2009 年支付行业访谈

2009-10-10 · 支付行业、金融服务与长期商业变化 · 原文约 3043 词
译文与英文原文逐段对齐可在本页展开英文,也可打开发布者原址核对上下文。
打开来源正文

2009 年 10 月 20 日,上午 10:00

Oct 20, 2009, 10:00am

文字实录:沃伦·巴菲特谈支付行业的未来走向

Transcript: Warren Buffett on What’s Next in the Payments Industry

为庆祝 PYMNTS.com 正式上线,“奥马哈先知”就支付行业乃至整体经济的下一步走向发表了看法。商业通讯社(Business Wire)首席执行官凯茜·巴伦·坦拉兹(Cathy Baron Tamraz)对巴菲特先生进行了独家专访。以下是视频的文字实录。

To kick off the launch of PYMNTS.com, the “Oracle from Omaha” weighs in on what’s next in the payment industry and the economy at large. Business Wire CEO Cathy Baron Tamraz sits down with Mr. Buffett in an exclusive interview. The following is a transcript of the video.

凯茜·巴伦·坦拉兹我在圣地亚哥向大家问好,我们刚刚在这里结束了《财富》杂志“最具影响力女性峰会”。我是商业通讯社的总裁兼首席执行官凯茜·巴伦·坦拉兹,和我一起的这位是全场唯一获准参会的男性——沃伦·巴菲特,伯克希尔·哈撒韦的董事长,也是商业通讯社的母公司。沃伦今天欣然同意回答一些问题,并为商业通讯社和市场平台动态公司即将在纽约市联合举办的一场会议揭幕,这场会议将推出一个关于支付行业的新网站,名叫 PYMNTS.com。我们对这个新门户网站感到相当兴奋,它将成为支付行业新闻的主要来源,提供支付领域的突发新闻、监管动态,还有新技术和新产品。

CATHY BARON TAMRAZGreetings from San Diego, where we have just completed the Fortune Most Powerful Women’s Summit. I am Cathy Baron Tamraz, CEO of Business Wire, and I am here with the only male that is allowed into this conference and that is Warren Buffett, Chairman ofBerkshire Hathaway, which is also the parent company of Business Wire. Warren has graciously agreed to answer some questions today, and kick off a conference that Business Wire and Market Platform Dynamics are holding in New York City, to launch a new Web site about the payment industry callexd PYMNTS.com. We are really excited about this new portal, which will be a primary source of news for the payments industry. It will havebreaking news and regulatory news in the payment industry, new technology and new products.

由于支付行业对经济至关重要,我们认为与沃伦聊聊他的看法很有意义——他怎么看当前的经济形势,以及我们如何重振经济。所以,沃伦,谢谢你今天接受我的采访。

Because the payment industry is so vital to the economy, we thought it would be relevant to talk to Warren and hear his views on the state of the economy and what we can do to revitalize it. So thank you, Warren, for speaking with us today and agreeing to be interviewed by me.

沃伦·巴菲特你是我最喜欢的采访人!

WARREN BUFFETTYou are my favorite interviewer!

CBT非常感谢。顺便说一句,这些都被录下来了。所以,我问你的第一个问题是关于我们经济的近期前景。过去 12 个月感觉就像一场极其糟糕的噩梦。今年是撼动世界的一年。雷曼兄弟破产已经过去一年了,那次破产几乎把经济推下悬崖。我们经历了贝尔斯登的崩塌、美林卖给美国银行、AIG 危机、房利美和房地美落入政府掌控。确实是极为艰难的一年。那么,你认为 2009 年第四季度以及 2010 年接下来会发生什么?

CBTThank you very much. That’s on tape, by the way. So, the first question I have for you is about the near-term future of our economy. The last 12 months feels like a really bad dream. This year has been the year that shook the world. It’s been a year since the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and it almost sent the economy over a cliff. We had the Bear Stearns fallout, Merrill Lynch sold to Bank of America, the AIG crisis, Fannie and Freddie falling under government control. It’s been a really difficult year. So, what do you think is going to happen now in the fourth quarter of 2009 and also in 2010?

