2009 年 NBC Dateline Tom Brokaw 完整访谈

2009-01-18 · 金融危机、奥巴马与美国经济 · 原文约 9197 词
译文与英文原文逐段对齐可在本页展开英文,也可打开发布者原址核对上下文。
打开来源正文

2009 年 1 月 18 日播出的沃伦·巴菲特接受 NBC 汤姆·布罗考《日期线》专访:完整文字记录

Warren Buffett’s Dateline Interview with Tom Brokaw of NBC: The Complete Transcript aired on January 18, 2009.

以下是 NBC 新闻提供的该访谈完整文字记录:

This is the complete transcript of that interview, as provided by NBC News:

汤姆·布罗考,NBC 新闻

TOM BROKAW, NBC NEWS

去年秋天,沃伦,一位民意调查专家告诉我,这场选举是希望与恐惧之间的对决。那么在经济问题上,希望和恐惧,谁占了上风?

Last fall, Warren a pollster told me that the election was between hope and fear. When it comes to the economy, who’s winning, hope or fear?

沃伦·巴菲特

WARREN BUFFETT

嗯,眼下恐惧占了上风。我是说,你到处都能看到。圣诞节期间,几乎每样商品的销售,你都能看出来。全国上下弥漫着很多恐惧。就连那些工作稳当、银行里有钱的人也不例外。但他们——他们就是担心。

Well, right now fear is. I mean, you’re seeing it everyplace. You saw it at- in the sales of almost every item at- at Christmas. There’s a lot of fear throughout the country. Even- even with people whose jobs are fine, and who have money in the bank. But they- they’re worried.

布罗考

BROKAW

我一直把这件事比作一场相当于战争的本土事件。这么说是不是有点夸张了?

I’ve been describing this as the domestic equivalent of war. Is that an overstatement?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,其实我在九月份就说过——这是一场经济上的珍珠港事件。我——那是在国会刚介入的时候。这确实就是一场经济上的珍珠港事件。这个——这个国家正面临着二战以来从未遇到过的局面。

Well, actually, in September I said- this is an economic Pearl Harbor. I- that was the time congress had made it in. It really is an economic Pearl Harbor. It- the- the country is facing something it hasn’t faced since World War II.

他们对此感到恐惧,也不太清楚该怎么应对。关键是——而且——而且这这——暂时看起来我们处于下风。这还真有点——有那种感觉。有意思的是,珍珠港事件后我们也输了一阵子。但美国人民从未怀疑过我们会赢。我是说,那时候我们就是这种态度。我觉得,现在他们多少有点被吓瘫了。

And they’re fearful about it. And they don’t know quite what to do about it. And the point is- and- and it- and temporarily it looks like we’re losing. It has that- that same aspect. Interestingly enough, we were losing for a while after Pearl Harbor. But the American people never doubted that we’d win. I mean, we had that attitude then. I think, right now, that they’re sort of paralyzed.

布罗考

BROKAW

巴拉克·奥巴马是执掌经济大局的合适统帅吗?

Is Barack Obama the right commander in chief for the economy?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

他是绝对合适的最高统帅。那个——你知道,美国人民似乎偶尔还会做的一件事,就是选出符合时代要求的人。你知道,无论是林肯还是罗斯福。而——我要说奥巴马——你——你找不到——比他更合适的人来掌舵了。

He’s the absolute right commander in chief. That- you know, that’s another thing the American people seem to do, occasionally, is that we elect people that are right for the times. You know, whether it was Lincoln, Roosevelt. And- and I would say Obama- you- you couldn’t have- anybody better in charge.

布罗考

BROKAW

但他为什么适合这个时代?

But why is he right for the times?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

他——他——他非常聪明,价值观端正,而且他对经济理解得非常透彻。他很冷静。他——他——他善于分析。但当他全面思考清楚后,他动作很快,能向美国人民——向美国人民讲明白需要做什么。不要指望奇迹。这需要时间。但我们一定能到达彼岸。我——我——我真想不出有谁比当选总统更适合这个职位了。

Well, he’s- he- he’s smart, he’s got the right values, but he also- he understands economics very well. He’s cool. He’s- he’s- he’s analytical. But then, when he gets it all thought through, and he’s fast- he can convey to American- the American people what needs to be done. Not to expect miracles. That it’s gonna take time. But that we’re gonna get to the other end. And- and I- I- I don’t think there’s anybody better for the job than- than- the president-elect.

布罗考

BROKAW

他经常把你当作顾问挂在嘴边。而且我知道你一直和他的经济团队保持联系。但通常的情况是,当选那个职位的人——尤其是那个职位——他们找你更多是为了告诉你他们知道什么,而不是来倾听。他会倾听吗?

He often cites you as an advisor. And I know that you’ve been in touch with his economic team. But what often happens to somebody who gets elected to that office, particularly, they’re more to you to tell you what they know than they are to listen. Does he listen?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

他是个倾听者。我——我第一次见他,大概是四年前吧,差不多那时候。那时他就是个倾听者,现在依然是。但另一方面,他会自己做决定。他不会——他的团队不会支配他。他会用他的团队,会非常有效地用他们。他会综合、会——会——会分析。但最后,得由他来拍板。

He’s a listener. I- I first met him, maybe, four years ago, or something like that. He was a listener then, he’s a listener now. But, on the other hand, he makes up his own mind. He will- he will not be- his team won’t run him. He’ll use his team, he’ll use them very effectively. He’ll synthesize, he’ll- he’ll- he’ll analyze. But, in the end, it’ll be his decision.

布罗考

BROKAW

除了他当选之外,在你看来,经济上还有别的利好消息吗?

Apart from his election, in your judgment, is there any other good news in the economy?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

现在真没什么好消息——没错。我们——我们正处在经济上的珍珠港时刻。我是说,我们的船已经被击沉了。现在——(笑声)现在我们必须全面动员起来——去打赢这场战争,而我们一定会赢。

There’s not much good new right now- no. The- we are- we are in the middle of the economic Pearl Harbor right now. I mean, our ships have been sunk. Now- (LAUGHTER) now we have to get mobilized- to win the war, which we will.

布罗考

BROKAW

你的朋友,也是我的老板,杰夫·伊梅尔特——他是通用电气的首席执行官——说过一句话,我觉得在很多方面,并不是因为他是我的老板我才这么说,而是我真的觉得他总结得非常到位。他说:“这不是一个周期,而是一次重置。”

Your friend, and my boss, Jeff Immelt — who is the CEO of General Electric , had a phrase that I thought, in many ways, not just because he’s my boss, but I thought he summed it up pretty well when he said, “This is not a cycle, it’s a reset.”

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,这话确实有几分道理——相当真实。我们一直以一种方式生活在一种经济形态里。而现在正在给那种经济去杠杆。我们——我们得习惯在没有信贷扩张那股推动力的情况下过日子——那股推动力确实帮着驱动经济引擎好长一段时间。那股——那股风不会再吹在我们背后了。不过,我们背后还会有各种各样的东西。但他说得对——重置,就是不能再靠信贷扩张当经济的燃料。

Well, there’s- there- there’s some real truth to that. And- we have lived in one way in one type of economy. And- and- we’re now deleveraging that economy. We’re- we’re gonna have to live without the same impetus from credit expansion that- really helped propel the economic engine for a long period of time. The- the- that- that wind will not be at our back. But there’s all kinds of things that will be in our back. But that- he’s right about resetting with- without credit expansion being the propellant for the economy.

布罗考

BROKAW

那么,新总统想推行、国会正在拼凑的那个刺激计划,在你看来,它靠谱吗?有没有哪些事情他们该做却没做的?

And the stimulus program, that- the new president wants to have, and that congress is cobbling together, in your judgment is it sound? Are there some things they’re- they should be doing they’re not doing?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,他们打算对着这场大火开大水龙。我是说,从某种程度上说,这算是个粗暴的工具。但规模非常大。我们要用到的药量是前所未见的。但它不会立即见效。它需要时间才能有力地作用到经济上。所以人们不应该指望二月、三月或四月就出现奇迹。那不可能发生。

Well, they’re doing- they- they- they’re gonna turn the fire hose on this- on this fire. I mean, the- the- and- and- it’s- it’s- it’s a blunt instrument, to some extent. At- at- but it’s very, very big. We’re- we’re- we’re gonna- we’re gonna have a medicine coming in a dosage we’ve never seen before. And- it- but it won’t- it won’t- it won’t have immediate impact. It should- it takes time for it to- to hit the economy in real force. So people should not expect miracles in February or March or April. That isn’t gonna happen.

布罗考

BROKAW

我对这个很感兴趣。还有美国消费者的行为模式。过去 40 年里,我们经历了好几次经济下行,但每次都能迅速反弹。里根执政的头两年,那是一次非常严重的衰退。老布什总统执政末期,也是一次非常严重的衰退。但后来我们都靠着信息技术来了个大翻身。我在想,美国人的潜意识里是不是都觉得,“没事,这次我们也能很快挺过去。”

I’m very interested in that. And the conditioning of the American consumer. We’ve been through some downturns here in the last 40 years. But we’ve always made a snappy recovery. The first two years of the Reagan administration, that was a very sharp recession. At the end of George Bush 41’s administration, very sharp recession. But then we made a big comeback with the information technology. I- I wonder if the American people don’t, in the back of their minds, say, “Well, we’ll come out of this one pretty quickly.”

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,如果他们真这么想,我希望他们别太……(笑声)别太往心里去。顺便说一句,从技术角度描述的话,你可以把 80 年代那场衰退说得相当短暂。但如果你把从石油危机一直到保罗·沃尔克搞定通胀那段时间都算进来,那整段时期就是滞胀,股市也毫无作为。大家不信任货币——你知道的,现金是垃圾,他们拼命逃离现金,因为他们觉得……

Well, if they do, I- I hope they don’t get- (LAUGHTER) feel that way too strongly. And, incidentally, in the- in the way it was technically- described, you could describe the 80s as being a fairly quick recession. But if you think of the period from the oil shock all the way through ’til (Paul) Volcker got done, that whole period was one of stagflation and general- the stock market did nothing. People didn’t trust- money, you know, cash is trash, and they were running from it ’cause they thought-

布罗考

BROKAW

20% 的利率——

Twenty percent interest rates-

巴菲特

BUFFETT

当然。所有那些。所以,我得说,当时确实有一段十年期,美国经济几乎没什么进展。我并不是预测这次也会那样。但那个时期,多数人对经济感觉并不好。不过,他们当时并没有像现在这么沮丧。

Sure. And all of that. So- so I would say that you really had- a ten year period there where the American economy did not make much progress. I’m not predicting that this time. But I- that- that was- that was a period that most people didn’t feel great about the economy. They didn’t feel as depressed as they feel right now though.

