four opportunities or something like that, and they were expected to be equally attractive. You know, if I were running a numbers racket, you know, every day would have the same expectancy of that I would keep 40% of whatever the handle was, and so the only question would be is how much we transacted, but we’re not running that kind of business. We’re running a business which is very, very, very opportunistic. Charlie always thought I did too many things. I thought if we did about five things in our lifetime, we’d end up doing better than if we did 50, and that we never concentrated enough.

沃伦·巴菲特我们现在账上有 3350 亿美元的美国国债,我们当然更希望外部环境能发展到我们只需要持有 500 亿左右的地步,但生意的规律不是那样的。我们之所以赚了很多钱,靠的就是不想时时刻刻都满仓。其实,对于那些被动投资者只做几笔简单的投资,然后一辈子坐享其成,我们觉得也没什么不对。但我们是自己决定要干投资这一行的。所以我们认为,用一种极不规律的方式来行事,我们能比那种做法稍微好上那么一点。

WARREN BUFFETTIf we’ve got 335 billion now in treasuries, we would rather have conditions that have developed where we would have like 50 billion or something like that, but that just isn’t the way the business works. We have made a lot of money by not wanting to be fully invested at all times. We don’t think it’s improper, actually, for people who are passive investors just to make a few simple investments, and sit for their life in. But we’ve made the decision to be in the business. So we think we can do a little better than that by behaving in a very irregular manner.

沃伦·巴菲特假如你命令我必须投资——嗯,这么说吧,我们每年大概有 400 亿美元进账,起始规模是 3350 亿——假如你命令我每年必须投出去 500 亿,直到现金降到 500 亿为止,那用这种办法去投资会是世界上最蠢的事。真正极具吸引力的机会,只会非常偶然地出现。长期趋势是向上的。没人知道,我当然也不知道。格雷格不知道,阿吉特也不知道。没人知道市场明天、下周或下个月会怎么走,也没人知道生意明天、下周或下个月会怎么样。可他们把所有时间都花在谈论这些上,因为说这些很容易,却毫无价值。

WARREN BUFFETTIf you told me that I had to invest, well, let’s say that we have roughly 40 billion a year coming in, and we start with 335. If you told me I had to invest 50 billion every year till we got down to 50 billion, that would be the dumbest thing in the world to invest in that manner. Things get extraordinarily attractive very occasionally. The long-term trend is up. Nobody knows, and I certainly don’t know. Greg doesn’t know. Ajit doesn’t know. Nobody knows what the market is going to do tomorrow, next week, or next month, and nobody knows what business is going to do tomorrow, next week or next month. But they spend all their time talking about it because it’s easy to talk about, but it has no value.

沃伦·巴菲特在这个话题上,我从来没遇到过哪个人的话我愿意听。另一方面,我倒觉得翻看那些我已经看不懂的日本大厚书很有意思。那是在寻宝,时不时,你能发现点什么,偶尔,非常偶尔,还会再出现一次——我不知道什么时候。可能就在下周,也可能是五年后,但不会是五十年后。我们会被各种机会砸中,到时候有现金在手会很高兴;要是明天就砸过来,那当然更有趣,但明天发生的可能性非常低。非常、非常不可能明天发生,但五年内发生并不是小概率事件,再往后推移,概率会越来越高。大致就是这么回事。我的意思是,如果你 10 岁,第二天就死掉的概率很低。你要是活到 115 岁上下,那几乎是板上钉钉,特别是如果你是男性。我是说,所有长寿纪录都是女性保持的,我还试着劝查理去做个变性手术,好验证一下呢。他作为一个男性,已经活得相当不错了,我就这么说了吧。好,下一个问题。

WARREN BUFFETTI’ve never found anybody I wanted to listen to on the subject. On the other hand, I’ve found the leafing through things like those big Japanese books that I can’t read anymore. That’s a treasure hunt, and every now and then, you find something, and occasionally, very occasionally, but it’ll happen again, that I don’t know when. It could be next week, it could be five years off, but it won’t be 50 years off. We will be bombarded with offerings that we’ll be glad we have the cash for, and it’d be a lot more fun if that happened tomorrow, but it’s very unlikely to happen tomorrow. Very, very unlikely to happen tomorrow, but it’s not unlikely to happen in five years, and then the probabilities get higher as you go along. It’s kind of like that. I mean, if you’re 10 years old, the chances that you’re going to die the next day are low. If you get to be 115 or something like that, it’s almost a cinch, particularly if you’re a male. I mean, all the records are held by females in terms of age, and I tried to get Charlie to have a sex change so he could test that. He did pretty well for being a male, I’ll put it that way. OK, station 2.

房地产投资

Real estate investing

JACKIE HAN早上好,沃伦、克雷格,还有阿吉特。我叫杰基·韩,来自中国,现在在加拿大多伦多工作。这已经是我第八次参加伯克希尔·哈撒韦股东大会了。我花在各位身上的时间,可能比大多数人花在 Netflix 上的时间还多。你可能也猜得到,华人家庭出来的孩子,对房地产总有一种情结。所以,惯常的问题不是你为什么不买房,而是你为什么还在买股票,而不多买点房产?所以,我的问题是:在当下利率高企、全球充满不确定性的环境中,你是否仍然相信“别人恐惧时我贪婪”这句话?或者说,价值投资在当今环境下是否正面临新的挑战?谢谢。

JACKIE HANGood morning, Warren, Craig, and Ajit. My name is Jackie Han. I’m from China and now work in Toronto, Canada. This is my 8th Berkshire Hathaway meeting at this point. I’ve probably spent more time with you than most people spend on Netflix. As you might guess, coming from a Chinese family, we always have a soft spot for real estate. So the usual question isn’t Why don’t you own a house? Is it why you are still buying stocks instead of more property? So here is my question. With today’s high interest rates and global uncertainty, do you still believe in being greedy when others are fearful, or the value investing facing new challenges in today’s environment? Thank you.

沃伦·巴菲特就房地产而言,无论交易谈判、时间投入、多方的牵扯还是持有权问题,它都比股票难太多了。通常,当房地产出问题时,你会发现自己要打交道的不仅是股权持有人。但历史上也确实有过大量房地产以白菜价易手的时候,不过那时往往股票更便宜,而且操作起来容易得多。所以,查理做房地产更多一些。查理很享受房地产交易,他生命最后五年里实际上经手了相当多笔。他玩的是一个他自己觉得有趣的游戏。但我认为,如果你在他 21 岁的时候让他选:后半辈子只能做股票,或者后半辈子只能做房地产,他会二话不说选股票。至少在美国,证券市场呈现的机会比房地产要多太多了。

WARREN BUFFETTWith respect to real estate, it’s so much harder than stocks in terms of negotiation of deals, time spent, the involvement of multiple parties, and the ownership. Usually, when real estate gets in trouble, you’ll find out you’re dealing with more than the equity holder. But there have been times when large amounts of real estate have changed hands at bargain prices, but usually, stocks were cheaper, and they were a lot easier to do. So, Charlie did more real estate. Charlie enjoyed real estate transactions, and he actually did a fair number of them in the last five years of his life. He was playing a game that was interesting to him. But I think if you’d asked him to make a choice when he was 21. He had to be in stock exclusively. The rest of his life was in real estate. For the rest of his life, he would have chosen the stocks in the second. There’s just so much more opportunity, at least, in the United States. There’s so much more opportunity that presents itself in the security market than it does in real estate.

沃伦·巴菲特做房地产,你通常面对的是单个业主或一个家庭,他们可能持有一处大物业很久了。也许他们拿这处物业抵借了太多钱,也许人口流向对他们不利。但对他们来说,这是天大的决定。而当你走进纽约证券交易所时,你可以做成几十亿美元的交易,完全匿名,五分钟搞定,交易那一刻就算尘埃落定。

WARREN BUFFETTIn real estate, you’re usually dealing with a single owner or a family that owns maybe a large property they’ve had a long time. Maybe they’ve borrowed too much money against it. Maybe the population trends are against them. But to them, it’s an enormous decision. When you walk down to the New York Stock Exchange, you can do billions of dollars worth of business, totally anonymous, and you can do it in five minutes, and the trades are complete when they’re complete.

沃伦·巴菲特做房地产,当你把一笔大交易——和陷入困境的贷款方做的一笔大交易——签下协议后,就会进入另一个阶段,然后人们开始没完没了地谈更多条款。这完全是另一种游戏,而且在某种程度上,是另一类人才会乐在其中的游戏。我们在 2008 年和 2009 年也做过几笔主动找上门的房地产交易,但它们耗费的时间,跟你在证券市场上做明智的、很可能还更好的投资相比,根本就不在一个量级上。我的意思是,在一笔房地产交易里,每一个句子都跟一个人一样难缠。

WARREN BUFFETTIn real estate, when you make a deal, a big deal with a distressed lender, and you know, when you sign the deal, then you go into another phase, then people start negotiating more things, and more things. It’s a whole different game, and a different type of person, to some extent, enjoys the game. We did a few real estate deals that came our way in 2008 and 9, but the amount of time that they would take us compared to doing something intelligent, and probably better, and securities, there was just no comparison. I mean, in a real estate deal, every sentence is as important as a person.

沃伦·巴菲特在股票上,如果有人需要卖出 2 万股伯克希尔的股票,他们会联系我们,只要价格合适,五秒钟内就能成交,而且交易始终能完成。在股票市场,部分原因是他们可能对通话或交易指令有录音记录,但成交率几乎接近百分之百。而房地产交易,即使双方达成一致,也只是刚刚开始,后续流程可能耗时漫长。对一个 94 岁的人来说,参与一项谈判可能持续数年的交易,实在不是最有趣的事。实际上,如果你追溯到上世纪 60 年代的泽肯多夫,他当时想要改变世界,加州世纪城就是他的产物。他曾经站在世界之巅,然而项目却耗费多年才建成。

WARREN BUFFETTIn stocks, if somebody needs to sell 20,000 shares of Berkshire or something, they call us, and the price is right, it’s done in five seconds, and it closes all the time. In stocks, partly that’s because they’re probably having their wires or phones or whatever it is recorded as to what they’ve said, and everything but the completion rate for working on anything. In stocks, assuming you got a meeting of the minds on prices, essentially 100%. In real estate, it just begins when you agree, and it takes forever. For a guy, 94, it’s not the most interesting thing to get involved in something where the negotiations could take years. In fact, if you go all the way back to Zeckendorf in the 1960s, he was going to change the world, and Century City, out in California, is a product of this. He was sitting on top of the world with the years building.

沃伦·巴菲特所以,干那行的人很容易陷入麻烦。银行通常不愿意承认,但走完银行的全部流程,要花极其漫长的时间。他们刚刚才处理完马斯克三年前收购现在叫 X 的那家公司时借的那笔贷款,你看,一笔交易,双方都没准备好干净利落地行动,结果拖了三年才解决。我们觉得,当人们随时愿意拿起电话,一天就能做成几亿美元生意的时候,事情要顺畅得多。我是被惯坏了,但我喜欢被惯着的感觉,所以我们就这么保持下去。好的,贝基。

WARREN BUFFETTSo people tend to get in trouble in that business. The banks usually don’t want to recognize it, but that takes a long time to go through the bank processes. They just got through redoing the Musk loan that he made when he was buying, three years ago, the company that’s now X, and you know, three years to work out a transaction where you’ve got parties on both sides that aren’t ready to act. We find it much better when people are just ready to pick up the phone, and you can do hundreds of millions of dollars worth of business in a day. I’ve been spoiled, but I like being spoiled, so we’ll keep it that way. OK, Becky.

人工智能与保险

AI and insurance

贝基·奎克这个问题来自旧金山的萨姆·英格兰,提给沃伦和阿吉特。“随着人工智能系统变得能力更强、也更难以解读,你们认为这将如何影响保险业评估价格和转移风险的能力?伯克希尔以往在承保与资本配置方面应对过的颠覆性变化中,有与此类似的情形吗?”

BECKY QUICKThis question comes from Sam England in San Francisco, and it’s for Warren and Ajit. “As AI systems become more capable and harder to interpret, how do you see that affecting the insurance industry’s ability to assess price, and transfer risk? Are there parallels to past disruptions Berkshire has navigated in underwriting for capital allocation?”

沃伦·巴菲特好的,贝基。阿吉特的智商比我高出差不多一百点吧,而且他今天上午只在这儿待一阵子,所以我让他先来回答这个问题。

WARREN BUFFETTOK, Becky. Ajit got about a hundred points of IQ on me, and he’s just going to be here this morning, so I’m going to let him answer the question first.

阿吉特·贾恩毫无疑问,人工智能将真正改变游戏规则,它将改变我们评估风险的方式——无论是价格风险、销售风险,还是最终我们如何支付赔款。话虽如此,我确实也觉得,人们最终会花大量金钱去追逐下一个新潮事物。我们并不擅长成为最快或最先行动的人。我们的方法更倾向于等待观望,直到机会变得清晰,我们对失败风险、上行空间和下行空间有了更好的判断。所以目前,各保险业务部门确实在涉猎人工智能,试着找出利用它的最佳方式。但我们还未有意识地、大规模地向这个机会投入大量资金。我猜我们会保持准备就绪的状态,一旦那个机会闪现,我们随时会迅速投入其中。

AJIT JAINThere is no question in my mind that AIs are going to be a real game changer, and it’s going to change the way we assess risk. The price risk, the sell risk, and then the way we end up paying claims. Having said that, I certainly also feel that people end up spending an enormous amount of money trying to chase the next new fashionable thing. We are not very good in terms of being the fastest or the first mover. Our approach is more to wait and see until the opportunity crystallizes, and we have a better point of view in terms of risk of failure, upside, and downside. So right now, individual insurance operations do dabble in AI, and try, and figure out what is the best way to exploit it. But we have not yet made a conscious, big-time effort in terms of pouring a lot of money into this opportunity, and my guess is we will be in a state of readiness, and should that opportunity pop up, we’ll be in a state where we’ll jump in promptly.

沃伦·巴菲特我不会拿阿吉特去换未来 10 年人工智能领域的所有发展成果。所以,如果你给我的两个选项是:未来 10 年有 1000 亿美元可以用来参与财产意外险业务,再加上可以选择由任何开发方提供的最顶尖 AI 产品,还是让阿吉特来拍板,我任何时候都会选阿吉特,这话我不是在开玩笑。好,3 号提问站。

WARREN BUFFETTI wouldn’t trade everything that’s developed in AI in the next 10 years for Ajit. So, if you gave me a choice of having a hundred billion dollars available to participate in the insurance property casualty insurance business for the next 10 years and a choice of getting the top AI product out of whoever’s developing it or having Ajit making the decision, I would take Ajit anytime, and I’m not kidding about that. OK, Station 3.

波蒂略热狗

Portillo’s Hot Dogs

肖恩·西格尔大家好,我是来自伊利诺伊州芝加哥的肖恩·西格尔。感谢你们投入时间,也感谢执行委员会组织这次会议,把这么多来自不同背景的人聚集在同一个屋檐下。在伯克希尔·哈撒韦拥有的所有公司中,有一家是你们收购的,那就是总部位于芝加哥的 Portillo's Hot Dogs。你们怎么知道这家公司会与集团的整体投资组合相匹配?