沃伦·巴菲特具体哪几个季度之类的,我不好说。下周或下个月会怎样,谁知道呢?自去年以来,我们取得了巨大进展。当时是真的恐慌。你要是没感到恐慌,那就是没搞明白当时的情况。2008 年 9 月和 10 月发生的事,人们会记得很久很久。虽然政府部门有时办事不靠谱,但幸运的是他们做对了一些事,一些非常重要的事。他们处理得当,让我们没有坠入悬崖。那场金融恐慌的余波,像一吨重的砖头一样砸向实体经济,第四季度尤其明显。我们正在从那种局面中恢复过来。病人确实是进了急诊室,但要完全出院还得等一段时间。

WBI am not sure about exact quarters or anything of the sort. Who knows about next week or next month? We made enormous progress since a year ago. We had a real panic. And if you didn’t panic, you didn’t understand what was going on. What happened in September and October of 2008 will particularly be remembered for a long, long time. And while the governmental authorities malign things sometimes, they fortunately did some very right things, very important things. They did them properly, and they kept us from going over the cliff. The fallout from that financial panic hit the regular economy in the fourth quarter like a ton of bricks. We are coming back from that. The patient really went into the emergency room and it won’t come out of the hospital entirely for a while.

系统里确实有些东西需要纠正,但这个系统是管用的。看看这个国家,我们经历过经济大萧条,经历过世界大战,经历过内战,而我们的进步是全世界任何国家都比不了的。我们的制度是对的,它没法避免所有问题,但它能克服所有问题。

There are things that have to be cured in the system, but this system works. If you look at this country, we have gone through the Great Depression, we have gone through world wars, we have gone through civil war, and we have progressed like no country in the world. We have the right system. It doesn’t avoid all the problems, but it overcomes all the problems.

CBT您认为近期消费者支出会增加吗?

CBTDo you see consumer-spending increasing in the near term?

沃伦·巴菲特不,暂时不会。我认为人们一年前经历的事情,不会很快忘记。但工厂还在,人的潜力还在,制度还在。它长期有效。你的孩子会比你我过得更好,我们的孙子孙女会比他们过得更好。这个国家在向前走。

WBNo, and not for a while. I think people had an experience a year ago that they are not going to get over quickly. But the factories are there, the human potential is there, the system is there. It works over time. Your kids will live better than you and I live, and our grandchildren will live better than they do. This country moves forward.

看看整个 20 世纪,我们经历了大萧条、世界大战、原子弹、流感大流行。所有这些都发生过,但到 20 世纪末,美国普通人的生活水平比世纪初好了七倍。这太了不起了。道琼斯指数从 66 点涨到了 11,400 点。所以这个国家行得通,你根本不用为它操心。

If you take the 20th century, we had a Great Depression, world wars, a nuclear bomb, a flu epidemic. We had all these things, and at the end of the 20th century, the average American was living seven times better than at the start of the century. It’s amazing. The Dow Jones Average had gone from 66 to 11,400. So the country works, you don’t have to worry about that.

财经论坛最近这场灾难也被称为“信心危机”。5 万亿美元的美国财富化为乌有。如果提振经济需要的是信心,我们该如何重建金融体系的信任?政府是否需要保持更强的干预力度?

CBTThis latest debacle has also been called a “crisis of confidence.” Five trillion dollars of American wealth has vanished. If confidence is what’s needed to stimulate the economy, how do we put trust back into the financial system? Does the government need to retain a stronger hand?