布罗考

BROKAW

我们知道,或者说我们相当清楚,刺激计划在纯粹的金额层面会对经济产生什么影响。但经济学家们似乎无法就它多久能见效达成一致。有人说一年,也有人说可能长达五年。您对此有什么看法?

We know, or we have a pretty good idea, what the stimulus program will mean to the economy in terms of raw dollars and so on. The economists can’t seem to come to a judgment about how long it will take for it to have an effect. Some are saying a year, others are saying it may be up to five years. Do you have a position on that?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

呃,我觉得不会是五年,汤姆。但我回答不了这个问题。我不知道股市明年会怎么走。我确实知道的是,如果你回头看 20 世纪,整整 100 年,你经历了两次世界大战,还有其他规模很大的战争,你经历了大萧条,你经历了流感大流行,你经历了十几次衰退和恐慌,你经历了形形色色的事情。

Well, I- I don’t think it’ll be five years Tom. But I- I don’t have the answer to that. I- I- I don’t know what the stock market will do in the next year. What I do know is that, if you go back to the 20th century, 100 years, you had two great wars, you had other very large wars, you had the Great Depression, you had the flu epidemic, you had a dozen recessions and panics, you had all kinds of things.

上世纪结束时,普通美国人的生活水平是世纪初的七倍。道琼斯指数从 66 点涨到了 11,497 点。所有那些问题都没能挡住它。这是一个具备要素的国家——它释放了人类的潜能。而这些潜能依然在这里。所以,五年——你可以算我一个。一年你可不能算我。(笑)

At the end of that century the amer- the average American was living seven times as well as- the start of the century. The DOW Jones average went from 66 to 11,497. With all those problems. This is a country that has the ingredients that- that- well, it unleashes the potential of humans. And- and they’re still here. I mean- so five years- you can put me down on that one. You can’t put me down on one year. (LAUGHTER)

布罗考

BROKAW

那么,新总统在灌输信心、对美国人民直截了当地说“会有一些痛苦,你们可能需要做出一些牺牲”这一方面,究竟有多重要?

And how important is the new president to all of that in terms of instilling confidence, and talking bluntly to the American people saying, “There is gonna be some pain here. And you may have to make some sacrifices.”

巴菲特

BUFFETT

他肯定会这么说,因为这是事实。而且他——他足够聪明,知道这是事实,他——他是那种会对你说实话的人。所以——我认为他是管理这家公司的理想总裁。但这并不是因为我觉得他能挥一挥魔法棒。

That’s exactly what he’s gonna say, ’cause it’s the truth. And- and he’s- he’s smart enough to know it’s the truth, and he- and he’s the kind of person who’s going to tell you the truth. So- I think he’s the ideal president for it. But that’s not because I think he can wave a magic wand.

而是因为我认为,从某种意义上说,他能再次找到办法,让美国经济的这些基本优势重新运转起来。我是说,我们——我们拥有一个了不起的经济体,只是眼下卡壳了。过去它也卡过很多次。

It’s because I think he can, in a sense, figure, once again, how to get these basic strengths of the American economy in gear again. I mean, we- we have a wonderful economy that’s gummed up at present. And it’s gotten gummed in the past many times.

总统是谁,这很重要。美国人民信任他,这很重要。我们采取正确的政策行动,这很重要。但一两个月、三个月里,不会有奇迹发生。他会把这个事实告诉美国人民。

And it is important who’s president. It’s important that the American people believe in him. It’s important that we take the right policy actions. But there are no miracles in a month or two months or three months. And he’s going to tell the American people that.

布罗考

BROKAW

他有吗——

Has he-

巴菲特

BUFFETT

他一向如此。

He always has.

布罗考

BROKAW

你真会说话。他有没有问过你——哪怕一次——对他的就职演说给点建议?(笑)

You’re very good with words. Has he asked you if- at all for any advice on his inaugural address? (LAUGHTER)

BUFFETT

BUFFETT

不——不。没有。我可没闲到整天写什么“八十七年前”之类的东西。(笑声)不,他不需要——他完全不需要任何帮助——

No- no. No. I have not been sitting around writing four score and- (LAUGHTER) any of that sort. No, he doesn’t need- he doesn’t need any help-

布罗考

BROKAW

我们唯一值得恐惧的就是恐惧本身。

We have nothing to fear but fear itself.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

没错。除了恐惧本身,没什么好怕的,对吧。

That’s right. Nothing to fear but fear itself, right.

布罗考

BROKAW

但非得用那个调调吗?就像罗斯福说的“我们唯一要恐惧的就是恐惧本身”?或者约翰·肯尼迪说的“不要问你的国家能为你做什么,而要问你能为你的国家做什么?”我们准备好迎接那种调调了吗?

But does it have to be in that tone? Like FDR, “We have nothing to fear?” Or John Kennedy saying, “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what- you can do for your country?” Are we ready for that again?

BUFFETT

BUFFETT

嗯,我——我没有什么内幕消息。不过我的猜测是,它会鼓舞人心。它会——它会——它——它——它——它会对美国人民提出一些要求。我的意思是,他——他完全有权利对美国人民有所期待。

Well, I don’t- I don’t have any specific knowledge. But my guess is it will be inspirational. It’ll- it’ll be- it- it- it- it will be asking something of the American people. I mean, he- he has every right to expect something of the American people.

我——我觉得美国人民是希望被召唤的。所以,我确信,在这一点上,它——它会有——它——它会有——和肯尼迪一样的语气。而且,我觉得它也会有一些罗斯福的口吻,就是说——你知道,我们仍有 305 万或 1000 万人,不管具体数字是多少,他们拥有全部的能力。

I- I think the American people want something to be asked of- of them. So I think it will have- it will- it- it’ll- it’ll have that same tone, I’m sure, as- as- as Kennedy, in that respect. And I think it’ll have some tones of- of Roosevelt in saying that- you know, we still have 305 or ten million people, whatever it is, who have all the abilities.

我们仍然拥有法治和市场经济体系,而且我们相信,你知道,每个——每个人都能发挥他们的潜——所有这些优势都站在我们这边。我想他会比我刚才讲得更清楚。(笑声)

We still have a rule of law and a market system and- and we believe, you know, in- in- in- in everybody reaching their potent- all of these things are going for us. And I think he will convey that a lot better than I just have. (LAUGHTER)

布罗考

BROKAW

但是,沃伦,同时我们也有一些新的系统在起作用。涟漪效应现在似乎发生得快得多,而且影响也深得多。我们这次陷入困境的部分原因,就是系统太复杂了,似乎没人知道水面下正在发生什么。

But, at the same time Warren, we have- new systems in play too. And the ripple effect seems to happen a lot faster now, and goes a lot deeper. Part of the reason we got in trouble this time is the system is so complex, and no one seems to know what’s going on just below the surface.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

对,我们现在陷入了一个负反馈循环。恐惧让人们不想消费,也不想投资,而这又反过来加剧了恐惧——我们就是处在一个负反馈循环里。三四年前,我们当时是正反馈循环,人人都能拿不断升值的房子借到越来越多的钱(笑声),可以不断花自己压根没有的钱,诸如此类。我们终会走出来。但——这需要时间,没人能准确预测什么时候会好转。但我可以向你保证,因为现在坐在总统位置上的是合适的人选,好转的速度会比原本快得多。

Yeah, we- we have a negative feedback cycle going on now. We have fear which leads to people not wanting to spend. And- and not wanting to make investments. And then that leads to more fear. And- we’re in a negative feedback cycle. We were in a positive feedback cycle three or four years ago, when everybody lent you more and more (LAUGHTER) on a house that kept going up, and you could keep spending money you didn’t have and so on. We’ll break out of it. But- it takes time, and nobody can predict exactly when it’ll happen. But it will happen faster, I will guarantee you. Because we have the right president- in office- than would be the case otherwise.

布罗考

BROKAW

您认为美国纳税人或美国消费者会从这次经历中学到任何关于分寸感的教训吗?因为我们刚刚经历了一场狂欢。

Do you think that the American taxpayer, or the American consumer, will have learned anything about proportion as a result of this experience? Because we have been on a binge.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

是的,我们一直在狂买。

Yeah, we’ve been on a binge.

布罗考

BROKAW

顺便说一句,我自己也算在内。

And I count myself on that by the way.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

是啊,呃——呃,说实话,你看起来像个刚放纵了一把的家伙。(笑声)不,我认为——大多数人不会——但有些机构会。而且——而且有些机构不管愿不愿意都会学到这一点。但——但大多数人都有花光自己赚的钱、甚至再多花一点的天性。

Yeah, well- well, you look like a guy that’s been on a binge, actually. (LAUGHTER) No, I think- the- most people won’t. But some institutions will. And- and some will learn it whether they want to or not. But- but the- most people have a propensity to spend what they- what they make and maybe a little more.

麻烦在于,他们碰上了一位好说话的酒保——你知道的,就是这场豪饮期间的酒保。而我觉得——我觉得这位酒保马上就要清醒过来了,而且清醒得还很彻底。关于他能端上多少杯酒、以及诸如此类的规矩——(笑声)——都会收紧一些。

And- and the trouble is they- they’ve had a friendly bartender, you know, in- in terms of this binge. And I think- I think the bartender is going to, been sobered up materially. And some of the rules about how many drinks he can serve and all of that- (LAUGHTER) will be tightened up somewhat.