SEAN SIEGELHello, I’m Sean Siegel from Chicago, IL. Thank you for investing your time, and to the executive committee for putting on this meeting, and for bringing together a diverse group of people in attendance under one roof Out of all the companies that Berkshire Hathaway owns, there was one that you acquired, the Chicago-based company Portillo’s Hot Dogs. How did you know that this would be a good fit for the overall company’s portfolio?

沃伦·巴菲特这个我得问格雷格了,因为我对这事一无所知。说不定他是在我看向别处的时候买的。

WARREN BUFFETTWell, I’ll have to ask Greg about that because I don’t know anything about it. So maybe he bought it when I was looking the other way.

格雷格·阿贝尔这个我得打个电话请教一下朋友。

GREG ABELI think I’ve got to call a friend on this one.

沃伦·巴菲特我们持有不少公司,不过我觉得我对它们大多都还算了解,但可能有些子公司的子公司不太清楚。不过这个我真的完全不了解。抱歉,但这说不定是件好事。不过热狗我倒是懂一些。

WARREN BUFFETTWe own a lot of companies, but I do like to think I know most of them, but maybe a subsidiary of a subsidiary in some way. But I really don’t know anything about it. I’m sorry, but that may be a good thing. I do know something about hot dogs, though.

格雷格·阿贝尔沃伦,我们在芝加哥确实有不少公司,都是通过马蒙集团收进来的,那个投资组合下已经积累了一批优秀的公司,但就像你说的,我觉得波蒂略不在里面。

GREG ABELWe do have a lot of companies in Chicago, Warren, through Marmon, and that’s been a great opportunity where we’ve accumulated a variety of excellent companies under that portfolio, but as you noted, I don’t believe Portillo’s falls under that.

沃伦·巴菲特我每个月大概会看五六十家我们旗下公司的财务报表,但以马蒙集团(Marmon)为例,马蒙集团本身拥有超过 100 家公司。它是由杰伊·普利兹克和他的兄弟鲍勃创建的,我们收购它时,它已经是一家非常出色的公司。但它本就高度多元化,而我们又进一步让它更加多元化了。

WARREN BUFFETTI look at the financial statements of about, perhaps, 50 or 60 of our companies every month but in the case of Marmon, for example, Marmon itself owns over 100 companies. It was created by Jay Pritzker, and his brother Bob, and it was a remarkable company when we bought it. But it was highly diversified already, and then we diversified it further.

沃伦·巴菲特所以它某种程度上就像是伯克希尔里的伯克希尔。我们发现这种安排效果很不错。挺有意思的。杰伊·普利兹克是一位出色的管理者,普利兹克家族有好几个分支。真要追溯的话,要到杰伊之前的 A.N. 普利兹克那一代了。不过 1954 年,美国联邦税法经历了一次非常重大的修改。这对我是个不小的打击——我当时在哥伦比亚大学,一直在读 J.K. 拉瑟写的一本关于税法的书,结果他们就把那整套该死的东西全改了。

WARREN BUFFETTSo it is something of a Berkshire within Berkshire. We found that that’s working very good as an arrangement. It was interesting. Jay Pritzker was a remarkable manager, and there are various branches of the Pritzker family. So it really goes back to A.N. Pritzker before Jay, and so on. But in 1954, they changed the federal tax code very dramatically in the United States. It was quite a blow to me because I’ve been at Columbia, and I’ve been reading a J.K. Lasser book about the tax code, and then they went and changed the whole damn thing.

沃伦·巴菲特但 1954 年是个大年。重大变化。那样的年头每隔一段时间就会出现,比如 1986 年,说不定这些日子你又会看到一个。布鲁克林有家叫 Rockwood 巧克力的公司,生产 Rockwood 巧克力碎粒,我们巴菲特杂货店以前就卖这个,人们拿它做巧克力曲奇之类的。后来发现,可可豆——最近价格猛涨——在 1941 年税务上首次允许采用后进先出法(LIFO)时,才 5 美分一磅。Rockwood 巧克力公司采用了后进先出法。于是,他们持有了 3000 万磅可可豆库存。

WARREN BUFFETTBut ‘54 was a big year. Big change. Those years come every now, and then like 1986, and you may see a big one of these days. There was a company called Rockwood Chocolates in Brooklyn, and they made Rockwood Chocolate Bits, which we used to sell at the Buffet grocery store, and people made chocolate chip cookies out of them, and everything, and then it turned out that cocoa, which lately has had a big run to cocoa was $0.05 a pound in 1941 when LIFO was first allowed for insurance, for tax purposes. The Rockwood Chocolate company went into the LIFO. So they owned 30 million pounds of cocoa.

沃伦·巴菲特然后,1955 年可可价格暴涨,当时我刚搬到纽约。新税法里有条规定:如果你同时持有两家以上公司的股份,满足特定条件,并且持股满五年,那么当你卖掉其中一家时,后进先出法(LIFO)下的存货收益可以免缴资本利得税。当时的税率大约在 48%,可能 52% 左右。因此,由于可可价格上涨,就出现了这笔巨额利润,但对洛克伍德巧克力屑(Rockwood Chocolate Bits)的销售却是灾难——零售价跟不上批发价的走势。差不多同样的事情眼下正在巧克力行业上演。最近好时巧克力(Hershey Chocolate)刚公布业绩,他们这一季度会很糟。我们买巧克力要花 4.50 美元一磅,因为西非那边出了状况,导致可可价格暴涨。

WARREN BUFFETTThen, cocoa took a run in 1955, and I just moved to New York. There was a provision in the new tax code that if you were in two or more companies, and you did certain things, and you’ve been in them for five years, and you got out of one of them there would be no capital gains tax on LIFO inventory gains, and tax rates were around 48%, maybe 52%, and so there was this huge profit cause the cocoa had gone up in price, but that made it terrible for them in selling Rockwood Chocolate Bits because the price of retail, which of the chocolate bits did not match what was going on at wholesale. Something almost identical has been happening in the chocolate business. Recently, Hershey Chocolate just came out, and they’re going to have a bad quarter, and we’re paying $4.50 a pound for chocolate because things are going on in West Africa that make cocoa prices go up dramatically.

沃伦·巴菲特不管怎样,杰伊·普利兹克买下了洛克伍德这家巧克力公司的控股权,正如我说的,我当时 24 或 25 岁。他们召集了会议,目的是用一种能把这项可可豆的收益确认出来、同时却不用为这笔收益缴纳大约 50% 联邦所得税的方式,把其中一家巧克力业务分拆出去。于是我去参加了那个会议,会议在布鲁克林,会场里几乎没人到场——除了一个人。我 24 岁,他 29 岁,那就是杰伊·普利兹克。几乎没人来开会,他们那栋楼也挺寒酸的,不过楼里倒是有很多家公司。杰伊干脆给我上了一课——确切地说,是一堂税法课。就算我读好几年研究生,学到的东西也赶不上他那天教我的多。后来,我们确实买下了那家公司,也就是洛克伍德,不过在他做了其他一些事情之后,它成了马蒙集团的基础。马蒙集团做过的众多事情里,包括研发出了赢得第一届印第安纳波利斯 500 比赛的赛车,还发明了后视镜——虽然我不确定这在经济学或其他方面有多大优势。以前在印第安纳波利斯 500 比赛里,车里坐着两个人:一个人负责回头看其他车手在干什么,另一个人负责开车。我们那位负责看后面的伙计生病了,于是他们发明了后视镜。所以,要是你想知道伯克希尔·哈撒韦的实验室里在搞什么名堂——我们正有人在研究后视镜这玩意儿。

WARREN BUFFETTIn any event, Jay Pritzker bought control of Rockwood, the chocolate company, and as I say, I was 24 or 25 years old, and they called the meeting to split off one of the chocolate businesses in a way that would enable them to recognize the gain on this these cocoa beans without paying roughly 50% federal taxes on the gain. So I went to the meeting, which was in Brooklyn, and nobody was there, this was in the turned every page category, except one guy. I was 24, and he was 29, and it was Jay Pritzker. Nobody had shown up at the meeting, and it was kind of a crummy building they had. But they had a lot of corporates there, and Jay just gave me a lecture or a lesson, I should say, on the tax code, and I could have gone to graduate school for years, and never learned as much as he did, and then later, we actually bought the company, that Rockwood Company, but after he did some other things became the basis for Marmon, and Marmon, among other things, developed the car that won the first Indianapolis Speedway race, and it invented the rearview mirror, which I’m not sure is a great advantage in economics or anything. They used to have, at the Indianapolis 500, two people in the car. One guy was to look back and see what the other people were doing, and the other guy was to drive the car. Our guy got sick, and so they invented a rear-view mirror. So if you want to see what’s going on in the laboratories of Berkshire Hathaway, we’ve got people working on things like the rear-view mirror.

格雷格·阿贝尔嘿,沃伦?我很高兴有个朋友打来电话,看来这招还行。彼得·伊斯特伍德,他负责管理我们伯克希尔的一家子公司,干得相当出色,他查到 Portillo’s 是由一家名叫 Berkshire Partners 的私募股权公司持有。这就是这个问题的来由。但它和伯克希尔并没有关联。所以,我们算是把这事查清楚了。谢谢,彼得。

GREG ABELHey, Warren? I’m happy a friend called. So that still works. Peter Eastwood, who runs one of our Berkshire subsidiaries, and does a great job of running it, tracked down that Portillo’s is owned by a private equity firm called Berkshire Partners. So that was the basis of the question. But it’s not associated with Berkshire. So, we got to the bottom of that one. Thank you, Peter.

美国例外主义

American exceptionalism

沃伦·巴菲特这只是我们运作方式的一个例子。好的,贝基。

WARREN BUFFETTThat’s just the sample of the way we operate around. OK, Becky.

贝基·奎克这个问题来自 Jessica Poon,她问:“您长期以来一直坚信美国的顺风效应和韧性,历史也证明您是对的。如今,美国似乎正在经历重大且可能是变革性的变化。一些投资者开始质疑‘美国例外论’这个概念。在您看来,投资者是对美国经济过于悲观了,还是这个国家确实正在进入一个需要以全新视角重新评估的根本性变革时期?”

BECKY QUICKThis question comes from Jessica Poon, who says, “You’ve long been a strong believer in the American tailwind, and the resilience of the United States, and history has proven you correct. Today, the US appears to be undergoing significant, and potentially revolutionary changes. Some investors are now questioning the concept of American exceptionalism. In your view, are investors being overly pessimistic about the US economy, or is the country indeed entering a period of fundamental change that requires a reassessment from a new perspective?”

沃伦·巴菲特我觉得杰茜卡确实相信这一点。从某种角度看,她是我们一位经理的继孙女——就是我在年报里提到的那位。可能不是同一个人。但不管怎样,美国自建国以来,一直经历着意义深远、颠覆性的变革。我说过,我们最初是个农业社会,一个许下崇高承诺的社会,但这些承诺并未兑现得很好。我们说人人生而平等,然后在宪法里把黑人算作五分之三个人。在第二条里,你会发现男性代词用了 20 次,女性代词一次都没有。所以一直等到第 19 条修正案通过,像是在说:“哦,对了,我们在 1776 年给过女性承诺,现在总该兑现了吧。”但之后我们又拖了很久才去兑现。我们始终处于变革之中。在这个国家,我们总能找到各种可以批评的事情。

WARREN BUFFETTI would say that Jessica quite believes this. In some sense, she is the step-granddaughter of one of our managers that I mentioned in the annual report. It may not be the same one. But in the event, America has been an insignificant, and revolutionary change, ever since it was developed. I mentioned that we started out as an agricultural society. We started out a society with high promises, and we didn’t deliver on it very well. We said all men were created equal, and then we wrote a constitution that counted blacks as three-fifths of a person. In Article 2, you’ll find male pronouns used 20 times, and no female pronouns used. So it took till, I should say until the 19th amendment was passed saying, “Oh yeah, we promised the women back in 1776, and now we’ll do something about it.”, and then we didn’t do something about it for a long time. We’re always in the process of change. We’ll always find all kinds of things to criticize in the country.

沃伦·巴菲特我人生中最幸运的一天,就是我出生的那天。你们知道,我生在美国,而当时全球大约 3% 的新生儿降生在美国。我想说,如果我能做什么的话,就是提前给我父母发信息:看在上帝的份上,在我出生前赶紧搬到美国去吧。但我就是运气好,运气好生得白,运气好生来是白人,各种运气。不过,如果你认为美国从 1930 年我出生以来没变过,我们经历过各式各样的事情——我们经历过大萧条,经历过世界大战,经历过原子弹的研发,那是我出生时做梦都想不到的东西。

WARREN BUFFETTThe luckiest day in my life was the day I was born. You know, I was born in the United. States, and at the time about 3% of all the births in the world are taking place in the United States. I’d like to say that if I had something to do was to send messages out to my parents, for God’s sake, move to the United States before I was born or anything. But I was just lucky, and I was lucky to be born pale, I was lucky to be born white, and all kinds of things. But if you don’t think the United States has changed since I was born in 1930, we’ve gone through all kinds of things, and we’ve gone through great recessions, we’ve gone through world wars, we’ve gone through the development of atomic bomb that we never dreamt of the time I was born.

沃伦·巴菲特所以,我不会因为并非每个出现的问题我们都解决了这件事而感到气馁。如果我是今天才出生,你知道,我会一直在娘胎里谈判,直到他们答应让我生在美国为止。所以我们都相当幸运。我们这里有两位非美国人士,正好可以提供另一边的视角。好了,4 号台。

WARREN BUFFETTSo I would not get discouraged about the fact that that’s not like we solve every problem that comes along. If I were being born today, you know, I would just keep negotiating in the womb until they said you can be in the United States. So we’re all pretty lucky. We’ve got two non-United States guys here just to get the other side. OK, Station 4.

保持耐心与快速行动

Being patient vs acting fast

丹尼尔你好,巴菲特先生。我叫丹尼尔,来自新泽西州特纳夫莱。首先,我只想说非常感谢能有这个机会向您提问。关于您的投资原则,您经常强调耐心有多重要。在您的投资生涯中,有没有过打破这条原则、快速行动反而让您受益的情况?谢谢。

DANIELHi, Mr. Buffett. My name is Daniel, and I’m from Tenafly, NJ. First of all, I just want to say how grateful I am for getting the opportunity to ask you a question. When it comes to your principles of investing. You often talk about how important it is to be patient. Has there ever been a situation in your investing career where breaking that principle, and acting fast has benefited you? Thank you.

沃伦·巴菲特嗯,这是个好问题。有些时候你必须快速行动。事实上,我们赚过一大笔钱,就是因为我们愿意比周围任何人都行动得更快。杰西卡·通斯凯尔,我想她是我们的经理本·罗斯纳的继外孙女。

WARREN BUFFETTWell, that’s a good question. There are times when you have to act fast. In fact, we made a great deal of money because we’re willing to act faster than anybody around. Jessica Toonskel, I think she’s the step-granddaughter of Ben Rosner, manager of ours.