沃伦·巴菲特嗯,一年前人们变得恐惧,而恐惧存在的时候,信心就不可能存在。恐惧的传染性很强,传播得非常快,去年第四季度初发生的就是这种情况。信心恢复的速度没有它失去的速度快,但确实会恢复。现在已经恢复了不少,但还有一段路要走。随着人们看到并切实重新确认这个系统是有效的——我们每年仍然产出价值 14 万亿美元的产品——它会回来的。对大多数人来说,在大多数方面,它已经回来了,但还没回到 100%。它会达到那个水平的。

WBWell, people became afraid a year ago, and confidence is not going to exist when fear exists. Fear is very contagious. It spreads very quickly, and that’s what happened in the start of the fourth quarter last year. The confidence doesn’t come back as fast as it’s lost, but it does come back. It’s come back a long way already, but it has a ways to go. As people see and really get re-affirmed about the fact that this system works. We are still tossing out 14 trillion worth of product a year. It will return. It’s already returned with most people in most ways, but it’s not back 100%. It’ll get there.

CBT你对失业率有什么看法吗?

CBTDo you have any comment on the unemployment rate?

沃伦·巴菲特失业率会在后期才掉头好转,它总是滞后。经历过这样一段时期的人,在真正被迫之前,招聘都慢吞吞的。但另一方面,他们不得不招人的时候总会到来。一年或两年后,住房行业会有更多人在干活。我们有家砖厂,还有几家做地毯生意的公司。过去一年半里,我们不得不裁掉这些公司的员工。某个时候我们会重新招人,但在看到需求回来之前不会动手。动作会有点慢,因为我们不想再经历之前那种折腾。不过我可以向你保证,三年后,我们的砖厂、地毯公司和保温材料公司,雇的人会比现在多得多。

WBWell, the unemployment rate will turn around late. It always lags. People who have gone through a period like this are slow to rehire until they really have to. On the other hand, the time will come when they have to. There will be more people working in housing a year or two from now. We have a brick company. We have companies in the carpet business. We have had to let people go in those businesses in the last year, year and a half. We will be adding people at some point, but we won’t do it until we see the demand come back. It’ll be a little slow because we don’t want to go through what we did before. Although, I will guarantee you that three years from now, our brick companies, our carpet company, and our insulation company will all be employing far more people than now.

CBT这很好。下一个问题关于政府。国会和行政部门一直在推进金融监管改革。你觉得他们走对方向了吗?保护消费者的改革和新规则会帮助恢复信心吗?

CBTThat’s good to hear. The next question is about the government. Congress and the administration have been working on reforming financial regulation. Do you think they are on the right track? And will reforms and new rules to protect consumers help restore confidence?

沃伦·巴菲特新规则占了上风,所以他们去年做的那些事离让人信服还差得远。没有哪件事是干得十全十美的,但也没人能什么都能做到完美。重要的是他们把事办了,大家也确实信任他们,而且随着时间推移,这种信任会越来越深。政府确实有它该扮演的角色,但也不可能永远拦住泡沫。人类隔三差五就会干出些疯狂的事,真正的问题是他们怎么从里面走出来。你我这辈子都干过些荒唐事,说实话,我们也挺过来了。这才是关键。

WBWell, the new rules won out, so the things they have done during the last year fell pretty short of confidence. Not everything is done perfectly, but nobody can do them perfectly. The important thing is that they got things done and people do believe in them, and they’ll believe in them more and more as it goes along. Government has a real role to play and it will not prevent bubbles forever. Human beings do crazy things from time to time, and the real question is how they recover from it. You and I have done things in our life, and the truth is that we came back from them. That’s the important thing.

人的情绪你不能排除。当一群人集体贪婪时,奇怪的事情就会发生。当他们集体恐惧时,奇怪的事情也会发生。大多数时候人们并不是这样,但他们确实会陷入其中。所以,规则能帮我们避免一些问题,能帮我们修正一些问题,但没法根除所有未来的问题。

You can’t rule out human emotions. When people get greedy as a pack, strange things happen. When they get fearful as a pack, strange things happen. That isn’t the way they exist most of the time, but they do give into that. So rules will help us avoid some of the problems. They’ll help us modify some of the problems, but they won’t eliminate all future problems.