所以,我——我——我不认为引发这轮危机的那些因素会很快重演。不过,未来我们还会看到泡沫。人性嘛,贪婪和恐惧会一直——一直存在。而——而——而我们还会有其他泡沫,它们不会和这次一模一样。但不会——你很长时间内不会再看到这种特定类型的泡沫重演了。

So I- I- I do not think we will see a repeat of the factors that led to this soon. We will see bubbles though again in the future. Human nature, you know, greed and fear will keep- continue to exist. And- and- and we will have other bubbles, and they won’t be exactly like this one. But they won’t- you won’t see this particular type repeated for quite a while.

BROKAW

BROKAW

还有——我们身后的那座大楼,美国国会大厦,现在民主党掌控了两院,肯定会有人大声疾呼要加强华尔街的监管。要更严格地监督金融机构。这是个好主意吗?

And- and that building behind us, the U.S. Capitol, Democrats controlling both chambers now, there’s gonna be a big cry for more regulations on Wall Street. For the financial institutions to be more closely supervised. Is that a good idea?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,这——这——这大概是个好主意。但我——我不会把它看作灵丹妙药。你——你——你多少得做的是,还得为那些经营这些机构的人创造正确的激励机制。

Well, it’s- it’s- it’s probably a good idea. But I- I wouldn’t look at that as a panacea. What- what- what you have to do, to some extent, is you have to create the right incentives also for that are running those institutions.

你知道,我不太确定是否应该枪毙——任何一家破产银行的 CEO 之类的。但我——(笑声)——我会让把机构搞垮这件事,比过去困难得多。我认为——我——我认为——我认为,无论是在董事会会议室,还是在参议院或众议院的房间里,都有很多事情可以做。

And, you know, I’m not sure whether I would shoot the- CEO of any bank that went broke or anything. But I would- (LAUGHTER) I would make it much tougher than it’s been in the past- to- to run an institution into the ground. I think- I- I think- I think there are plenty of things to be done in the board room as well as in the rooms of- the Senate or the House.

BROKAW

BROKAW

你对高管薪酬问题也一直非常严厉,多次公开批评。那个时代是不是已经结束了?就是不管公司成不成功,都能拿到巨额报酬的那种。

Well, you’ve also been very tough on executive compensation. Speaking out on it. Has that era come to an end? Where these huge, huge paydays come whether or not you’ve been successful.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

是的,那——我——我希望他们有,汤姆。他们当然应该有。那——而且我觉得——我——我认为会有很多限制措施出台。但我——我——我不会低估那些拿到的报酬比自身价值还高的人的欲望。我是说,(笑声)尤其是顶层那些人。

Yeah, that’s- I- I hope they have, Tom. And they certainly should. That- and I think- I- I think there will be a lot of curbing of that. But I- I- I wouldn’t underestimate the desire of people who get paid more than they’re worth. I mean, (LAUGHTER) and particularly at the top.

你知道吗,我有个朋友说过一句话:“失败冲昏了他们的头脑。”(笑声)这些人开始觉得,就算自己把一家机构搞垮了,也理应收个八九位数的报酬。这确实该由美国股东和董事会来决定。

And- you know, so- one of my friends says, “Failure goes to their head.” You know, they start- (LAUGHTER) they start thinking that they’re entitled to- eight or nine figures. You know- with an institution that’s failed. That’s really up to American shareholders and to boards.

也许有些法规能在这方面起到帮助。但——但是——在董事会上,这很大程度上一直是一个老男孩俱乐部。而且——而且——而且——你知道的,这种情况早就该停止了。我认为最近——最近的事件——会帮助遏制这种风气。但——但是——人们操纵——薪酬安排的冲动——不会消失。

There may be some regulations that help on that. But- but that- it’s been an old boy’s club to quite a degree in board rooms. And- and- and- the- you know, that should have ceased a long time ago. I think the- the events- the recent events will help it get curbed. But- but the urge for people to rig the- the compensation arrangements- will not go away.

布罗考

BROKAW

有个人还跟我说,没人在这局里有“skin in the game”,就那个高尔夫的旧说法。因为他们不承担风险,这些新工具层层转手,特别复杂。我在华尔街碰到好多人,我问他们:“信用违约互换是什么?”他们根本给我解释不出来。

Well, someone also said to me that no one had any skin in the game. That old golfing phrase. Where they didn’t have a stake in it because these new instruments are passed along, they’re complex. There were a lot of guys on Wall Street when I would say to them, “What’s a credit default swap?” They couldn’t explain it to me, for example.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

是啊,不过我们可能反而因此占了便宜,因为他们没法(做空)。这——这——这让他们推销(标普 500 期货)更容易了。但你说得对,我的意思是——如果你想获得巨大的上涨潜力,就应该存在实实在在的下行风险。而——而现实却不是这样。

Yeah, well, we may have been better off ’cause they couldn’t. That’s- that’s- that enabled them to sell them easier. But they- you’re right. I mean it- there should be a real downside if you want a big upside. And- and that has not been the case.

股票期权,你知道,简直是一张只赚不赔的单程票。我——你知道,我——我大致上认同——经营企业的人应该把大部分身家放进自己的企业里。而且——不能光——不能停留在纸面上。我是说,要真正拥有所有权,自己掏钱买来的。但这看法前阵子显得有点老派。不过它或许还会卷土重来。

The stock option is all- you know, it’s a one way ticket. I would- you know, I- I sort of believe in- in people that are running businesses having most of their net worth in those businesses. And- and- and- and not just- not- not on paper. I mean, with real ownership, having paid for it themselves. And- but that looked a little old fashioned here a while back. But it may- it may stage a comeback.

布罗考

BROKAW

候任总统有没有跟你谈过税收政策?你在不少问题上也一直很敢言——比如工资税。你的秘书按收入比例交的税比你还多,这很不公平。

Did the president-elect talk to you about tax policy? You’ve been outspoken as well about- for example, payroll taxes. It’s unfair that your secretary pays more of her income, proportionally, than you do.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

确实如此。没错。

That’s true. That’s right.

布罗考

BROKAW

还有那个关于资本利得税一直卡在 15% 的问题。他有没有就这件事征求你的意见?

And there’s that whole question about capital gains staying stuck at 15 percent. Did he ask your advice on that?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,我们好些年前聊过这个。我是说,不是——不是最近。不过——实际上,在他那本《无畏的希望》(The Audacity of Hope)里,他——他提到了我们关于税收的一两次谈话。但我认为,你知道,过去 20 年我们学到的是——水涨了,只有游艇跟着浮起来。

Well, we’ve talked about that some years back. I mean, not- not- not- not recently. But- actually, in his- in his book, The Audacity of Hope we- he- he mentions it, conversation or two we had about taxes. But I think that, you know, what we learned in the last 20 year- we learned that a rising tide lifts all yachts.

可是——那些划着划艇的家伙却被甩在了后面。那 400 位富豪的总财富从 2200 亿美元涨到了 1.54 万亿美元,涨了七倍。而普通美国人的工资却原地踏步。

But- but the- the fellows in the row boat- boats have been left behind. And- while the aggregate wealth of the four- four- 400 went from 220 billion to a trillion 540 billion. Seven for one. The wage of the average American went no place.

而且税收政策还在一贯地、越来越偏向富人。我是说——你瞧,资本利得税率只有 15%。而我——完全不用为这部分收入缴纳任何工资税。所以整个天平已严重向富人倾斜,可人人都说这挺好,因为我们需要鼓励投资。好吧,过去八年投资相对于劳动所得享受了最低的税率,看看这带来了什么。

And- and tax policy has just consistently favored, more and more- the rich. I mean- basically you’ve got, you know, capital gains rates at 15 percent. And- and- and I don’t pay any- payroll taxes on that at all. So it’s- it’s gotten tilted way to the rich, and everybody said this is wonderful because we need to encourage investment. Well, we’ve had the lowest tax rates for investment relative to earned pen- income the last eight years and look at what it’s produced.

布罗考

BROKAW

竞选期间乔·拜登说过,富人缴纳更多税是爱国之举,那些偏保守的人立刻群起攻之。你觉得富人缴纳更多税算爱国吗?

When Joe Biden said, during the course of the campaign, it’s patriotic for the wealthy to pay more in taxes, those who are more conservative jumped all over him. Do you think it’s patriotic for the wealthy to pay more taxes?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

这个嘛,我——(笑声)我是,但我可不愿意指望爱国心。我更愿意指望税法。(笑声)

Well, I- I- (LAUGHTER) I- yeah, but I wouldn’t want to rely on patriotism. I’d rather rely on the tax code. (LAUGHTER)

布罗考

BROKAW

但是,非得到那一步吗?

But is- is it gonna have to come to that?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,我们——我们接下来——我们会花更多的钱。不过你看,就——就过去一年——你知道,我们花了大约 2.9 万亿美元。我们筹集了大约 2.6 万亿美元。而且——你知道,我们越来越从——从那些——呃——世界上——的劳动人民那里——筹集这些钱,(笑声)而越来越不从——像我这样的人这里——筹集。

Well, we- we’re gonna- we’re gonna spend a lot more money now. But here just- the last- in the last year- you know, we spent about 2.9 or- trillion dollars. We raised about 2.6 trillion. And- you know, we are raising more and more of that from the people that- that are- you know- are- are the- are the working people in the world, (LAUGHTER) and less- less from people like me.

钱总得从某个地方来。我是说,我们——我们——我们——还有——这完全取决于国会来决定,谁该为这些造福共同利益的事业出钱。而——而在过去十年里,算上工资税(你必须把工资税算进去,因为它们占联邦政府收入的 30% 以上),但算上工资税——像我这样的人承担的比例在下降,而我秘书那样的普通人在上升。

And we’ve gotta the money from someplace. I mean, we- we- we- and- and it’s just- congress makes that decision as to- as to whom shall contribute to these things that contribute to our common good. And- and, in the last decade, the proportion that, counting payroll taxes, and you gotta count them, because they’re over 30 percent of the receipts of the federal government, but counting payroll taxes- the proportion has gone down on guys like me and it’s gone up on people like my secretary.

布罗考

BROKAW

你认为这届政府能改变这一点吗?