沃伦·巴菲特1966 年,我接到纽约一个叫费尔斯坦纳的人打来的电话。他说,我代表安内伯格夫人。我记得在莫·安内伯格这个儿子出生前,安内伯格家其实有九姐妹。但他说,我们有家生意想卖给你。于是我打电话给查理,了解了一些细节,听起来挺有意思的。我和查理去了纽约威尔·费尔斯坦纳的办公室,他是个相当不错的人。自那以后再没见过他,但他当时在处理 E. A. 西蒙夫人的事务——她娘家姓安内伯格。她丈夫生前是本·罗斯纳的合伙人,但丈夫去世后,她和罗斯纳的合作关系变得有些紧张。所以罗斯纳以一个很划算的价格把生意卖给了我们。他把公司以 600 万美元的价格卖给我们,含 200 万美元现金,外加市场街 900 号街区一处价值 200 万美元的房产。

WARREN BUFFETTIn 1966, I got a call from a man named Felstiner in New York, and he said, I represent Mrs. Annenberg. There were actually nine Annenberg sisters, I believe before Moe Annenberg came along as a son. But he said we have a business we’d like to sell you. So I called Charlie, and I got a few details, and it sounded very interesting. Charlie, and I went back to the office of Will Felstiner in New York, who was a marvellous guy. Never met him since, but he was handling things for Mrs. EAS, E. A Simon, but she was named Annenberg. Her husband had been the partner of Ben Rosner, but he had died and then got kind of tense about working with her. So he offered his business at a bargain price. He offered us a business for $6 million, 2 million in cash, and another 2 million dollar piece of property in the 900 block of Market Street.

沃伦·巴菲特这家公司每年税前能赚 200 万美元,要价 600 万美元。我和查理又回到那个地方,本·罗斯纳也在场。他当时跟合伙人的遗孀一起做生意,心里很不痛快。那女的极为富有,他却一点乐子都没有。他对卖公司这事紧张得要命,对我和查理说,我替你们管到 12 月 31 号,之后我就走人。我跟查理走到走廊那头,我说,要是这家伙年底真辞职,那所有的心理学书都可以扔了。于是我们买下了这家公司,后来的关系一直处得很好。

WARREN BUFFETTIt was making 2 million a year pretax, and the price was 6 million. Charlie and I went back to this place, and Ben Rosner was there. He was just upset about doing business with his partner’s widow. She was extremely wealthy. He wasn’t enjoying it. He was very nervous about selling it, and he said to me, and Charlie, I’ll run this business for you until December 31st, and then I’m out of here. I got Charlie, we went down the hallway, and I said, If this guy quits at the end of the year, you can throw away every book on psychology. So we bought the company and had a great relationship.

沃伦·巴菲特我遇到过几次这种情况——我就是其中之一——东部的人心里觉得,他们对中西部人自有一种刻板印象。本结过婚。他的第一任妻子是爱荷华州人,他就觉得中西部来的人都挺好。你做生意的时候,要是跟这样的人共处一室,他们想把某个东西以 600 万美元卖给你,里面自带 200 万美元现金,外加几百万美元的房地产,而且每年还能赚 200 万美元。你知道的,这种时候你可不想保持耐心——你得保持耐心,等着偶尔接到那种电话。

WARREN BUFFETTI’ve had a couple of times, and I’m one of them where people in the East felt that they had a stereotype, in their mind, of what people from the Midwest were like. Ben had been married. His first marriage was to a woman from Iowa, and he just figured that anybody from the Midwest was okay, and the trick when you get in the business with somebody, they’re getting the room with somebody like that, and they want to sell you something for $6 million, it’s got 2 million in cash, and couple million real estate, and it’s making 2 million a year. You know. You don’t want to be patient then, you want to be patient, then wait to get the occasional call.

沃伦·巴菲特我的电话有时会响,是那种能把我弄醒的事情。我可能正在那边睡觉什么的。你永远不知道什么时候会遇到这种事,而这正是它有意思的地方。所以,这是一种耐心与愿望的结合——如果机会出现在你面前,你愿意当天下午就行动。对于有意义的交易,你不想在行动上磨磨蹭蹭;而对于别人跟你谈那些永远不可能实现的事,你也不想太有耐心。所以,耐心既不是一种恒定的资产,也不是一种恒定的负债。好了,我刚才想补充一句。

WARREN BUFFETTMy phone will ring sometimes, and it’s something that wakes me up. I may be sleeping in there or something. You just never know when that will happen, and that’s what makes it fun. So it’s a combination of patience, and willingness to do something that afternoon if it comes to you. You don’t want to be patient about acting on deals that make sense, and you don’t want to be very patient with people talking to you about things that will never happen. So it’s not a constant asset. It’s not a constant liability to be patient. Well, when I was going to add.

格雷格·阿贝尔嗯,我正想补充,在你保持耐心的过程中,据我所知——我想我们的阿吉特也一样,我们所有的经理人都是这样——我们在寻找机会时非常耐心,同时,正如你提到的,我们也想迅速行动。但在保持耐心的过程中,永远不要低估我们为快速行动所做的大量阅读和准备工作,因为我们都明白,无论是股票,还是各种私人公司,一旦机会出现,我们已准备好行动。耐心的很大一部分作用,就是用来做好准备。

GREG ABELWell, I was going to add as you’re being patient, I happen to know, and I think that goes for our Ajit also, and all our managers, very patient when we’re looking at opportunities, and as you touched on, we want to act quickly. But while we’re being patient, never underestimate the amount of reading, and work that’s being done to be prepared to act quickly because we do know, be it equities, but I would include a variety of private companies that when the opportunity presents itself, we’re ready to act, and that’s a large part of being patient is using it to be prepared.

沃伦·巴菲特对,当然,机会的到来没有任何均匀规律可言。我是说,这是你能涉足的最不稳定的那种活动。你要做的关键事情是,你得愿意在五秒钟后挂断电话,也得愿意在五秒钟后说“行”。干这行,你不能满脑子自我怀疑。

WARREN BUFFETTYeah, and of course it doesn’t come in anything like an even flow. I mean, the most uneven sort of activity you could get into. The main thing you have to do is you have to be willing to hang up after five seconds, and you have to be willing to say yes after five seconds. You can’t be filled with self-doubt in the business.

沃伦·巴菲特你就把它从工作中忘掉,转而去做别的事。这一行的一大乐事——实际上真是莫大的乐事——就是有人信任你。到了 90 岁,钱多得谁都没法数,为什么还要工作?你知道,就算他们今天才开始,有机器帮忙,还有各种条件。这跟你怎样生活、你的孩子怎样生活,或者其他任何事都没关系。

WARREN BUFFETTYou just forget it in your work, and go to some other activity. One of the great pleasures–it is a great pleasure actually in this business–is having people trust you. Why work at 90 when you’ve got more money than anybody could count? You know, if they started today, and have machines that are helping them, and everything else. It means nothing in terms of how you’re going to live, how your children are going to live or anything else.

沃伦·巴菲特查理和我都很高兴人们信任我们。他们 60 年前、70 年前就信任我们,当年我们还在合伙公司的时候就是这样。我们从来没找过专业投资者来加入我们的合伙公司。在我所有的合伙人里,一个机构客户都没有。我从不想招机构。我要的是人。我不想要那种人——他们成天坐在那儿,每三个月就有人跑来汇报,专挑他们爱听的说,搞那一套。我们得到的就是现在这帮人,所以才有今天台下这么多人。所以一切都很圆满。但该行动的时候,你不能磨蹭,那天就得把事情办成。好,贝基。

WARREN BUFFETTBoth Charlie, and I just enjoyed the fact that people trusted us, and they trusted us 60 years ago or 70 years ago, and in partnerships we had, and we never sought out professional investors to join our partnerships. Among all my partners, I never had a single institution. I never wanted an institution. I wanted people. I didn’t want people who were sitting around having people present to them every three months and tell them what they wanted to hear, and all that sort of thing. That’s what we got, and that’s why we’ve got this group here today. So it’s all worked out. But you don’t want to be patient when the time comes to act, you want to get it done that day. OK, Becky.

GEICO 的现代化改造

Modernizing GEICO

贝基·奎克这个问题来自弗拉维奥·蒙特内格罗,一位来自危地马拉的股东。“几年前,在这次会议上,贾恩先生概述了 GEICO 在现代化及整合其 IT 系统方面面临的重大挑战。当时还提到,竞争对手因使用远程信息处理技术而在定价策略上领先。如今,GEICO 的转型成效显著,体现在强劲的定价和运营改善上。您能否提供更多细节,说明在托德的领导下采取了哪些具体行动,以及这些变化将如何帮助公司在未来几年保持长期竞争优势?”

BECKY QUICKThis question is from Flavio Montenegro, a shareholder from Guatemala “A couple of years ago, in this meeting, Mr. Jain outlined the significant challenges GEICO faced in modernizing, and integrating its IT systems. It was also mentioned that competitors were ahead in their pricing strategies because of the use of telematics. Today GEICO’s turnaround is evident through strong pricing and operational improvements. Could you provide more details on the specific actions taken under Todd’s leadership, and how those changes will help sustain a long-term competitive advantage in the coming years?

阿吉特·贾恩是的。托德在扭转运营局面上为我们做了极为出色的工作。他接手时,GEICO 在两个重大方面落后于竞争对手。

AJIT JAINYeah. Todd has done a great job for us in terms of turning around the operations. When he took over, there were two major issues that GEICO was behind its competitors on.

阿吉特·贾恩第一,沃伦用过、我们大家也一直在用的一个说法,叫“按风险匹配费率”。第二,就是远程信息处理技术。五六年前,我们在远程信息处理技术方面还处于垫底的位置。从那时起,我们进步很快,曾经是我们的竞争劣势来源的远程信息处理技术,现在已经不再是短板。可以说,GEICO 现在在这方面的水平跟任何一家同行都不相上下。

AJIT JAINFirstly, the term Warren used, and we all have been using is “matching rate to risk.”, and secondly, telematics. We were at the bottom of the list, and so far as telematic circuits about five or six years ago. Since then, we have made rapid strides, and telematics, which used to be a source of competitive disadvantage to us, is no longer so. I would argue that our telematics at GEICO is about as good as anyone else is today.

阿吉特·贾恩所以这算是一次巨大的追赶。其次,在按风险匹配费率方面,我认为我们已经赶上了竞争对手,在这个领域我们不输给任何人。再加上 GEICO 和托德在降本方面功劳很大——他基本上裁掉了 2 万名员工。最初员工数接近 5 万,现在降到了 2 万,我估计这至少节省了 20 亿美元。所有这些让 GEICO 成为了一家竞争力非常集中的公司。所以在过去七个季度,GEICO 的综合成本率都是 8 开头。

AJIT JAINSo that’s been one huge catch-up. Secondly, in terms of matching rate-to-risk there again, I think we have caught up with our competitors, and we are as good as anyone else in the field. All this together with the cost reduction effort that GEICO and Todd get a lot of credit for. He has basically reduced the workforce by 20,000. Starting with something close to 50,000. He’s brought it down to 20,000, and that translates to, I guess, at least $2 billion. All this has allowed GEICO to become a much-focused competitor. So in the last seven quarters, GEICO has shown a combined ratio that has eight in front of it.

阿吉特·贾恩我从没想过有生之年能看到有人能把综合成本率压到这么低的水平。所以我认为 GEICO 干得非常出色。综合成本率 80 意味着,它在个人汽车保险的承保端创造出了业内最高的利润。我们已经取得了很大进展,托德也取得了很大进展,但我不想傲慢到说大功告成。我们确实进展不小,但我仍然认为在技术方面还需要做更多工作。人工智能,正如我们讨论过的,将会成为一股巨大力量,我们在这方面需要赶上,不是追平,而是要进入时刻准备好的状态。所以我认为 GEICO 现在的状态极好。沃伦,你不补充点什么吗?

AJIT JAINAnd I never thought I’d live to see the day when anyone could have a combined ratio as low as it is right now. So I think GEICO has done a great job. Its 80 combined translates to the largest profit anyone is making on the underwriting side in the personal automobile business. We’ve achieved a lot. Todd has achieved a lot, but I do not want to be so arrogant as to say that mission accomplished. We’ve achieved a lot, but I still think we need to do a lot more in technology. AI, as we talked about, is going to be a big force, and we need to play catch-up there, not catch up. But we are to be in a state of readiness. So I think GEICO is in great shape right now. Warren, don’t you want to add anything?

沃伦·巴菲特这是一个极有参考价值的案例,而这正是商业游戏整体、尤其是我们旗下各家生意最有趣的地方——每家情况都略有不同。它们都会遇到这样那样的挑战,但很多数字背后也蕴藏着很多机遇。1976 年,我们花 5000 万美元买下了 GEICO 的一半股权——准确说是当时 GEICO 的一半,5000 万美元。现在我们拥有 100% 的股权,而我们今年一季度赚的 20 亿美元里,有一半即 10 亿美元。相对于那 5000 万美元的投资,一个季度的回报就是 20 倍。

WARREN BUFFETTIt’s a fascinating case study, but that’s what’s so interesting about the whole game of business, but particularly about our businesses, is that each one is a little different. They all have challenges of certain sorts, but they also many certain numbers have many opportunities. We paid $50 million for half of GEICO in 1976. What turned out to be half of GEICO, 50 million. We now own 100%, but 50% of the 2 billion that we earned in the first quarter is a billion dollars, which on a $50 million investment is you know 20 to one in a quarter.

沃伦·巴菲特这需要多年才能成就,但有意思的是汽车保险保单——一百年前甚至根本不存在。准确说,应该是 120 年前。它现在是财产/意外险业务中体量最大的险种,规模极为庞大。

WARREN BUFFETTSo that takes years to develop, but the interesting thing is the auto insurance policy, which didn’t even exist a hundred years ago. Well, I should say 120 years ago. It’s by far the largest item in the property casualty insurance business. It’s huge.

阿吉特·贾恩我只想补充一点,除承保利润之外,GEICO 还提供了 390 亿美元的浮存金。

AJIT JAINThe only thing I’d like to add is that in addition to the underwriting profit, GEICO provides $39 billion of float.

沃伦·巴菲特哦,对。另外,是的,这可不是小事。你花了 5000 万美元买来的那些业务,给了你 290 亿美元免费使用,而且那一个季度还额外赚了 10 亿美元利润。汽车保险有意思的地方在于,我们这家公司是 1936 年成立的,卖的跟 1936 年一样的产品。在定价上我们比当年更精细了。当年有人凭判断——这完全是来自 USAA 的思路——判断政府雇员——GEICO 全称就是政府雇员保险公司——他们的驾驶水平比平均水平好。

WARREN BUFFETTOh yeah. In addition, yeah, and that’s not unimportant. You paid $50 million to get the businesses giving you $29 billion to work with for nothing, and on top of that gives you a billion dollars of profit in the quarter. The interesting thing about auto insurance is that we are a company that was started in 1936. We’re selling the same product as in 1936. We’re being more sophisticated about pricing it than we were then. Somebody just made the judgment. That’s all that came from USAA, which made the judgment that government employees–the name GEICO stands for Government Employees Insurance Company– the government employees were better drivers than average.