CBT我这周看了会儿电视,听了威廉·科恩的访谈,他是《纸牌屋》的作者。他说,如果你不改变华尔街的薪酬和激励机制,同样的事情还会再发生一次。但最近我又听说,华尔街正在招人,还承诺大笔奖金和高薪包,这在我看来有点让人警惕。您怎么看这个问题?

CBTI was watching a little TV this week and I was listening to William Cohen, who is the author of “The House of Cards.” He said that if you don’t change compensation and how Wall Street is incented, the same thing is going happen all over again. And yet, I recently heard that Wall Street is hiring, and they are also guaranteeing big bonuses and compensation packages, which is a little bit alarming if you ask me. What’s your view is on that?

沃伦·巴菲特华尔街的本质就是想赚大钱。这是系统的天性。你拥有一个庞大的资本主义体系,它募集海量资金,促成巨额交易,有些人因此赚得盆满钵满。华尔街需要改变的地方在于,你得确保除了胡萝卜,还得有大棒。不能是一条单行道——形势好时他们赚得盆满钵满,形势糟时就换个地方待一阵。必须让他们承担后果。我希望有些做法能落实到位——我自己也会有一些想法——但国会无疑也会有一些想法。你得制定一些措施,让那些确实搞垮大型机构的人付出代价,我们在这方面需要新的手段。太多人为自己给社会制造的麻烦一走了之——不光祸害了自己的机构——而且走的时候还富得流油。他们可能不如以前那么有钱,但比他们本该拥有的还是要好得多。必须得有激励机制——不仅是让人变富,还要让人行为得当。

WBWell, Wall Street is about trying to make a lot of money. It’s the nature of the system. You get a huge capitalist system, and it raises lots of money and it makes lots of big deals and people - some people get paid very well for it. What you have to change in Wall Street is you have to make sure that in addition to carrots, there are sticks. And it can’t be a one-way street where they are making ungodly amounts of money when things are good and then they move on to someplace else for a while when things are bad. You have to create a downside. I hope there are some practices put into place - and I’ll have a few thoughts on them myself - but Congress undoubtedly will have a few thoughts too. You have to put in something where there is downside to people who really mess up large institutions and we need some new help in that. Too many people have walked away from the troubles they have created for society, not just for their own institution, and they have walked away rich. They may not be as rich as they were before, but they have walked away better than they should have. There have to be incentives - not only to get rich, but to behave well.

CBT奥巴马总统本周说,金融机构“欠美国人民一笔债”。我当时不太确定,他们具体怎么还这笔债。

CBTPresident Obama said this week that the financial firms “owe a debt to the American people.” And I wasn’t exactly sure how, how they could pay that back to the American people.

沃伦·巴菲特说来有趣。整整一年前,我参加这个会议时,对所谓的“有毒资产”提过一个方案。我找了金融界的三个朋友,让他们给保尔森财长写信。我是在 10 月 6 日写的信。我请了三个人来帮忙,这需要他们付出大量精力,也要投入一些金钱、时间和能量。我问他们三位,如果这个方案推进下去,能不能完全无偿地做。我请他们不要从中赚一分钱。他们都答应了。所以,他们都是好人。很多人是受贪婪驱使的,但我们谁也不是完美的,对吧?我总说,“每个圣人都有过去,每个罪人都有未来。”我们身后确实有些罪人,但他们也不全是坏的。他们跟着自己参与制造的泡沫走——但全体美国公众也一样。对行为的奖惩必须得当,这样才能得到体面的行为。所以,我不觉得华尔街是“邪恶”的。我觉得华尔街有时候会过度放纵。我不想消灭它。我们需要一个系统来配置资本、发行证券等等。我们有一个庞大的资本主义体系,就必须有一个庞大的资本市场——但改进的空间还大得很。