And do you think that that can get changed in this administration?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

我——我认为这会改变的,是的。

I- I think it will get changed, yeah.

布罗考

BROKAW

您认为国会和保尔森财长,对那些在全华盛顿伸手想从救市计划里拿钱的金融机构,已经足够严厉了吗?美国银行、花旗银行、美国国际集团——这些最初把我们拖入困境的巨型金融机构,现在却由那些第二天还在担心失业的普通纳税人来兜底?

Do you think that congress and Secretary Paulson, between them, have been tough enough on the financial institutions that have their hands out all over Washington trying to get money out of this bailout program? Bank of America , Citi Bank , AIG , these huge financial institutions that helped get us in trouble in the first place now are being underwritten by the ordinary taxpayer who’s out there worrying about losing his job the next day?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

呃,我、我、我认为已经采取的措施是必要的。我的意思是,如、如果金融体系彻底失灵,那这个国家的一切都会跟着失灵。你也许很不情愿去救他们,因为——你懂的——他们可能在很多方面让我们陷入了困境。

Well, I- I- I think what’s been done has been necessary. I mean I- I- if your financial system becomes totally dysfunctional everything else becomes dysfunctional in the country. Now the- you may hate to help them out, because you- you may- you know, they- they may have gotten us in trouble in many ways.

而处于顶层的人或许从中捞得盆满钵满。但我不会因此停下脚步,不去做正确的事,好让明年变得更好。我——呃——你知道,我现在觉得,比起寻找罪人,更重要的是找出一个能让我们迅速摆脱困境的办法。而且——而且——不过——我确实认为,那些投票通过巨额“金色降落伞”之类东西的董事会,我是说,他们真该重新审视一下自己的所作所为。

And the people at the top may have made out like bandits in- in terms of it. But I wouldn’t let that stop me from doing what’s right to make next year better. I- the- we- you know, I- the searching for villains is less important to me now than figuring out a solution that gets us out of this promptly. And- and- and- but I- I do think that boards that vote big golden parachutes and all that sort of thing. I mean, I think they ought to reexamine their activities.

布罗考

BROKAW

你那位朋友——阿诺德·施瓦辛格,是加州州长。那个州在很多方面都是这场危机的重灾区。我是说,他们面临的房市危机需要好多年才能走出来。而他们的预算赤字现在都高达——

Your friend- Arnold Schwarzenegger, is the governor of California. That state, in many ways, is ground zero for all of this. I mean, they’ve got a housing crisis that it’ll take years for them to get out of. And their budget deficits are running into the, now-

巴菲特

BUFFETT

巨大。

Huge.

布罗考

BROKAW

也许是 400 亿美元。他是在征求你的意见吗?

-40 billion dollars maybe. Is he asking for your advice?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

不——(笑声)不,我不确定自己会跟他说什么。但你会看到——首先,各州和城市的养老金计划——在去年已经遭受了重创,损失惨重。由此带来的后果是,随着经济放缓,他们面临收入匮乏,这意味着你会看到一队队市长和州长涌向华盛顿,那种阵势你前所未见。

No- (LAUGHTER) no, I’m not sure what I’d tell him. But what you will see down- for one thing, the pension plans of states and- and cities- has been decimated- have been decimated in the- in the last year. And the costs from that, the lack of revenue they’re going to face as the- economy slows, means that you are going to see a parade of mayors and governors to Washington like you’ve never seen it.

他们到时候会说,“你们能帮通用汽车,能帮花旗集团,那肯定也能帮我们这个州、那个州吧。”所以我觉得——我觉得就冲那些跑来喊“我们——我们需要帮助”的官员们,就职典礼那天那阵势跟这比起来根本不算什么。他们的收入会下降,开支——尤其是养老金支出——会上升。到时候全国各地,各州各市,预算都会失衡。

And they’re gonna say, “If you can help out General Motors , and you can help out Citicorp, you can certainly help out, you know, this state or that state.” So I- I think you’re going to be- I think it’s gonna make inauguration day look like nothing in terms of the public officials that come in here and say, “We- we need help.” Their revenues are gonna be down. Their expenses, particularly including pension expenses, are going to be up. And you’re going to have unbalanced budgets just all over the country with states and cities.

布罗考

BROKAW

但到底能印多少钱?我是说,在最新的 NBC 新闻和《华尔街日报》联合民调里,人们已经说了,他们对财政赤字的担忧,几乎跟对生活中其他任何事的担忧一样重。

But how much money can we print? I mean, the people are already saying, in the latest NBC News Wall Street Journal poll they’re as concerned about the deficit as they are about almost anything else going on in their lives.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

对,嗯,他们应该——他们应该担心赤字。但他们更该操心怎么让经济正常运转。我——我不是说——我的意思是,印钞票是有后果的。而且——而且那些后果可不愉快。

Yeah, well, they should- they should be concerned about the deficit. But they should be more concerned about getting the economy working right. I- I don’t- I mean, the- there are consequences to printing money. And- and they’re not pleasant.

我、我是说,天下没有免费的午餐。如果我们现在做必须做的事,那就要付出代价。但我们正身处一场战争,这是一场经济上的珍珠港事件。而且,你知道,我们后来为战争买了单——(笑声)……但、但我们仍然——知道必须先打赢这场仗。

I- I- so there is no free lunch. And if we do the things we need to do now there’s a cost to them. But we are in a war. This is an economic Pearl Harbor. And- and, you know, we paid for the war later on, as (LAUGHTER) … But- but we- we still- knew we had to win the war first.

而——这是一场必须打赢的仗。而且越快越好。因为每次你读到 52.3 万人,或者类似数字,那些人在 12 月份丢了饭碗,那就是 52.3 万个人间悲剧。我是说,我想不出比回家跟家人说“我失业了,我们还有房贷要还、有饭要买”更糟的事了。

And- and this is a war that needs to be won. And- and the sooner the better. Because every- every time you read about 523,000, or whatever, those people losing their jobs in December, that’s- those are 523,000 human tragedies. I mean, it- it- I can think of nothing worse than going home and saying, you know, to a family that, “I’ve lost my job and we’ve got mortgage payments and food to buy.”

所以我们得解决这个问题。我们这样一直赤字下去是会出事的。有些后果会很不好受。但我宁可面对那些后果,也不愿面对什么都不做的后果。

And so we need to solve that one. And- and we will have consequences to the kind of deficits we’re running up. And- and- and some of them will be unpleasant. But I would rather face those consequences than to face the consequences of doing nothing.

布罗考

BROKAW

您认为有没有可能——失业率在 2009 年底之前上升到两位数?

Do you think there’s a possibility that- unemployment will go to double digits before the end of the calendar year, 2009?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,我不擅长预测。但确实有可能。有这个可能。而且,如果我们当初做了错误的事,我觉得那就会变成必然。

Well, I’m not good at predicting. But it- it- certainly it- it’s a possibility. It’s a possibility. And if we’d done the wrong things I think it would have been a certainty.

布罗考

BROKAW

那么,那些人后来都怎么样了?

And what happens to all those people?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

我觉得这事非常棘手。而且,在失业救济这件事上,我认为像我这样的人应该缴纳更高的税。然后,你也会听到有人说,“那你为什么不自愿去缴呢?”

I think it’s very tough. And I think, in terms of unemployment benefits, I mean, I think that- I think people like me should be paying higher taxes. And, you know, and you’ll- you’ll hear from people who say, “Well, why don’t you pay it voluntarily?”

但如果是自愿缴税的制度,那可就(笑声)不怎么样了。我的意思是,我们国家的富人需要多出点力,要知道,坦率地说,还有许许多多普通民众,我是说,数百万、数百万、数百万的家庭正在受苦。

But a voluntarily tax system is not (LAUGHTER) a very good system. I mean, it- we- we- we need the rich of the country contributing more, you know, while the, frankly, a lot of the people, I mean, millions and millions and millions of families are suffering.

布罗考

BROKAW

你住在奥马哈的同一栋房子里,到现在住了多久了?

You live in the same house that you’ve lived in in Omaha for how long now?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

五十——五十多年了,没错。

Fifty- fifty- a little over 50 years, yeah.

BROKAW

BROKAW

在过去五年里,您有没有动过念头,想建一栋更大的房子?(笑声)

Were you ever tempted, in the last five years, to build one of those bigger houses? (LAUGHTER)

巴菲特

BUFFETT

不,不。我现在这样挺好。你知道吗,有人曾说过,成功是得到你想要的,而幸福是想要你已经拥有的。我这房子是 50 年前买的,我特别喜欢它。(笑声)

No. No. I- I’m happy where I am. I- you know, some- (LAUGHTER) somebody said, one time, that success is getting what you want, and happiness is wanting what you get. You know, and I got that house 50 years ago and I love it. (LAUGHTER)

布罗考

BROKAW

上一次我在奥马哈的时候,你开的还是凯迪拉克。

And the last time I was in Omaha you were driving a Cadillac.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

我开的还是凯迪拉克。

I’m driving a Cadillac still.

布罗考

BROKAW

通用汽车的产品。

General Motors product.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

对。对。

Right. Right.

布罗考

BROKAW

你是在——你在额外囤备件吗?(笑声)

Are you- are you storing away extra spare parts? (LAUGHTER)

巴菲特

BUFFETT

不不,我——我完全支持他们。我是说,你知道,里克·瓦格纳接手了一副非常、非常、非常棘手的牌。而这波经济又狠狠地重创了——但他们必须得拿出一个能行得通的商业计划。

No. No. I- I- I’m all for the- I’m all for them. I mean, you know, Rick Wagner got handed a very, very, very tough hand. And then this economy has just decimated the- but they’ve gotta come up with a business plan that works.

布罗考

BROKAW

你觉得他们走上那条路了吗?

And do you think they’re on that track?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

他们——他们可能刚开始走上那条路。但如果我是国会,在把钱交给三大汽车公司这件事上,我会非常强硬,确保他们拿出一个能行得通的商业计划。我之前也说过,我会让那些公司的首席执行官、工会的头头,以及所有在这个问题上的重要参与方,承担和美国纳税人一样的下行风险。

They’re- they may be starting on that track. But I would be very tough, if I were congress however, handing money to- to- the big three- to make sure they had a business plan that worked. And I- I’ve said before, I would- I would have the CEOs of those companies, and the head of the union, and anybody else that’s- a big party to this- take the same downside risk as the American taxpayer.