沃伦·巴菲特我不觉得他是什么精算师或类似身份,他只是观察到了这一现象,于是他离开了 USAA(那家公司至今仍非常成功),用几十万美元创办了 GEICO,第一年承保就赚了钱,第二年也赚了钱。这可不是那种搞上市圈钱的路子,不是那种只按 10 年做账之类的做法。他们就是定价确保赚钱,而从 1936 年以来他们一直都是这么做的。你现在买的车险保单,跟当年的看起来也差不多。这个庞大的行业在我们身边兴起,而且还在不断增长。当然,没人喜欢买保险,但人们确实喜欢开车。

WARREN BUFFETTI don’t think he was an actuator or anything else, but he just made an observation, and so he left USAA, which is still a very successful company, and he started GEICO for a few hundred thousand dollars, and he made money the first year from underwriting. He made money the second year. This is not a public offering type of thing. They aren’t, you know. He’s only accounting for 10 years, and all that sort of thing. They just price it to make money, and that’s exactly what’s been done since 1936. Your auto insurance policy looks a lot like the one from back then. This huge field has sprung up around us, and it’s still growing. Of course, nobody likes to buy insurance, but they sure like to drive.

沃伦·巴菲特GEICO 是一个引人入胜的故事。这些年来,公司大约有过三次因这样或那样的原因偏离了轨道,但随后又回归了自己的根本,这是一门非常、非常出色的生意。我们曾在一次股东大会上播放过洛里默·戴维森发来的一段信息。1950 年 1 月,他是那栋楼里唯一的人。我是在一个星期六跑到华盛顿去的,结果发现他们星期六不上班,我使劲敲门,最后是一个看门人让我进去了。我对看门人说:“除了你,这楼里还有没有别的人能跟我说说话?”他没往心里去,回答说:“嗯,六楼有一个人。”而那位名叫洛里默·戴维森的人,后来为我做了非常了不起的事。

WARREN BUFFETTGEICO is a fascinating story, and about three times over the years, the company has gotten sidetracked one way or another, and then it gets back to its basics, and it’s a wonderful, wonderful business. We showed at this annual meeting one time a message from Lorimer Davidson. In January of 1950, he was the only person in the building. I had gone down on a Saturday to visit but turned out they didn’t work on Saturdays in Washington, I pounded on the door till finally a janitor let me in, and I said to the janitor, “Is there anybody else I can talk to here except you?” He didn’t take it personally, and he said, “Well, there’s one guy on the 6th floor.”, and a fellow named Lorimer Davidson did wonderful things for me.

沃伦·巴菲特人生中你会碰到几个贵人,他们会彻底改变你的人生轨迹。如果你有幸遇到那么几位,得到了就要珍惜。在伯克希尔的董事会里,我们就有这样的贵人:汤姆·墨菲、桑迪·戈特斯曼、沃尔特·斯科特,还有比尔·斯科特。我们做对了一件事,就是牢牢抓住了这些人力资产,把对的人变成了终身的资产——他们才华横溢,合作起来又其乐无穷,而且总是付出远超分内之事。就像某个周六下午有机会听洛里默·戴维森说话时,你只需认真倾听。这就像那句“翻遍每一页”,有些书页你会想飞快地翻过去,但人生中总会有运气降临的时刻,你要懂得抓住这些运气。好了,第五区。

WARREN BUFFETTYou get a few breaks in life, in terms of people you will meet who will just change your life dramatically. If you’ve had a handful of those, and when you get them, you treasure them. We’ve had them on this board of Berkshire: Tom Murphy, Sandy Gottesman, Walter Scott, and Bill Scott. One thing we’ve done is we’ve held on to human assets, we’ve made lifelong assets out of people that are the right sort, and with incredible talent, but also just lots of fun to work with, and always doing more than their share, and to get a chance to talk to Lorimer Davidson on a Saturday afternoon, you just listen carefully. That comes in the category of “turn every page”, you know, some of them you want to turn pretty fast, But you just get lucky in life, and you want to take advantage of your luck. OK, Station 5.

格雷格·阿贝尔的继任者特质

Greg Abel’s successor qualities

本杰明·格雷厄姆·桑德森我叫本杰明·格雷厄姆·桑德森,来自加利福尼亚州帕萨迪纳。沃伦,感谢你多年来教给我们的一切。之前,你提到“只有史蒂夫·乔布斯能创造出苹果,但也只有蒂姆·库克能像他这样把苹果带到今天的高度。”沃伦,只有你能缔造伯克希尔,我猜你是不是也把格雷格看作万里挑一的人中龙凤?但他看上去却如此普通。抱歉,格雷格。

BENJAMIN GRAHAM SANDERSONMy name is Benjamin Graham Sanderson from Pasadena, CA Warren, thank you for all you’ve taught us over the years. Earlier, you said, “Nobody but Steve Jobs could have created Apple, but nobody but Tim Cook could have developed it like he has.” Warren, nobody but you could have created Berkshire, and I presume you view Greg as an outlier among outliers? But he seems so normal. Sorry, Greg.

沃伦·巴菲特说得挺好听的,其实意思就是不太正常,但我心领了。

WARREN BUFFETTThat’s a nice way of saying not normal, actually, but I appreciate it.

沃伦·巴菲特[01:20:33 本杰明·格雷厄姆·桑德森:所以我想知道您能否具体分享一下,格雷格身上哪些特质让他成为您首选的继任者?格雷格,我们很期待在未来的几十年里更多地了解您。谢谢。]

WARREN BUFFETT[01:20:33 Benjamin Graham Sanderson: So I was hoping you could share what specifically about Greg makes him your preferred successor, and Greg, we’re excited to get to know you more over the next few decades. Thank you.

格雷格·阿贝尔谢谢。

GREG ABELThank you.

沃伦·巴菲特你问到了最关键的问题。就业务而言,他们拥有一批极其出色的企业。我们具备做别人做不到的事的能力,在像美国这样已经发育成熟的资本主义体系里,这种能力是很难得的。我的意思是,想象一下,在一个非常、非常、非常大的赛场上,几乎不可能创造出类似的东西。我不认为光靠这个就能在你身边培养出这样的人才,更不用说资本实力、历史底蕴以及其他一切了。

WARREN BUFFETTWell, you’ve hit on the most important question, and now in terms of the business, they’ve got a wonderful group of businesses. We’ve got an ability to do things that nobody else can do, which is hard to get in a capitalistic system that’s been developed as fully as the United States has been. I mean, imagine being able to create something that in a very, very, very big playing field it would be very, very hard to develop anything like that. I don’t think you could develop the people around you with that, let alone the capital position, the history, and everything else.

沃伦·巴菲特答案当然是,这需要很长、很长的时间。你得先聚集一小批核心骨干,然后慢慢向外扩展,在这个过程中大家建立起相互信任,每个人都愿意多付出一些。我这些年接触过很多企业,天性上对什么多少都有点挑剔。我是说,我就是在找事情里有什么毛病,因为审视哪里会出问题是投资的一部分——你到底漏掉了什么?但我们这里的人,如果要他们放下日常工作,来搞一场像今天这样的活动,他们也照样乐意参与。

WARREN BUFFETTAnd the answer, of course, is that it does take a long, long time. It takes getting around a small cadre of people, which then spreads out somewhat, where you’ve got mutual trust, where people do more than their share. I’ve been around a lot of businesses over the years, and by nature, I’m somewhat critical of everything. I mean, I’m looking for what’s wrong in things because that’s part of investing is looking. What are you missing? But we’ve got people who, if they’re asked to put on a show like this, instead of doing their regular job, they participate.

沃伦·巴菲特昨天我花了一个半小时,去各个展区转了一圈。这些人都跑来感谢我,你瞧,他们个个热情高涨,赶来干这么多额外的工作,却一分钱额外报酬都不多拿。我不知道各家公司是怎么安排的,但他们确实很努力,而且乐在其中——你确实应该做自己喜欢的工作。

WARREN BUFFETTI went around the groups of people who were exhibiting yesterday for an hour, and a half, and these are people that are thanking me, you know, and totally enthused about coming and doing a lot of work for which they don’t get paid anything extra, and I don’t know anything about the arrangements the individual companies make, but they work hard, and they enjoy their work, and you really want to work in something you enjoy.

沃伦·巴菲特我这辈子有过五个老板,个个我都喜欢,而且个个都有意思。不过我还是觉得,替自己干活比替谁干都强。但如果你能找到共事起来极为愉快的人,那地方就值得去。我跟孩子们说过,你未必能像我这么幸运——我七八岁就找到了让自己感兴趣的事,但有的人可能得多花不少时间。有部电影叫《格伦·米勒传》,格伦·米勒带着他的乐队,一直混得不怎么样,足足熬了十五年。后来他找到了那种声音,打造出了第一张金唱片——你们知道是哪一首——就是 1941 年的《查塔努加·啾啾》。

WARREN BUFFETTI’ve had five bosses in life, and I liked every one of them, and they were all interesting. I still decided that I’d rather work for myself than anybody else. But if you find people that are wonderful to work with, you know that’s the place to go. I’ve told my kids that you don’t get lucky like I did when I found that seven or eight years of age, which really interested me but it could have taken a lot longer. There’s a movie called The Glenn Miller Story, and Glenn Miller went on from having a broken-down band for 15 years. He found the sound and created the first gold record, and you know what it was, but it was the Chattanooga Choo Choo in 1941.

沃伦·巴菲特他原本籍籍无名,带着乐队一路摸索,直到找到那种声音,这才扭转了局面。打那以后,我一直跟我的孩子们说,属于你们的声音不是我的声音,而且你不一定在第一份工作上就能找到它,因为你也得吃饭,对吧。但如果你能像我一样幸运,很小的时候就找到了,那就一直做下去。别太在意起薪,要格外留心你是替谁工作,因为你难免会沾染上周围人的习惯,所以有些工作不能接。你身处全世界最伟大的国家,也身在全世界最美好的时代。所以,我现在把这个交给格雷格了。

WARREN BUFFETTHe turned around from being a nothing with the band that he had till he found the sound, and I have always told my kids ever since that their sound isn’t my sound, and you don’t find it necessarily on the first job you take because you got to eat, you know. But if you get lucky like I did, you find it when you’re very young, and then just keep doing it. Don’t worry too much about starting salaries, and be very careful who you work for because you will take on the habits of the people around you, so there are certain jobs you shouldn’t take. But you’ve got the greatest country in the world, and you got the greatest time in the world. So I would say that I’m handing this over to Greg.

沃伦·巴菲特就算你穷尽想象,也未必能把关于伯克希尔这样的地方所有可能的梦想都梦完,但你必须确保的一件大事,就是永远能保证明天还能继续下场。我是说,在相当规模的金融活动层面上。

WARREN BUFFETTYou can’t even dream all the dreams that you could have about a place like Berkshire, but the big thing you have to do though, is always to be sure you can play the next day. I mean, in terms of financial activities on a meaningful scale.

沃伦·巴菲特有本书说,人一辈子富一次就够了。我的意思是,你绝不想去冒任何风险。如果你周围正发生着极其愚蠢的事情,你就别去参与。如果有人因为借钱、或者参与那些本质上是垃圾、却指望后面有更大的傻瓜接盘的证券而赚了更多钱,你得彻底忘掉这回事。这种事迟早会反过来狠狠教训你。

WARREN BUFFETTThere was a book about how you only have to get rich once. I mean, you don’t want to do anything but risks. If very stupid things are happening around you, you do not want to participate. If people were making more money because they’re borrowing money or they’re participating in securities that are really pieces of junk but they hope to find a bigger sucker later on, you just have to forget that. That will bite you at some point.

沃伦·巴菲特这游戏本身的底子就这么好,而你刚好生在当下,已经何其幸运。我的意思是,如果我生在 1700 年,我会说:“我想回到子宫里去。这他妈的都是什么?活得太难了。”但现在我一路走来,可以做每天都能尽情投入、乐在其中的事,这是相当美妙的人生。格雷格,你有什么要补充或者删减的吗。

WARREN BUFFETTThe basic game is so good, and you’ve been so lucky to be born now. I mean, if I’ve been born in 1700, I’d say, “I want to go back in the womb. What the hell with this? It’s too hard.” But now I’ve come along to do something where I can just play around all day with things I enjoy doing, and it’s a pretty wonderful life. Anything, Greg, you want to add or subtract from that.

格雷格·阿贝尔删减倒没有,但我想说,如我过去所言,担任这个角色,我再怎么深感谦卑、倍感荣幸都不为过,但更重要的是,能成为伯克希尔的一分子。沃伦,现在已经有 25 年多了。我有机会成为伯克希尔的一员,并与你、阿吉特、我们的董事会以及公司里许多其他人共事。正如你提到的,当你找到这样的事物,当你找到像伯克希尔这么特别的所在,你就会爱上它,它就会变成你每天都想做的事,这是何等难以置信的机会。所以,谢谢你。

GREG ABELNothing to subtract, but I would always just say it couldn’t be more, as I’ve said in the past, more humble than honoured obviously be in this role, but to have actually been part of Berkshire. Warren, it’s now 25-plus years. I had the opportunity to be part of Berkshire and to work with you, Ajit, our board, and many other people in our company, and as you touched on when you find something like that, and you find something like that like Berkshire that’s so special, you fall in love with it, and it becomes just what you want to do every day, and it’s just an incredible opportunity. So, thank you.

沃伦·巴菲特也谢谢提问的那位先生。如果一时找不到,在此期间别让自己饿死就行,但你终究会找到的,而且会在对的人身上找到。从这个意义上说,这几乎就像在婚姻中找到对的那个人一样。我是说,你们当中可能有人第一次约会就结了婚,不过我猜现在的人连约会都免了。但你知道,有时候等待也是值得的。好,贝基。

WARREN BUFFETT, and to the gentleman who asked the question. If you don’t find it immediately, you know, don’t starve to death in the meantime, but you will find it, and you’ll find it in the right individual. In this sense, it’s almost like finding the right person in marriage. I mean, probably some of you may have married the person you met on your first date, although I guess they don’t even have dates anymore. But you know, sometimes it pays to wait too. OK, Becky.

外币计价资产的投资

Investments in foreign currency-denominated assets

贝基·奎克这个问题来自南达科他州拉皮德城的马克·邦基和海伦·弗雷德里克森。“随着 2025 年美元兑其他外币迅速贬值,伯克希尔·哈撒韦是否在采取措施,来尽量降低这种货币风险及其对季度和年度收益的影响?如果有,请解释一下。”我再补充一位股东玛丽·张的问题:“伯克希尔目前借入日元,用来对冲其持有的日本股票投资的汇率风险。未来,你们会不会投资不对冲汇率风险的外币计价资产?”

BECKY QUICKThis is a question from Mark Bonki and Helen Fredrickson in Rapid City South Dakota. “As the US dollar quickly loses value in relation to other foreign currencies in 2025, is Berkshire Hathaway taking steps to minimize this currency risk, and its impact on quarterly, and annual earnings? If so, please explain. I’ll just add Mary Chang, another shareholder. “Berkshire currently borrows in Japanese yen to offset its currency risk and its Japanese stock investments. In the future, will you invest in foreign currency-denominated assets unhedged?”