WBIt’s interesting. Exactly a year ago when I was at this conference, I had a proposal for the so-called “toxic assets.” I called three people in the financial world who were going to write Secretary Paulson about it. I wrote them on October 6th. I called three people to help out on this, and it would have required a lot of effort on their part and some commitment of money and time and energy. I asked all three of them if this went forward to do it absolutely pro-bono. I asked them not to make one dime out of it. And they all said yes to me. So, they are good people. Many are motivated by greed. None of us are perfect, you know? I always say that, “Every saint has a past, every sinner has a future.” We have got some sinners back there, but they are not all bad. They went along with a bubble that they helped create - but the whole American public did. You still have to have the right rewards and penalties for behavior. That’s how you get decent behavior. So, I don’t look at Wall Street as “evil.” I look at Wall Street as given to huge excess sometimes. I don’t want to get rid of it. We need something to allocate capital and distribute securities and all of that throughout the system. We have got a big capitalist system and we have to have a big capital market - but there is plenty of room for improvement.

CBT你对着水晶球看一看,一年后的股市会是什么样子?

CBTLooking into your crystal ball, what will the stock market look like a year from now?

沃伦·巴菲特嗯,一年以后会怎样我不知道。五年以后,肯定会更高,没错。十年以后,也会更高。但一年以后,我不知道。

WBWell, I don’t know about a year from now. Five years from now, it’ll be higher, yeah. Ten years from now, it’ll be higher. One year from now, I don’t know.

CBT有道理。我们把话题再拉近一点,聊聊支付和卡系统。9 月 3 日,《华尔街日报》登了一篇文章,标题是“沃尔玛将通过支票卡发薪”。沃尔玛以后不再发工资支票了,全部通过卡系统来发。这对支付行业和卡行业来说,其实是件好事。而且用卡来发放支付,似乎正在成为一股越来越大的趋势。我发现有些航空公司,如果你没有卡——某种信用卡——坐经济舱就没法吃喝,因为他们不再收现金了。所以,这个还挺有意思的……

CBTFair enough. Moving a little bit more closely to the payment and card system. On September 3rd, the The Wall Street Journal had an articled titled “Wal-Mart to Pay via Check Cards.” Wal-Mart isn’t going to issue paychecks anymore. So it’s all going to be through a card system, which is actually good for the payment industry and the card industry. And it seems to be a growing movement to use cards to dispense payments. I noticed that on some airlines, if you don’t have a card - a credit card of some kind - you can’t eat or drink anything if you are sitting in economy because they don’t take cash anymore. So that, that’s kind of interesting…

沃伦·巴菲特纽约也有家餐厅刚宣布,他们不收现金了。

WBSome restaurant just announced that in New York too, that they weren’t going to take cash.

CBT这就带出了下一个问题:你认为现金作为一种支付方式,有朝一日会彻底消失吗?

CBTThat brings us to the next question: Do you think cash is ever going to disappear as a form of payment?

沃伦·巴菲特它不会消失,但最终——这就是美国制度的精妙之处——我们确实会给消费者他们想要的东西。如果人们想用信用卡的便利,他们就会用。当然,也会有足够多的人想用现金,所以消费者不会完全抛弃现金。他们也没完全因为手机而放弃固定电话。美国消费者——归根结底——是国王。你可以把他们推来推去一星期或一个月,但你要么搞清顾客心里想什么,决定去服务他们;要么就别做生意了。他们是对的,你是错的。从某种程度上说,正是这一点造就了今天的美国。我们的市场体系让顾客——3 亿美国人——告诉企业该生产什么、在哪里提供服务、以及如何做生意。把它和某个极权体制比较一下,在那里是某个人决定人们午餐该吃什么,而我们赢了。

WBIt won’t disappear, but in the end - and that’s the genius of the American system - we do give the consumer what they want. If people want to use the convenience of cards, they will do it. Now there will be enough people that want to use cash, so consumers won’t turn their back on it entirely. They haven’t given up landline phones entirely for cell phones. The American consumer - in the end - is king. You can push them around for a week or a month maybe, but you either figure out what’s in your customers’ mind and decide you are going to serve them; or you are not going to be in business. They are right, and you are wrong. It’s what made this country, to some extent, what it is. Our market system where the customer - 300 million Americans - tell people what to make, where to serve them, and how to do business. Compare that to some totalitarian system, where somebody decides what people are going eat for lunch and we win.