他们把自己净资产的四分之三押了进去。所以,如果美国纳税人最终损失了所出资金的 20%,这些人也得跟着一起赔。我在上行时会有巨额奖金。但我认为,当他们拿着商业计划去找国会和总统,说“这行得通”的时候,他们自己应该在游戏中有相当分量的个人投入。好吧,那就让他们用行动来证明。

For- three quarters of their net worth. So if the American taxpayer ended up losing 20 percent of what they put up, these guys would lose along with them. Now I’d have a big bonus on the upside. But I think they ought to have- they ought to have something meaningfully personally in the game when they come to congress and the president with a business plan and say, “This will work.” Okay. Let them back it up.

布罗考

BROKAW

是否该设一位直接向总统汇报的汽车业主管,以确保他们达到人们预期的目标?

Should there be an automobile czar who reports to the president to make sure that they’re hitting the markers that are expected of them?

沃伦·巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,确实应该有一套制度来确保他们达标。但让——让他们达标的最好办法,汤姆,就是设计成这样:要是他们没达标,要是——要是行不通,他们去跟国会说“我们会搞定”,结果却没搞定——那就让他们亏掉四分之三的净资产,或者类似的代价。

Well, there ought to be some system for making sure they hit the markers. But the best- best way to have them hit the markers, Tom, is to have them so that if they don’t hit those markers, if- if it doesn’t work, what they tell congress, “We’ll work.” If it doesn’t work they lose three quarters of their net worth or something like that.

汤姆·布罗考

BROKAW

那在链条的另一端,也就是遍布全美的汽车经销商那边,又会怎样?

And what happens at the other end of the pipeline or the car dealers across the country?

沃伦·巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,这——这就是为什么你要想出一个能在整个——整个系统里行得通的方案。而——而——任何要想让车企最终获胜的方案,其中一部分工作也最终必须惠及它们的经销商,或者说大部分经销商。而且——而且——你得有一个切实可行的方案。否则他们只会弄出一堆电子表格,然后——然后不停地要更多的钱。

Well, that- that’s why you want to have something that’s gonna work in terms of the whole- the whole system. And- and- part- part of anything that’s gonna work for the victory has to work for their dealers, or most of their dealers, eventually. And- and- and- you want a realistic thing. Otherwise they’ll just come up with a bunch of spreadsheets and- and keep asking for more money.

汤姆·布罗考

BROKAW

我想问问关于一些争论——不只是在这次会上,过去一年左右全美也都在讨论。在华盛顿,民主党会说:“我们正在经历的一切都是布什政府的错。”布什政府又会说:“这全是从民主党开始的。是他们想要廉价资金和宽松的楼市准入门槛。”到底谁对?

Let me ask you about some of the arguments that have been made, not just here, but around the country, in the last year or so. In Washington, Democrats will say, “What we’re going through is all the fault of the Bush administration.” Bush administration will say, “This all began with the Democrats. They’re the ones who wanted to have cheap money and easy entrance into the housing market.” Who’s right?

沃伦·巴菲特

BUFFETT

我不会在这上面费功夫。我——我——你知道,如果——如果——如果这是 1941 年 12 月 7 日,我不会花大把时间去琢磨,你知道,是谁让那些军舰停在了港口,让它们那么不堪一击,诸如此类的事。我会琢磨的是,到底怎样才能打赢这场仗。

I wouldn’t worry about it. I- I- you know, if- if- if- if this were December 7th, 1941, I wouldn’t spend a whole lot of time, you know, wondering about who- who got those ships in the harbor, you know, so that they were vulnerable or anything like that. I’d figure out how the hell we win the war.

BROKAW

BROKAW

如今另一个我们经常听到的说法——或者说另一个经常被讨论的话题——是我们惹上麻烦是因为贪婪吞噬了美国。你知道,所有人都想要更多。贪婪变成了一股腐蚀的力量。还有电影《华尔街》里那句著名的台词——

The other issue that we hear a lot about these days, or the- the other subject that we hear a lot about these days is we got in trouble because greed took over America. You know, all- everybody had to have more. And the greed became a corrupting force. And that famous line from the movie Wall Street-

沃伦·巴菲特

BUFFETT

贪婪是——

Greed is-

(交叠对话)

(OVERTALK)

汤姆·布罗考

BROKAW

戈登·盖柯说过:“贪婪是个好东西,因为它能激励人。”贪婪是好是坏?

Gordon Gekko said, “Greed is good because it motivates people.” Greed good or bad?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,贪婪总是会存在的。我会区分贪婪和抱负。你知道,(笑声)亨利·福特可能算是有抱负,托马斯·爱迪生也是,还有形形色色的人——一个人想让自己过得比今天更好,或者想让家人过得比今天更好,这没什么不对。

Well, I- greed is gonna be present. At- at- at- if- I would distinguish between greed and ambition. I- I- you know, (LAUGHTER) I mean, you know, Henry Ford may have been- been ambition, or Thomas Edison, or all kinds of people, you know, that- that they- there’s nothing wrong with wanting something better for yourself than you have today, or wanting something better for your family than you have today.

我是说,这一直是美国体制的一部分,也带来了这些了不起的成就。但当你开始炮制虚假的金融工具去欺骗别人,好把钱塞进自己腰包,或者把杠杆加到天上去,以至于——你知道——金融活动或经济活动稍有风吹草动,你就不堪一击,那——那就是个错误。但人总是会贪婪的。你最好不要去设计一套本质上指望人们不贪婪的体制。贪婪总会存在,但你需要用各种方式去约束它。

I mean, it- it’s been part of the American system. And it- it’s led to this- these wondrous things that have happened. It- when you start trying to create phony instruments that fool other people so you stick money in your pocket, or- or- or leverage yourself to the sky so that, you- you know, that- you’re vulnerable to the least little- interruption of- of financial activity, or economic activity, you know, it- it’s a mistake. But people are gonna be greedy. You better- you- you- you shouldn’t design a system that essentially counts on people not being greedy. It’s gonna- it’s gonna exist, but you- you need to temper it in various ways.

BROKAW

BROKAW

你在中国的业务量相当大。当你和那边的中国同行、朋友、客户——也就是你的生意伙伴——交流时,他们会不会对你说:“巴菲特先生,这到底是怎么回事?你本该是教我们资本主义的呀。”

You’re doing a fair amount of business in China. When you talk to your Chinese counterparts, and your friend and your clients over there, the people you’re doing business with, do they say to you, “Mr. Buffet, what in the world is going on? You’re supposed to teach us about capitalism”?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,这些年来我们确实让他们见识了一点资本主义。我是说,中国在很长一段时间里几乎停滞不前。但在过去 30 年,他们做得极为出色。其中一部分原因正是他们借鉴了我们的某些制度。但——你知道,说到底,我不会告诉中国人该怎么做,(笑声)也不指望他们来告诉我们该做什么——

Well- well, we’ve taught them a little about capitalism over the years. I- I mean, China, for a long time, went no place. But, in the last 30 years, they just- they’ve done fabulously. And- and they- and partly they’ve adapted parts of our system to do that. But- you know, in- in the end I don’t tell the Chinese what to do, (LAUGHTER) and I don’t expect them to tell us what-

布罗考

BROKAW

但他们现在又不太想买我们的一些金融工具了。我是说,他们犹豫着说:“我们不确定是否还想投资美国国债,而我们以前是一直依赖它们的。”

But they don’t want to buy, now, some of our instruments. I mean, they’re holding back saying, “We’re not sure that we want to invest in American treasuries. And we have relied on them.”

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,他们——他们必须投资。你想想看,汤姆,如果他们每年卖给我们的商品比我们从他们那里买的多出几千亿美元,那我们就得拿点什么给他们——他们每天都在投资。

Well, they- they have to invest. If- if you think about it, Tom, if they’re selling us a couple hundred billion dollars worth of goods every year more than we’re buying from them we have to hand something to- they’re investing every single day.

这些钱可能流向了主权财富基金,而不是美国国债,或者类似的东西。但是——他们给我们的,可以称为卖方融资。我的意思是,因为我们每天都在向中国人输送美元。他们可以用这些美元去买美国国债、买美国股票、买美国房地产。但正是我们的购买行为,在把美元强行塞给中国人。他们必须在这里投资。所以他们不会停止在这里的投资。

They may be going into sovereign wealth funds instead of treasuries, or something of the sort. But the- they’re giving us what you might call vendor financing. I mean, because every day we ship money to the Chinese. And they can- they can take those dollars and they can buy treasuries, they can buy U.S. equities, they can buy U.S. real estate. But we’re force feeding dollars to the Chinese by our purchases. They have to invest here. So they’re not gonna quit investing here.

布罗考

BROKAW

很多人会关注到这个情况,想知道它对沃伦·巴菲特有什么影响?伯克希尔·哈撒韦的股价跌了不少,跌得挺多。你的生活方式有任何改变吗?

A lot of people are gonna be looking in on this, and wondering how has it affected Warren Buffet? Berkshire Hathaway stock is down. Significantly. Has your lifestyle changed at all?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

没有。(笑声)我——我这辈子从没卖过一股。我——我——我经历过三次伯克希尔股价跌去 50% 的情形。我的意思是——你——你——你得能承受股价下跌 50%,否则就不该持有股票。

No. (LAUGHTER) I- I’ve never sold a share in my life. I- I- I’ve been through three earlier periods where Berkshire’s stock’s gone down 50 percent. I mean, it- it- it- you shouldn’t own stocks unless you can handle them going down 50 percent.

如果你拥有一座农场,没人会告诉你价格跌了 50%,因为你不会每天看到报价。但你实际上要看的是那座农场——它产出的东西——来判断自己是不是做了笔好投资。反过来,如果人们每天盯着报纸上的股价,来决定自己投资做得好不好,那他们就大错特错了。

If you own a farm nobody tells you when it’s gone down 50 percent ’cause you don’t get a quote every day. But you really look to the farm and the- what it’s- its pro- what it produces to determine whether you made a good investment. Now if people look to the newspaper every day at the price of a stock to determine whether they made a good investment they’re making a mistake.