沃伦·巴菲特是的。我们一直都是这样——大体如此。日本的情况不太一样,因为我们打算长期持有那个头寸,而且融资成本极其低廉。我确实在一定程度上做过用日元计价的负债去匹配买入资产的操作,但那不是我们的一项政策。实际上,这是我们第一次这样做,而我们过去还持有过大量外币计价证券。所以,对于它是如何影响季度和年度盈利这个问题,我们完全不做任何应对。我们不会依据它对季度和年度盈利的影响来做决策。我的意思是,从来没有就这个问题开过董事会会议。我只记得我跟查理谈过一次,我说:“要是我们这么做,年度盈利就会是这么个数,你也知道,所以我们应该——”无论是会计还是其他方面,数字该是多少就是多少。重要的是五年、十年、二十年之后,我们站在什么位置。

WARREN BUFFETTYeah. Well, we always have–pretty much. The Japanese situation is different because we intend to stay long in that position, and the funding situation is so cheap. I’ve attempted to some degree to match purchases against yen-denominated funding but that’s not a policy of ours. In fact, that’s the first time we’ve done that, and we’ve owned lots of securities in foreign currency. So, we do nothing in terms of the question about its impact on quarterly, and annual earnings. We don’t do anything based on its impact on quarterly, and annual earnings. I mean, there’s never been a board meeting. I can remember the conversation I had with Charlie when I said, “If we do this, our annual earnings will be this, you know, and therefore we ought to– Whether it’s accounting or with anything, the number will turn out to be what it will be. What counts is where we are five 10 or 20 years from now.

沃伦·巴菲特如果你一门心思想着要做出怎样的数字,那你很快就会受到诱惑——至少从我观察过的 20 家公司的经验来看是这样。总有人会以这样那样的方式在数字上做手脚,有时候还很严重。我见过一些人在其他各方面都值得我信任,但他们觉得在数字上动点手脚完全没问题——这绝不是什么好事。这种事我们连想都不会去想。

WARREN BUFFETTAnd if you start focusing on what number you’re going to produce, you will quickly get tempted, at least based on the experience I’ve seen from viewing 20 companies. One way or another, I’ll play around with the numbers, and sometimes seriously play around with the numbers, and I’ve seen people that you know, I trust them in all kinds of other ways, but they regard playing around with numbers as perfectly okay, and that’s just not something. We just don’t think about that.

沃伦·巴菲特实际上,上季度与日元的相关操作按照 GAAP 准则产生了某些费用,但这没什么大不了的。它下个月或明年就会变化。显然,我们绝不想持有任何我们认为其货币最终会一落千丈的资产。这才是我们担心的核心问题,我们担心的是美元。我的意思是,政府长久以来总有一种想把货币贬值的倾向。没有哪种制度能从根本上克服这一点。你可以选独裁者,也可以选代议士,做任何尝试都无济于事。但民众本身,就会持续推动货币走向疲软。

WARREN BUFFETTActually, the relationship with the yen in the last quarter resulted in certain GAAP charges, but it doesn’t make any difference. It will change next month or next year, and obviously, we wouldn’t want to own anything that we thought was in a currency that was really going to hell. That’s the big thing, we worry about with the United States currency. I mean, it’s the tendency of a government to want to debase its currency over time. There’s no system that beats that. You can pick dictators. You can pick representatives. You can do anything. But the people, there will be a push toward weaker currencies.

沃伦·巴菲特当然,我在年报里也简短提过,财政政策在美国让我感到害怕,因为现状就是如此,所有动机都在推动大量会引发货币麻烦的事情,但这不限于美国,全世界都是如此。有些地方这种事还经常失控,你也知道,他们会把货币贬值。利率高得惊人,而且这种情况还在持续。我是说,人们可以研究经济学,你也可以搞出各种制度安排。但说到底,如果你手里有控制货币的人,你就可以发行货币来支付,也可以像几个世纪前那样削减铸币成色,总会有人这么做。这是他们工作的天性。

WARREN BUFFETTAnd of course, I mentioned very briefly in the annual report that fiscal policy is what scares me in the United States because it’s made the way it is, and all the motivations are doing a lot of things that will cause trouble with money, but that’s not limited to the United States. It’s all over the world, and in some places, it gets out of control regularly. As you know, they devalue it. Rates that are breathtaking and that’s continued. I mean, people can study economics, and you can have all kinds of arrangements. But in the end, if you’ve got people that control the currency, you can issue pay for money, and you will or you can engage in clipping currencies like they used to centuries ago, and there will always be people. It’s the nature of their job.

沃伦·巴菲特我不是要专门指出他们特别邪恶或类似的意思,但政府运作的自然趋势就是让货币随时间贬值,这会产生严重后果。要在体系内建立制衡来防止这种情况发生,非常困难。我们在这里过得很愉快,不管叫它头 100 天还是最后 100 天,随你怎么称呼。人们会竭力确保自己不是在制造财政风险,确保游戏不会终结,也永远不会终结。归根结底,如果你把二战后的重大通胀梳理一遍,那就是一份没完没了的名单,同样的名字反复出现,诸如此类。所以货币的价值是件让人不安的事,我们也没有什么了不起的体系能战胜它。但在日本这个特定头寸上,我们确实做到了,因为我们预期会持有它 50 年、100 年甚至更久,我们持有的资产归根结底是以某种货币计价且容易预测的,只要套息的条件依然成立,我们就会持续这样做。我们会设法发行以日元计价的负债,但这跟我们在季度或年度收益上的考量毫无关系。格雷格,你有什么要说的吗?

WARREN BUFFETTI’m not singling them out as particularly evil or anything like that, but the natural course of government is to make the currency worth less over time, and there are important consequences. It’s very hard to build checks and balances into the system to keep that from happening, and we’ve had a lot of fun here, either the first 100 days or the last 100 days, whatever you want to call it. What happens when people try to make sure that they aren’t running fiscal risks, and that the game isn’t over, and never will be over. You know, in finality, if you look up, and you search the great inflations of post-World War 2, it’s just a list that goes on forever, and the same names keep popping up, and everything. So value of currency is a scary thing, and we don’t have any great system for beating that. We do in this particular Japanese position because we expect to hold it for 50 or 100 years or more, and we will be owning something that’s denominated in the end, and easily predictable, and we’ll just as long as the carry-on is right. We’ll attempt the issue of Japanese-denominated liabilities, but that’s not because of anything we care about in terms of quarterly or annual earnings. Greg, do you have anything to say?

格雷格·阿贝尔我想接着刚才的问题说,毫无疑问,我们在基本面上对投资这五家日本公司感到非常放心,也清楚地认识到我们投资的币种是日元。我们能够借入日元这件事,几乎可以说是一个不错的额外机会,但我们无论是对这几家日本公司,还是对最终将会实现的币种,也就是日元,都感到非常安心。

GREG ABELI was just going to say that relative to the question, there’s no question we were fundamentally very comfortable with investing in the five Japanese companies, and recognizing we’re investing in yen. The fact we could then borrow in yen was almost just like a nice incremental opportunity, but we are very comfortable both with the Japanese companies and with the currency we would ultimately realize, IE, in the yen.

沃伦·巴菲特我们只做过一次大规模的外汇投资,跟我为《财富》杂志写那篇文章多少有点关联。我们做多了 12 种货币,我记得其中只有四五种是主要货币。但我说我们做多,就意味着我们在做空美元。这个头寸我们持有了几年,赚了几十亿美元,在当时对我们来说相当可观。查理一直觉得,如果你必须在股票以外挑选投资领域——他对债券相当精通,对房地产相当精通,对很多很多事情都相当精通——但他说,他认为自己能在外汇上赚到大钱。

WARREN BUFFETTWe only made, as I referred to earlier one big currency play which was connected a little bit with when I wrote that article for Fortune. We got along 12 other currencies, as I remember, only four or five of them are really big currencies. But when I say we got long, it means we’re short the dollar. So we held that position for a couple of years, and we made several billion dollars on it which was significant to us then. Charlie always felt that if you had to pick an area outside of stocks in which to invest—And he knew a lot about bonds. He knew a lot about real estate. He knew a lot about a lot of things.—But he said he thought he could make a lot of money out of being in foreign currency.

沃伦·巴菲特我们做过一次。并非不可想象我们会再做一次,但可能性不大。美国可能会发生一些事情,让我们想持有大量其他货币,我想,如果我们做出某笔金额很大的投资,比如在某个欧洲国家或类似地方,可能会出现一种情况,就是我们会用他们的货币进行大量融资。不过在日本这个案例中,我们有能力以极低极低的持有成本借入日元,而且对从这些证券上收到的收益感觉良好,这件事几乎是不言自明的决策。

WARREN BUFFETTWe’ve done it once. It’s not inconceivable that we would do it again, but it’s unlikely, there could be things happen in the United States that would make us want to own a lot of other currencies, and I suppose if we made some very large investment, European country or some, there might be a situation where we would do a lot of financing in their currency, but it was something that just was sort of obvious to do. In the Japanese situation where we had the ability to borrow yen at a very, very low carrying cost, and we felt very good about the income we’d been receiving from these securities.

沃伦·巴菲特如果当前状况——但不会的,我的意思是,从来都不会——持续几十年、几十年,我们可能还会继续做同样的事,但世界也在变化,所以别把这当成预测。好了。第 6 部分。

WARREN BUFFETTIf the present condition–which it won’t, I mean, it never does— prevail for decades and decades, we would probably keep doing the same sort of thing, but things change in the world too, so don’t take that as a prediction. OK. Section 6.

给新兴市场的建议

Advice for Emerging Markets

来自蒙古的达什早上好,沃伦、格雷格、阿吉特,非常感谢你们举办这场活动。很高兴来到这里。我叫达什,来自伟大的蒙古。先简单介绍一下我的国家。蒙古是一个新兴市场国家,也是一个夹在俄罗斯和中国之间的内陆国。但我们拥有悠久的历史和矿产资源,实行完全民主制度,经济也在增长。上周,我们在纽约举办了第二届年度蒙古投资者大会,想吸引像您这样的投资者。我知道您曾非正式地为韩国、中国、印度等国政府领导人提供建议。对于像蒙古这样的新兴市场的政府和企业领导人,要吸引像您这样的机构投资者,您会给出什么建议?如果您对新兴市场有长期配置计划,无论是作为对冲还是机会性投资,那就太好了。最后,我欢迎在座各位来蒙古,如果你们能出席今年七月我国的年度经济论坛,我国人民会非常高兴。

DASH FROM MONGOLIAGood morning, Warren, and Greg, Ajit, thank you so much for hosting this event. It’s good to be here. My name is Dash, and I’m from the great country of Mongolia. A little bit of background about my country. Mongolia is an emerging market and a landlocked country sandwiched between Russia, and China. But we are reaching history, and minerals, and have a full democracy, and a growing economy. Last week, we hosted our second annual Mongolia Investor conference in New York to attract investors like yourself. I know you needn’t give advice informally to government leaders such as South Korea, China, and India. What advice would you give to government business leaders of emerging markets like Mongolia to attract institutional investors like yourself? It would be great if you had long-term plans for exposure to emerging markets as a hedge or an opportunistic investment. Lastly, I welcome all of you to Mongolia, and my country’s folks would be very happy if you could make it to our Economic Forum this July.

沃伦·巴菲特谢谢。是啊,我连去一趟康瑟尔布拉夫斯都觉得费劲,那儿离这里才几英里,但这样的计划总得是乐观的人才能想出来。其实,大概 20 年前或更早,我在股东大会上认识了一位朋友,他在蒙古做了很多业务,做得相当成功,后来还真搬到那儿住了好一阵子。我想说,如果你要我给那边政府提建议,那就是要长期建立起币值稳健的声誉。我的意思是,我们确实不想进入任何我们认为有可能性——我是说,有显著概率——发生恶性通胀的国家。这实在让人太难估算了。

WARREN BUFFETTThank you. Yeah, I have trouble planning a trip to Council Bluffs, which is just a few miles from here, but it takes an optimist. Actually, I met a fellow here at the annual meeting probably 20 years ago or more who did a lot of Mongolia, and he did very well in Mongolia, and actually moved there for quite a while. I would say that if you’re looking for advice to give the government over there is to develop a reputation for having a solid currency over time. I mean, we don’t really want to go into any country where we think there’s a chance, I mean, a significant probability of runaway inflation. It’s just too hard to figure.

沃伦·巴菲特其他人想出了在恶性通胀下赚钱的办法,但那不是我们的游戏,而且我觉得自己可能也玩不好。所以,对我们来说,这会是一个考虑因素。除此之外,我们在蒙古找到符合我们规模要求的机会的可能性不大。但就像我说的,我 20 年前在这里遇到的那位朋友在蒙古做得非常出色。如果这个国家能培育出商业友好和注重货币稳健的声誉,我觉得这对本国居民来说会是很好的兆头,尤其是如果它还有其他可以围绕其建立发展的资源禀赋的话。我对那里的矿产之类的情况了解不多,但话说回来,1790 年的时候,谁会押注美国呢?我们不需要完美,只需要在相当长的一段时间里比别国做得好一些。我们从一无所有起步,最终经济规模接近全球 GDP 的 25%,实现了更高的增长率、总体更稳健的经济周期,以及种种成就。所以我祝你好运。好了,贝基。

WARREN BUFFETTThe other people figured out ways to make money in hyperinflationary situations, but that’s not our game, and I don’t think I’d play it well. So, that would be a factor with us. The chances are we won’t find anything in Mongolia that fits our size requirements aside from that. But like I say I think my friend that I met here 20 years ago has done very well in Mongolia. If the country develops their reputation for being business-friendly, and currency-conscious. You know, I think that bodes very well for the residents of that country, particularly if it has some other natural assets that it can build around. I don’t know that much about the minerals there or anything of the sort, but I mean, who would have bet on the United States in 1790? We didn’t have to have perfection. We just had to be better than the other guy for quite a while. We started out with nothing, and we ended up with close to 25% of the world’s GDP, faster growth rates, generally sounder recurrences, and all kinds of things. So I wish you well. OK, Becky.

私募股权的“竞争”

Private equity “competition”

贝基·奎克这个问题来自新泽西的彼得·沈,向巴菲特先生和贾恩先生提问。近年来,黑石、阿波罗和 KKR 等大型私募股权公司大举进军保险业,筹集永久性资本、管理浮存金,试图复制伯克希尔几十年前开创的模式。鉴于这些公司现在直接竞争保险资产,且往往使用更高杠杆和更激进的投资策略,您如何看待它们对伯克希尔保险业务和承保纪律的影响?您是否认为私募股权模式会给整个金融体系中的保单持有人带来风险?这种竞争是否让伯克希尔今天更难安全、有利地发现并定价保险机会?

BECKY QUICKThis question is from Peter Shen in New Jersey. It’s for Mr. Buffett and Mr. Jain. In recent years, large private equity firms like Blackstone, Apollo, and KKR have aggressively expanded into insurance, raising permanent capital, managing float, and aiming to replicate the model that Berkshire pioneered decades ago, given that these firms are now directly competing for insurance assets, often using higher leverage and more aggressive investment strategies, how do you view their impact on Berkshire’s insurance operations and underwriting discipline? Do you believe that the private equity model poses risks to policyholders in the broader financial system, and has this competition made it more challenging for Berkshire to find, and price insurance opportunities safely, and profitably today?