CBT嗯,我们当然不习惯这样……

CBTWell, we are certainly not used to that…

沃伦·巴菲特哦,是的。嗯哼。

WBOh yeah. Mm-hmm.

CBT信用卡行业大约有 50 年历史了,可以说接下来 10 到 15 年它一定会发生变革。有时候我想,我们手上会有芯片,一扫就能付钱。各种交易都将通过电子方式完成。

CBTThe credit card industry is about 50 years old, and it’s pretty safe to say that it’s going to transform in the next 10 or 15 years. Sometimes I think we’ll have chips in our hands to scan and pay for things. All kinds of things will be transacted electronically.

沃伦·巴菲特凯茜,我在 1950 年代见过大来卡(Diners Club)的创始人拉尔夫·施奈德。他当时刚设计出一种个人退休账户(IRA),只在纽约一带使用。他们向商户收取 10% 的手续费,当时用卡的成本非常低。美国运通最初进入这个领域是为了防御。他们当时有旅行支票,担心信用卡会冲击这个业务。1964 年,美国运通发生了他们所谓的“色拉油大丑闻”,我们这家奥马哈的小机构成了美国运通公司的最大股东。我跑到餐馆和加油站,问大家这个卡会不会因为丑闻而失去吸引力。他们说卡的吸引力不但没失去,反而在增长。所以,我几乎从一开始就在关注信用卡行业。我们入场很早,我能看出这是一个强大的工具。第一数据公司就在奥马哈,我也一直在观察他们。还有 Carte Blanche、希尔顿卡——有些已经消失多年了。当然,Visa 和万事达一直很成功。各种发展层出不穷,但事实是,美国公众就是喜欢能从口袋里掏出卡来用。

WBCathy, I met Ralph Schneider who was the founder of the Diners Club back in the 1950s. He had just designed an IRA, and they are just using it around New York. They used to charge the merchants 10 percent and the card was very low priced then. American Express went into the business originally defensively. They had the Travelers Check and they were worried about what the credit card would do to it. In 1964, when American Express had what they called the great Salad Oil Scandal, we became this little outfit in Omaha and became the largest shareholders of the American Express Company. I went around to restaurants and service stations, and asked people about whether the Card was losing its appeal because of the scandal that was going around. They said the Card wasn’t losing it but that it was growing in appeal. So, I watched the credit card industry almost from the beginning in that respect. We got in early. I could see it was a powerful tool. First Data was in Omaha, and I have watched them all. Carte Blanche, the Hilton Card - some of those have disappeared over the years. Of course, Visa and MasterCard have been successful. There have been all kinds of developments, but the truth is, the American public likes to be able to go into their pocket and pull out a card.

CBT嗯,这倒是给我原本准备问的那个关于美国运通的问题做了极好的铺垫。大家都知道,您刚才也提到了,伯克希尔·哈撒韦在美国运通有投资。所以,您显然对支付行业,特别是这家公司,非常了解。能跟我们说说,是什么吸引了您投资这家公司?

CBTWell, that was a really great lead into a question I had about American Express. Everyone knows here that Berkshire Hathaway has an investment in American Express, as you just said. So, you obviously know a lot about the payment industry and that company in particular. Can you tell us what attracted you to that company?