他们必须着眼于企业本身,也就是资产本身。如果你拥有一栋公寓楼,你不会每天都去问它的报价。你只会看看租金收入是多少,税费和各项开支是多少。如果这些数字都和你当初买下它时预期的相符,你就会觉得这是一笔令人满意的投资,而且你根本不会去要它的报价。所以,我不看股价。大部分时候——我甚至说不清今天伯克希尔·哈撒韦的股价是多少。

They have to look to the business, the asset itself. If you own an apartment house you wouldn’t get a quote on it every day. You’d just look at- what the rent rolls were, and what your taxes were and expenses were. And if they all came in with- in line with what you expected when you bought it you’d feel you’d made a satisfactory investment, and you’d never get a quote on it. So I don’t- I don’t look at quotes. Mostly- I can’t tell you what Berkshire Hathaway is selling for today.

布罗考

BROKAW

你在大萧条时期还是个孩子,亲历了二战。二战结束后那段日子非常艰难,很多人都忘了。你经历过这么多轮繁荣与萧条的周期。这一次在你的人生中处于什么位置?

You were a child in the Great Depression. You witnessed World War II. It was a very difficult time right after World War II, a lot of people forget about that. You’ve been through these- cycles of boom and bust. Where does this one fit in your lifetime?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,这——这确实跟第二次世界大战没法比。我是说,你知道,那时候整个国家都面临威胁。而且——而且它也不像大萧条。但这是一场严重的经济——你知道,这是——这是二战以来最严重的一次。

Well, this is- this certainly is nothing like World War II. I mean, you know, the- with the country threatened. And- and it’s not like the Great Depression. But it’s a severe economic- you know, this is- this is number one- the- since World War II.

但说到底,你知道,自 1776 年以来,做空美国从来没有好下场。我是说,你知道,(笑声)我的意思是,我们总能挺过这些事。二战期间有首歌这样唱:“我们过去做到过,我们还能再来一次。”也许你还记得——你知道,我记得。而事实是,我们过去做到了,我们还会再来一次。我们——我们总能挺过来。但这——这趟旅程从来不是一帆风顺的。

But, in the end, you know, it- since 1776 it’s never paid to bet against America. I mean, you know, (LAUGHTER) I mean we come through these things. There was a song during World War II that- that said, “We did it before, and we can do it again.” Maybe you can remember- you know, I can remember it. And- and the truth is we’ve done it before and we’ll do it again. We- we come through things. But it’s not- it’s not always a smooth ride.

布罗考

BROKAW

而巴拉克·奥巴马作为美国总统,我们知道他口才极佳,具备激励人心的能力。然而,他是否需要改变在华盛顿执政的方式,更多地在全国走动,成为经济以及国家天生乐观主义的某种啦啦队长?

And Barack Obama, as president of the United States, we know he has very strong oratorical skills, and the capacity to inspire people. Does he have to change, however, the way he governs from Washington and move around the country a lot more and become a kind of cheerleader for the economy and for the country’s innate sense of optimism?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

他不会——他不会为了自己不相信的事情去当啦啦队长——他会做个讲事实的人,用一种美国公众觉得合情合理的方式来讲述。我的意思是,他——他不需要编造任何东西。或者说,那种——那种喊口号的做法根本没必要。

Yeah, he won’t be- he won’t be a cheerleader for things beyond what he believes in- he’ll be a fact teller in- in- a way that’s- makes good sense to the American public. I mean, he- he doesn’t have to make up anything. Or the- the rah-rah isn’t called for.

需要的是冷静的分析,以及一个关于你目标方向的计划。还要对达成目标所需的时间抱以切合实际的预期。我认为他具备所有这些特质。他不是一个只会喊口号的家伙。

What’s called for is cool analysis and- and a plan as to where you’re going. And getting realistic expectations about the time it’ll take to get there. And I think he’s- he has all those qualities. He is- he- he’s not a rah-rah guy.

但他是一个……是一个相信那些让这个国家取得今天成就的东西的人。我的意思是,我们是世界的奇迹,你知道。想想看,一个世纪内生活水平提高了七倍。你可以回溯很多个世纪,那时几乎连百分之一都没有增长。

But he is- he’s a believer in- in- in the very things that have allowed this country to do what it’s done. I mean, it- we are the miracle of the, you know, of the world. Just think of seven for one improving the standard of living in a century. I mean, you can go back many centuries where it didn’t move one percent virtually.

所以说,我们的系统是能运转的,只是被卡住了。我相信他能把这点讲清楚。他不会过度承诺。他对自己的目标会有非常清晰的愿景,还有实现目标需要多长时间。我觉得他在与国会合作推动事情上会非常出色。我也觉得他在向美国人民解释国会为什么必须有所作为这件事上会做得很好。

So we have a system that works. But it’s gummed up. I think he’ll convey that. And it- the- he- he won’t over promise. He- he- he will have a very clear vision of what he’s trying to do. And- and how long it’s gonna take. I think he’ll be very good at working with congress to get it done. I think he’ll be very good at explaining to the American people why congress needs to do things.

布罗考

BROKAW

而内布拉斯加州北普拉特的五金店老板、佐治亚州萨凡纳的银行家、或是得克萨斯州阿马里洛的商人——那位在小镇拥有几桩生意、可能是一家汽车配件店加别的什么——他们都在 2009 年咬牙硬撑,盼着日子能好起来,结果——

And the hardware dealer in North Platte, Nebraska, or the banker in Savannah, Georgia, or in Amarillo, Texas, the guy who’s got a couple businesses in town, maybe an auto parts store and something else, they just hunker down during ’09 and hope for better times and- and-

巴菲特

BUFFETT

他们就这么挺过来了,就像,你们知道的,1931 年我爸在奥马哈丢了工作(笑声),他有两个小孩,每月欠着 55 美元的房贷,还没工作。可他挺过来了。而且他为国家出了力,国家也对他不薄。萨凡纳或北普拉特的那个家伙,他的孩子会过得比他好,他的孙子孙女会比他们的父辈过得更好。这个制度管用。

They- they work through it, just like, you know, 1931 my dad- lost his job in- (LAUGHTER) in Omaha, and he had two little kids, and he owed $55 a month on a mortgage, and no job. And he worked through it. And- and he came through for the country, and the country came through for him. And that fellow in Savannah, or in North Platte, his kids are gonna live better than he did, and his grandchildren are gonna live better than his kids did. The- the system works.

布罗考

BROKAW

新任总统的棘手之处在于:既要给人们希望,让他们的梦想展翅高飞;同时,在这样的气候下,又得要求他们做出牺牲——让他们明白,他们将不得不经历一些痛苦。他该怎么做到?这两件事怎么捏在一起?

The tricky part for the new president is to give people hope and make their dreams soar. But simultaneously, in this climate, to ask for sacrifices. To make them understand they are gonna have to go through some pain. How does he do that? How do you put those two pieces together?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,这事儿发生在——你知道,发生在 1941 年 12 月 7 日之后。我的意思是,我们知道自己正经历一段极其痛苦的时期。我是说,那种终极痛苦,就是把——主要是——年轻人送上送上前线。而且我们也知道,我们买不到消费品了。每个人都要去军工厂之类的地方上班。

Well, it was done- you know, it was done after December 7th, 1941. I mean, we- we knew we were going through- a period of enormous pain. I mean, the ultimate pain in terms of sending- sending- primarily the- young men off to- off to war. And- and we knew that we weren’t gonna be able to buy consumer goods. Everybody is going to go to work in defense plants and that sort of thing.

但他们买不了车。也买不了冰箱。诸如此类。所以,他们接受了。他们也知道这要花很长时间。他们不知道要花多久。他们不知道战争会打一年还是四年。他们——他们确实觉得美国最终会赢。所以,同样的信息,同样的时间表,虽然不是完全相同的处境……

But they couldn’t buy cars. Or couldn’t buy refrigerators. All of that. So, they accepted that. And they knew it was gonna take a long time. They didn’t know how long it was gonna take. They didn’t know whether the war was gonna be one year or four years. They- they did feel the United States was gonna prevail in the end. And so, that same sort of message that is in the same time table, not exactly the same situation ..

布罗考

BROKAW

但大萧条和战争塑造了他们的观念,他们习惯了没有东西。

But they were conditioned by the Great Depression, war. And they were used to not having things.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

是的。

Yeah.

布罗考

BROKAW

所以,这对他们来说又是一个牺牲的年代。我们早已习惯了拥有一切,包括信用卡。(笑声)

And so, it was one more era of sacrifice for them. We’re used to having everything, including credit cards. (LAUGHTER)

沃伦·巴菲特

BUFFETT

是的。是的,没错。

Yeah. Yeah, yeah.

布罗考

BROKAW

先放着,将来某个时候,我们会付的。

Put it down and sometime, we’ll pay.

沃伦·巴菲特

BUFFETT

没错。不过——嗯。我想说的是,过去这六个月,我认为相当——相当泼来一盆冷水。不过——我想说——我想说美国民众的预期,从某些方面看,已经被过去六个月到一年发生的事重新调整了。而现在,他们——他们会对少一点——少一点靠信贷拉动的经济感到更舒心。

That’s right. But- yeah. I would say this, the last six months, I think has been- has been a- a big bucket of cold water though I- in terms of I- I would say- I would say the American public’s expectations, in some ways, have been reset by events of the last six months to a year. And- now, they- they’d be happier for a- a- a little less of a- a credit propelled economy.

所以——不过这是——奥巴马可以跟美国民众谈这些。我是说——他们会愿意听他说。他说起话来也很入耳。听他说话你能学到很多。所以——我认为这对整个国家来说将会是一次开眼界的学习过程。

So I- but that can- Obama can talk to the American public about that. I mean- they’ll want to listen to him. And he’s very easy to listen to. And you can learn a lot by listening to him. So I- I think this is gonna be an educational experience for the country.