阿吉特·贾恩好的。是的,这个问题有一部分非常好回答。毫无疑问,私募股权公司已经进入了这个领域,而我们在这个领域已经不具备竞争力了。我们以前在这个领域做过相当多的业务,但在过去三四年里,我觉得我们一单都没做成。现在要把这整个板块分成两个不同的方面:一是财产意外险那一端,二是人寿险那一端。你提到的那些私募股权公司,它们在人寿险那一端都非常活跃,而不是财产意外险那一端。你准确地指出了这些私募股权公司在杠杆方面和信用风险方面所承担的风险。在经济表现很好的时候,信用利差很低。这些私募股权公司把资产从非常保守的投资中拿了出来——我不会用“高辛烷值”来形容,但它们确实把这些资产投到了能获得高得多回报的地方。正如我所说,只要经济好、信用利差低,它们就能赚钱。因为有杠杆,它们还能赚很多钱。然而,危险始终存在:到了某个时点,监管机构可能会感到不快,会说,你们代表保单持有人承担了过高的风险。那样的结果可能是以泪水收场。我们不喜欢这类情况所呈现的风险回报比,因此,我们举起了白旗,说,我们目前在这个板块无法竞争。

AJIT JAINOK. Yeah. Part of the question is very easy. There’s no question that private equity firms have come into this space, and we are no longer competitive in this space. We used to do a fair amount in this space. But in the last three to four years, I don’t think we’ve done a single deal. Now you are to separate this whole segment into two separate segments. One is the property casualty end of the business and the life end of the business. The private equity firms that you mentioned are all very active in the life end of the business, not the property casualty end of the business. You are right in identifying the risks these private equity firms are taking on both in terms of leverage, and in terms of credit risk, and while the economy is doing great, credit spreads are low. These private equity firms who’ve taken the assets from very conservative investments, and I wouldn’t say high octane, but they’ve certainly invested these assets in situations where they get a lot more return on the investment, and as I said, as long as the economy is good, and credit spreads are low, they will make money. They’ll make a lot of money because of leverage. However, there is always the danger that at some point, the regulators might get cranky, and say, you know, you’re taking too much too much risk on behalf of your policyholders, and that could end in tears. We do not like the risk-reward that these situations offer, and therefore, we put up the white flag, and said, you know, we can’t compete in this segment right now.

沃伦·巴菲特有人想复制伯克希尔的模式,但他们通常不想连 CEO 把所有资金永久留在公司里这一点也一起复制。我的意思是,他们打的算盘不一样。他们感兴趣的是——而这正是资本主义的运作方式。但他们面对的情况全然不同,而且对于自己所做的事情,他们大概也有着不太一样的受托责任感。有时候这能行得通,有时候行不通。如果行不通,他们就会转向其他事情。如果我们在伯克希尔做的事情行不通,我的余生都将在对自己一手创建的这一切的悔恨中度过。所以这完全是个人层面的不同计算。没有哪家财产意外险公司能从根本上复制伯克希尔,起初也并非如此。我的意思是,一开始我们只有离这里几英里远的国民赔偿公司,任何人都可以复刻我们当时拥有的东西,但那是阿吉特 1986 年加入我们之前的事了,到了那一刻,其他竞争者就该放弃了。是的,7 号台,请提问。

WARREN BUFFETTThere are people who want to copy Berkshire’s model, but usually they don’t want to copy it by also copying the model of the CEO having all of this money in the company forever. I mean, they’ve got a different equation. They’re interested in—and that’s capitalism. But they have a whole different situation, and they probably have a somewhat different fiduciary feeling about what they’re doing. Sometimes it works, and sometimes it doesn’t work. If it doesn’t work, they go on to other things. If what we do here at Berkshire doesn’t work, I spend the end of my life regretting what I’ve created. So it’s just a whole different personal equation. There is no property casualty company that can basically replicate Berkshire that wasn’t the case at the start. I mean, at the start, we just have National Indemnity a few miles from here, and anybody could have duplicated what we had, but that was before Ajit came with us in 1986, and at that point, the other fellow should have given up. Yeah, Station 7, please.

给年轻投资者的建议

Advice for young investors

玛丽嗨,我叫玛丽,来自马萨诸塞州梅尔罗斯。感谢您今天抽出时间。作为一个像我这样对投资感兴趣的年轻人,巴菲特先生,我非常想听听您的见解。您职业生涯早期学到过哪些关键的教训?对那些希望在投资上摸索出自己理念的年轻投资者,您有什么建议?谢谢。

MARIEHi, my name is Marie. I’m from Melrose, MA Thank you for the time today. As a young person interested in investing like myself. I would love to hear your insights, Mr. Buffett. What were some pivotal lessons you learned early in your career, and what advice do you have for young investors who are looking to develop their investment philosophy? Thank you.

沃伦·巴菲特这些问题问得好。我真希望在自己更年轻的时候就能想到。你和什么人交往,这事极为重要,而且别指望这件事上你每次都能做对。我是说,你的人生会沿着你所共事的人、所敬佩的人、所结交的朋友的方向去发展。

WARREN BUFFETTThose are good questions. I wish I thought of them myself earlier in my life. Who you associate with it’s just enormously important, and don’t expect you’ll make every decision right on that. I mean, you’re going to have your life progress in the general direction of the people that you work with, that you admire, that become your friends.

沃伦·巴菲特我刚才提到了几位在过去两三年里去世的人。这些人呢,即便他们一起做的是一件规模只有伯克希尔万分之一的事,他们也仍是你愿意挑选的那种人。有些人会让你想要变得比现在的自己更好,而你要去跟那些比你更优秀的人待在一起,也就是那些你感觉比你强的人,因为你会朝着你交往的人的方向发展——这一点你慢慢会懂的。

WARREN BUFFETTI mentioned a few fellows who have died in the last couple of years. Well, all of those people were people, if they were working together on something ten-thousandth the size of Berkshire, I mean, they’d be the kind of people you choose. There are people who will make you want to be better than you are, and you want to hang out with people who are better than you are, and that you feel are better than you are, because you’re going to go in the direction of the people that you associate with, and that’s something you’ll learn.

沃伦·巴菲特当然,你是在年纪大了之后才领悟到这一点的。有些因素到底有多重要,不到年纪更大一些的时候,确实很难体会到。但如果你身边有汤姆·墨菲、桑迪·戈特斯曼和沃尔特·斯科特这样的人,那你的人生就会过得更好。如果你只是走出去四处看看,看到某人赚了很多钱,就决定也要去试试、去模仿他们或者诸如此类——那就不一样了。所以,我也会试着跟聪明人交往,这样我可以从他们身上学到很多东西。

WARREN BUFFETTOf course, you’ve learned late in life. It’s hard to really appreciate how important some of those factors are until you get much older. But when you’ve got people around you, like Tom Murphy, Sandy Gottesman, and Walter Scott, then you’re just going to live a better life. If you just go out and look, and somebody is just making a lot of money, and decide you’re going to try, and copy them or something of the sort. So I would try to be associated with smart people, too, where I could learn a lot from them.

沃伦·巴菲特我会试着去找一种就算不缺钱也愿意做的事。我是说,你这一生想找的,是一份即使不靠它挣钱你也愿意干的工作。而查理,我拥有这份工作已经很久很久了。我刚才提到的那几位,全都拥有这样的工作。我说的这几位,他们每个人做的都远超自己分内的事,而且按他们的想法,从不会去多求半分功劳。他们的行事方式,正是你希望任何一位共事的人该有的样子。当你找到他们,要珍惜;如果还没找到,你当然还是得继续做那些能养活你的事,但不要放弃寻找——你终究会发现有人会为你做些很棒的事。

WARREN BUFFETTI would try to look for something that I would do if I didn’t need the money. I mean, what you’re really looking for in life is something where you’ve got a job that you’d hold if you didn’t need the money, and I’ve had that Charlie out for a very, very long time. All the fellows that I named had it. Every one of those I named, always did more than their share, and they thought like they never sought more than their share of the credit. They just behave the way you’d like anybody you work with, and when you find them, you treasure them, and when you don’t find them, you still keep doing whatever causes you to eat or enables you to eat but you don’t give up on looking around, and you will find people do wonderful things for you.

沃伦·巴菲特所以,正如我刚才提到的,当年跑到 GEICO,敲响那扇锁着的门。谁知道那扇门背后会是什么?我走进去,十分钟之内,就找到了一个后来对我帮助极大的人。当然,如果有人要帮你,你也得想办法去帮他们,这样善意的念头与善意的行为就会产生复利。可惜的是,人生中也可能出现相反的情形。

WARREN BUFFETTSo, I mentioned earlier that you know, going down to GEICO, and knocking on the door when the door was locked. I mean, who knows what was behind that doorway? I went in, and in 10 minutes, I found the man who was going to be just wonderfully helpful to me. Of course, if somebody’s going to be helpful to you, you want to try to figure out ways to be helpful to them so you get a compounding of good intentions and good behaviour, and unfortunately, you can get the reverse of that in life, too.

沃伦·巴菲特我很幸运,拥有一个良好的环境去过这种生活。而其他人呢,他们所处的环境完全不同,就得自己去克服。但如果你运气好,不要为此感到内疚。如果你住在美国——全世界有 80 亿人,美国只有 3.3 亿——那你在很大程度上已经赢在了起跑线上,接下来只管好好发挥。但你要避免跟那些要求你做、或者指使你去做什么不该做的事的人或企业扯上关系。这就是问题之一。

WARREN BUFFETTI was lucky to have a good environment for living that kind of life, and other people, you know, have a whole different environmental situation, they have to overcome it. But don’t feel guilty about your good luck if you’ve got it. If you live in the United States, there are 8 billion people in the world, and there are 330 million in the United States, you’ve already won the game to a great degree, and then just keep making the most of it. But you don’t want to associate with people or enterprises that ask you to do something or tell you to do something that you shouldn’t be doing. That’s one of the problems.

沃伦·巴菲特不同职业会筛选出不同类型的人。让我感到有意思的是,在投资行业,很多人在赚了一大笔钱之后就退出了。如果你真的想找一件能让你一直做下去的事,无论你是否需要那笔钱——格雷格不需要这笔钱,阿吉特也不需要这笔钱,远远不需要,但他们就是热爱自己做的事,而且做得极其出色。我有幸得以长期亲眼观察这种状态是如何持续的。我认识的最好的经理人——这个名号的竞争虽然激烈,但实际上是老汤姆·墨菲,他如今已快 98 岁了,我从未见过有谁能像墨菲那样把别人的潜力激发出来。

WARREN BUFFETTI mean, different professions select for different types of people. It’s interesting to me that in the investment business, many people get out of it after they’ve made a pile of money. If you really want something that you’ll stick around for, whether you need the money– Greg doesn’t need the money, Ajit doesn’t need the money, remotely, but they enjoy what they do, and they’re so damn good at it. I’ve had the advantage of seeing how that works over time. The best manager I ever knew, and there’s a lot of contention for who that would be, but actually was Tom Murphy Sr, who lives in his almost 98, and I’ve never seen anybody who could get the potential out of other people more than Murph.

沃伦·巴菲特如果你想成为一个更好的人,你会愿意为汤姆·墨菲工作。世上确实有不少成功人士,但他们并没有把这种特质带到局中。我不是说那是成功的唯一路径,但我确信,那是最令人心情愉快的成功方式。伯克希尔的经历相当震撼。我是说,与桑迪·戈特斯曼从 1963 年共事直到他几年前去世,与沃尔特·斯科特共事了 30 年。你简直不可能错过这一切。你会时时刻刻学到东西。你不仅会学到如何在商业上成功,还会学到如何在人生中成功。所以,这就是我的建议。而且出于某种原因,很明显,你还会活得更久。这相当不可思议,我说的是我提到的这些人,也包括我自己在内——我当然愿意把这一点归因于这个,再加上其他一些因素,但我认为一个快乐的人,比那些做着自己心底并不佩服的事的人活得更久。好了,我们继续吧,我想接下来该轮到贝基了。

WARREN BUFFETTIf you want to become a better person, you want to work for Tom Murphy, and there are all kinds of successful people who really don’t bring that to the party. I’m not saying that’s the only way to succeed. I think it’s the most pleasant way to succeed for sure. The Berkshire experience is pretty dramatic. I mean, to operate with Sandy Gottesman from 1963 until he died a couple of years ago, Walter Scott for 30 years. You really can’t miss it. You’ll learn all the time. You’ll not only learn how to be successful in business, you’ll learn how to be successful in life. So, that’s my recommendation, and for some reason, apparently, you live longer too. It’s pretty amazing, I mean, these people I’m talking about, including myself, I mean, I’d like to attribute it to this, and a few other things, but I think a happy person lives longer than somebody that’s doing some things that they don’t really admire that much in life. OK. Let’s move on to, I guess, it’s Becky next.

近期市场波动中的买入

Purchaeses in the recent market volatility

贝基·奎克一季度于 3 月 31 日结束,数据显示伯克希尔的现金储备确实较去年底有所增加。但市场最剧烈的动荡出现在 4 月。今天出席股东大会的苏格兰股东马丁·迪瓦恩想知道:“近期市场波动是否给伯克希尔带来了机会?”马丁大约在 40 分钟前刚补写了一条附言,指出您提到伯克希尔近期差点投了 100 亿美元,想知道您能否就这一点多做些说明。

BECKY QUICKThe first quarter ended March 31st, and it did show that Berkshire’s cash pile expanded from the end of last year. But the greatest market turmoil came in April. Martin Devine, a shareholder from Scotland who is attending the meeting today, wants to know, “Has the recent market volatility presented Berkshire with opportunities?” Martin just wrote in an addendum in the last 40 minutes or so, pointing out that you mentioned Berkshire almost invested $10 billion recently and wanted to know if you could talk more about that.

沃伦·巴菲特第二个问题我可以给你一个明确的答案——没有。不过 100 亿美元其实也起不了多大作用。这是问题的另一面。过去 45 天也好,100 天也好,随你怎么算,总之这段时间里发生的事情,真的不算什么。自从我们收购伯克希尔以来,公司曾在相当短的时期内三次跌去 50%。三次不同的时期。每次公司基本面都没出任何问题,但这样的跌幅都不算太剧烈。道琼斯指数 1929 年 9 月最高 381 点,后来跌到了 42 点,相当于从 100 跌到了 11。眼下的情形根本算不上什么惨烈的熊市,完全谈不上。我是说,正如我指出的,我有很多年每天做 250 笔交易。我年纪够大,一直在买卖股票。我经历过 17000 或 18000 个交易日。比眼下剧烈得多的时期太多了。

WARREN BUFFETTI can give you a good answer to the second part, which is no. But $10 billion wouldn’t have done that much. That’s the other side and another side of it. What has happened in the last 45 days, 100 days, whatever you want to pick up, whatever this period has been, it’s really nothing. There have been three times since we acquired Berkshire that Berkshire has gone down 50% in a fairly short period of time. Three different times. Nothing was fundamentally wrong with the company at any time, but this was not a huge move. The Dow Jones average hit 381 in September 1929. It got down to 42, so that’s by going from 100 to 11. This has not been a dramatic bear market or anything of the sort. I mean, as I pointed out, I’ve had 250 trades per day for many years. I’ve been old enough to trade stock. I’ve got 17,000 or 18,000 trading days. There have been plenty of periods that are dramatically different from this.