沃伦·巴菲特嗯,最早在 1964 年吸引我的是,大来卡抢了先机。它们远远领先于美国运通。美国运通带着一个很有意思的市场和概念杀了进来。那时候人们已经用上了大来卡,美国运通想进这个领域。它们的收费比大来卡高。大来卡的卡上印着一堆花哨的小标志和图案。美国运通则推出了那个百夫长图案,最初就是那张绿卡,上面那个人看着就像“正直先生”。要是你去餐厅请人吃饭,掏卡的时候,一边是这张大来卡,看起来就像你从妈妈那儿拿的支票一样寒酸,另一边是那张百夫长卡,让你看起来像是 J.P. 摩根之类的大人物——你肯定会选“正直先生”。它们实际上是通过把自己定位成高端竞争者、而不是低价竞争者,从而拿下了这个领域。这个营销策略棒极了。然后这卡风靡全国。我口袋里这张卡上写着:“会员始于 1964 年。”

WBWell, what originally attracted me back in 1964 was that Diners Club got the jump. They were way ahead of American Express. American Express came in with a very interesting market and concept. People already were carrying Diners Club, and American Express wanted to enter the field. They charged more than Diners Club did for their product. Diners Club had this card that had a bunch of flashy little symbols and everything on it. American Express brought out that centurion, and originally it was the green card with the guy that looked like Mr. Integrity. If you went into a restaurant, and you were buying dinner for somebody, and you had a choice of pulling out this Diners Club card that looked like you were giving a check from your mother or pulling out this centurion that made it look you were J.P. Morgan or something - you went with Mr. Integrity. They actually took over the field by establishing themselves not as the low-priced competitor but, but as the class competitor. It was a great marketing arrangement. Then it swept the country. The card I carry in my pocket says, “Member Since 1964.”

CBT我的上面写着“会员始于 1983 年”。

CBTMine says “Member Since 1983.”

沃伦·巴菲特那是你出生的年份,我干这件事的时候大概 40 岁吧。

WBWell, that was the year you were born, I was 40 years old or something when I did this.

CBT最后一个问题。我们想请您分享一点建议,告诉我们,从这个经济版的“珍珠港”事件中,我们最该汲取的一个教训是什么?

CBTLast question. We would like you to impart a little bit of advice and tell us what is the one lesson that we should take away from this economic Pearl Harbor?

沃伦·巴菲特嗯,我觉得这又回到了我告诉经理们要做的事:只管把客户照顾好。在这个国家,我们有大量客户。从 1886 年起,可口可乐就在卖人们喜欢的产品,他们只是不断照顾好这些客户。这就是你在美国商业资讯做的事。到最后,从来没有哪个把客户照顾得好的人输过;我是说,这才是生意的全部要义。

WBWell, I think that it goes back what I have told my manager to do: Just keep taking care of the customer. We have got a lot of customers in this country. Since 1886, Coca-Cola has been selling a product that people like, and they just keep taking care of them. It’s what you have done at Business Wire. In the end, nobody that’s ever taken good care of the customer has ever lost; I mean, that, that is the name of the game.

CBT这是非常好的建议。感谢您抽出宝贵时间,沃伦,和您交流非常愉快,也谢谢您给予我采访您的机会。

CBTThat is great advice. I want to thank you for your time, Warren, it’s been a pleasure talking to you, and allowing me to interview you.

沃伦·巴菲特这次交流很愉快。谢谢你,凯茜。

WBIt’s been fun. Thanks, Cathy.

我最近一直在思考支付行业。查理和我很早以前就意识到,人们在付款这件事上不喜欢麻烦。喜诗糖果的生意就从现金和支票转到了信用卡和借记卡,这改变了一切。支付领域的变革速度相当惊人。但关键是,你得搞清楚哪些公司拥有持久的竞争优势——也就是护城河。Visa 和 Mastercard 这样的公司,护城河很深,因为他们拥有庞大的网络效应。但也有一些新玩家,他们可能以为自己在掘金,其实只是在给矿工卖铲子。

http://pymnts.com/transcript-warren-buffett-on-what-s-next-in-the-payments-industry/