汤姆·布罗考

BROKAW

你就在他开会现场待过。你——你还在电话会议上听过他发言。不是我第一个听到金融界里——圈里很有分量的人说,“这哥们,确实相当厉害。”

You’ve been in the room. You’ve- you’ve heard him on the phone on conference calls. You’re not the first very high powered person in the financial word- world that I’ve heard say, “The guy’s really impressive.”

巴菲特

BUFFETT

对。

Yeah.

汤姆·布罗考

BROKAW

那他到底有什么地方,能让他在那些会上这么出众?

But what is it about him that makes him impressive in those meetings?

沃伦·巴菲特

BUFFETT

这个,他很聪明。他很会听。他不会——不会把决策权推给任何其他人。我是说,到最后,他——他——他会把别人说的话都吸收了。而末了,他能得出——这么说吧——比起我听同样的内容能想出来的,他得出的主意要更好。他就是——他有一种本事——能从其他人身上提炼出大量的信息、大量的分析。然后——取其中最精粹的部分。而且——

Well, he’s smart. He listens. He doesn’t- he doesn’t delegate decision making over to anybody. I mean, in the end, he- he- he absorbs what people are saying. And in the end, he comes out- you know- with better ideas than I come out with when I’m listening to the same thing. And he just- he has an ability to- to extract from other people a lot of information, a lot of analysis. And- and take the best of it. And-

(众人同时说话)

(OVERTALK)

巴菲特

BUFFETT

从某种意义上说,他就像一位非常出色的编辑。我是说,你可以——你可以说他是一位——对他人的想法进行出色梳理整合的——编辑。而且——而且——而且他还不怕去付诸行动。我是说,他身上有一种自信,这自信是名符其实的。不是傲慢。是一种——是一种——但确实是一种自信。而且他——他——他信任自己。他信任自己的国家。而且——而且——而且——他会把事情办成的。

He’s like a great editor in a sense. I mean you could- you could argue that he’s a great editor- of people’s ideas. And- and- and that he’s not afraid to act. I mean, he’s got a confidence about him which is warranted. It’s not an arrogance. It’s- it’s- but it’s a confidence. And he- he- he believes in himself. He believes in his country. And- and- and- he’ll get the job done.

汤姆·布罗考

BROKAW

关于总统,你始终要担心的一点是,他们会不会变得狂妄自大。

And one of the things you always worry about with a president is whether they develop hubris.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

是的。

Yeah.

布罗考

BROKAW

无论他们——

Whether they-

巴菲特

BUFFETT

任何类型的领导者。

A leader of any kind.

BROKAW

BROKAW

对。

Right.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

任何类型的领导者。

A leader of any kind.

布罗考

BROKAW

对。那你觉得他在这方面会经不起诱惑吗?

Right. And do you think that he’ll be tempted in that regard?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,我——我——我觉得——我觉得任何一个领导者,如果身边所有人都围着他转,成天说他有多么了不起,你懂的,又是鞠躬行礼,一走进房间就奏“领袖万岁”——我是说,这种事就得警惕。我——不过——我相信他比我——你懂的,比我更清楚这一点。

Well, I- I- I think- I think any leader who has everybody coming around him telling him all the time how wonderful they are, you know, and- and bowing- and- playing “Hail the Chief” when they walk into a room. I- I mean, it’s something to be guarded against. I- I- but I’m sure he’s more conscious of that than- you know, than I am.

但这事儿——但这事儿——不管你是个将军、教皇(笑声),还是 CEO、总统,你都会——都会听到一大帮人对你说你有多棒。但很少有人会跟你说:你也就是个普通人,穿裤子也得一条腿一条腿往里套。所以,这——这——这事儿得警惕。不过我倒不担心这个(听不清)。

I- but it’s- it’s- it’s something that, whether you’re a general or a pope or- (LAUGHTER) you know, or a CEO or a president, it’s- you’re gonna have- you’re gonna listen to an awful lot of people who tell you how wonderful you are. And there are very few people will say, you know, you’re just- you put on your pants one leg at a time. So it’s- it’s- it’s- it’s something to be guarded against. But I’m not worried about that (UNINTEL).

BROKAW

BROKAW

竞选期间,当他在谈论经济政策时,很多对手都说,“他是个社会主义者。”我是说,他们开始冲他喊,从——从——然后他就会说,“瞧,如果我是个社会主义者,我会把沃伦·巴菲——(笑声)——请来做顾问和好友吗?”

During the course of the campaign, when he’d talk about his economic policies, a lot of his opponents said, “He’s a socialist.” I mean, they started shouting it at- from- from- and he would say, “Look, if I were a socialist, would I have Warren Buffet- (LAUGHTER) as one of my advisors and one of my friends?”

巴菲特

BUFFETT

对。不,他相信的美国,是一个有越来越多商品和服务可供分配的国家。但他确实相信,应该让每个人获得比过去 20 年更好的机会。我是说,在任何国家——我们这个国家的人均 GDP 是 4.6 万、4.7 万美元,却有 20% 的家庭年收入在 2.1 万美元或更低。所以他们——他们——是有机会——你知道,我——我非常幸运。

Yeah. No, he believes in an America where there’s more and more goods and services to go around. But he does believe in having everybody get a better shot at it than- than has existed in the last 20 years. I mean, it- in any country- we’re a country that has, you know, 46,000- $47,000 of GDP per capita. And we’ve got 20 percent of the households making $21,000 a year or less. So they’re- they’re- there is a chance- you know, I’m- I’m very lucky.

我是说,我——我算是那种在正确的时间,来到了正确的地方,生而为合适的人。但这跟我本人一点关系都没有。而且——我有动力继续工作、赚更多钱之类的事,这没问题。但应当有一套制度。因为这套制度把这么多好处给了我,那么就应当有一套制度来保证,至少——至少确保这个国家几乎每个人都能享受到某种合理水平的富裕。

I mean, I’m- I’m the right guy in the right place at the right time sort of. But I- I didn’t have anything to do with that. And- and it’s fine that I’m motivated to keep working and make more money and all of that sort of thing. But there should be a system. Because this system delivers these goodies to me, there should be a system to make sure that they’re- that at least- that there’s some reasonable level of- of prosperity enjoyed by almost everybody in the country.

BROKAW

BROKAW

竞选期间,我曾问过他们两位想让谁来当财政部长。他俩都提到了你的名字。连约翰·麦凯恩也这么说。

At one point during the course of the campaign, I asked the two of them who they wanted as their treasury secretary. Your name came up from both of them. Even John McCain said.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

对,但拉尔夫·纳德从来就没上过这条船。(笑声)

Yeah, but Ralph Nader never got on board. (LAUGHTER)

布罗考

BROKAW

他——他本来也不会的,沃伦。

He- he wouldn’t have, Warren.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

不。不,这并不——这并不适合我。但——但我——你知道——

No. No it’s not- it’s not for me. But- but I’m- you know-

(众人同时说话)

(OVERTALK)

布罗考

BROKAW

但为什么不适合呢?我是说,你父亲是国会议员。你——你从小就在这里生活。你在这件事上有很多强烈的观点——

But why wouldn’t it be? I mean, your father was a congressman. You- you were a child here. You have a lot of strong ideas about this-

巴菲特

BUFFETT

这需要——

It takes-

布罗考

BROKAW

保罗·沃尔克跟你年纪差不多。他要回政府任职了。

Paul Volcker is your age. He’s gonna come back into government.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

是啊。嗯,说实话,我根本没那个精力。我——我——我——我——我被惯坏了。你知道,我每天都能做自己喜欢做的事,和喜欢的人一起做。我——让我去向 535 个国会议员汇报,回答他们每个人的问题,这我可干不来。我——我更擅长做别的事。

Yeah. Well, I wouldn’t have the energy for it, frankly. I- and- and- and- and- I’m spoiled. You know, I get to- I get to do what I like to do every day with people that I like doing it with. And I- I would not be good at reporting to 535 members of congress and answering questions from every one of ’em. I- I’m better at something else.

布罗考

BROKAW

很多人都在担心,政府是在把钱往无底洞里扔——那个 7000 亿美元的问题资产救助计划,还有我们往底特律那些地方撒出去的各种钱。这些东西里面,有没有哪部分经济账,将来能收回本钱?

A lot of people are concerned that the government is just throwing money down a rat hole with the bailout program, with the 700 billion dollars of troubled assets. And the kinds of money that we’re handing out to Detroit and other places. Is there an economic component to all of this that will pay off at some point?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯——那正是我们在 1933 年做的事。我的意思是,1933 年罗斯福上台时,有一个叫“复兴金融公司”(RFC)的机构。实际上,这个机构是在 1932 年胡佛任内立法的。但——罗斯福在 1933 年任命了杰西·琼斯。他们向银行注入了优先股。他们主要关注银行,但也涉及了其他领域。

Well, that’s exactly what we did in 1933. I mean, in 1933, when Roosevelt came in, there was something called the Reconstruction Finance Corp, RFC. Actually, Hoover enac- it got enacted under Hoover in ’32. But- Roosevelt appointed Jesse Jones in 1933. And they put preferred stocks into the banks. They concentrated on banks, but they went into other things.

顺便说一句,杰西·琼斯当年投钱进去的时候,也告诉了他们补偿利率会是多少。我是说,他是个强硬的总管。这帮助美国走出了大萧条。我的意思是,复兴金融公司(RFC)是——是一个重要组成部分。而且我敢肯定,他们一开始也挨过骂。那些批评的人说:“各位,你们这是在把钱往错误的地方扔,诸如此类的话。”

Incidentally, Jesse Jones was- when he put that money in, he told ’em what the compensation rate was gonna be too. I mean, he was a tough tsar. And it helped take the United States out of a depression. I mean, the RFC was- was an important component. And I’m sure they got criticized at the start. And they said, “People, you’re throwing money into the wrong things and all that.”