沃伦·巴菲特我出生那天,道琼斯指数是 240 点,那天是 1930 年 8 月 30 日;从那之后到最低点,指数从 240 点跌到了 41 点。所以,如果人们以为眼下的波动带来了什么重大变化,其实并没有。如果它涨了 15% 而不是跌了 15%,人们倒会十分坦然地接受。但如果你的股票跌 15% 与否对你来说确有分别,那你可能需要换一套投资哲学。世界不会来适应你,你得自己去适应这个世界。

WARREN BUFFETTI mean, the day I was born, the Dow Jones was 240, and that was August 30th, 1930, and between that and the low, it went from 240 to 41. So, if people think that it made a really major change, it didn’t. If it had gone up 15% instead of down 15%, people would take that with remarkable grace. But if it makes a difference to you whether your stocks are down 15% or not, you need to get a somewhat different investment philosophy. The world is not going to adapt to you, you’re going to have to adapt to the world.

沃伦·巴菲特世界不会来适应你,你得自己去适应这个世界。

WARREN BUFFETTThe world is not going to adapt to you, you’re going to have to adapt to the world.

沃伦·巴菲特在将来,当然是在未来 20 年里,你一定会看到一段让你大开眼界的时期,有市场人士曾形容,和那种场面相比,以前经历的都只是“卷发棒”。我是说,这种事就是会周期性地发生。世界会犯下极大极大的错误,意外会以极具戏剧性的方式出现。金融体系越精巧,意外就越可能从天外飞来。这就是股市的一部分,也正是它值得你投入精力的地方——前提是你具备恰当的性情;反之,如果你不具备,股市就会是个糟糕的涉足之地。如果你在市场下跌时感到恐慌、在股市上涨时兴奋不已——我不是有意说得那么不客气。我是说,我知道人有情绪,但当你投资的时候,必须把情绪挡在门外。好的,请 8 号台提问。

WARREN BUFFETTYou will see a period in the next, certainly in the next 20 years, you’ll see a period that will be in. Somebody in the market described it one time as a “hair curler” compared to anything you’ve seen before. I mean, it just happens periodically. The world makes big, big, big mistakes, and surprises happen in dramatic ways. The more sophisticated the system gets, the more the surprises can be out of the right field. That’s part of the stock market, and that’s what makes it a good place to focus your efforts. If you’ve got the proper temperament for it, and a terrible place to get involved. If you get frightened by markets that decline and get excited when stock markets go up, I don’t mean to sound particularly critical. I mean, I know people have emotions, but you’ve got to check them at the door when you invest. OK. Station 8, please.

人生中的重大挫折或低谷

Major setbacks or low points in life

彼得·陈早上好,巴菲特先生、格雷格先生、阿吉特先生。我叫彼得·陈,来自中国上海。这是我第一次参加股东大会。我想问一个关于人生智慧的问题。您在人生中有没有遇到过重大的挫折或者低谷,您又是如何度过、并克服它们的?非常感谢。

PETER CHANGood morning, Mr. Buffett, Mr. Greg, and Mr. Ajit. My name is Peter Chan. I’m from Shanghai, China. This is my first time attending this shareholders’ meeting. I would like to ask a question about the wisdom of life. Have you ever encountered any major setbacks or low points in your life, and how did you get through, and overcome them? Thank you very much.

沃伦·巴菲特是啊,每个人都会遇到挫折,有些人的运气格外差,另一些人则只经历了些不大的波折。查理有过挫折,我也有过挫折,这是人生的一部分,并不好受。要是你正经历重大挫折,我没什么了不起的建议能让你在那时候还过得舒心,但它本来就是一辈子的事。你死的时候肯定算一个挫折。所以说,人人都会有挫折,这是跑不掉的。但有些人——我是说,这从某种意义上讲不是闹着玩的——会遇到极差的运气,而另一些人则碰到极好的运气。

WARREN BUFFETTWell, everybody gets setbacks, and some people have particularly bad luck in that respect, and others get through with fairly minor setbacks. Charlie had setbacks. I had setbacks, and it’s part of life, and they’re not fun. I don’t have any great advice for you about having the time of your life while you’re having some major setbacks, but it comes with a lifetime. You certainly have a setback when you die. So everybody’s got setbacks guaranteed to them. But some people get, and I mean, it is no laughing matter in a sense, because people get extraordinary bad luck, and other people get extraordinary good luck.

沃伦·巴菲特通常,那些运气好的人并不觉得那是运气,反倒觉得是自己本事大。想想看,你在健康问题上可能就没那么走运,生活中各种事情也是。我是说,你出生在一个好时代。纵观整个中国历史,你愿意生在哪个年代?100 年前、500 年前、1000 年前,还是现在?毫无疑问,你够幸运。如果我的祖上 20 代都是牧羊人,我想我会对每天盯着这些羊的日子感到厌倦。但你看,我们能坐在这儿,我能看内布拉斯加的比赛——虽然现在打的跟 20 年前不太一样了。

WARREN BUFFETTUsually, the people who get good luck don’t really think it was so much luck as themselves. Think that you’re less likely to have it in terms of medical problems. In terms of, you know, various things in life. I mean, you were born at a good time. If you look all the way through the history of China, when would you rather have been born? You know, 100 years ago, 500 years ago, a thousand years ago or now? You know it’s just hands down. You’d be lucky. If I came from 20 generations of shepherds, I think I get kind of tired of my life just looking at these sheep every day. But you know, we can sit here, and I can watch Nebraska. Not quite play the same game of football that we played 20 years ago.

沃伦·巴菲特但我的意思是,生活中的一切都变得好太多了,你得觉得自己是抽到了幸运签——在娘胎里待了几十万年,然后正好赶上了好时候出来。所以我更愿意关注生活中那些美好的事,而不是那些糟糕的事。坏事确实会发生,但生活照样可以很精彩。你可能会碰到极糟的打击。到目前为止,这种事还没发生在我身上。但在我的一些朋友身上发生过,他们时不时会碰到糟糕的运气。不过,我已经 94 岁了,想喝什么就能喝什么。

WARREN BUFFETTBut I mean, everything in life has been made so much better that you’ve got to figure that you do a lucky straw by staying in the womb for a couple hundred thousand years, and then just emerging it at the right time. So I would focus on the things that have been good in my life rather than the bad things that have happened. Bad things do happen, but it can often be a wonderful life. You could get terrible breaks in it. So far, that really hasn’t happened. But it happened with some of my friends, but he gets some bad breaks from time to time. But for 94, I’ve been able to drink whatever I want to drink.

沃伦·巴菲特他们给我预测了各种糟糕的事,但到现在也没发生。你看看现在职业橄榄球球员挣的钱,跟三四十年前比,你可以说,哎呀,那不是挺好吗?但你要是看看职业运动员的寿命,过不了多久你就会明白,其实当初没被选进棒球队或篮球队,或者别的什么队,反而是件好事。

WARREN BUFFETTThey predict all kinds of terrible things for me, but it hasn’t happened yet. If you look at what pro football players are making now, and everything compared to what they were making 30 or 40 years ago, you can say, well, isn’t that wonderful? But if you look at the lifespan of professional athletes, after a while, you get to decide that you’re better off if you really weren’t the first one chosen to be on the baseball team or the basketball team, or anything else.

沃伦·巴菲特我和查理——我觉得我也能在一定程度上代表其他人——我们从来就没怎么运动过,也没干过什么锻炼的事。这么多年来,我们一直在小心翼翼地保存精力。所以,尽量多看看事情好的一面吧。你今天能坐在这里,就算走运的了。你身体没毛病,从大老远跑来,有机会深入了解自己感兴趣的东西,想想几百年前的人,他们可没这种待遇。好了,大道理就讲这么多。行,贝基,轮到你了。

WARREN BUFFETTCharlie, and I, and I think I speak for the others to some extent, that we never did, we never really exercised that much or did anything. We have been carefully preserving ourselves for years. So look at the bright side of things to the extent that you can. You’re lucky enough you’re here today. You’re healthy, and you come from a long distance, and you’re getting a chance to learn more about something that interests you, and compare that with the situation a couple of hundred years ago that you would have been offered. So anyway, that’s enough moralizing. OK, Becky.

自动驾驶汽车与 GEICO

Autonomous vehicles and GEICO

贝基·奎克这个问题来自希曼舒·宾达尔,提给阿吉特和沃伦。“无人驾驶汽车已经在美国城市的道路上行驶,完全不需要司机参与。沃伦和阿吉特如何看待这些无人驾驶汽车可能对 GEICO 车险业务造成的颠覆性风险?GEICO 的业务建立在对人类驾驶员的理解和承保上。今天我们所说的车险,会不会变成针对无人驾驶汽车和自动驾驶软件公司的产品责任险?”

BECKY QUICKThis question comes from Himanshu Bindal for Ajit and Warren. “Autonomous vehicles are already driving across roads in American cities with no driver involvement. How do Warren, and Ajit think about any disruption risk from these autonomous vehicles to GEICO’s auto insurance business, which is built around understanding, and underwriting human drivers? Wouldn’t what we call auto insurance today just become a product liability for autonomous vehicles and autonomous software companies?

沃伦·巴菲特嗯,阿吉特。

WARREN BUFFETTWell, Ajit.

沃伦·巴菲特是的,我们预期所有业务都会发生变化,幸好我们做了改变——查理把我推向了这一步。但如果我满足于停留在新英格兰的纺织业,你知道,即使那行业在之前 70 年左右一直运转良好——世界会变的。如果游戏完全不变,那其实也没什么意思。如果你每次挥棒打棒球都能打出本垒打,那比赛就没意思了。如果你每次挥杆打高尔夫都能一杆进洞,那也没意思了。所以,一路走来总会有些东西需要你不断思考,你会犯错,会经历所有这些,那才是乐趣所在。我的意思是,如果没有时不时遇到点问题,你的大脑就会变迟钝。

WARREN BUFFETTYeah, we expect a change in all our businesses and good thing we did— Charlie pushed me into it, but if I’d settle for being in New England textiles, you know, and even though it worked well for 70 years or so prior–the world changes. If the game didn’t change at all, it really wouldn’t be very interesting. If every time you swung the baseball, you hit a home run in the game, it wouldn’t be interesting. If every time you hit a golf ball, you had a hole-in-one, it wouldn’t be interesting. So the fact that there will be things you have to think about all the time as you go along, and you’ll make mistakes, and all that, and then that’s really part of the fun. I mean, your brain would turn to mush if you didn’t have a few problems now, and then.

沃伦·巴菲特所以说,汽车保险是会变的,不过让人惊讶的是它过去的变化竟然这么小。但话说回来,这东西出现的时间其实相对也不算长。谁知道一百年后我们的交通方式会变成什么样?往回推个两百来年,谁能料到美国会变成现在这个样子,人们会像今天这样出行、像今天这样享受生活?我的意思是,这是一个充满变动的世界,而我们最需要担心的,不幸的是,我们已经学会了怎么毁灭这个世界。

WARREN BUFFETTSo, auto insurance will change, although it’s remarkable how little it has changed. But it’s only been around since, you know, for relatively a short time. Who knows what we’ll be doing in transportation a hundred years from now? Going back a couple of hundred years ago, who could have predicted the United States would look like what it does, and people would move like they do, and people would enjoy themselves like they do? I mean, it’s a dynamic world, and the biggest thing we have to worry about, unfortunately, is that we’ve learned how to destroy the world.

沃伦·巴菲特我们生活在这个美妙的世界里,而现在我们知道有八个国家——很可能第九个也即将出现——有能力毁灭这个世界。而这九个或其中一些国家的领导人,我并不认为个个都是完美人选。1905 年爱因斯坦提出 E=mc² 时,他做梦也没想到质量能以如此方式转化为能量,从而改变世界。

WARREN BUFFETTWe’ve got this wonderful world, which now we know that there are eight countries that, and probably a ninth coming, that can destroy it. We don’t have what I would consider necessarily the perfect people leading each one of the nine or some of the nine countries. When Einstein came up with the E=mc² in 1905. He didn’t dream of the fact that mass could be converted into energy in a way that would change the world.

沃伦·巴菲特我出生于 1930 年,当时人们已经知道爱因斯坦 25 年前提出的物理学定律,但据我所知,没有人想过这能如何改变未来的战争形态。真的,根本没人往那方面想。爱因斯坦当时也没想过。到了 1939 年,大约在德国入侵波兰前一个月,罗斯福收到了一封信。大概是 8 月 1 日收到的。那封信来自利奥·西拉德,堪称史上最著名的一封信。利奥·西拉德没办法把信送到罗斯福面前,因为谁会听说过利奥·西拉德呢?但他请爱因斯坦签了名。

WARREN BUFFETTWhen I was born in 1930, knowing about the law of physics that Einstein had come up with 25 years earlier, nobody, to my knowledge, had thought about what can this do to change warfare in the future. Literally, it wasn’t thought. Einstein didn’t think about it at that point, and then in 1939, Roosevelt got a letter around the month before Germany moved into Poland. He then got it around August 1st. The most famous letter in history was from Leo Szilard. Leo Szilard couldn’t get his letter in front of Roosevelt, because whoever heard of Leo Szilard? But he got Einstein to sign it.

沃伦·巴菲特罗斯福对物理学的了解大概跟我差不多,所以他并不懂。但他知道签名的是爱因斯坦。于是他把格罗夫斯将军叫来——当时他可能还不是将军——说我们应该对此做点什么。结果我们干的,就是学会了如何毁灭世界,而且那是我们必须做的事。德国有海森堡,看起来他比我们领先一步,我们不可能把这个精灵再塞回瓶子里去。

WARREN BUFFETTRoosevelt probably understood about as much about physics as I do, so he didn’t understand it. But he understood that Einstein signed. So he calls in—General Groves may not have been general then—and said we should do something about this, and all we did was learn how to destroy the world, and we needed to do it. Germany had Heisenberg. He looked like he was ahead of us, and we couldn’t put that genie back in the bottle.

沃伦·巴菲特世界确实在变,我们拥有很多美好的东西。但北边有个家伙,要是我们批评他的发型,谁知道他能干出什么事来?朝鲜要核武器干嘛?我是说,这难道能是全世界的好事吗?可他们也不会凭空消失。所以世界一直都在变,我们正在享受难以置信的变化,这些变化让在座各位的生活比几百年前的人好太多了。但到目前为止,人类本身改变得并不多。我们确实改造了大规模杀伤性武器,可人类自身的进步微乎其微。

WARREN BUFFETTThe world does change, and we’ve got wonderful things. But we have a guy in North Korea. If we criticize his haircut, who knows what he might decide to do? What does North Korea need nuclear weapons for? I mean, can that be a good thing in the world? But they’re not going to go away. So it’s a world of change, and we are enjoying incredible change that’s contributed to everybody in this room living so much better than people were living a couple of hundred years ago. We haven’t changed human beings very much so far. We’ve certainly changed weapons of mass destruction but we haven’t made much progress with the human race.

沃伦·巴菲特我们等着瞧会怎样,但与此同时,车险这边当然也会有变化。这对我们来说处理起来会更容易,比当年我们在新英格兰地区处理纺织业的那些麻烦要简单。你只能应对这个发展中的世界,而且我说过,在座的各位都活在史上最幸运的时期。享受你的好运,同时你还是要努力琢磨接下来会发生什么。一路走来,我们在保险这块做得还算不错。保险业确实有几个大问题,我不确定整个行业——尤其是一些特定公司——会怎么适应,但这正是让游戏变得有趣的地方。

WARREN BUFFETTWe’ll see what happens with that, but in the meantime, we’ll see changes in auto insurance, too, of course. That will be more, and it is easier for us to deal with it than it was when we had to deal with the problems of turning textiles in New England, and you deal with the world as it develops, and like I say, everybody here is living in the luckiest period. Enjoy your luck, and you still try to figure out the answers to what’s going to happen, and all insurance as we go along, we’ve done pretty well. There are a few big problems in insurance, and I don’t know how the insurance industry adapts to them, particularly, but that makes the game interesting.