我敢肯定他犯过错误。但当你打一场战争时,我的意思是,你不会指望每一步部署都大获成功。你要做的是打赢战争。而——而——这——这是确保金融体系不至于失灵的一部分,当时——已经到了——已经到了几乎失灵的地步。这是其中的重要一环。

I’m sure he made mistakes. But when you’re fighting a war, I mean you don’t expect every single maneuver to be a huge success. What you want to do is win the war. And- and the- it’s a component making sure that the financial system does not get dysfunctional, which was- it was- it was there almost. That’s an important part of it.

而且你没法——你也许想——你也许——你也许想惩罚华尔街什么的(现场听不清)。但你没办法——你没办法把华尔街、主街、小街分开。我们都联系在一起。这是一个共同体。而且——而且你最好让信贷流动起来。

And there is no way- you may want to- you may- you maybe want to punish Wall Street or something (UNINTEL). But you can’t- you can’t separate Wall Street, Main Street, side streets. We are connected. This is one big community. And- and you better have credit flowing.

布罗考

BROKAW

但在这一场战争里,我们还有哪些盟友?比方说,比尔·克林顿就任总统时,你的朋友比尔·盖茨和硅谷的其他人为他帮了大忙——他们开创了一个全新的行业,给美国经济带来了巨大的影响。

But who are our other allies in this war? When- Bill Clinton took office, for example- he was helped a lot by your friend Bill Gates and the other people in Silicon Valley who created a whole new industry that had an enormous economic impact on this country.

放眼未来,或者往地平线之外看,我们现在能从哪儿获得助力?是来自亚洲吗?是来自中国以及他们正在做的事情吗?绿色产业能像许多支持者说的那样,为美国经济带来同样大的贡献吗?

As you look down the road or over the horizon, where do we get help now? Is it gonna be from Asia? Is it gonna be from China and what they’re doing? And can green industries do as much as a lot of their proponents say that they will for the American economy?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

它将来自美国人民,而且是巨大的助力。我的意思是,你想想看,回到 19 世纪中期左右吧。那时候人们觉得,如果——如果你弄出——嗯,比那还要晚一些——拖拉机、联合收割机之类的东西,把所有这些人都搞失业了。但他们后来找到了别的事做。我能预测到电影产业会兴起吗?

It’ll be from the American people, big time. I mean, when you think about it, you know, you go back to the mid 1800’s or something. And people thought, you know, if you had done- if you- come along with- well, it was later than that. The tractors or the combines or that sort of thing. And put all these people out of work. But they found other things to do. Could I have predicted that the motion picture industry would have sprung up?

再比如电力行业?或者——说晚近一点——半导体和软件行业?美国的独到之处,在于它解放了千百万拥有各种潜能的人,有些潜能他们自己甚至都不知道。这些人能创造出我做梦都想不到的东西。我敢保证,三四十年后,美国会涌现出各式各样人们渴望、但自己压根想象不出来的东西。

Or the electric utility industry? Or- to make it later, the semi conductors or software? The American genius is that it frees up millions and millions of people with all kinds of potential. Sometimes, potential they didn’t even know. To come up with things that I can’t dream up myself. I will guarantee you that 30 or 40 years from now, you will see all kind of things being turned out in the United States that people hunger for but that- they couldn’t conceive of them themselves.

但确实有人做到了。那——那确实是存在的。这在一定程度上受到了我们所拥有的体制的启发。因为我们有——我们确实有——我们有一套市场体制,人们通过它来提供商品和服务。很多人都想出了把商品和服务送到人们手里的办法。而且我们还有——我们——你知道,我们在相当程度上拥有机会平等。虽然并不完美。但——但我们能够——我们能让像杰克·韦尔奇这样的人,你知道,最终掌管通用电气。

But somebody did. That- that it was- it was out there. Inspired by- partly inspired by the system we have. Because we have- we do have a- we have a market system that- that people are- goods and services. And a lot of people figure out ways to get it to ’em. And we got the- we- we- you know we have equality of opportunity to quite a degree. Not perfect. But- but we can- we can let a fellow like Jack Welsh, you know, end up running General Electric.

而——另一方面,我们有迈克·泰森去打重量级拳王争霸赛。我们不会让杰克去打重量级拳王争霸赛。你明白吗?(笑声)也不会让迈克·泰森去经营通用电气。我们把人放到对的岗位上,用对的天赋去做对的事。这种做法会一直延续下去。它会带来你我都无法想象的商品和服务。

And- and on the other hand, we got Mike Tyson fighting for the heavyweight championship. And we don’t have Jack fighting for the heavyweight championship. You know? (LAUGHTER) And Mike Tyson running General Electric. We get people in the right jobs doing the right things with the right talents. And that will continue to exist. And that will deliver goods and services you and I can’t dream of.

布罗考

BROKAW

那么,还要多久沃伦·巴菲特才会开着一辆电动汽车在奥马哈兜风呢?

And how long will it be before Warren Buffet is tooling around Omaha in an electric car?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,我们有一笔这方面的投资——(笑声)投了一家中国公司。明年伯克希尔的股东大会上,我会开一辆电动汽车过去。

Well, we have this investment — (LAUGHTER) in a Chinese company. I’m going to have- I’m going to have an electric car at the annual meeting at Berkshire next year.

布罗考

BROKAW

那也会成为这个国家的未来吗?

And is that gonna be the future of this country as well?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,我——我认为电动汽车绝对会是未来的一部分。我是说,这——这非常合理。我是说,电池显然是个巨大的阻碍。但我们会想办法解决这个问题的。我是说,我们在这个领域已经解决了很多问题——我预测,在——肯定是在五年之内,会出现一款价格合理的电动汽车,靠插电就能跑很远。

Well, I- I think an electric car is- is definitely part of the future. I mean I- it- it makes so much sense. I mean, the battery, obviously, is the big stumbling block. But we- we’ll figure out how to do that. I mean, we figured out a lot of things in this- I- I will predict that within- certainly within five years, there is a- a reasonably priced electric car that will go a long way with a plug in arrangement.

BROKAW

BROKAW

保罗·克鲁格曼等人认为,我们做得还不够。我们必须把阀门开得比现在还要大。很多人担心赤字,也担心未来会有什么后果。我们做得够了吗?

Paul Krugman, among others, says we’re not doing enough. That we’ve got to even- open the valves even greater than we have been. A lot of people are concerned about the deficit and what the consequences are gonna be down the stream. Are we doing enough?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

我不知道完美的答案。其他人也不知道。我的意思是,保罗·克鲁格曼不知道,巴拉克·奥巴马不知道,(候任财政部长)蒂姆·盖特纳也不知道。我们只知道,必须采取规模极其庞大的行动。如果六个月后我们发现——你知道——有点偏离了方向,偏左或偏右,那是可以调整的——我们可不想坐着干等、争论六个月什么才是完美方案。

I don’t know the perfect answer. Nobody else does either. I mean, Paul Krugman doesn’t know it. And Barack Obama doesn’t know it. And (Treasury Secretary-Designate) Tim Geithner doesn’t know it. All we know is we have to do something on a very major scale. And if we find out six months down the road that we’ve- you know, we’ve gone a little off course, left or right, we- that can be adjustment- we do not want to sit around and debate for six months what the perfect solution is.

就算找到了完美方案,我们也认不出来。重要的是去做我们现在知道必须做的事。而且——我们总——总会有人对此评头论足。那——关键是,身处其位的人必须采取在当时看来合理的行动。我们处理珍珠港事件后一个月的善后工作时,做得完美吗?我不知道做没做到。但我对此表示怀疑。你知道,现在总会有人能想出更好的方案来。重要的是,我们行动起来了。

We wouldn’t know it if we found it. The- the important thing to do is do what we know we need to do now. And- and we’ll always- there will always be critics on that. That- that- the important thing is, that the person that’s there takes the action that makes sense at the time. Did we handle the- the aftermath of Pearl Harbor the next month perfectly? I don’t know whether we did or not. But I would doubt that. You know, somebody now can come up with a better system. The important thing is, we got going.

布罗考

BROKAW

一年前,你那些大企业界的朋友和共和党朋友对巴拉克·奥巴马还相当挑剔、相当怀疑。现在他们转过弯来了吗?

A year ago, some of your big business friends and Republican friends were pretty critical and pretty skeptical about Barack Obama. Have they come around?

巴菲特

BUFFETT

嗯,我是这么看的。我——我从来没见过这么广泛的善意。我是说——那些没投票给他的人——我有很多朋友没投他——他们……他们对他有过批评。但他们希望他成功。我的意思是,大家都意识到这件事非同小可、极其重要。所以,他们不是……没有一个人希望他栽跟头。因此他们会……会支持他。而且是全力支持。我——

Well, I- I would say this. I- I’ve never quite seen the amount of good will. I mean that- the people that didn’t vote for him- I’ve got plenty of friends that didn’t … — are- are- they were critical of him. They want him to succeed. I mean, there’s- people realize this is something very big and something important. And so, they are not- nobody is hoping he falls on his face. So they are- they are going to be behind him. And- in a big way. I-

布罗考

BROKAW

而且,他任命的人选也给他们留下了深刻印象。

And they’ve been impressed by his appointments.

巴菲特

BUFFETT

是啊,他任命的人选给他们留下了深刻印象——从选举日以来他说的那些话也让他们印象深刻。我的意思是,你知道,选举结束后,我听到的对奥巴马的挑剔简直少得出奇——哪怕是那些,你知道,根本不想投他票的人发出的挑剔。而且你知道,他并不完全代表他们所信仰的东西。但老天,他们——他们希望他能成功。

Yeah, they’ve been impressed by his appoint- they’ve been impressed by what he’s said- since- since- election day. I mean- you know, I- I have heard amazingly little- carping at- at- at Obama since- since the election by people who, you know, they- they didn’t want to- they didn’t vote for him. And you know, he doesn’t quite stand for what they believe in. But boy, they- they want him to succeed.

布罗考

BROKAW

你觉得你能拉他去一次冰雪皇后吗?(笑声)

Do you think you’ll ever get him to stop by a Dairy Queen? (LAUGHTER)

巴菲特

BUFFETT

我觉得——我猜他肯定去过冰雪皇后。我会从他那几个姑娘身上做做工作。(笑声)

I think- my guess is he’s been to the Dairy Queen. I’ll work on his girls. (LAUGHTER)