阿吉特·贾恩我想补充一点,我们之前谈到了责任险从产品责任向因产品设计或供应方面的失误导致事故的保障转移。除此之外,我还想说的是,我认为我们将会看到的另一个重大变化是,由于自动驾驶,发生事故并需要赔付的数量将大幅下降。但另一方面,每一次事故的维修成本——把车辆恢复原状所需的费用——会因为汽车中嵌入的大量技术而显著上升。这两个变量在保险总成本上如何相互作用,我认为仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。

AJIT JAINI’d just like to add we talked about the shift to product liability into protection for accidents that take place because of an error, in terms of how the product was designed or supplied. The only thing I want to add is in addition to that shift, I think what we’ll see is a major shift where the number of accidents that take place and need to be provided for will drop dramatically because of automatic driving. But on the other hand, the cost per repair every time there’s an accident. The cost of repairing, and bringing everything back to where it used to be would go up very significantly because of the amount of technology that’s going into the car. How those two variables interact with each other in terms of the total cost of providing the insurance, I think, is still an open issue.

沃伦·巴菲特我给你们两个有意思的数字琢磨一下。1950 年代我走进 GEICO 办公室时,一份保单的平均价格是每年大约 40 美元。价格因地区不同差异很大。现在,价格很容易涨到 2000 美元,而且根据你所在地区的城市化程度等因素,还能高出不少。同一时期,每行驶 1 亿英里死于车祸的人数从大约 6 人降到了略高于 1 人。

WARREN BUFFETTI’ll give you two interesting figures to ponder. When I walked into GEICO’s office in the 1950s. The average price of a policy was around 40 bucks a year. It varies all over the law depending on location. It’s pretty easy to get up to $2000, and depending on how urban your areas are, and everything, you can get them considerably higher. During that same time, the number of people killed in auto accidents has fallen from roughly six per 100 million miles, rather than a little over one.

沃伦·巴菲特所以汽车安全性大幅提升,但买份保险的成本差不多涨了 50 倍。所以,当人们聊到驾驶技术发展这类事情时,有时候事情会简单很多。我是说,那种“巴克·罗杰斯”式的科幻色彩,大家看得到,但他们并没有去想过这对这门生意的数字究竟意味着什么。汽车保险行业一直是个巨大的增长行业,而且就此而言,内布拉斯加州的房屋保险价格在过去 10 年也翻了一番。这是剔除了一般通胀和强对流风暴影响后的情况。

WARREN BUFFETTSo cars become incredibly safer, and it costs 50 times as much down or thereabouts to buy an insurance policy. So, when people talk about the developments in car driving and all that sort of thing, it’s a lot easier sometimes. I mean, the Buck Rogers aspect of it, people look at it, but they don’t actually think of what really happens to the math of the business. The auto insurance industry has been a huge growth industry, and for that matter, homeowners’ insurance prices in Nebraska have doubled in the last 10 years. Adjusted for general inflation, and convective storms.

沃伦·巴菲特再接着往下说。即便过去十年内布拉斯加州的房屋保险费翻了一倍,承保房屋保险依然不赚钱。所以,很难预测这些重大变化意味着什么,你得一直不断思考,但你不要去读那些研究报告,说什么世界末日要来了,或者世界会因为这样那样的原因变得美好。同时大约还有 50 种其他变化在发生,你需要去考虑,需要边往前走边持续观察。在这门生意里,你永远得不到一个最终答案。你会找到一个采取行动的节点——但我们努力把自己认为能做的、高概率的事情做进去,用同样的方式玩这个游戏,只是结果会跟你想的不一样。

WARREN BUFFETTIt just going on to terror, and it is still unprofitable to write home homeowners insurance in Nebraska after doubling the price in the last 10 years. So, it’s very hard to predict what these big changes mean, and you just have to keep thinking all the time, but you don’t want to read some research report that says the world’s coming to an end or the world’s going to be wonderful because of this or that. There are about 50 other developments going on at the same time that you need to think about, and that you need to keep observing as you go along. You never reach an answer in this business. You reach a point of action that you take but we try to get into as high probability things as we think we can do, and play the game in the same way, but it will be different than you think.

沃伦·巴菲特如果你从事的是管理企业的工作,那么你每天早上醒来也应该想一想这件事。

WARREN BUFFETTYou should wake up every morning, and think about that, too, if you’re in the business of managing businesses.

经营利润

Operating earnings

格雷格·阿贝尔沃伦,休息时间快到了,你要不要谈谈经营利润的情况?

GREG ABELWarren, as we approach the break. Would you like to address the operating earnings?

沃伦·巴菲特哦,对。我们今天上午发布了 10-Q。我们总是尽量安排在周六发布,这样谁也没法比别人抢先一步。我们只有三张简单的图表。各位会看到,我们第一季度的保险承保利润同比大幅下滑,而去年是保险业多年难遇的好年景。保险从来都难以预测,但去年所有因素都顺了我们的意,整个保险行业也是如此。今年保费在下降,风险却在上升。所以,你根本不用费心去猜会是个什么结果。我们在保险业务上确实有非同寻常的优势,是竞争对手难以复制的。

WARREN BUFFETTOh, yeah. We released our 10-Q this morning. We always try to do it on a Saturday, so nobody gets a jump on other people. We just have three simple charts. You’ll see that our insurance underwriting income was down dramatically for the first quarter, and last year was as good a year as you’ll see in insurance. And it’s always unpredictable insurance, but everything broke our way. The insurance industry’s way last year, prices are down this year. Risks are up this year. So, you don’t have to figure out what the answer is on that. We do have unusual advantages in the insurance business that can’t really be replicated by our competition.

沃伦·巴菲特这不代表他们没在设法争取我们所不具备的优势。但我们也会努力复制任何看起来更好的做法。我之所以如此频繁地谈论我们的保险业务,正是因为我确实认为,在一个极为庞大的行业里,我们拥有一些相当持久的优势。就在过去 24 小时内,我们刚宣布与苏黎世保险和安达保险共同组建了一个联合运营体,来承保金额极为巨大、很少有人能承接的保单。

WARREN BUFFETTThat doesn’t mean they aren’t trying to get advantages we don’t have. But we’ll try to replicate anything that seems better. I wouldn’t talk about her insurance business as much as I do unless I really thought we had some really permanent advantages in a very, very large industry. We just announced within the last 24 hours that we, Zurich, and Chubb, have arranged a joint operation to be the writer of really large sums that very few people can do.

沃伦·巴菲特当然,在责任风险方面我们必须以合适的价格承保。但这种事情我们连眼睛都不会眨一下就能做,而任何想做这种事的人,都想让我们参与进来。总之,我们的投资收益变化不大,因为我们的浮存金略有增长,这给了我们更多资金用于投资,同时我们的留存收益也在增长。因此,如果没有找到其他用武之地,我们预计一年内会增加 400 亿美元左右甚至更多的可投资资金。

WARREN BUFFETTAnd of course, we’ve got to write about the right price in terms of liability. But we can do that sort of thing without blinking, and anybody who wants to do it wants to get us in it. So anyway, our investment income did not change that much because we have a float that grows a little bit, which gives us more money for investment, and then we have retained earnings, which grow. So we would expect in a year to have like 40 billion or more that we’ll build up investments unless we find things to do with it.

沃伦·巴菲特至于国债的投资收益率——我应该说是短期国库券——低于之前的水平。所以,这个负面因素拉低了收益,但幅度不算大,而我们手头的钱更多了。因此,我们在盈利方面还稍微多了一点。铁路业务比去年多赚了一点。但它还没赚到应有的水平,不过这是当前可以解决的问题,也正在解决中,它仍然是伯克希尔一笔极为优质的资产。

WARREN BUFFETTSo the investment income rates on treasuries are less than– they were short-term bills, I should say or less than they were before. So you had that negative effect pulling it down, but not that much, and we had more money. So we came up with a little more in the way of earnings. The railroad is earning a little more than last year. But it’s not earning, but it should be earning at the present time, and that’s solvable, and it’s getting solved, and it’s still an incredible asset for Berkshire.

沃伦·巴菲特能源公司去年遇到了特殊问题,今年这些问题不复存在了。所以那部分收益是上升的,而我们旗下众多的普通业务则基本持平。我记得你前几天做过一个小统计,看看有多少家增长、多少家下滑。

WARREN BUFFETTThe energy company last year was having particular problems, and those were absent this year. So those earnings are up, and then among our range of general businesses, they were pretty much a push, and I think you did a little calculation the other day on how many were up, and how many were down.

格雷格·阿贝尔在我们密切关注的 49 家公司中,21 家上升,28 家下滑。所以可以看出,纵观整个非保险运营业务,这个季度确实是个喜忧参半的季度。

GREG ABELOf our 49 that we measured closely, 21 or up, and 28 were down. So you can tell it was really a mixed quarter when you go across the non-insurance operating businesses.

沃伦·巴菲特下一张幻灯片。我这里还剩五分钟提醒,不过现在来看一下更长远的事情。这张幻灯片展示的是我们的财务状况——我们依然持有比理想情况多得多的现金和美国国库券,但这说到底取决于有什么样的机会出现。如果每五六年才出现一次像样的好机会,你知道,你必须要耐心。查理一直指出,我们的绝大部分钱是——我算了下,大约八九个主意——在 50 多年里赚到的。我们每天都谈论这些,我们阅读每一份报告,我们做所有其他工作,但如果你以为每天听听你的弗里德里克·布克尔或者大量阅读发布的财经信息就能得到一个好主意,那趁早忘掉这回事。因为偶尔你才会遇到非凡的机会,而大多数时候你并没有多少优势。另外,那张幻灯片上还显示了我们的浮存金,它在持续增长。阿吉特,有没有哪家财产意外险公司拥有我们这样的浮存金?

WARREN BUFFETTThe next slide. I’m getting a five-minute warning here, but for the long ball now. It shows our financial condition, which continues to hold a lot more. Cash, and US. Treasury Bills, I would like, but that’s simply a question of what opportunities occur, and if you get real opportunities every five or six years, you know, you have to be patient. Charlie always pointed out that we made most of our money. I’m above about eight or nine ideas over 50 years, and we talked about it every day, and we read every report, and we did everything else but if you think you can get an idea day from listening to your Frederick Booker or doing a lot of reading of the financial information published, forget it, because every now, and then you get extraordinary opportunities, and most of the time, you don’t have much of an edge. So, we also have on that thing our float, which continues to build. There’s no property casualty company that has our float, Ajit?

阿吉特·贾恩是的,显然我们远超其他任何一家。

AJIT JAINYeah, clearly we are head and shoulders above anyone else.

沃伦·巴菲特是的。所以,只要我们的承保保持盈利,这笔钱就是完全免费的资金,而且我们预期在 50 年或 100 年的时间跨度里,我们还能说出同样的话。但总会有一些年份承保业绩会非常糟糕,那就会连累浮存金的收益。不过到目前为止,过去 20 年里,我想我们只出现过一次承保亏损,对吧?

WARREN BUFFETTYeah. So, that is money that, as long as we’re writing it in an underwriting profit, is absolutely free money, and we would expect that over a 50 or 100-year period, we would be able to say the same thing. But there will be years when you have a very bad underwriting record, and it will lead to the float earnings. But so far in the last 20 years, I think we’ve only had one underwriting loss?

阿吉特·贾恩如果把所有业务都算上,包括人寿保险,我们的浮存金成本是负 2.2%,这意味着我们不仅拿到了浮存金,还有人相当于额外给了我们这笔现金 2.2% 的收益。

AJIT JAINIf you look at the entire range, including life insurance, our cost of flow to 2.2% negative, that means we’ve got the float plus somebody has given us 2.2% of that of cash.

沃伦·巴菲特对,这就像开一家银行,人们把钱存你那儿,你付给他们负 2.2% 的利率,而且还不用处理支票清算之类的事。我们经营业务的心态,实际上跟世界上任何一家财产险公司都不一样,我觉得,大概吧。

WARREN BUFFETTYeah, it’s like running a bank where people leave their money with you, and you pay a minus 2.2%, and you don’t have any check clearing or anything else. We run our business actually with a different mindset than any other P&C company, I think, probably, in the world.

沃伦·巴菲特如果我认为它们会重复,我就不会谈这个话题了。年报最后几页是关于回购的,很明显,我们今年还没有进行任何回购,到目前为止我们没有回购过伯克希尔的股票。如果伯克希尔回购自己的股票,我们支付的代价已经比你买入时更高。如果你买入伯克希尔的股票,我不认为人们普遍知道这一点,但大约一年前出台了一项税收政策,我们要缴纳 1% 的税,这不仅让我们比你们付出更高的成本,而且对你们来说,这比对我们更划算。

WARREN BUFFETTI wouldn’t be talking about it if I thought they duplicated. The final pages on share repurchases, and clearly we haven’t made any, we have not made share repurchases so far this year. If Berkshire buys Berkshire shares, and repurchases, we’ve now paid more than you will pay. If you buy Berkshire shares. I don’t think people generally know that, but there is a tax that was introduced a year or so ago where we pay 1%, and that not only hurts us because we pay more for it than you do pay. It’s a better deal for you than for us.

沃伦·巴菲特不过对我们投资的一些公司来说,影响确实相当大。蒂姆·库克干得非常出色,我的意思是,他管理苹果简直无可挑剔。但他一年内大概花了一千亿美元回购股票,现在附加了 1% 的税,那就是一年十亿美元。他买入苹果股票——我们很喜欢这个价格——比你们付的钱划算。听起来不多,但十亿美元还是相当大一笔钱。有人想大幅提高这个税率,我们不会读到相关报道或类似的东西,但这让回购比以前稍微不那么有吸引力了。我们只有在认为自己的股票价格几乎肯定被严重低估时,才会回购我们的股票。

WARREN BUFFETTBut it is actually for some of our investing companies quite substantially. Tim Cook has done a wonderful job. I mean, really wonderful job running Apple. But he spent a hundred billion dollars roughly in a year repurchasing shares, and there’s a 1% charge attached now, so that’s a billion dollars a year. He buys Apple stock which we like compared to what you pay. It doesn’t sound like much, but well, a billion dollars sounds like a lot still. But there are people that want to increase that particular rate dramatically, and we won’t read about it or anything like that, but it’s slightly less attractive than it was before, and we will only buy in our shares if we think that they are almost certainly underpriced as valued very conservatively.

沃伦·巴菲特我们偶尔会有这样的机会,但联邦政府收取的税越高,我们做回购的成本就越高,除非我们能完成回购。所以,带着这个好消息,我们将在 11 点继续,然后一直进行到 1 点。在此期间,请大家尽情享受,我想我们所有的门店都还在营业,所以,让收银机响起来吧。

WARREN BUFFETTWe get that opportunity occasionally, but the higher that charge goes that the federal government charges us for doing it unless we are able to do a repurchase. So on that happy note, we will rejoin at 11:00, and then we’ll continue until 1:00. In the meantime, enjoy yourself, and I think all our stores are still open, So, ring the cash register.